- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Orphan requests
by Ranguvar 05 Oct '09

05 Oct '09

The package 'rxvt' <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13618> has been out-of-date for a long time and has been flagged and commented as such, with no reply from the maintainer. I also emailed the maintainer to no avail. I'd like to request that that package and all of the maintainer's other packages <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=xaw&SeB=m> that are out-of-date are orphaned so others may maintain them, as it appears they are AWOL.' I'll likely adopt at least some of them. Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Some package deletion and orphaning requests...
by Try Again 04 Oct '09

04 Oct '09

Hi, I have some propositions for AUR packages. Here they are : - human-themes: should be orphaned. This package hasn't been updated since December 2008. Some users posted updated PKGBUILDs in comments but didn't got an answer. - lib32-bzip2: same as human-themes. Hasn't been updated since August 2008. - bin32-kega-fusion: should be removed. I submitted this package (x86_64 only) along with kega-fusion which is a 32-bit binary. However, as I found out how to make kega-fusion PKGBUILD multi-arch, so bin32-kega-fusion is no longer needed. - mamepgui: should be orphaned. The PKGBUILD has been submitted not long ago but has many defects. It is already outdated, is i686 only and doesn't rely on compilation from sources, though possible. I flagged the package and posted a improved PKGBUILD in comments one month ago but the maintainer didn't react. I'd like to adopt this package. Thanks in advance!

5 4

[aur-general] package deletion: rdesktop-rawmouse
by Ray Kohler 03 Oct '09

03 Oct '09

Please delete the rdesktop-rawmouse PKGBUILD from AUR. The patch it provides is now included in rdesktop 1.6.0-3 in extra.

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal (dwm-git).
by member SpeedVin 03 Oct '09

03 Oct '09

Hello.Please remove my package (dwm-git) from AUR. Thanks ;)

2 2

[aur-general] xorg packages
by Xavier 03 Oct '09

03 Oct '09

These packages are all called -git, but wrongly. They are actually just duplicate of extra packages... http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18966 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29446 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28891 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28907 Actually, I would not recommend using any of these packages because of their poor quality : http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=SpeedVin&SeB=m

3 8

[aur-general] The State Of XMonad
by jelle van der waa 03 Oct '09

03 Oct '09

The Last XMonad upgrade a few moths ago had some problems , GHC (haskell compiler ) was released before XMonad was rebuild against the new compiler causing it to potentially break. Can't the XMonad pkgbuild be changed so it sticks with the GHC version it has been build against , that would cause less trouble. Also a new XMonad release , means much haskell-x11-* , xmonad-contrib , xmobar need to be rebuild and pulled together else ghc will complain. Related to my question about XMonad are some issue's (features) on the bugtracker, wich could be added to xmonad-contrib ( xmonad-contrib-darcs from AUR already has this extra dependency's). http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16339 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14146 Still many thanks for having XMonad in community, if you need some help rebuilding packages mail me ;) Jelle van der Waa

1 0

[aur-general] Package removal (xorg-server , xorg-server-newest).
by member SpeedVin 02 Oct '09

02 Oct '09

Hello.Please remove fllowing packages: xorg-server xorg-server-newest Thanks!

2 3

[aur-general] Yet another test.
by Xyne 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Can one of the list admins please email me so we can figure out why I no longer recieve messages from this list? I'm not a big fan of frustration.

3 2

[aur-general] (Spam) It's Xyne's fault
by Dusty Phillips 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

Apparently Xyne is having trouble with e-mail messages sent to aur-general from the archlinux.ca domain. I've been instructed to subscribe with my own archlinux.ca domain and post a message to see if they were getting through. So I have done that. If you are offended by this message, please blame Xyne. Also, to turn this into real spam, we have some neat new goodies at: http://zazzle.com/archlinux* and http://schwag.archlinux.ca/ Dusty

4 6

[aur-general] AUR cleanup page
by Xavier 01 Oct '09

01 Oct '09

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:58, Stefan Husmann > <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I will go and delete the entries, whose packages are already gon from AUR. >> But on th long hand we should decide if we use and keep that wiki page or >> remove it completely. >> >> Regards Stefan >> > > I don't really think a wiki page is worth it. We're going to be > constantly struggling to keep it up to date. > But what do you do with all the existing contents then ? That work should just get lost ? Couldn't all the users or TUs interested in AUR cleanup check that page, come up with a good list of packages to be cleaned up, clean it, and then kill the page if it's not worth it ?

2 1