- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion request: gnome-terminal-urgent-hint
by Jekyll Wu 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 gnome-terminal-urgent-hint[1] is patched against a quite old version(2.26), not maintained and does not build. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28871 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJPcauTAAoJEOemZ9znWXlA4F0P93V01HEZOKF36m1vgztRPM8v sjUWr3m0VY5tnonMDD3Hpjnhq21/zPVl00qOyim7pITX4Rm/7u1IuFRTHKwOMWr3 JborJjd10zhWoZ1enYgCNXmNOaAZgKjXdiV4i706U2CCU2XQvjOnfDq9bs3hZqAu BYP0fR4ifn/PbsgmmAFgGvt2lREVgyO6pZN9AKTiajRHQFCfW/u1sDFnvSOwXYzM czkaqCqwyrvny/7qm16BwVw84T5Ix6p4nsUKmQNNI4XS3iL1AJ9bEEHaX+eMO4D5 oBmnu9a5vzmrFtAeOMUYWTeEr9I3lk5d/kA0YqLaSTX/d8ORxw/jBYA8nN2r1R2x YZvyx0htHWUuG42jpaI8BvhuHqi39ESr2Qpv9SwQW+0QKb/aMPpLsQW/MQkOi2bA 0uVWSBvZUmP2uVSmtRdYo/pVwYNzKrnRPf/A2pZeNW4XXeIT9c1SpSKk9K97t7pj vebR7Oe3BL2S5AHLwhls8Yy4hEVmDiB+RoY/nSHDqohshNq6Ki6HfTBLmzCd1uZV nf9JjafZE0YSEv/9jbAnj1qAVWpegsgKFGBpdUkpp0/UquwwY2iGwRgZYGqlDZ8h LL4uQAdC112pOoDvHLkeo30DoH8KCAXNJjNJnrOzg15nm3i/KvbdAvjXfcYuXfdH /PwdgIalMR6Iw+12sAs= =4c8l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: google-chrome-mini
by Det 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

This is not even funny: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57611 - A clone of 'google-chrome-dev' - Otherwise the same but the build and dependencies somehow more 'minimal' - In practice completely useless Det

14 32

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Mar '12

27 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 22 signoffs 2. tomegun - 10 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: mysqlpp
by Adam Nielsen 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Hi, Could mysqlpp[1] please be deleted? It is out of date, and there is a newer version in [community] under the name mysql++[2]. Thanks, Adam. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4538 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mysql++/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 10 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (10 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686) * vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686) * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20110915-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 21 signoffs 2. dreisner - 8 signoffs 3. eric - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by BxS 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Dear TUs, please delete package [1], it as been replaced by package [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57910 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57960 Thanks. Best Regards, BxS

3 2

[aur-general] Request for Oracle package merges
by Adam Nielsen 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

Hi all, This morning with the cooperation of the previous maintainer, I have adopted the out of date Oracle Instant Client packages on AUR. I would like to change the package names however, as I believe "instantclient" is not descriptive enough. I would like to change this to "oracle-instantclient". I have gone ahead and uploaded new/updated packages to the AUR with these new names, so I would like to request the old packages be merged into the new ones. Would someone please be able to assist me with this merge? The new packages all start with "oracle-". Here is a list of all the old ones: instantclient-basic https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16676 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57813 instantclient-jdbc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16726 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57817 instantclient-odbc https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19875 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57816 instantclient-sdk https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16725 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57814 instantclient-sqlplus https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 New version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57815 I would also like to request the instantclient-basiclite package be deleted, as it is identical to instantclient-basic but only contains messages in English (the translations have been removed), so I don't think it is necessary to maintain separately: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16706 Anyone currently using the basiclite package can switch to oracle-instantclient-basic with no loss in functionality. I have included some shell code in the new PKGBUILDs to help alert people to the fact that the package data files need to be downloaded separately (directly from Oracle) as they cannot be downloaded automatically. I would appreciate any feedback on whether the way I have done this is acceptable. It doesn't seem to have caused any issues with AUR. Please let me know if you need any additional information or if there is something I have missed. Many thanks, Adam.

