- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] deleted revengeofthetitans-hib
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 24 Dec '10

24 Dec '10

Hello, Please delete "revengeofthetitans-hib", it's of duplicite which http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37457 to remove : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44694 thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Bartek Piotrowski 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

Following packages have been out-of-date for a some time now. Maintainers hasn't replied comments and emails in more than week. flush (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25114) bleachbit (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22499) gpick (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24975) muttng (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10892) wklej (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7811) - Maintainer answered, that he forgot password and request to orphan his packages and account, if you can. -- Bartek "Barthalion" Piotrowski

2 2

[aur-general] Please orphan earcandy
by Ng Oon-Ee 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24059 Maintainer does not respond since Dec 9th

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] rpcbind 0.2.0-3
by jwbirdsong 23 Dec '10

23 Dec '10

On 12/20/2010 11:40 AM, Andreas Radke wrote: > Minor fix: add missing man page for rpcinfo > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21271 > > Please sign off. > > -Andy > If you'll take user signoff... Signoff both arches

1 0

[aur-general] xmobar-darcs deletion request
by Cédric Girard 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi, xmobar development has moved to git repository, thus xmobar-darcs [1] may be deleted as it has been replaced by xmobar-git [2] Please feel free to review the PKGBUILD for xmobar-git as well. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13627 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44683 Thanks, -- Cédric Girard

2 2

[aur-general] AUR/apache-maven removal?
by Guillaume ALAUX 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi there, AUR/apache-maven [1] is: - out of date - orphan - duplicate of community/maven [2] [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36876 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/maven/ Let's make some room :) -- Guillaume

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicates
by Nathan Owens 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

The following are duplicaates: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42059 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8110 (has the most votes) Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Remove ardour3-svn
by Bernardo Barros 22 Dec '10

22 Dec '10

Hi, I suggest to remove ardour3-svn from AUR. It's not ready for use yet. See message from the author below. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34433 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> Date: 2010/12/20 Subject: Re: [LAU] Ardour3 To: Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2(a)gmail.com> Cc: Fabio <capoeirista(a)arcor.de>, linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It's not really a oficial arch binary package, paul.. > it's a arch user script that builds from svn. that doesn't make a whole heap of difference. people who use svn are at least 1 step closer to understanding that the first step after a crash is "svn update". people using arch build scripts ... not so much, i suspect. moreover, people using svn are probably (hopefully!) on the commit mailing list and can see that the version they got this morning is now 8 commits old by lunchtime. again, people using arch build scripts ... not so much

10 19

Re: [aur-general] Remove ardour3-svn
by Cédric Girard 21 Dec '10

21 Dec '10

Le 21 déc. 2010 18:33, "Xyne" <xyne(a)archlinux.ca> a écrit : > > On 2010-12-21 15:55 +0100 (51:2) > Cédric Girard wrote: > > > I know why you did it, even though I don't see why AUR PKGBUILDs content > > should be dictated by upstream devs. > > It's not being dictated by upstream devs. The dev has expressed concerns and > we're trying to address them out of respect. He has been neither rude nor > demanding from what I have seen, and a simple message is a completely > reasonable solution. > > Really, the entire OSS community would fall apart if everyone adopted this > apparent attitude of "I don't have to do shit for you, no matter how > ridiculously easy it would be for me, so why should I? Now do more for me." > It's parasitic consumption and it undermines the mutualism on which we thrive. It seems there is a misunderstanding of what I was trying to express. It does not bother me that an upstream dev asks the maintainer to add some warnings about the early state of an application and the need of proper bug reports. And I'm fine with giving warnings about that. What I do not understand is him asking for the removal of a package. If he put a public svn he should accept that code is checked out from it. Anyway I do agree with the benefit of understanding and collaboration between open source communities.

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion
by Dan Vrátil 21 Dec '10

21 Dec '10

Hi, please remove k3b-svn [1], since the project was moved to the git repo. I already uploaded k3b-git package [2]. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19034 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44665 -- -- Dan Vrátil vratil(a)progdansoft.com Tel: +4202 732 326 870 Jabber: progdan(a)jabber.cz Tento email neobsahuje žádné viry, protože odesílatel nepoužívá Windows. / This email does not contain any viruses because the sender does not use Windows.

2 1