- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git
by Alberto Salvia Novella 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

AUR: > Alad deleted aur-git: > > Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is > in order? That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and only one day has passed. I haven't had time that fast for thinking a new name and requesting a change, which I was planning to do this very week. I suggest that you make standard in Arch waiting a couple of days for feedback before making unilateral decisions.

4 4

[aur-general] aur client
by Alberto Salvia Novella 30 Oct '19

30 Oct '19

Since publishing to the AUR is something that all packagers do quite frequently, I have developed a software that reduces the related operations to the bare minimum, making publishing to the AUR instant. Basically it's a SMED <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoqra9bXAAg> system. The software is called "aur <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-git>" itself, and you can check its manual out by in the terminal entering: curl --silent https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/aur/raw/master/assets/aur.1 > aur.1; man ./aur.1; rm aur.1 As long as constructive, suggestions are very welcome. When replying please include my email address in the recipients list. Alberto <https://es20490446e.wordpress.com>

6 10

[aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS
by Iyán Méndez Veiga 28 Oct '19

28 Oct '19

Hi, I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after reading the wiki I did a commit with those little changes. I am not sure if they are correct and he argues that I should a conflict array. Can someone have a look at these two (three) PKGBUILDS and tell me if I should change something and why? Thanks, Iyán

3 6

[aur-general] aurweb 4.8.0 released
by Lukas Fleischer 25 Oct '19

25 Oct '19

Dear aurweb contributors and users, This is a bit of a late announcement but we are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.8.0 has been released last week! Several bugs have been fixed, we made some significant performance improvements by caching results of expensive database queries, and a simple CAPTCHA has been added to combat the growing number of spam accounts. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/log/?id=v4.8.0 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0

[aur-general] Rename Request for python-spotipy, python-spotipy-git and python2-spotipy
by Mario Ortiz 23 Oct '19

23 Oct '19

First of all: this is one of my first contributions to a mailing list so if I did something incorrectly, please let me know. I sent this to aur-requests but was told to post here instead. A rename is being discussed for the spotipy package, since the original one hasn't been updated since 2017 and its maintainer is inactive. Here's the new API's GitHub issue where this is being discussed https://github.com/felix-hilden/spotipy/issues/22. The package is going to be renamed on PyPi and Read The Docs, with depreciation warnings and enough time for the current users to update it. But the old version shouldn't be removed in case someone still wants to use it. The same thing applies to the AUR packages. Currently these are python-spotipy, python-spotipy-git and python2-spotipy. The maintainers of these projects should either update it to the new API once it's ready and create the old API packages, or rename them and create a new package with the new API. And by maintainers I also mean myself. I can help by maintaining these packages if necessary. Also, please note that this new API isn't available for Python2 so python2-spotipy would only have to be renamed. I'd appreciate suggestions on this change and how it could be done. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Spam account
by Rafael Fontenelle 22 Oct '19

22 Oct '19

DanielWilliams [1] seems to be a spam account, and sent one to trizen [2] comments. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/DanielWilliams [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trizen/

1 0

Re: [aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif
by Giancarlo Razzolini 21 Oct '19

21 Oct '19

Em outubro 20, 2019 14:19 Ray Rashif via aur-general escreveu: > Sorry folks, I should have probably sent in a resignation for this. I > have also made unfulfilled promises as a developer and never sent in > an inactivity declaration in the hopes of getting back to Arch/Linux > once I have a new computer. As funny as it sounds my undeclared > inactivity is as long as this current machine ~3-4 years and a > purchase has been pending since last year but keeps getting > down-prioritized due to $$ requirements elsewhere in RL. > Hi Ray, Sorry to hear that. Can you also clarify your status as a developer? It is not clear from this email what is it. Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini

1 0

[aur-general] SPAM user account
by John 21 Oct '19

21 Oct '19

Please see the latest comment in the following package which I believe to be made by a SPAM user. Any chance to delete the comment too? Thanks. https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/distccd-alarm/

2 1

[aur-general] TU removal: Ray Rashif
by David Runge 20 Oct '19

20 Oct '19

Hi all, I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status. Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in [community] and [extra], of which none are actively maintained by him (for years). Ray's last action as a community member (in archweb) has been on '2019-03-12 12:50'. The account 'schivmeister' doesn't maintain any packages in the AUR and the last login in aurweb was on '2019-03-12'. However, the last counted Trusted User vote is number 117 (current vote: 118). The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion period, in which Ray can state his case. Bests, David [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_special_removal_of_an… -- https://sleepmap.de

4 6

[aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)
by Lukas Jirkovsky 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

Hello everyone, after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux deserves. While I still manage to update the packages I actively use, such as rawtherapee, I can no longer keep up with other packages and updates often come late. I've given up on other duties such as keeping AUR clean already. I'm very sorry for that, but time has come for me to pack. Arch Linux community is one of the best communities out there and it was a great pleasure to be part of the team. I still love Arch Linux very much and it's surely going to be my distro of choice for time to come. Lot of you were very helpful with keeping the more complicated packages up to date already. A stellar example is intellij-idea-community-edition, which is now thanks to Maxime built from sources. The packages left that I'm still listed as a sole maintainer doesn't get updates too often and are fairly trivial to update. Though I guess some of them can be safely dropped without anyone noticing (I'm looking at you, gimp plugin packages). So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish, Lukas

12 11