- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] rfkill package
by Thomas Bächler 09 Jan '10

09 Jan '10

I noticed that the rfkill package is in community now (very good). However, I have been asked if it was possible to make a few improvements: 1) Add a rfkill group (or use an existing group) and allow that group to write /dev/rfkill using udev (if we add a group, we should do that in the filesystem package, not the rfkill package). Apparently, some desktop applications would like to set the rfkill state, so this way we could allow that. 2) Add an init script that can optionally unblock wifi, bluetooth or anything else on boot. In the past, some devices were soft-blocked on boot by default (is this still an issue?), so this could be improved. Maybe we should even move this to extra or even core. Giovanni, this seems to be your package, what do you think?

2 1

[aur-general] Module breakage (WAS: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] kernel 2.6.32.3-1)
by Thomas Bächler 09 Jan '10

09 Jan '10

Am 08.01.2010 09:06, schrieb Tobias Powalowski: > Hi guys, > bump to latest bugfix version. > > Arch Linux bugfixes/feature requests: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17538 # added blktrace > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17106 # finally added CONFIG_MMIOTRACE One of these changes broke aufs, a rebuild is necessary. At least virtualbox is also affected, maybe more. I am rebuilding aufs, please post if any other modules are affected.

1 0

Re: [aur-general] aur-general Digest, Vol 63, Issue 4
by Hans-Kristian Arntzen 07 Jan '10

07 Jan '10

On 01/07/2010 04:23 AM, aur-general-request(a)archlinux.org wrote: > As I said last time: > > Although it's obvious you are the same person as the AUR maintainer, > since you do not have the same email, > I am sending an email to the AUR email address, please reply and say > to delete and the i will delete:) > > Don't want to be bureaucratic about it, just think we should have a > strict policy so we don't delete packages based on > word from someone who turns out to just be malicious:) > > -- Ranguvar > [Devin Cofer] > Ah, I didn't know my e-mail was different on AUR. Well, I've changed my e-mail into the address I'm writing with now :) Should be okay. -- Themaister

2 1

[aur-general] Voting for djszapi results
by Sergej Pupykin 07 Jan '10

07 Jan '10

Hello, the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority of votes. He got Yes: 4 No: 9 Abstain: 5 It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the failure.

16 27

[aur-general] db-scripts glitch
by bardo 07 Jan '10

07 Jan '10

Just had a little problem that required manual intervention on sigurd. I was running db-community, but it happened to be already running, so it stopped. It left a symlink behind, though, and it failed until I removed it. Here's the log, tomorrow I'll investigate the problem, now it's 4 am and I only have the energy to cut&paste. G'night. -------------------------- [cprimier@sigurd ~]$ /arch/db-community ==> Processing 1 new/updated arch-independent packages for 'community'... Checked out revision 7496. Validating package arch (any) eclipse-ve Checking SVN for eclipse-ve Updating DB for community-i686 ==> Copying DB file from 'community'... ==> Processing 1 new/updated packages for repository 'community'... D checkout/eclipse-ve Checked out revision 7496. ==> Extracting database to a temporary location... ==> Adding package 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz' ==> Creating updated database file 'community.db.tar.gz' Copying new files to '/srv/ftp/community/os/any' and symlinking error: db generation is already in progress (started by dgriffiths) [cprimier@sigurd ~]$ /arch/db-community ==> Processing 1 new/updated arch-independent packages for 'community'... Checked out revision 7496. Validating package arch (any) eclipse-ve Checking SVN for eclipse-ve Updating DB for community-i686 ==> Copying DB file from 'community'... ==> Processing 1 new/updated packages for repository 'community'... D checkout/eclipse-ve Checked out revision 7496. ==> Extracting database to a temporary location... ==> Adding package 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz' ==> WARNING: An entry for 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1' already existed ==> Creating updated database file 'community.db.tar.gz' Copying new files to '/srv/ftp/community/os/any' and symlinking ln: creating symbolic link `/srv/ftp/community/os/i686/eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz': File exists error: failed to make link for eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz. [cprimier@sigurd ~]$ ls -l /srv/ftp/community/os/i686/eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz lrwxrwxrwx 1 cprimier tusers 40 Jan 6 22:16 /srv/ftp/community/os/i686/eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz -> ../any/eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz [cprimier@sigurd ~]$ rm /srv/ftp/community/os/i686/eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz [cprimier@sigurd ~]$ /arch/db-community ==> Processing 1 new/updated arch-independent packages for 'community'... Checked out revision 7496. Validating package arch (any) eclipse-ve Checking SVN for eclipse-ve Updating DB for community-i686 ==> Copying DB file from 'community'... ==> Processing 1 new/updated packages for repository 'community'... D checkout/eclipse-ve Checked out revision 7496. ==> Extracting database to a temporary location... ==> Adding package 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz' ==> WARNING: An entry for 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1' already existed ==> Creating updated database file 'community.db.tar.gz' Copying new files to '/srv/ftp/community/os/any' and symlinking Updating DB for community-x86_64 ==> Copying DB file from 'community'... ==> Processing 1 new/updated packages for repository 'community'... Checked out revision 7496. ==> Extracting database to a temporary location... ==> Adding package 'eclipse-ve-1.4.0-1-any.pkg.tar.gz' ==> Creating updated database file 'community.db.tar.gz' Copying new files to '/srv/ftp/community/os/any' and symlinking [cprimier@sigurd ~]$

1 0

[aur-general] Removing "ralsa" package
by Hans-Kristian Arntzen 06 Jan '10

06 Jan '10

Hi, I'd like to get my ralsa package removed from AUR as I have already uploaded the renamed rsound. The package apparently didn't get deleted last time I requested. -- Themaister

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of two packages in the AUR
by Gereon Schomber 06 Jan '10

06 Jan '10

Hi, I have two packages in the AUR that are not needed anymore since quite some time and I'd like to have them deleted. The packages in question are: - libjpeg-jpegint; was needed for xbmc because of a missing header file in libjpeg - eigen2; was needed for koffice2, however both are now in [extra]. Thank you. Gereon Schomber

3 3

[aur-general] package removal request
by Francois Rigaut 06 Jan '10

06 Jan '10

Hi, Can you please remove the yorick-svn package? I messed up the other day and wanted to submit yorick-cvs (which I did since then), but instead created and submitted a yorick-svn, which I now request to be deleted. Sorry. Thanks, Francois

2 1

[aur-general] Duplicate package (emesene-bzr)
by Rene Pärts 05 Jan '10

05 Jan '10

Found another one. emesene-bzr duplicates emesene-svn. Sources are different, but one is just a mirror of another. svn is the main developement source and launchpad mirrors it, so maybe remove one of them to avoid confusion. I would remove bzr, because it has much less votes and PKGBUILD of svn is much newer and better. emesene-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7930 emesene-bzr: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28049 Regards, Rene

2 3

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by José Valecillos 05 Jan '10

05 Jan '10

Hello, can you please orphan "bashish" package?. The maintainer doesn't updated it since 19 Sep 2006, and currently is flagged out of date. -- José Valecillos

3 4