- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] unicap splitted in 3 packages
by Jordi Cerdan 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hi, I currently maintain unicap package in AUR. This package has been splitted in 3 new packages ( http://unicap-imaging.org/blog/ ): libunicap, libunicapgtk and libucil. I think we have 2 solutions there, but I don't know which one is more "elegant": - create 3 new packages and delete unicap - rename unicap to libunicap and create 2 new packages Which one should we choose? Kind regards. -- Jordi Cerdan http://www.jordicerdan.com Andorra

2 1

[aur-general] Delete package: sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1
by Farhan Yousaf 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Can someone delete this package please? I just created it in error. sabnzbd-0.5rc6 0.5.0RC6-1 <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34388> Thanks. Farhan

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by H.Gökhan SARI 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

Hello, I've been maintaining blogpost* package but developer prefers working on a mercurial repository rather than publishing clear version updates. And there is already a package 'blogpost-hg*' in AUR, so please delete my package blogpost. * blogpost => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18588 blogpost-hg => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33024 -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning Request (xf86-input-wacom)
by M Rawash 08 Feb '10

08 Feb '10

please orphan "xf86-input-wacom" in AUR, for the reason cited by "illicium" in the comments section (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28999 ) i've already contacted maintainer a couple of days ago, with no response. thanks, M Rawash

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request
by Ismael Barros² 07 Feb '10

07 Feb '10

Hi, Please, remove this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33846 It's a duplicate of this package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 I duplicated it by mistake, I forgot to change the package name when I forked xf86-input-synaptics package. Regards, Ismael

3 5

[aur-general] zim-nightly package in AUR
by H.Gökhan SARI 07 Feb '10

07 Feb '10

Hello, There is a package called zim in [extra]. I've been using it, but today i realised that zim is rewritten with python rather than perl. Then I removed old version and switched to pyzim in AUR (Because package in [extra] is not updated for a while). However, there is a package called zim-nightly* in AUR, which is -*very*- obsolete :P (It's not updated for more than a year). I think it should be deleted, shouldn't it? *: zim-nightly => http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16408 -- H.Gökhan SARI hsa2(a)difuzyon.net

2 1

[aur-general] Taking package (kernel26-bfs) by TU to community.
by member SpeedVin 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello. Is there any way to take package (kernel26-bfs) to community by someone from Trusted Users group? I will orphan it in some time becouse I don't have much time to maintrain it. Thanks for answer [image: smile]

2 2

[aur-general] Staff : can you clean this AUR page's comments ?
by CalimeroTeknik 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hello ! New to this list but not to AUR, I subscribed to ask for someone to delete some comments on one of my AUR packages : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30159 rosedubai seems to be a windows xp (bleeh) user, who apparently looks for help for wifi on windows at the wrong place. (AUR page for an ethernet driver...) I explained him that patiently by mail. Can someone delete his comments ? -- Calimero

2 1

[aur-general] Change of Package Name
by José Valecillos 06 Feb '10

06 Feb '10

Hi Everybody. I need some help, i'm the current mantainer of dosbox-cvs package and i have a problem. The source code of CVS repository isn't being mainteined recently, it's deprecated. Instead, the SVN repository is actually mantained for the devel team and for the moment the one. I have no problem to update the PKGBUILD, but i need to change the name of the package because it won't be CVS anymore. Can any TU help me with that? -- José Valecillos

6 9

Re: [aur-general] [arch-notifications] Integrity Check i686: core, extra, community 05-02-2010
by Eric Bélanger 05 Feb '10

05 Feb '10

On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:00 PM, <repomaint(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > > ================================================ > = Integrity Check i686 of core,extra,community = > ================================================ > > Duplicate PKGBUILDs > --------------------- > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword-plugins vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/abiword > /srv/abs/rsync/i686/extra/xmlrpc-c vs. /srv/abs/rsync/i686/community/xmlrpc-c > What's the deal with xmlrpc-c ? It seems that it was moved from extra to community repo. Is that correct? But the package is still in the extra db. It's in the community svn but the package isn't in the community repo yet. Did someone forgot to run db-community?

1 0