- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] b43: wireless issues
by Magnus Therning 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

I'm having problems getting my wireless connection to work properly. It's a broadcom card, using the b43 driver. It connects fine on login, but once I actually use the network I'm disconnected and all attempts to re-connect fail. I've found some reports of similar behaviour online, but none seem to offer any good solutions to it :-( So I'm trying my luck in here instead. One person mentioned that things started working much better if he limited the network to 802.11b (not g), but I haven't seen any obvious way of achieving this. Any hints on what I can do to test that myself? $ lspci -vnn |grep 14e4 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11b/g [14e4:4315] (rev 01) I did extract some stuff from dmesg that might be of importance, but I really couldn't tell: b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/ucode15.fw b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/lp0initvals15.fw b43 ssb0:0: firmware: requesting b43/lp0bsinitvals15.fw b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01 00:50:23) b43-phy0 ERROR: Fatal DMA error: 0x00000800, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000 b43-phy0 ERROR: This device does not support DMA on your system. Please use PIO instead. b43-phy0: Controller RESET (DMA error) ... b43-phy0: Loading firmware version 478.104 (2008-07-01 00:50:23) b43-phy0: Controller restarted Cheers, M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe

3 6

[arch-general] Important notice on the Arch Security Team to the whole Arch Linux community.
by Ananda Samaddar 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

Dear Arch community, I thought I'd post a follow up on some of the things said in the last thread I created on this list. I'm using upper case for headings just to make things easier to read and not to shout! Please post or cc all follow ups to the Arch General list, and read this message carefully before replying. 1. DISCUSSION ABOUT SECURITY ON ARCH-GENERAL AND THE GOOGLE GROUP It's been mentioned that because my proposition for an arch-security list was rejected, I'm trying to circumvent that by posting stuff about setting up a security team to arch-general. That's not my intention. I am proposing a compromise. Internal communications on security issues will be kept to the Google Group. An irregular 'newsletter' will be posted to arch-general when major things are done to keep Arch users who are not on the Google Group informed. Also when security alerts do eventually start getting issued they *will* be posted to arch-general. I believe that all Arch users should benefit from the work that will be getting done. Doing it this way will keep email traffic on security issues on arch-general to a minimum. 2. THE RELEVANCE AND USEFULNESS OF AN ARCH SECURITY TEAM. There's been some murmurings that this undertaking is pointless. Happily this has mostly come from users and not developers. In fact it has the direct or indirect support of at least two Arch developers, Pierre Schmitz and Hugo Doria: http://www.osnews.com/story/22692/Arch_Linux_Team/page6/ This is just as much an experiment as anything else. It remains to be seen if setting up an Arch Security team is worthwhile. Evidence based on other distros seems to point to the fact that it is. If you are not convinced that's fine, but please provide constructive criticism and not mindless trolling like suggesting naming a security team after a Mexican food dish or the British English slang word for buttocks. If you don't want any part of this, other than the odd email on arch-general you won't be hindered or pestered in any way. 3. WE NEED YOUR HELP There is no Arch security team as of now. Hopefully there soon will be. If you want to help it would be helpful if you have the following skills or experience: -Ability to modify PKGBUILDs, rebuild and test packages. -Know how to patch and compile software -Are willing to subscribe to several security related mailing lists -Know basic usage of GPG in email -Are willing to hang out in the arch-security IRC channel -Are willing to file bugs in the Arch bug tracker You don't need to be security guru, just willing to help out, learn and with a desire to make our favourite Linux distro even better than it already is. If you want to help out please subscribe to the Google Group and submit a message with the subject "I want to join the team", without quotes. http://groups.google.com/group/arch-security If you don't have or don't want to create a Google account, please send me a personal email and I'll add you to the member list. 4. SCOPE OF THE SECURITY TEAM It is my intention that at this point, the security team will only deal with finding and fixing security related issues. This will entail providing interim pkgbuilds, reporting issues on the bug tracker and sending out alert notices via email. All communications to the 'outside world' (emails, wiki articles etc) from the team will state that (for now) the team's work is completely unofficial and unsupported by the Arch Developers. This is to avoid sullying the reputation of the Arch developers. 5. LONG TERM GOALS Most Arch stuff starts out as external projects than then merge with the main distro. If our work turns out to be useful, and I hope it will be, I would like us to become an official Arch Team. We could then having something like Debian does, with two mailing lists, one for security discussion and a read only list where announcements are posted. The details of this remain to be determined as this initiative is only just starting out. 6. FINAL WORDS I hope this message has made things a bit clearer for everyone. I won't start on the actual process/policy documents till after this weekend coming as I have some things to attend to before that. Of course feel free to suggest things on the Google Group, I'd like to make things as open and transparent over there as possible. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to post on the Google Group or email me personally. Thanks, Ananda Samaddar

9 21

[arch-general] How to install perl plugins in pidgin ?
by Nilesh Govindarajan 23 Jun '10

23 Jun '10

How to install perl plugins in pidgin ? The default pidgin doesn't have perl support, so I compiled it with --enable-perl from ABS, but the perl plugin in ~/.purple/plugins with executable perm doesn't show up in the list. -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr Website: http://www.itech7.com Cheap and Reliable VPS Hosting: http://j.mp/arHk5e

