- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Package deletion request: nghost3
by Jonas Heinrich 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hey, unfortunately this project is dead and discontinued: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nghost3/ Please remove the packae, thank you! - onny

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicated package for amule-adunanza
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, there's two package that provides amule-adunanza: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amule-adnza/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/amule-adunanza/ The first one is the correct one, is updated and maintained, the second one is orphaned and old. The right name of the package is amule-adunanza (like the second one) so after removing "amule-adunanza" the fist package must be renamed into amule-adunanza. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicate package for gtk theme config git
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, there's two packages that provides the same software. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-preferences-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-theme-config-git/ The first one has more votes (11 vs 3), but the second one has the right name (gtk-theme-preferences is wrong) and I know that the maintainer is in constant contact with the developer on Google+. I'd keep the second one, but the coiche is not mine :) Have a nice day, Edoardo

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686), since 2013-05-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64), since 2013-05-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Duplicate package for Kingsoft Office
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I noticed that there are two packages offering the same software: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kingsoft-office/ (76 votes) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wpsforlinux/ (5 votes) I think we should keep just the first one. Have a nice day, Edoardo

2 1

[aur-general] Please merge dupeguru-me packages
by Rob Til Freedmen 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

We have now a native ARCH build of dupeguru-me Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dupeguru-me-bin/ to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dupeguru-me/ Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Multiple requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

Removal https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prism/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/prism-svn/ Google Reader stuff - as Google Reader will be gone shortly, will it make these packages obsolete? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-googlereader/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/conkygooglereader-bzr/ Spam by JOYOAUTO https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-May/023640.html There are at least a few spam comments left https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arbtt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cnijfilter-mp610/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/Catalyst-hook/ Can you search and remove them or do you need the urls like the ones above?

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Karol Blazewicz 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

1. 4dtris-git has been renamed by the developer to ntris 2 months ago (see comment in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ ). https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ returns 404 for the source while https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntris/ looks maintained. Please remove 4dtris-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/4dtris-git/ (no votes, single comment) 2. acpi-handle-hack-lenovo-git and hack-lenovo have become obsolete as the fix has been included upstream - see comments on https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hack-lenovo/ Does it mean both these packages should be removed from the AUR? They need to be updated to work with the current kernel but there seems to be no need for them. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acpi-handle-hack-lenovo-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hack-lenovo/

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] blender2.6-bin
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Hi everyone, I think this package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blender2.6-bin/ ) should be removed from AUR because it won't install Blender 2.6. Also, there's a package that works and provides Blender 2.6: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/blender2.62-bin/ Have a nice day, Edoardo

3 2

[aur-general] Cinnamon theme packages
by Edoardo Maria Elidoro 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

2 1