- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] TU Vote: Angel Velásquez (angvp)
by Evangelos Foutras 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Hi TUs, This begins the voting period for the addition of Angel Velásquez (angvp) as a TU, which will end in seven days. You can view his application at http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-October/006803.html Don't forget to vote (using the web interface)! Cheers.

1 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] List of packages that could be rebuilt if you have nothing better to do...
by Allan McRae 20 Oct '09

20 Oct '09

Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > >> Allan McRae wrote: >> >> >>> Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Allan McRae wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have created a list of packages the could use a rebuild but for >>>>> which there is no hurry. These include packages without the arch in >>>>> their filename, packages containing a .FILELIST file, packages with >>>>> man pages in /usr/man or uncompress man and info pages. See >>>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Unimportant_Rebuild_List >>>>> >>>>> Do people think this is useful and should I move it to the >>>>> DeveloperWiki? >>>>> >>>>> Allan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Good job. >>>> >>>> And for "Packages that can be converted to arch=any" sometime ago I >>>> sended a list of tentative packages [#1]. Its old and some of listed >>>> packages [#2] are now "any" >>>> >>>> >>>> [#1] >>>> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-July/005960.html >>>> [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any.txt >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> I'm being lazy... any change you can easily generate an updated list >>> for [core]/[extra]? Don't worry about it if it will be a hassle. >>> >>> Allan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> No problem, I can do a "light scan" making a difference between this >> list and list of current packages. >> I guess that doing again a "deep scan" don't make much sense, >> >> >> Good Luck! >> >> >> > List updated [#1] > > This is based on old list, deleting current converted packages and > packages deleted from repos. > No new packages are added because I didn't a deep/fine scan. For each repo. > > If any have a time, the idea to do the deep scan is (what I remember was > done manually in the past) > > 1) Download this db [#2]. > 2) Keep with 0 size files from db. -> packages names. > 3) Scan from previous result list if there are any ELF32/ELF64 LSB > (relocatables (objects files, kernel modules, ar archives, etc), > executables, shared objects) and discard ELF for others archs (for > example AVR, ARM, SPARC) inside each package. > > > [#1] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/misc/any-20091019.txt > [#2] http://archlinux.djgera.com.ar/pkgdyn/db-20091019.tar.bz2 > Thanks, I have added the [core] and [extra] packages to my wiki page. A TU probably wants to add this to the [community] TODO page (which needs a big update: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community_todo) Allan

1 0

[aur-general] nouveau-drm-snapshot
by Xavier 19 Oct '09

19 Oct '09

>From my comment in AUR : " But I am not sure this pkgbuild is needed after all. It does exactly the same as the one in extra : http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBUILD… So it violates AUR guidelines :) " The new "web svn" location is : http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/nouveau-drm/repos/extra-i686/PKGBU…

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: kernel-eeepc-901-kms
by Smith Dhumbumroong 18 Oct '09

18 Oct '09

Please delete kernel-eeepc-901-kms (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26393) as it have been replaced by kernel-eeepc-901 package in AUR.

2 2

[aur-general] Obsoleted, lacking developer wiki parts
by Laszlo Papp 17 Oct '09

17 Oct '09

Hello some obsoleted, laking part of the Developer Wiki! --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Adopting_Packages 1. Browse the *community* Trusted User Repository located at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?L=3 (the link is not available anymore) 3. Retreive the PKGBUILDs for the new packages: CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.archlinux.org:/home/cvs-community and perform the testing/verificatoin on the PKGBUILD. Note that there is no need to change the version number unless changes are made to the package, this will minimize needless re-downloading. (CVS to SVN?) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Sigurd_%28TU%29 <- empty presently (gerolde, gudrun is okay.) --- http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:NewsletterSteps 1. Get most recent version of the newsletter: git clone ssh:// archlinux.org/srv/projects/git/newsletter.git/ <- I can't clone it. (Can the developers maybe do this action only?) --- Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by Tim Yang 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: webkit-sharp
by tdy＠gmx.com 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

2 1

[aur-general] Filter packages by voted-status
by Lauri Niskanen 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Hello, Is it possible to only show the packages I have voted for on the AUR web interface? If not could you please add that feature. It would make managing votes much easier. And who doesn't like to have easier control over things. -- Ape <Lauri Niskanen>

2 3

[aur-general] [delete request] kde4-servicemenu-pdf
by Christoph 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

There is a package kde4-servicemenu-pdf http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21764 and a package servicemenu-pdf-kde4 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24898 I think that one of them should be deleted, in my opinion the first one because the first one is orphaned anyway and the second one is newer and has the better name (I think). Cheers, Christoph

2 1

[aur-general] [bugtracker] Question about tickets for orphaned community pkgs.
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 16 Oct '09

16 Oct '09

Hello guys! To what people and/or group of peoples I can assing tasks for orphaned packages (examples: [#1] [#2] [#3]) ? I think that many packages are always maintained by Dan Griffiths (Ghost1227) and Ionut Biru (wonder). There are no problems if I assing task to both? Sometimes I assing based on "#Maintainer" field in PKGBUILD and or SVN commiter that is ok, but there are other cases that this information is not valid anymore. Thanks in advance. [#1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16679 [#2] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16624 [#3] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16554 -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

3 4