- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] net-pf-X aliases in linux 3.2
by Leonid Isaev 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

Hi, I am trying to find the mapping between actual modules and net-pf-X aliases which used to be in /usr/include/linux/socket.h but not anymore... Does anybody know where these aliases are defined now? Thanks. -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D

2 2

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 87, Issue 75
by Gordy Campbell 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:24:51 +0100 > From: fredbezies <fredbezies(a)gmail.com> > To: General Discussion about Arch Linux <arch-general(a)archlinux.org> > Subject: Re: [arch-general] gnome-shell 3.2.2-1's problem? > Message-ID: > <CAG8iRG18wcSHdKe3Ui8KRcT8FtfMYirnT-Pc8Cem9eKBi-KTxQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > 2012/1/19 ??? <zhugehonghn(a)gmail.com> > > > today,i upgrade gnome-shell to 3.2.2-1,but i found notify tray of bottom > > doesn't work. > > e.g: > > open pidgin or deluge will add icon to notify tray and i can click it to > > activate app, > > but it does't work now when i upgrade gnome-shell and i close these > > app,the notify tray can't delete icons in tray. > > can i fix it? > > > > See this thread : > > https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=133814 > > And bug reported : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664138 > > For now, downgrading gnome-shell. Too bad :( > > -- > Frederic Bezies > fredbezies(a)gmail.com This problem has now been fixed with the latest update which was released to extra today. Gordy

1 0

[arch-general] tp_smapi - LENOVO g470
by Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

recently bought a Lenovo G470 notebook, I installed tp_smapi triggers to change the start and end of the battery charge, the following error when trying to load the module. modprobe tp_smapi # tp_smapi.ko.gz no such file I've installed linux-headers and in / lib / modules / kernel-version there is a file that says missing command when loading the module Atts, Paulo Roberto AVISO LEGAL ...Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem é dirigida, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, desde já fica notificado de abster-se a divulgar, copiar, distribuir, examinar ou, de qualquer forma, utilizar a informação contida nesta mensagem, por ser ilegal. Caso você tenha recebido esta mensagem por engano, pedimos que nos retorne este E-Mail, promovendo, desde logo, a eliminação do seu conteúdo em sua base de dados, registros ou sistema de controle. Fica desprovida de eficácia e validade a mensagem que contiver vínculos obrigacionais, expedida por quem não detenha poderes de representação. LEGAL ADVICE ...This message is exclusively destined for the people to whom it is directed, and it can bear private and/or legally exceptional information. If you are not addressee of this message, since now you are advised to not release, copy, distribute, check or, otherwise, use the information contained in this message, because it is illegal. If you received this message by mistake, we ask you to return this email, making possible, as soon as possible, the elimination of its contents of your database, registrations or controls system. The message that bears any mandatory links, issued by someone who has no representation powers, shall be null or void.

7 14

[arch-general] security problem in X with screen saver
by Divan Santana 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

Hi All, As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA There is a quite a serious security problem. Is there a patch coming out soon? Does anyone yet know a workaround to this in the meanwhile? Can it be announced?

7 7

[arch-general] gnome-shell 3.2.2-1's problem?
by 朱格宏 19 Jan '12

19 Jan '12

today,i upgrade gnome-shell to 3.2.2-1,but i found notify tray of bottom doesn't work. e.g: open pidgin or deluge will add icon to notify tray and i can click it to activate app, but it does't work now when i upgrade gnome-shell　and i close these app,the notify tray can't delete icons in tray. can i fix it?

3 3

[arch-general] Installing the 3.1 sources of Kernel with Asterisk
by Christian 18 Jan '12

18 Jan '12

Hi all, I am installing Asterisk and Dahdi on my system and when I am installing dahdi it tels me to install the sources of the 3.1 kernel. How to do this on Arch? Many thanks, Christian

4 3

[arch-general] Dependency: pyalpm: requires pacman<3.6 (workaround install pyalpm?)
by David C. Rankin 18 Jan '12

18 Jan '12

Guys: There is a strange dependency with pyalpm that prevented upgrade to pacman 4 which I solved by -- installing pyalpm?? Installing pyalpm pulled in pacman as a dependency which successfully completed the upgrade, but pacman would not -Syu and upgrade on its own. That doesn't make sense. The -Syu error was: :: The following packages should be upgraded first : pacman :: Do you want to cancel the current operation :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] y resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: pyalpm: requires pacman<3.6 So I tried the following and answered NO to the pacman upgrade. Evidently pyalpm pulled it in as a dep anyway: 15:18 providence:~/dt/icons/coolicons/openOffice> sudo pacman -Sy --needed pyalpm :: Synchronizing package databases... core is up to date extra is up to date community is up to date archlinuxfr is up to date xyne-any is up to date downloading kdemod3.db... phoenix is up to date :: The following packages should be upgraded first : pacman :: Do you want to cancel the current operation :: and upgrade these packages now? [Y/n] n resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... Targets (3): libarchive-3.0.3-2 pacman-4.0.1-4 pyalpm-0.5.3-1 Total Download Size: 2.20 MB Total Installed Size: 6.20 MB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] :: Retrieving packages from core... libarchive-3.0.3-2-i686 1215.4K 720.0K/s 00:00:02 [#######################################] 100% pacman-4.0.1-4-i686 1005.0K 693.3K/s 00:00:01 [#######################################] 100% :: Retrieving packages from extra... pyalpm-0.5.3-1-i686 36.8K 194.3K/s 00:00:00 [#######################################] 100% (3/3) checking package integrity [#######################################] 100% (3/3) checking for file conflicts [#######################################] 100% (1/3) upgrading libarchive [#######################################] 100% (2/3) upgrading pacman [#######################################] 100% warning: /etc/pacman.conf installed as /etc/pacman.conf.pacnew >>> Run `pacman-key --init` to set up your pacman keyring. (3/3) upgrading pyalpm [#######################################] 100% Not sure if this is an issues that will catch others trying to upgrade, but it definitely was a screwy way to work-around pacman not upgrading on its own... -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