4 5

[aur-general] Delete Request
by speps 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Hi, distrho-plugins-lv2-git [1] is now superseded by distrho-lv2-git [2] and can be deleted. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55567 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57903 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] removal request: fchvt
by Martti Kühne 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

please remove my package fchvt. haven't used it in a while and don't really think anyone would. cheers! mar77i

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-freetds-static
by Schala Zeal 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

Please have the following package removed. mingw32-freetds is able to provide both static and shared libs, thus obsoleting this package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28832

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Mar '12

25 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-2 (any) * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * avr-libc-1.8.0-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * avr-binutils-2.22-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * avr-gcc-4.7.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-back-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-base-1.24.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnustep-gui-0.22.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 11 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request : kding and kding-kde4
by Jekyll Wu 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 They pack the same application, except that kding[1] has a maintainer while kding-kde4[2] does not. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12576 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28559 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPbS/JAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAAngQAKTZxN4B0Y6Jxd1iuZkbM2EK Pf/FttXFOl2ajQYg1EZmvFbz1OS6rM4sJlF4ERUZoYppKVw4VwZXaYzoe1RwjJMD 1vha9sdkOBkdIcM1UabLXXY6G/TXIZd00oYGGSsnn4BbDJ/qOriUKOqpMB/cMiY2 0dF50fYYVS9GuknipZWP33Div5+t6NNLJFTDwnxpQSDKUzKILn63KN8PkC/lWRtE 8cnqmZDOn089jCou+d7AScbycXBgH5GxpsB0aWuS0l61EgfcNg8DnH5sSHnvVIQv WmqhlgPpoljWHsA3v2DoJ2nM35i9Ryo7o+OfU19RSSbFFed/3ulotSMwMEq51J1h ritpbXz296HFQI96zQzy2WJVQy0EZqxrgTdpPPfQi/mARpWme+ftVxJNdKVgxg+R h6yrIlmgWVRTG2JTOUVI3UTvXQD9+iuZrANy9Kx5W2XpERAJHSzRSxK9TFFBSTrK q1d1yQmKwzixvRfJ+5iN3HeqnBViITNH/re5XPcsgEB6Csl/NLAVVDwjNtBWxxbo iAvreIvg0ELFl5GPp4M4gBZ9dijw1bSy0X77/EDHlHXzNhCYAKn67uqqZiLxIUZU icU9ETiT8emq2aOkJfKelF/gmq1lzbfi0G6rclD0FEb+ZPhTnGIm26teF2k82vtf RPPlM44x0lEUVHT/TmZO =wCWx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

Package xf86-video-sis671 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34256) is outdated, broken and lacks some features that xf86-sis-m671 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47620) have (support for 1366x768 resolution and others). Anyway it is just feature-lacking version of xf86-video-sisimedia in [community] and therefore should be removed and have it's votes merged into xf86-sis-m671 to preserve votes of sis761 chipset owners in AUR. -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

4 6

[aur-general] mysql-gui-tools unmaintained
by Jeff Cook 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

mysql-gui-tools 5.0r14-5 has not been updated since Jun '11. It no longer builds. A fix for the build failure has been in the comments since December. The package has been marked out of date since Dec 1. Can we get this package orphaned and adopted by someone else please?

5 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Mar '12

24 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 9 signoffs 2. dan - 4 signoffs 3. idevolder - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Mar '12

23 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request pure-stlvec
by Bjoern Lindig 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi, the new package pure-stllib provides pure-stlvec. Could somebody please remove the later. The new one: pure-stllib https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57850 To be removed: pure-stlvec https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57181 Many thanks! Bjoern

2 1

[aur-general] darcs moved into aur
by Pierre Schmitz 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hi all, just to let you know: darcs has been moved from [community] to aur as it can no longer be built with the haskell packages in [extra]. It was also one of the last unsigned packages in the repo. Of course any TU may re-add it once these issues are fixed. See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57820 Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com

3 3

[aur-general] [Delete request] flo-git
by Stefan Husmann 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

Hello please delete flo-git. The maintainer was e-mailed and agreed to do so, because the project is not active anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39921 Best Regards Stefan

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Mar '12

22 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Eric Koenigs 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Ahoy, I've recently submitted the charon package[1], but I've renamed it to charon-flow[2]. Would somebody be so kind as to remove the former? Thanks in advance. Greetings, Eric [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57661 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57828 -- Umlauts? This. Is. QUERTY!

