- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16805] Deletion Request for the-darkmod-tweaked
by Alberto Salvia Novella 26 Nov '19

26 Nov '19

On 26/11/19 2:27, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for the-darkmod-tweaked [2]: > > After discussion in the package comments for thedarkmod-bin, it was > determined that the custom installer used in the former package > "darkmod" violated the rules of submission on numerous levels. > > The package was reimplemented by a Trusted User, and for good measure > cleaned up and renamed to something more closely matching upstream > intentions, but for all this, the core issue with > https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/the-darkmod-tweaked had nothing to do > whether mv is better than cp, or whatever else this justification > entails: > > ``` > So I'm providing an alternative version for this package, called "the- > darkmod-tweaked", with the following enhancements over the official > bundle: > > Separated saved games and downloaded mission repository for each > user. > Missions cache auto-cleanup. > Enhanced installation speed compared with the official installer. > ``` > > No, this is not acceptable. Your new package is still obfuscation and > violates the rules of submission. > > Your "tweaks" in comparison with thedarkmod-bin do not answer the > question: "why was the previous package orphaned via moderator > action". > > You may not re-upload a package which was deemed inadmissible to the > AUR, and simply rename the pkgname in order to justify its existence. > You are REQUIRED to either: > - first defend your claim that the initial judgment "this is unfit for > the AUR" was incorrect, or > - fix the problems > > You have done neither. > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/the-darkmod-tweaked/ Even when I thought that could piss you off, I genuinely believed that would fall within the rules. Now you suspended my account, and destroyed all my work on Arch. But that was a less risky decision than keeping you around. Your purpose was never to enforce good practices but to boycott. What you call quality standards won't allow me to reach my goals. You don't care about the contents of the book, you only care about how well it's written.

4 4

[aur-general] xmrig-amd package deleted?
by Matt Harrison 25 Nov '19

25 Nov '19

Hi, It looks like the xmrig-amd [1] was recently deleted from the AUR. I don't currently see any mention anywhere of why or how it was deleted, so I am wondering why it was deleted? I can re-created it from the archive and maintain it myself, but I wanted to check first to not step on anyone's feet if it was deleted for a specific reason. Thanks, Matt Harrison [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xmrig-amd/

2 2

[aur-general] Dispute on thedarkmod-bin
by Alberto Salvia Novella 24 Nov '19

24 Nov '19

A Trusted User decided to orphan one of my packages, and override it with their own version. The reason given was I was using a custom installer for it, but without that installer the software cannot run properly as it was never designed to be used in a Linux filesystem system wide. Still they insisted it could be done. Now that they orphaned the packaged and implemented their own solution, the software is no longer working and it can never do so. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thedarkmod-bin

2 1

[aur-general] hook failed on git-push, package not displayed
by Rafael Fontenelle 23 Nov '19

23 Nov '19

Hello, I just created a new package 'obs-xdg-portal' and with containing a PKGBUILD, a .SRCINFO and a .gitignore, pushed it to AUR, but it didn't went well. Firstly, the package is not available https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obs-xdg-portal/ When I ran 'git push', it complained about hooks/update not being executable: $ git push Enumerating objects: 4, done. Counting objects: 100% (4/4), done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 830 bytes | 830.00 KiB/s, done. Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) hint: The 'hooks/update' hook was ignored because it's not set as executable. hint: You can disable this warning with `git config advice.ignoredHook false`. To ssh://aur.archlinux.org/obs-xdg-portal * [new branch] master -> master Whenever I try to clone the directory again, it reports "nonexistent ref" $ git clone ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/obs-xdg-portal Cloning into 'obs-xdg-portal'... remote: Enumerating objects: 7, done. remote: Counting objects: 100% (7/7), done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. remote: Total 7 (delta 0), reused 1 (delta 0) Receiving objects: 100% (7/7), done. warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout. Ideas? Best regards, Rafael Fontenelle

2 1

[aur-general] Updating AUR versions server side
by Alberto Salvia Novella 05 Nov '19

05 Nov '19

What if regular, non development, AUR packages were tested server side for new versions? Won't that make more sense than the maintainer having to run pkgver() manually from time to time? (Reply including me on the recipients) Alberto <https://es20490446e.wordpress.com>

4 4

Re: [aur-general] aur client
by Alberto Salvia Novella 02 Nov '19

02 Nov '19

Loui Chang: > I would hope some TU does add 'aur' to the blacklist > of package names. That would make sense if the package was misleading, but "aur" is an aur client for publishing to the AUR. It couldn't have clearer naming. Have a look at "sex", described as "spouts silly mad-lib style porn-like text". I'm still wondering what that means. Bottom line is that packages can be named after anything you want. As long as they are named the same as upstream, and the software is legal and useful.

4 12

Re: [aur-general] [PRQ#16499] Deletion Request for aur-git
by Alberto Salvia Novella 31 Oct '19

31 Oct '19

AUR: > Alad deleted aur-git: > > Why are you submitting this again after agreeing that a name change is > in order? That was the original package which was there before the discussion, and only one day has passed. I haven't had time that fast for thinking a new name and requesting a change, which I was planning to do this very week. I suggest that you make standard in Arch waiting a couple of days for feedback before making unilateral decisions.

4 4

[aur-general] aur client
by Alberto Salvia Novella 29 Oct '19

29 Oct '19

Since publishing to the AUR is something that all packagers do quite frequently, I have developed a software that reduces the related operations to the bare minimum, making publishing to the AUR instant. Basically it's a SMED <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aoqra9bXAAg> system. The software is called "aur <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-git>" itself, and you can check its manual out by in the terminal entering: curl --silent https://gitlab.com/es20490446e/aur/raw/master/assets/aur.1 > aur.1; man ./aur.1; rm aur.1 As long as constructive, suggestions are very welcome. When replying please include my email address in the recipients list. Alberto <https://es20490446e.wordpress.com>

6 10

[aur-general] Doubt conflict array & request check PKGBUILDS
by Iyán Méndez Veiga 28 Oct '19

28 Oct '19

Hi, I recently adopted two packages from AUR: adwaita-qt and adwaita-qt4. Today @morealaz (who is maintaining adwaita-qt-git) asked me to edit some of the arrays in the PKGBUILD (please read comments in the AUR website) and after reading the wiki I did a commit with those little changes. I am not sure if they are correct and he argues that I should a conflict array. Can someone have a look at these two (three) PKGBUILDS and tell me if I should change something and why? Thanks, Iyán

3 6

[aur-general] aurweb 4.8.0 released
by Lukas Fleischer 25 Oct '19

25 Oct '19

Dear aurweb contributors and users, This is a bit of a late announcement but we are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.8.0 has been released last week! Several bugs have been fixed, we made some significant performance improvements by caching results of expensive database queries, and a simple CAPTCHA has been added to combat the growing number of spam accounts. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/log/?id=v4.8.0 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0