- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] joystick - request for removal
by Jozef Riha 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

please remove joystick pkgbuild: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48504 reason: linuxconsole (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55442) made this pkgbuild obsoleted thank you, jose

3 2

[aur-general] Package removal
by Mario St-Gelais 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Pls remove adesklet-pacmansentry 0.0.6-2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18336) I was the maintainer of this package. The adesklet project is dead http://adesklets.sourceforge.net/index.html Mario

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-lcms1
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

I've since renamed and resubmitted this as mingw32-lcms, and resubmitted version 2.3 as mingw32-lcms2. mingw32-lcms1 is no longer needed.

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: aurorasim-git and tao-framework
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

Please delete 'aurorasim-git' and 'tao-framework' AUR packages These packages are two of my mistakes. The first one, aurorasim-git, was submitted when I was still a newbie last summer and it was not tested before submission. Even after testing it a while later, it's broken and the Aurora-Sim project is very unkempt as it is so having this package isn't much use. The second one, 'tao-framework', works. However I discovered a little late that another package, 'taoframework' (no hyphen) already exists and seems to do a cleaner job of building and installation. Thank you for your understanding in this matter.

2 2

[aur-general] Adopt/orphan request: mingw32-gettext
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

I would like to request mingw32-gettext be orphaned. The provided email address of the maintainer seems to be no longer valid, as sending a notice to him resulted in a failure delivery notice in my inbox, and mingw32-gettext, although up to date, is in need of PKGBUILD tweaking because the current configuration causes the build stage to fail. Thanks

2 2

[aur-general] Package removal request
by Smith Dhumbumroong 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

Hi, Please remove the following packages of mine: thailatex-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28852 ttf-thai-latex: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54664 ttf-thai-latex have been replaced by ttf-latex-tlwg and I no longer planned to maintain thailatex-svn. Thank you, Smith

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request: vulture-nethack
by Heiko Baums 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

The package vulture-nethack [1] doesn't run and can't be built anymore since the latest libpng update. The maintainer created a new package vulture [2] which is patched for the new libpng and installs the full upstream package containing the variants for nethack, slashem and unnethack, and orphaned vulture-nethack. So I guess the package vulture-nethack can be removed, and the votes be merged to vulture. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48815 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56625 Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request:airdrop-ng, airgraph-ng and aircrack-ptw
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

airdrop-ng and airgraph-ng is duplicated with aircrack-ng-scripts in community. aircrack-ptw has been included into aircrack-ng since version 0.9, and the source link in PKGBUILD has down. airdrop-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41584 airgraph-ng:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44546 aircrack-ptw:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18331

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120208-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ibiru - 5 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. eric - 2 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 1 signoffs 5. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package rename requests: mingw32-lcms1 and mingw32-lcms
by Schala Zeal 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

I am hoping to get the two mentioned packages renamed to fit naming conventions for packages. mingw32-lcms1 -> mingw32-lcms mingw32-lcms -> mingw32-lcms2 Renaming these that way would make better sense. Thanks.

2 2