- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: ultrastardx
by Robert Knauer 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Hello, please delete my package ultrastardx[1]. It doesn't work for over a year now, there is no new version upstream and I don't think there will ever be one, because v1.1 was released in 2010 and there's not much activity in SVN. I maintain a working development package, ultrastardx-svn[2], which should be used instead. Regards, Robert. Links: [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ultrastardx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ultrastardx-svn/ -- GnuPG-Key: EDC67BBA Fingerprint: D5F0 BC03 3F6D 521C 6F2D 40C8 DDBA 25D9 EDC6 7BBA

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. jsteel - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: numix-icons-theme-git
by Diego Principe 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Please remove numix-icons-theme-git because i've duplicate in numix-icon-theme-git (whitout 's'). I want to keep numix-icon-theme-git and remove numix-icons-theme-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/numix-icons-theme-git/ *Diego*

2 1

[aur-general] remove savex
by Alexej Magura 09 Jun '13

09 Jun '13

Could yall please remove savex, I was so excited about it finally working and everything that I got carried away and added it to the AUR way ahead of schedule. I both maintain the AUR package thingy for savex and develop savex. here's a link https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/savex/ -- Alexej Magura Give a little more for a little less today. :)

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Nuno Araujo 08 Jun '13

08 Jun '13

Hi Could you please merge arnold-pulseaudio [1] into arnold [2] ? The maintainer of arnold has now enabled pulseaudio support into it's PKGBUILD so mine (arnold-pulseaudio) is now unnecessary. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arnold-pulseaudio/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arnold/ -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jun '13

08 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * denemo-1.0.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 31 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * laptop-mode-tools-1.63-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * blueman-1.23-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.15-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cwiid-0.6.00-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gammu-1.32.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnokii-0.6.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-pybluez-0.18-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * xbmc-12.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * blueman-1.23-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.15-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cwiid-0.6.00-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * denemo-1.0.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dolphin-emu-1:3.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freetalk-3.2-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gammu-1.32.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * geda-gaf-1.8.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnokii-0.6.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lilypond-2.16.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailutils-2.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-pybluez-0.18-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbindkeys-1.8.5-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xbmc-12.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 13 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. heftig - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] ocamlnet
by oliver 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Hello, I just marked it as outdated... ...then i saw that it is orphaned and adopted it. It has 28 votes... pacman -Ss ocamlnet does not tell me that it is officcially now. Or is this planned already? If not, I will update the package during the next days... ...otherwise again orphaning it might make sense... Anyone here, who knows details about it? Ciao, Oliver

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Evan Teitelman 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Could you please remove sqlmap-svn? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sqlmap-svn/ The project uses Git as its VCS now.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Evan Teitelman 07 Jun '13

07 Jun '13

Could you please remove arachni-rpc-em? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arachni-rpc-em/

2 1