1 0

[arch-general] - makepkg now aborts automatically with any errors during packaging
by Evgeny Burmentyev 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

Hello. With such an addition, how do I make a given command not interrupt makepkg? Like command || ignore_errors

3 4

[arch-general] Kudos to the Arch devs!
by David C. Rankin 22 Jun '10

22 Jun '10

Devs, As mentioned earlier, after my HD tanked, I did my first Gnome only install using the Arch 2010-05 install media. Except for my FU forgetting mkswap, the install is picture perfect. Further, since the radeon/dri/mesa modules are mature enough that they handle gpu downclocking during idle clock ticks, there is no further reason to hang onto the fglrx driver and limp suse 11.0 along on my laptops. Gnome 2.30 is near perfect, the packaging is, from what I can tell so far, perfect, and a simple 'rsync -au otherbox:/var/cache/pacman/pkg /var/cache/pacman' seals the deal. Great Job Devs. That brings my total Arch installs to 7, including my 2 primary servers. Arch has nailed what a distro should be and that's something worth jealously guarding against the pressures of change ;-) -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

6 5

[arch-general] vala pkgbuild
by Damien Churchill 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it, just a simple version bump and sha256sum update. http://pastie.org/1014264

2 4

Re: [arch-general] [arch-announce] Xorg 1.8 moves to extra
by Nilesh Govindarajan 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke wrote: > Andreas Radke wrote: > > This release works with udev for input hotplugging and supports > /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*.conf as a replacement for the hal .fdi files. After > upgrading to this release, configuration for input devices in hal is ignored. > Documentation about this change can be found on: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xorg#xorg.conf.d_.28Xorg_1.8.29 Nvidia-173xx > and -96xx drivers currently don't support the new Xorg release. We recommend > using the xf86-video-nouveau driver package for now. > > URL: http://www.archlinux.org/news/502/ > _______________________________________________ > arch-announce mailing list > arch-announce(a)archlinux.org > http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-announce WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ? -- Regards, Nilesh Govindarajan Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/nilesh.gr Twitter: http://twitter.com/nileshgr Website: http://www.itech7.com Cheap and Reliable VPS Hosting: http://j.mp/arHk5e

13 17

[arch-general] Gnome clock
by Ignacio Galmarino 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog with the following error: The panel encountered a problem while loading "OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet". and im offered the option to delete the clock applet. Any idea what goes wrong ? Ignacio

4 4

[arch-general] New Arch Install - Swap Won't Activate - Help the clueless?
by David C. Rankin 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

Guys, I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated. Initially, when I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue) But now, I want to activate it and I get an error activating swap that frankly, I have never seen before: [11:27 dcrgx2:~] # swapon -a swapon: /dev/sdb6: read swap header failed: Invalid argument Huh? Here are the current details of the install: [11:26 dcrgx2:~] # cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 8 16 488386584 sdb 8 17 1 sdb1 8 21 144522 sdb5 8 22 1951866 sdb6 8 23 29294496 sdb7 8 24 456992991 sdb8 8 0 39062500 sda 8 1 40131 sda1 8 2 39005820 sda2 [11:26 dcrgx2:~] # fdisk -l /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x0005cd36 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 1 60801 488384001 5 Extended /dev/sdb5 * 1 18 144522 83 Linux /dev/sdb6 19 261 1951866 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sdb7 262 3908 29294496 83 Linux /dev/sdb8 3909 60801 456992991 83 Linux # # /etc/fstab: static file system information # # <file system> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass> devpts /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0 shm /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid 0 0 #/dev/cdrom /media/cd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 #/dev/dvd /media/dvd auto ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0 #/dev/fd0 /media/fl auto user,noauto 0 0 /dev/sdb6 swap swap defaults 0 0 UUID=30247a6b-c639-4180-9b44-3535ade87de2 /home ext4 defaults 0 1 UUID=73356263-d92f-4914-bb0d-07f5611b5709 / ext3 defaults 0 1 UUID=de71b9f1-a954-4d41-84c2-926de89d1edb /boot ext3 defaults 0 1 It looks to me like swap should activate. What am I missing? Thanks for any insight you can lend here. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. Rankin Law Firm, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 Telephone: (936) 715-9333 Facsimile: (936) 715-9339 www.rankinlawfirm.com

5 8

[arch-general] xterm letters show up with strange bars
by PT M. 21 Jun '10

21 Jun '10

In fact this happeded weeks before, maybe after upgrading to xorg1.8, when typing in xterm, it left with each letter with an annoying vertical line. [see the image attached] I believe this has something to do with compiz-wm, if I switch to the other window and switch back, those lines gone, but still appear when new letters typed in. And if I switch to the default Metacity wm, nothing annoying any more. Any people encounter such problem? I switch to urxvt instead as the terminal this days. installed packages: [i686] *compiz-core 0.8.6-2 xorg-server 1.8.1-1 xterm 259-1* -- Arch Linuxer, Pythoner, Geek --> Blog: http://apt-blog.net

1 0