- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Request the removal of the package.
by egik 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

Hi! Can someone from TU to delete my package named eisklatdc-svn (page in aur -> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32113)? it package was created from my mistake. -- Eugene Petrov aka dhampire

3 5

[aur-general] Deletion request: ppasskeeper-{kde, gnome}-{, svn} and qdevelop-svn
by Martin PERES 16 Jan '10

16 Jan '10

Hi, Can a TU delete my(mupuf) packages called : ppasskeeper-kde ppasskeeper-kde-svn ppasskeeper-gnome ppasskeeper-gnome-svn Theses packages are not needed anymore as the upstream project has switched from Autoconf to CMake. Now, a single package generates all the plugins supported by the user. Please also delete qdevelop-svn, I don't use/maintain it anymore. Also, the project seems to be dead as http://qdevelop.org/ doesn't exist anymore. Thanks in advance, Martin aka MuPuF

3 2

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Marcin Karpezo 12 Jan '10

12 Jan '10

Hi! Can someone oprhan git-git AUR package for me? It's quite outdated and looks like unmaintained. I've tried to contact with it's maintainer but his email adress doesn't exist any more (there was an email delivery failiture). -- Pozdrawiam/Regards, Marcin

2 2

[aur-general] orphan request: imapfilter
by rich_o 12 Jan '10

12 Jan '10

Hi, i'd like to maintain imapfilter [1]. Last update was two years ago, it's out-of-date and the maintainer's mailbox' quota is exceeded. Can someone orphan it, please? Thanks, rich_o [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10090

2 1

[aur-general] Help in building i686 packages needed
by bardo 11 Jan '10

11 Jan '10

Since I'm experiencing problems with the aufs module (anyone else?) I'm currently unable to build i686 packages in a clean chroot. Can anybody help? At the moment I need gammu and wammu to be rebuilt. Thanks, Corrado

6 9

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Marcin 11 Jan '10

11 Jan '10

Hi! Could someone orphan ispell-pl AUR package for me? I've spoken to current maintainer, he isn't interested in arch any more. And he agreed for me as a new maintainer. -- Pozdrawiam/Regards, Marcin 'sirmacik' Karpezo

3 2

[aur-general] orphan request
by masutu Subric 10 Jan '10

10 Jan '10

Hi, can you please orphan the "quantlib" package ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7966) Last update was Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:17:36 and it's version is 0.9.0, while the actual quantlib.org one is 0.9.9. I emailed the maintainer (trader) 2 weeks ago, but did not get a response. Best Regards, masutu

2 1

[aur-general] rfkill package
by Thomas Bächler 09 Jan '10

09 Jan '10

I noticed that the rfkill package is in community now (very good). However, I have been asked if it was possible to make a few improvements: 1) Add a rfkill group (or use an existing group) and allow that group to write /dev/rfkill using udev (if we add a group, we should do that in the filesystem package, not the rfkill package). Apparently, some desktop applications would like to set the rfkill state, so this way we could allow that. 2) Add an init script that can optionally unblock wifi, bluetooth or anything else on boot. In the past, some devices were soft-blocked on boot by default (is this still an issue?), so this could be improved. Maybe we should even move this to extra or even core. Giovanni, this seems to be your package, what do you think?

2 1

[aur-general] Module breakage (WAS: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.3-1)
by Thomas Bächler 09 Jan '10

09 Jan '10

Am 08.01.2010 09:06, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > bump to latest bugfix version. > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE One of these changes broke aufs, a rebuild is necessary. At least virtualbox is also affected, maybe more. I am rebuilding aufs, please post if any other modules are affected.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 63, Issue 4
by Hans-Kristian Arntzen 07 Jan '10

07 Jan '10

On 01/07/2010 04:23 AM, aur-general-request(a)archlinux.org wrote: > As I said last time: > > Although it's obvious you are the same person as the AUR maintainer, > since you do not have the same email, > I am sending an email to the AUR email address, please reply and say > to delete and the i will delete:) > > Don't want to be bureaucratic about it, just think we should have a > strict policy so we don't delete packages based on > word from someone who turns out to just be malicious:) > > -- Ranguvar > [Devin Cofer] > Ah, I didn't know my e-mail was different on AUR. Well, I've changed my e-mail into the address I'm writing with now :) Should be okay. -- Themaister

2 1