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD with depending _pkgver
by Maximilian Bräutigam 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hi all, recently, I wrote an ebuild where pkgver=2.4.2 but in the download link a 242 is needed. Thus, I decided to avoid any redundancy and to write _pkgver="${pkgver//\./}". The PKGBUILD is working fine but aur.archlinux.org is expanding the download link to "2.4.2//\./}". Is there a way to avoid both the redundancy and the wrong interpretation at aur.archlinux.org? This is the package we are talking about: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230 Kind regards, Max

4 5

[aur-general] I would like to maintain mint-x-icons
by Carl George 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, I would like to become the maintainer for mint-x-icons in the AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42041 The package has been out of date for almost three months. I have contacted the current maintainer, Ryan Peters, and he is ok with me adopting it. I have a new PKGBUILD ready to submit for the current version of the package. What do we need to do to complete this? Thanks, Carl

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. dreisner - 6 signoffs 3. thomas - 5 signoffs 4. ibiru - 5 signoffs 5. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [merge-request] sabnzbd-bzr to sabnzbd-git
by Lucky 21 Mar '12

21 Mar '12

Hello, please merge the following packages, because developers switch to git. sabnzbd-bzr [1] to sabnzbd-git [2] [1] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38771> [2] <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51772>

2 1

[aur-general] [libccfits] removal
by Nico Nell 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, I've started maintaining ccfits (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4439) and found that there is a duplicate orphaned package called "libccfits" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38912) that should probably be removed. Thanks, ~Nick

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 4. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request
by Schala Zeal 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

I'd like to merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56848 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57782 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56849 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57783 It seems this project renamed itself

2 1

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Thanks Xiao-Long. I'll keep the `-dd` option in mind next time I encounter this problem. On the note of leaving a comment on AUR page - how do you even register an account there? Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > Yeah, that would be a problem in the packages then. There shouldn't be > circular dependencies. Maybe you can leave a comment on AUR page about this. > > You don't necessarily need to alter the PKGBUILD's. If you add '-dd' to > the pacman command arguments, it will ignore dependency issues, like > 'pacman -Udd nvidia-bumblebee-295.20-1.pkg.tar.xz'. The dependency loop > only lasts until both packages are installed anyway. > > Regards, > Xiao-Long Chen > > ------------------------------ > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:32:36 +1000 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > To: chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com; aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > > Hello, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: > > loading packages... > resolving dependencies... > looking for inter-conflicts... > error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) > :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 > > So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the > update has: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") > > which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at > 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: > > depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") > > Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly > clean. > > Cheers, > Xav > > > > 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav > > >

1 0

Re: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 20 Mar '12

20 Mar '12

Hello, Thanks for the suggestion. I've tried it, and I got: loading packages... resolving dependencies... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) :: nvidia-bumblebee: requires nvidia-utils-bumblebee=290.10 So I thought, all right, I'll update nvidia-bumblebee. However, the update has: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=${pkgver}") which fails the installation because my nvidia-utils-bumblebee is still at 290.xx. I hacked the PKGBUILD to be able to install it: depends=('linux' "nvidia-utils-bumblebee>=290.00") Otherwise it would raise an inter-conflict and fail. This isn't exactly clean. Cheers, Xav 2012/3/20 小龙陈 <chillermillerlong(a)hotmail.com> > The new xorg-server conflicts with nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) <= version > 290.10. > The current version of nvidia-utils(-bumblebee) is 295.20. Just install > the new > version from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50025 > > Hope this helps! > Xiao-Long Chen > > > From: contact(a)xavierho.com > > Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:46:25 +1000 > > To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org > > Subject: [aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in > conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > > Hello all, > > > > With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full > > system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. > > > > resolving dependencies... > > warning: dependency cycle detected: > > warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency > > looking for inter-conflicts... > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-uti ls-bumblebee are in conflict > (nvidia-utils). > > > Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] > > error: unresolvable package conflicts detected > > error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) > > :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict > > (nvidia-utils<=290.10) > > > > I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to > > utilise my discrete graphics hardware. > > > > The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem > > before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: > > > > Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > > > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > > > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > > > Need fix > > > > > > > > > > > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > > > Just rebuild the package manually. > > > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 > > > > > > How could I go around or fix this problem? > > > > Cheers, > > Xav >

