- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.2-1
by Tobias Powalowski 25 Jan '09

25 Jan '09

Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - bump to latest version please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

1 0

[arch-general] gstreamer0.10 0.10.21-2 i686
by Baho Utot 25 Jan '09

25 Jan '09

When trying to compile gstreamer0.10 0.10.21-2 i686 I have this error checking bison version 2.4.1 >= 1.875... Argument "^B^D^A" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at - line 1. current bison/gcc Anyone seen this?

1 0

[arch-general] silent fsck at startup
by wahjava.ml＠gmail.com 24 Jan '09

24 Jan '09

Hi all, Is there any switch for fsck (during startup) to be somewhat verbose like displaying the progress of filesystem check ? TiA -- Ashish SHUKLA

7 13

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] initscripts 2009.01
by Dieter Plaetinck 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

Hugo Doria wrote: > Signoff (both) > > -- Hugo > signoff i686. all looks good. Dieter

1 0

[arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
by Amanai 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. Will this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra? http://www.go-mono.com/moonlight/ Moonlight is an open source implementation of Microsoft Silverlight for Unix systems. It's avaible for 32/64 bit! Release Notes Final release of Moonlight 1.0 Support for the Microsoft Media Pack Quick and easy installation of media codecs Several media releate bug fixes I hope one of the dev's like to pick this up.

13 20

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Divide and Konquer - Splitting KDE packages
by Loui Chang 23 Jan '09

23 Jan '09

On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 07:35:45PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > Best I can do after some initial hacking. Are there any assumptions we > can make based on package name to trim the list so we don't have to > check all PKGBUILDs? > > This is done without a checkout of the full repo, using svn list and svn cat... > > $ ./pkgfind 3ddesktop #first package in the repos > Repo scan complete in 51ms > Package -> 3ddesktop/ > > $ ./pkgfind bash > Repo scan complete in 3809ms > Package -> bash/ > > $ ./pkgfind libpano13 #median package in the repos > Repo scan complete in 44170ms > Package -> libpano13/ > > $ ./pkgfind zsync #2nd to last package in the repos > Repo scan complete in 90997ms > Package -> zsync/ > > These numbers are just going to grow... And even more so when community packages are added... The svn repo needs a restructuring I think.

2 1

Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0
by stefan-husmann＠t-online.de 22 Jan '09

22 Jan '09

-----Original Message----- > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:05:47 +0100 > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0 > From: Allan McRae > To: General Discusson about Arch Linux > stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:28:36 +0100 > > > Subject: Re: [arch-general] Moonlight 1.0 > > > From: Amanai > > > To: "General Discusson about Arch Linux" > > > > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:19:55 -0800, Thomas Bohn > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 01:25, Thu 22 Jan 09, Amanai wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > The final Version from Moonlight 1.0 released on January 20th. > > > > > Will this be avaible in the Archlinux repo's extra? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently the SVN version of Moonlight is available via AUR, the > > > > package is called "moon-svn." > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I pick this up. I don't want to build it and upload moonlight for > > > AUR. > > > I don't want to use any packages from AUR. > > > > > > Archlinux have in Extra Repo's > > > > > > flashplugin > > > swfdec > > > gnash > > > libflashsupport > > > > > > it is just missing "moonlight"! > > > > > > > > > > > File a feature request. > > > > In all honesty, I would close this as a "won't fix". If no-one is > motivated enough to make a package for the stable version for this in > the AUR and the community does not then vote for it, the demand is > obviously not high enough for it to be included in the main repos. > > Allan > > > > Hello, I agree perfectly. But it would be the correct way to handle things like that, and would put some noise away from this list. BTW, the new rules for the TUs would even forbid to put it to community without discussion. The devs might have some similar rules for putting something new to extra. Regards Stefan

2 1

[arch-general] howto file missing in intltool
by Lyman 22 Jan '09

22 Jan '09

Hi, I found that the package intltool does not contain the file doc/I18N-HOWTO, which is contained in official release. As this file is supposed to be found locally easily, once it is missing even google can not give out useful hint efficiently. IMHO, this file is vital for the person who is new to gettext/intltool tool-chain (no kidding, more heuristic and important than the manpages). Can anyone here could add this file in next update, please? -- Lyman Li Blog(Chinese): http://lymanrb.blogspot.com Album: http://picasaweb.google.com/lymanrb

2 2

[arch-general] [signoff] kernel26 2.6.28.1-1
by Tobias Powalowski 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Hi guys, new kernel adresses the following things: - bump to latest version - fixed bugs: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12821 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12816 http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12820 please signoff for both arches greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa(a)archlinux.org

8 26

[arch-general] Question on traceroute/mtr
by Viv Diwakar 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Hi all, When I mtr to an IP I'm seeing the last three hops as having the identical IP address, and packet loss of 25%, 40% and 100% respectively. I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly - does that mean the last hop is basically looping on itself three times? Thanks in advance, cheers Viv Diwakar

1 0