5 6

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] udev-177
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 18 Jan '12

18 Jan '12

On 01/13/2012 09:40 AM, Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > I was broken at kernel level, I just found this (this is the output > using udev 177): > > [ 10.732916] Loading firmware rtlwifi/rtl8192sefw.bin > [ 71.520133] rtl8192se:rtl92s_init_sw_vars():<0-0> Failed to request firmware! > [ 71.520141] rtlwifi:rtl_pci_probe():<0-0> Can't init_sw_vars. > > Same issue for me, using udev-177 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: validate module index Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3867 queued, 'add' 'pci' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 317 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3867 running Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89dbe38 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:07:00.0' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+pci:0000:07:00.0: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89dc250 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89cc340 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+pci:0000:00:1c.1: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: IMPORT builtin 'kmod' /lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules:5 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6825]: execute 'load' 'pci:v000010ECd00008172sv000010ECsd00008181bc02sc80i00' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3868 queued, 'add' 'module' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3868 running Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: device 0x89cc448 has devpath '/module/rtlwifi' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+module:rtlwifi: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89e2e20 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3868 processed with 0 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 143 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3868 done with 0 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3869 queued, 'add' 'module' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3869 running Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: device 0x89cc448 has devpath '/module/rtl8192se' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+module:rtl8192se: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89e2e20 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3869 processed with 0 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 145 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3869 done with 0 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost kernel: [ 1863.593654] rtl8192se 0000:07:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost kernel: [ 1863.593679] rtl8192se 0000:07:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3870 queued, 'add' 'firmware' Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost kernel: [ 1863.606843] rtl8192se: rtl8192ce: FW Power Save off (module option) Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost kernel: [ 1863.607022] rtl8192se: Driver for Realtek RTL8192SE/RTL8191SE Jan 13 13:20:39 localhost kernel: [ 1863.607025] Loading firmware rtlwifi/rtl8192sefw.bin Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: validate module index Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: inserted 'rtl8192se' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3871 queued, 'remove' 'firmware' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3872 queued, 'add' 'drivers' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3872 running Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89d1fd0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: device 0x89cc448 has devpath '/bus/pci/drivers/rtl8192se' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3867 processed with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+drivers:rtl8192se: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: device 0x89db8c8 has devpath '/bus/pci/drivers' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: device 0x89dbb88 has devpath '/bus/pci' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+subsystem:drivers: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89e2e20 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6826]: seq 3872 processed with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 155 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3867 done with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3872 done with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 249 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3870 running Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: IMPORT builtin 'firmware' /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:107 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: error: can not open '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:07:00.0/firmware/0000:07:00.0/loading' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89cc6c8 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1/0000:07:00.0' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89dc250 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.1' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: device 0x89cd858 has devpath '/devices/pci0000:00' Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+pci:0000:07:00.0: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89d1fd0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3870 processed with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3870 done with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: passed 252 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89cc340 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3871 running Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost kernel: [ 1924.106791] rtl8192se:rtl92s_init_sw_vars():<0-0> Failed to request firmware! Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost kernel: [ 1924.106804] rtlwifi:rtl_pci_probe():<0-0> Can't init_sw_vars. Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost kernel: [ 1924.106867] rtl8192se 0000:07:00.0: PCI INT A disabled Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: no db file to read /run/udev/data/+firmware:0000:07:00.0: No such file or directory Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: passed -1 bytes to netlink monitor 0x89d1fd0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[190]: seq 3871 done with 0 Jan 13 13:21:39 localhost udevd[6825]: seq 3871 processed with 0 -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi \cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1

2 2

[arch-general] I can't upgrade to pacman4
by 朱格宏 18 Jan '12

18 Jan '12

Hi,i found some problem when upgrade to pacman4 i use pacman -Syu and it told me :: package-query: require pacman<3.6 but my pacman is 3.5.4-4, how to slove it?

4 4

[arch-general] Pacman-key keyring and my own GPG key
by Maciej Mazur 17 Jan '12

17 Jan '12

I have just upgraded to pacman 4, and as instructed I executed "pacman-key --init". It generated new GPG key "Pacman Keychain Master Key <pacman@localhost>" and imported it into pacman keyring. The question is: should i replace it with my own private GPG key that I use normally? I understand that it should all work well with the generated one, but since I already have GPG key, then wouldn't it make more sense to use it instead of generated one? If the answer for that question is yes, then is it better to import my GPG key into pacman keyring or instruct pacman to use my regular gnupg keyring at ~/.gnupg ? Maciej

4 3