- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] Makefile to build all packages
by Baho Utot 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

I am working on a makefile to build all the packages in a abs repos Here is what I have # # Maker.sh # rm Makefile echo 'CHROOT=/home/Build.Chroot' >> Makefile echo 'REPO=CORE' >> Makefile echo 'REPOS=/home/${REPO}' >> Makefile echo 'PKG=i686.pkg.tar.gz' >> Makefile echo -e "all:\t ALL" >> Makefile for i in $(find . -type d) ; do upper=$(echo ${i} | tr "[:lower:]" "[:upper:]") ALL=${ALL}" "${upper} echo "${upper}:" >> Makefile echo -e "\tsudo mkarchroot -u "'$(CHROOT)/root' >> Makefile echo -e "\tcd ${i}; sudo makechrootpkg -r "'$(CHROOT);mv *.pkg.* $(REPOS)' >> Makefile echo -e "\trepo-add "'$(REPOS)/$(REPO).db.tar.gz $(REPOS)/'"${i}"'*' >> Makefile echo -e "\ttouch "'$@' >> Makefile done echo -e "ALL:\t ${ALL}" >> Makefile It produces a Makefile with entries like this ./ABS: sudo mkarchroot -u $(CHROOT)/root cd ./abs; sudo makechrootpkg -r $(CHROOT);mv *.pkg.* $(REPOS) repo-add $(REPOS)/$(REPO).db.tar.gz $(REPOS)/./abs* touch $@ I want it to be like this (the ./ removed ) ABS: sudo mkarchroot -u $(CHROOT)/root cd abs; sudo makechrootpkg -r $(CHROOT);mv *.pkg.* $(REPOS) repo-add $(REPOS)/$(REPO).db.tar.gz $(REPOS)/abs* touch $@ find returns the directory entry with ./ in front of the directory name Anyone know how to make find return abs instead of ./abs Thanks

6 10

[arch-general] Planeta Arch - leprosys
by William Díaz 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

Hola, este es el feed para planeta: http://www.leprosys.info/search/label/Planeta%20Arch Gracias por hacerme la propuesta de participar. William Díaz o/

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Aspell dictionaries updates in [testing]
by Angel Velásquez 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Eduardo Romero <k3nsai(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday 05 April 2009 04:50:28 pm Eric Bélanger wrote: >> >> Thanks for the test. You could try to get the aspell-es in extra to >> work in kde. If it also doesn't work, then it's probably a >> configuration issue. >> >> BTW, I might try to test them myself. Before, I'll need to get text >> from these languages from the Internet. > Yeah, I might test this, but I have no time at the moment, so if you > want to test some spanish text, use this one. > > "Atencion, esto es una prueba... necesitamos la atencion de todos." > > It should catch "atencion", as it needs an accent in the 'o'. > I said to the #archlinux-es guys to test this package for some days, since we speak mostly in spanish ;), so we will be testing this package and we will you some feedback. Regards -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909

1 0

[arch-general] bz 12953 cant start mysqld
by Adam Stokes 06 Apr '09

06 Apr '09

There is a fix there and ticket has been open for 4 months. I feel its a pretty big issue since its an initialization script, could someone (the maintainer) please have a look at this bug? http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12953 Thanks -- ( adam stokes ) || ( adam.stokes(a)gmail.com )

3 3

[arch-general] libconfig error
by Mike Sampson 05 Apr '09

05 Apr '09

Hi, just did a pacman -Syu and one of the packages gives an error on install but still seems to install. Is this error harmless and ok to ignore? System is x86_64. [mercury|/home/mike] # pacman -S libconfig > warning: libconfig-1.3.2-2 is up to date -- reinstalling > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > > Targets (1): libconfig-1.3.2-2 > > Total Download Size: 0.00 MB > Total Installed Size: 0.39 MB > > Proceed with installation? [Y/n] > checking package integrity... > (1/1) checking for file conflicts > [###########################################################] 100% > (1/1) upgrading libconfig > [###########################################################] 100% > error: scriptlet failed to execute correctly > [mercury|/home/mike] # pacman -Ql libconfig > libconfig /usr/ > libconfig /usr/include/ > libconfig /usr/include/libconfig.h > libconfig /usr/include/libconfig.h++ > libconfig /usr/lib/ > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig++.a > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig++.so > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig++.so.8 > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig++.so.8.0.0 > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig.a > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig.so > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig.so.8 > libconfig /usr/lib/libconfig.so.8.0.0 > libconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ > libconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libconfig++.pc > libconfig /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libconfig.pc >

5 5

[arch-general] hplip and qt4
by Jeffrey Parke 05 Apr '09

05 Apr '09

Why is our hplip software still using qt3? If you download hplip straight from the hp site, you get the qt4 version, do you not? just wondering The Ringmaster

3 2

[arch-general] archlinux on twitter
by Abhishek Dasgupta 04 Apr '09

04 Apr '09

Does anyone know who owns the twitter archlinux account at: http://twitter.com/archlinux Just asking, since it would be useful to post library transitions and big updates (like today's GNOME transition) to twitter so that it's easier for users to stay informed. -- Abhishek

1 0

Re: [arch-general] arch-general Digest, Vol 53, Issue 43
by Keith 04 Apr '09

04 Apr '09

pyther wrote: > I was wondering if we could make arch-announce a read only list. Making the core, extra, and community repositories WRITE-ONLY would be a logical extension of this idea...{DDDD} g -- The Osmonds! You are all Osmonds!! Throwing up on a freeway at dawn!!!

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [Fwd: [arch-announce] Dropping i686 support]
by kludge 03 Apr '09

03 Apr '09

Loui Chang wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 02:35:34PM -0500, kludge wrote: >> leslie: fuck you and your macho-nerd, myth-of-progress bullshit. >> >> all the rest: i'm really upset with this decision. the basic >> assumption that anyone who matters is spending money on new hardware is >> fucked-up. > > I LOLed. alright, alright, ya' got me. the best jokes contain a kernel of truth, and this one hit real close to home. i maintain the basic premise of leslie's comment (serious or not) is widely held and fundamentally bad for the world. *and* i woke up with a hang-over, so please forgive me for being a bit too credulous. sheesh, kludge

4 3

[arch-general] Make arch-announce read only?
by pyther 03 Apr '09

03 Apr '09

I was wondering if we could make arch-announce a read only list. Sort of like the dev mailing list. Anyone who tries to respond to an announcement could get an email saying something along the lines of "If you have a comment about an announcement, please post it on the arch-general list. Thank you." I do not filter the arch-announce mailings for obvious reason and I do not think I am alone. It is very annoying to see replies in my inbox. ~pyther

5 5