- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge Request: aircrack-ng-cuda to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

aircrack-ng-cuda is acctually a svn package, so I rename it to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn and uploaded, please merge aircrack-ng-cuda to aircrack-ng-cuda-svn. aircrack-ng-cuda:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30958 aircrack-ng-cuda-svn:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56686

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by H. Gökhan Sarı 15 Feb '12

15 Feb '12

Hello, Can you please remove zentwitter and bashtc? Because twitter doesn't allow authentication with password this packages don't function anymore. And also, bashrc isn't updated and doesn't build for a long time. zentwitter: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26405 bashtc: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25227 Thanks, -- H.Gökhan Sarı <th0th(a)returnfalse.net>

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Feb '12

14 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * systemd-arch-units-20120208-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 11 signoffs 2. bisson - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Feb '12

13 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.2-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120208-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 9 signoffs 2. allan - 7 signoffs 3. tomegun - 4 signoffs 4. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] delete request: pysnmp-mibs
by Matthew Monaco 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

pysnmp-mibs[1] was out of date and incorrectly named. I have created python-pysnmp-mibs[2] and python2-pysnmp-mibs[3]. The latter replaces=('pysnmp-mibs') as the original was for python2. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33044 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56613 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56611

2 1

[aur-general] qjoypad doesn't compile (solution included)
by Alishams Hassam 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

Qjoypad doesn't compile due to not being linked against X11. This was pointed out in the comments: cd src/qjoypad-4.1.0/src g++ -m64 -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,--hash-style=gnu -o qjoypad axis.o axis_edit.o axisw.o button.o button_edit.o buttonw.o event.o flash.o icon.o joypad.o joypadw.o joyslider.o keycode.o layout.o layout_edit.o main.o quickset.o getkey.o moc_axis.o moc_axis_edit.o moc_button.o moc_button_edit.o moc_flash.o moc_icon.o moc_joypad.o moc_joypadw.o moc_keycode.o moc_layout.o moc_getkey.o moc_layout_edit.o -L/usr/lib -lXtst -lQtGui -lQtCore -lpthread -lX11 #I just added X11 to be linked makepkg should now be able to finish. I don't know how robust this solution is.... :/ Please update the pkgbuild to do this.

3 2

[aur-general] "news" package removal
by Ольга 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

Name of "News RSS reader" was changed to "Tickr" by upstream. Package with new name and updated links (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55249) was created, but old package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40116) still should be removed and votes should be added to newer one.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of some outdated font packages + rename of python-numpydocs
by Elena ``of Valhalla'' 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

Could you please remove the following packages: * ttf-alexander <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49199> * ttf-alfios <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49154> * ttf-anaktoria <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49201> * ttf-aroania <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49176> * ttf-atavyros <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49203> * ttf-avdira <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49202> upstream has merged them all in a single source package, and I've created a new PKGBUILD for it as ttf-textfonts <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56617> Could you also remove python-numptydoc <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38276> since I've fixed the dependency on python2-sphynx and replaced it with the properly named python2-numptydoc <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56618> Thanks -- Elena ``of Valhalla''

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.2-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * pacman-contrib-4.0.2-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * systemd-arch-units-20120208-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. bisson - 3 signoffs 3. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] netcf and the libnl rebuild
by Jan Steffens 12 Feb '12

12 Feb '12

Does anyone know netcf[1]? It still needs a rebuild[2] for the libnl 3.2 bump and it seems to be outdated as well (0.1.7 in our repos, 0.1.9 upstream). Ubuntu has libnl 3.2 patches[3] for it, but they don't apply to the upstream 0.1.9 sources. I'd rather have this handled properly instead of just blindly rebuilding against libnl1. [1]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/netcf/ [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/todo/124/ [3]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/netcf_0.1.9-2ubuntu3.d…

3 5