1 0

[aur-general] xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10)
by Xavier Ho 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hello all, With the recent repo update for libgl, I wasn't able to perform a full system upgrade (pacman -Syu) without uninstalling nvidia-utils-bumblebee. resolving dependencies... warning: dependency cycle detected: warning: udev will be installed before its util-linux dependency looking for inter-conflicts... :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils). Remove nvidia-utils-bumblebee? [y/N] error: unresolvable package conflicts detected error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies) :: xorg-server and nvidia-utils-bumblebee are in conflict (nvidia-utils<=290.10) I'm using a Acer 1215N EeePC, which requires the bumblebee project to utilise my discrete graphics hardware. The comments on nvidia-utils-bumblebee suggests that this was a problem before, but I've only encountered it now with the updates last week: Comment by: der_fenix on Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:15 +0000 > New xorg-server in testing availible. Got conflict > nvidia-utils-bumblebee and xorg-server conflicts (nvidia-utils=290.10) > Need fix > > Comment by: Svenstaro on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:26:31 +0000 > Just rebuild the package manually. > First Submitted: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:55:37 +0000 How could I go around or fix this problem? Cheers, Xav

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request exaile-beta
by J. W. Birdsong 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

I personaly see no reason to keep it around but if y'all feel differently feel free to leave it as an orphan. Thanks JB 1) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26257 2) https://launchpad.net/exaile/+download

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: gnustep-theme-gnome-svn
by spider-mario 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

GNUstep’s GNOME theme is now called “GTK”, so gnustep-theme-gnome-svn has been replaced by gnustep-theme-gtk-svn and should thus be removed from the AUR. > r34756 | gcasa | 2012-02-15 21:37:30 +0100 (mer. 15 févr. 2012) | 2 lignes > Rename GnomeTheme to GtkTheme which is more appropriate.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by speps 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, prpltwtr [1] is strongly outdated, the current maintainer seems to be inactive. I sent him a mail on the 9Th March. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35325 - speps -

2 1

[aur-general] Merge / deletion requests
by Simon Sapin 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, Please remove 'python2-weasyprint' and 'python-weasyprint' or merge them into 'weasyprint'. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57201 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57205 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57621 The later installs for both Python 2 and 3. I think that a single package is less confusing, and it avoids the conflict in /usr/bin WeasyPrint can be used from the command line or as a Python library. Unlike pip for example, users of the command-line executable do not care which version of Python is used, so having multiple versioned executables in /usr/bin/ is not useful. As a library however, users will want one Python version or the other. Do you have suggestion for packaging in such cases? Also, please remove python3-decorator. python-decorator (for python 3) and python2-decorator are now both in "community". https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57204 Regards, -- Simon Sapin

2 13

[aur-general] [community] Up for adoption: cairo-compmgr, gadmin-samba
by Florian Pritz 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

Hi, I'll drop those to the AUR unless someone adopts them in the next few days: - gadmin-samba: upstream website and ftp server are down - cairo-compmgr: upstream is pretty dead (hardly any commits in git nor recent releases) and it doesn't build right now because -ldl is missing from $(LIBS). -- Florian Pritz

3 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Mar '12

19 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 4 signoffs 2. lfleischer - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: kobby, libqinfinity
by Aaron DeVore 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

I just talked with the author of Kobby and libqinfinity, Greg Haynes. He has completely killed off both projects, so the AUR packages should be deleted. -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alessio Sergi 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: youtube2mp3-{128,192,256,320}-bitrate [1][2][3][4] 'cause they were uploaded by mistake. Thanks in advance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57706 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57707 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57708 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57709 -- Alessio Sergi

2 1

[aur-general] Request for merge
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

Please merge [1]xf86-input-synaptics-clickpad to [2]xf86-input-synaptics-led. The -led is just a new clone of my -clickpad version (People why do you steal my PKGBUILDs?). The naming is better considering future when version 1.6 of synaptics driver gets released with clickpad support in the mainline. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38120 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57575

2 1

[aur-general] remove request [celtx-bin64]
by member graysky 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

