- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] imlib2
by Baho Utot 28 May '09

28 May '09

Building 1.4.2-2 i686 has a dependency for libungif pkgname=imlib2 pkgver=1.4.2 pkgrel=2 pkgdesc="Library that does image file loading and saving as well as rendering, manipulation, arbitrary polygon support" url="http://sourceforge.net/projects/enlightenment/" arch=('i686' 'x86_64') license=('BSD') depends=('libtiff' 'libungif' 'bzip2' 'freetype2' 'libxext' 'libpng' 'libid3tag' 'libjpeg') There is not libungif in core/extra or AUR

3 2

[arch-general] No color with asus M50VC webcam
by richard terry 28 May '09

28 May '09

Wondered if anyone had any clues as to why no colour. The cam pictures in skype/xawtv which I tried B&W and pretty dim. Regards Richard

1 0

[arch-general] network-plasmoid-svn on extra? (WAS: KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi)
by Andrea Scarpino 27 May '09

27 May '09

On 27/05/2009, Thomas Bächler <thomas(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > How about adding this to extra? It seems NM is very popular, and until > it is part of kdenetwork we should not force a high percentage of our > users to build it from AUR. we could, I was waiting a stable version. what others DEV think about this? -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Developer

3 2

[arch-general] KDE, Bluetooth and Wifi
by Manne Merak 27 May '09

27 May '09

So, I am new here, just installed ArchLinux on my work laptop. Had some issues with getting X and KDE4 up, but all fine now. KDE4 is different, I can see why some people dislike it - still needs that polished feeling that 3.5 had, but hey that will come with time. My biggest concern at the moment is Bluetooth mouse and Wifi. KBluetooth looses my mouse, randomly, and there is no KNetworkManager (well a finished one) at the moment. So my question, what does the ArchLinux KDE community use for Bluetooth and Wifi management. (I can fiddle round with bluez and wpa_supplicant config files, but would rather use some higher level config util) Manne ps. I come from the OpenSUSE world, so excuse my desire for management tools.

6 8

[arch-general] libarchive - bsdtar producing weird archives?
by Michael Towers 27 May '09

27 May '09

The result of a makepkg run produced what looked like a totally garbled package, when viewed in mc's virtual file system. That led me to investigate a bit, so I tried packing up a few directories with bsdtar and sometimes got similarly garbled results. However, unpacking worked completely normally, as also did viewing the archives in xarchiver or squeeze. If I use tar instead of bsdtar to do the packing, they appear normally in mc. Does anyone know what's going on here? Is it mc that is getting something wrong, or bsdtar?

3 2

[arch-general] lilo 22.8-3 - compile - latest gcc
by Baho Utot 27 May '09

27 May '09

==> Making package: lilo 22.8-3 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:24 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Using cached copy of lilo-22.8.src.tar.gz -> Using cached copy of gcc-44.patch -> Using cached copy of lilo.conf ==> WARNING: Integrity checks (md5) are missing or incomplete. ==> Extracting Sources... -> bsdtar -x -f lilo-22.8.src.tar.gz ==> Entering fakeroot environment... ==> Starting build()... patching file checkit ./checkit GCC version 2.91 or later is required gcc is not present AS86 version 0.16.10 or later is required as86 version 0.16.17 OKAY LD86 version 0.16.10 or later is required ld86 version 0.16.17 OKAY BCC version 0.16.10 or later is recommended bcc is not present You will not be able to make floppy2, diag2.img, or lilo.com make: *** [test.img] Error 1 ==> ERROR: Build Failed.

2 1

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 55, Issue 46
by Keith 26 May '09

26 May '09

On Tue, 26 May 2009 at 10 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, they're cross posts. Note the [arch-dev-public] in the subject line. Those are cross posts from the public dev list (which is read-only to non devs) Ah - got it. Thank you. Regards...K

1 0

[arch-general] libnl 1.1-1 i686
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

Source package URL gone => Making package: libnl 1.1-1 i686 (Mon May 25 18:31:16 UTC 2009) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies... ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> Retrieving Sources... -> Downloading libnl-1.1.tar.gz... --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://people.suug.ch/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz Resolving people.suug.ch... 85.118.1.10, 2001:770:15f::2 Connecting to people.suug.ch|85.118.1.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 301 Moved Permanently Location: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz [following] --2009-05-25 18:31:17-- http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/libnl/files/libnl-1.1.tar.gz Resolving www.infradead.org... 85.118.1.10, 2001:770:15f::2 Connecting to www.infradead.org|85.118.1.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-05-25 18:31:17 ERROR 404: Not Found.

2 3

Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 26 May '09

26 May '09

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > I am missing something here ? > > > > > > sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u > > building union chroot > > ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > > > > > > I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs > > > > You need to patch makechrootpkg with this: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=2269e5c9 > > Allan > > > Since unionfs has been dropped from kernel-2.6.29.4-1 Please can someone push devtools-2269e5c9 to the repo that devtools installs from. And update the DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot to say you need kernel-2.6.xx and aufs2-utils. I lost 3 days trying to fix this. I needed to build a few packages for a server. Since I have done a Clean install from the latest install CD and sync'd/updated the system my build system broke and following the wiki no longer works. Thanks

2 1

[arch-general] Problem w/Digest?
by Keith 26 May '09

26 May '09

Below are the 1st and last messages contained in the copy of Vol. 55 #44 I received, dated May 24, 5:56 PM EDT. Note the timestamp on message #1: May 23, 9:17 AM UTC. Yet the message quoted within message #10, timestamped May 24, 11:52 UTC, isn't in the digest (or anywhere else I can find). I've noted this numerous times recently and wrote it off to a lousy memory. But it's clearly more than that. Are these cross-posts being replied to? Is the digest dropping messages? Thanks...K Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:17:27 +0000 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot(a)columbus.rr.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general(a)archlinux.org> Message-ID: <1243070247.15748.7.camel(a)desktop.bildanet.com> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > > Baho Utot wrote: > >> > > I am missing something here ? >> > > >> > > <snip> Message: 10 Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:55:59 +0300 From: Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] testing repo clean-up To: arch-general(a)archlinux.org Message-ID: <20090524215559.GA3136@dark> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:52:15PM +0200, Thomas B?chler wrote: > > Tobias Powalowski schrieb: > >> >> moved in lilo,openvpn,openswan and capi4k-utils to extra >> > > > > I'd like to keep openvpn in core. I'd even maintain it, but I use the > > openvpn 2.1 release candidates and thus don't test or use the 2.0.X > > releases. > > > The first three were moved to core not extra. Its just capi4k-utils that was moved in a different repo than it was before. -- Greg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20090525/b1695e…>

2 1