- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Doug Newgard 24 Oct '12

24 Oct '12

ConnMan-Gnome was merged with Moblin (renamed Carrick) which became part of Meego. These packages no longer exist and all are orphans. connman-gnome https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25182 connman-gnome-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48009 carrick-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27512 carrick-ng https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27076 The ConnMan api has changed, so even if someone is using one of these, it will not work with any version of ConnMan released in the last year or more. The following are also from Moblin, so the git repositories are all gone. Again, all orphans. dalston-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27078 hornsey-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27080 moblin-image-creator https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28292 moblin-panel-media-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29892 moblin-session-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27090 moblin-web-browser-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27091 mutter4moblin-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29789

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Oct '12

24 Oct '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 35 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (i686) * catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (i686) * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (i686) * unbound-1.4.18-2 (i686) * catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (x86_64) * catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (x86_64) * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (x86_64) * unbound-1.4.18-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.18-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * unbound-1.4.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 14 signoffs 2. eric - 10 signoffs 3. thomas - 7 signoffs 4. dan - 6 signoffs 5. allan - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Batch deletion request
by PyroPeter 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Hello Archers, the following packages are all mine and should be deleted: arduino-syslibs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44039 avrdude-arduino https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46189 librxtx-arduino https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46192 Reason: My attempt at packaging the arduino software "the right way". Pita to maintain and used by nobody. (Not even me.) Also outdated. php-fcgid https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44046 Reason: Runs php as root, which is obviously a really stupid idea. I'm not using PHP at the moment, so I'm not going to fix it. Imho, this should be deleted to prevent people from using it. Regards, PyroPeter -- freenode/pyropeter ETAOIN SHRDLU

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request - vimlite
by Piotr Rogoża 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Hello Please remove my aur package vim-vimlite: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63452 This package isn't elaborate and I published it early. -- Regards Piotr Rogoża

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request - Guarddog
by Dave Morgan 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Please remove Guarddog: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8998 It is dead upstream and no longer builds. I have tried their mailing list but only receive spam in reply to my mails. -- Dave.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 18 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 45 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (18 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-32 (i686) * connman-1.8-2 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-25 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.0-2 (i686) * r8168-8.032.00-7 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-19 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-10 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-13 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.2-2 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-32 (x86_64) * connman-1.8-2 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-25 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.0-2 (x86_64) * r8168-8.032.00-7 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-19 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-10 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-13 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (41 total) == * transmageddon-0.25-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-32 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-25 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-19 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-10 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * almanah-0.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.8-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * espeakup-0.71-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-packagekit-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-updates-3.6.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnote-3.6.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk-engine-unico-1.0.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-25 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qtcreator-2.6.0rc-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.032.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shotwell-0.13.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (4 total) == * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * activity-log-manager-0.9.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * zeitgeist-datahub-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 9 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. tpowa - 2 signoffs 4. idevolder - 2 signoffs 5. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] unscribe
by 金戈 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

unscribe

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests
by Schala Zeal 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59982 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59981 These are essentially Python modules, which is why I resubmitted them with a conventional python2-* prefix

2 1

[aur-general] ibus orphans in [community]
by Alexander Rødseth 23 Oct '12

23 Oct '12

Hello, ibus is used for keyboard input for a few major non-English languages. Several of the ibus packages has been unmaintained for a while now: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&repo=Community&q=ibus&maintainer=… For instance, ibus-sunpinyin, was last updated almost a year ago (2011-10-02). These ibus-packages have survived at least one package-cleanup, being neither adopted nor moved. While there is interest amongst the trusted users to maintain these, none of the trusted users are currently using ibus. After visiting #archlinux-cn, a couple of friendly people expressed interest in maintaining the ibus packages, but they had only few packages on AUR to show for. I also learned that mostly, fcitx (currently in [extra], is used instead of ibus). Dropping ibus could have been an option, but I also heard rumors that ibus will be a dependency of gnome-settings-daemon. There is also a canidate for asking to maintain the ibus packages, that has not yet been contacted, but which already maintains several related packages on AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=yangtsesu&SeB=m If you think that his packages look ok, my plan is to contact yangtsesu and ask if he wants to maintain the ibus packages in [community] (and thus becoming a TU). If you know of other canidates that have a comparable selection of relevant AUR packages, please let us know who they are. Please correct me if any of the above is incorrect or let us know if you have additional information. Sounds like a plan? -- Cordially, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

7 22

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Jagmjp Janpgm 22 Oct '12

22 Oct '12

<p><a href="http://www.femsmahus.se/associatechair/40jonathanwallace/">http://www.femsmahus.se/associatechair/40jonathanwallace/</a><br></p>

1 0