- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR
by H.Gökhan SARI 07 Feb '10

07 Feb '10

Hello, There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-nightly* in AUR, which is -*very*- obsolete :P (It's not updated for more than a year). I think it should be deleted, shouldn't it? *: zim-nightly => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 1

[aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community.
by member SpeedVin 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello. Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone from Trusted Users group? I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain it. Thanks for answer [image: smile]

2 2

[aur-general] Staff : can you clean this AUR page's comments ?
by CalimeroTeknik 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello ! New to this list but not to AUR, I subscribed to ask for someone to delete some comments on one of my AUR packages : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30159 rosedubai seems to be a windows xp (bleeh) user, who apparently looks for help for wifi on windows at the wrong place. (AUR page for an ethernet driver...) I explained him that patiently by mail. Can someone delete his comments ? -- Calimero

2 1

[aur-general] Change of Package Name
by José Valecillos 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

6 9

Re: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 05-02-2010
by Eric Bélanger 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, <repomaint(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > ================================================ > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > ================================================ > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > --------------------- > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword-plugins vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/xmlrpc-c vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xmlrpc-c > What's the deal with xmlrpc-c ? It seems that it was moved from extra to community repo. Is that correct? But the package is still in the extra db. It's in the community svn but the package isn't in the community repo yet. Did someone forgot to run db-community?

1 0

[aur-general] Adoption of python-markdown
by Andrew Antle 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

I've adopted python-markdown in [unsupported]. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10797 -- Andrew Antle <andrew dot antle at gmail dot com>

2 2

[aur-general] [exim] Bump to 4.71
by Angel Velásquez 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, Yesterday Andrea (BaSh) moved to [community] exim, when I arrived home I got the bug notifications which the package had when it was on [extra]; but Daniel (Ghost1227) closes those bug too fast :O (I already said thank to him), now that those bugs are closed, I packaged a new release and it's on [community-testing] I would like some feedback from exim's user, so if the package it's ready I will move it from [community-testing] to [community]. Opinions? -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Massimiliano Torromeo 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

Hi, please delete my aur package virtuoso-opensource since it is in testing and will be officially supported by arch. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24036 Thanks.

3 4

Re: [aur-general] TU without [community] maintaining?
by Andrea Fagiani 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

On 02/03/2010 02:41 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 03.02.2010 15:32, schrieb Lex Rivera: > >> Hi all. I wanna ask is it possible to become TU without [community] >> maintaining, just as AUR moderator? >> > I think it is a good idea. We could create the "AUR moderator" position > instead of calling it "Semi-TU". > > When I was a TU, I didn't care at all about moderating the AUR, and > maybe other TUs feel the same and rather do packaging. Conversely, you > don't seem to care about packaging but about AUR moderation. > > I am forwarding this to arch-dev-public for reference, but I guess > ultimately the TUs have to decide. > > I also think there is a lot of work to be done "polishing" the AUR, and that could be a good start.

4 3

[aur-general] oss maintainer needed
by Ionut Biru 04 Feb '10

04 Feb '10

Hi TUs, any of you are using oss? Now that Paulo has resigned, oss has no maintainer anymore and we have a bug pending on bugtracker. I can't do any fixes or maintenance since i don't use it and i don't intend to use it. -- Ionut

2 1