- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] announcing hsftp pkg
by Nathan Owe. 03 Jun '09

03 Jun '09

I have created another pkg called hsftp if anyone would like to try it.

3 2

[aur-general] Package Removal Request - traverso-cvs
by hollunder＠gmx.at 03 Jun '09

03 Jun '09

Please remove traverso-cvs: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22753 The hoster, savannah had trouble with cvs/git/... which accelerated the move to git. Now git is functional and cvs is gone. Consequently traverso-cvs doesn't work anymore and got superseded by traverso-git. Regards, Philipp

2 1

[aur-general] hsftp build error
by Nathan Owe. 03 Jun '09

03 Jun '09

well i thought hsftp is working but i get this error : The following are set in config.h pty/tty type: GLIBC /bin/sh ./mkinstalldirs /usr/bin /bin/install -c -s -m 755 hsftp /usr/bin/hsftp /bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/hsftp': Permission denied make: *** [install-binPROGRAMS] Error 1 ==> ERROR: Build Failed. Aborting... Error: Makepkg was unable to build hsftp package.

3 2

[aur-general] depenency checker
by Nathan Owe. 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

Is there a tool to find all the depenencies for a PKGBUILD. i know of namcap, but is there a better one?

5 6

[aur-general] scm naming conventions
by Ian Denhardt 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

Hello everyone, This is my first time posting to this list, though I've been lurking for a while. I have a thought, and forgive me if this would be better addressed on a different mailing list; I wasn't quite sure which to use, and I was already subscribed to this one so I chose it. right now for packages for development versions we use *-svn if the project uses svn, *-cvs if they use cvs, *-git if they use git, etc. I feel a better solution would be to use a single suffix for all development versions, say *-scm (source code management). This is already done in Exherbo. This would be advantageous because we wouldn't have to change the package name on the occasion that upstream switches tools, and it would make things more clear from a user perspective; right now if there are two scm packages in aur, you might have to do some digging to figure out which is current (though granted this isn't usually very difficult.) Of course, a policy change like this would require changing the names of a lot of packages in the short term. I'm curious to hear other people's thoughts on this. -Ian

3 2

[aur-general] Removal request
by Vinzenz Vietzke 02 Jun '09

02 Jun '09

Hi, please remove [1] since upstream development is stopped and the tool is superseeded by [2]. Thanks, vinz [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12302 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25823 -- Vinzenz Vietzke www.archmirror.de

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request
by Vinzenz Vietzke 01 Jun '09

01 Jun '09

Hi, please remove [1] since it's superseeded by [2]. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18538 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24152 -- Vinzenz Vietzke www.archmirror.de

2 2

[aur-general] Remove Request for mitter-svn
by Thomas Bohn 01 Jun '09

01 Jun '09

Please remove the package mitter-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19446 They switched to git. So the packages is useless. Thomas

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request.
by Peter Lewis 01 Jun '09

01 Jun '09

Hi, As part of my attempt to rationalise these packages in the AUR, and as described in the explanation / warning notices on the packages' pages, could these two packages please be deleted? latex-suite http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6091 unmaintained latex-suite-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25907 maintained by me They are superseded by vim-latexsuite and vim-latexsuite-svn respectively. Thanks! Pete.

2 1

[aur-general] delete ctunnel
by nathan owe. 01 Jun '09

01 Jun '09

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26922 needs deleting, for some reason it won't build i give up

3 3