- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Jun '13

11 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: mesa-r300g-xorg
by Martin Stolpe 11 Jun '13

11 Jun '13

Hello, can someone please delete the mesa-r300g-xorg package. The xorg state tracker is no longer devloped (VMware switched to XA state tracker and AMD is using GLAMOR now). Regards

2 3

[aur-general] Orphan request: gnupg-pkcs11-scd
by Gregor Robinson 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Package gnupg-pkcs11-scd has been out of date for almost two years, has been flagged as such since 2011-12-21, and its maintainer has not responded to my emails for two weeks. I am willing to maintain, and have a new PKGBUILD ready to go. Will someone please orphan it? Thanks! Gregor

2 1

[aur-general] SPICE cleanup
by Jakub Klinkovský 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Hi, please delete these packages: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/celt051/ (orphaned, there's https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/celt0.5.1/) * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spice-gtk-fedora/ (orphaned, outdated version, source unavailable) * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spice-client/ (orphaned, outdated - 'spice' provides up-to-date version) Thanks

2 3

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Jaara 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

[1]memcpymemset is bad duplicate of [2]libcofi_rpi-git [2]libcofi_rpi-git has been superseded by [3]arm-mem-git Remove: [1] & [2] --------------------------------------------------------- [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/memcpymemset/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcofi_rpi-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs 4. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Forgot my username
by Sherif Nagy 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Dears, I forgot my login username in aur, i managed to rest the password but there is no link to resend username , any idea how can i retrieve it ? Thx Sherif

4 4

[aur-general] merge request: lenmus-svn into lenmus
by Uwe Koloska 10 Jun '13

10 Jun '13

Please merge lenmus-svn[1] into lenmus[2]. There is now a stable build of the current version. Both are maintained by me. Thank you Uwe Links: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lenmus-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lenmus/

2 3

[aur-general] Delete request: i7z-svn
by member graysky 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i7z-svn/ Upstream is hosted on github and available via: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i7z-git/

2 1

[aur-general] systemd-rtirq/rtirq
by Rob Til Freedmen 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

These packages are providing the same functionality and are based on the same source https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rtirq/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/systemd-rtirq/ I think they should be merged - not sure which name should survive But I tend to rtirq - the prefix systemd is just a implementation detail I've cc'ed both maintainers - so they should come to an agreement.

2 3