I adopted the 'celtx-bin' package and updated it to the latest version as well as enhanced the support to cover both i686 and x86_64. There is also a package called celtx-bin64 which is now redundant. The maintainer of this package agrees that we should remove it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46977

2 1

[aur-general] please merge/delete
by Daniel Wallace 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

this is a new package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57714 andoidscreencast I just had the maintainer disown it and I fixed it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57719 androidscreencast-git thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Mar '12

18 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community
by Stefan Husmann 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Am 12.03.2012 21:20, schrieb Aaron Griffin: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kaspar Bumke<kaspar.bumke(a)gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM > Subject: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community > To: aaron(a)archlinux.org > > > Hi, > > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? > > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages are currently > orphans in community. Additionally, avr-gcc is flagged out of date. I > work with AVRs on Arch Linux and would be willing to take over > maintaining these packages. > > I have been using Arch for over two years now and you can have a look > at my small contributions to the AUR and Wiki: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=kasbah > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kasbah > > I would be delighted to be able to contribute more by maintaining > these packages and would be willing to put the time in to learn what I > need to be a maintainer. I can see that Jelle van der Waa is currently > maintainer on avrdude and avr-libc and if he/she is willing to adopt > these packages they may be a better maintainer than me. > > Kind Regards, > > Kaspar > I think, aur-general is the more appropiate list for [community]-packages.

1 0

[aur-general] [ike.devolder@gmail.com: Re: Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671]
by Martti Kühne 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

----- Forwarded message from Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 09:53:50 +0100 From: Ike Devolder <ike.devolder(a)gmail.com> To: aur-general(a)archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] Deletion/merge request - xf86-video-sis671 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120217 Thunderbird/10.0.2 Op 17-03-12 05:44, alexander.r(a)gmx.com schreef: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:12:52PM +1100, alexander.r(a)gmx.com wrote: >> Package xf86-video-sis671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34256) is outdated, broken >> and lacks some features that xf86-sis-m671 >> (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47620) have (support for >> 1366x768 resolution and others). Anyway it is just feature-lacking >> version of xf86-video-sisimedia in [community] and therefore should be >> removed and have it's votes merged into xf86-sis-m671 to preserve votes >> of sis761 chipset owners in AUR. >> -- >> My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR > ---end quoted text--- > > Am I ignored O_o ? Anyway sorry and please forget about previous message; better > disown xf86-sis-m671 (it was said to be useless and marked as outdated long ago) > and merge it into xf86-video-sis671, which I just updated. no you are not ignored but you are not the maintainer of xf86-sis-m671 so if you get hellnest to confirm the merge here we can do that -- Ike ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

[aur-general] Delete rEFIt package
by Keshav P R 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Hi, rEFIt[1] has not been updated in over two years by upstream, does not build under linux (any distro) as of now, and is orphaned. I have uploaded refind-x86_64[2] which is a fork of rEFIt. It currently builds under linux and contains bugfixes. Please delete the rEFIt package. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14837 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57632

2 3

[aur-general] Please merge/delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu
by Kevin Vesga 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

Please delete cairo-xcb-ubuntu [1] as the maintainer has made a new package cairo-ubuntu-xcb [2]. Or you can merge them I suppose. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44663 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52780

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Mar '12

17 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 9 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. eric - 2 signoffs 5. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: python3-lxml
by Tim Koopman 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

The package is available in community as python-lxml. Tim

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: zathura-girara-git and zathura-git
by karnath 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please, merge votes of zathura-girara-git [1] with zathura-git [2] and delete zathura-girara-git [2] since girara branch is now main development branch and is used in zathura-git. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48569 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30285 -- E-Mail : karnathtorjian(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by ianux 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please delete fortune-classe-americaine https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52043 which is duplicate of fortune-classe-americaine-fr And ices https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2035 which is duplicate of ices0 Thank you -- radio ianux - http://ianux.fr/

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Please remove [1]voikko-openoffice as it isn't needed anymore as I assume everyone has already changed to libreoffice. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44143

2 1

[aur-general] kdebindings-python provides bindings for Python 3.x
by Andrea Scarpino 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi all, I updated kdebindings-python to provides bindings for Python 3.x. Many projects still use python 2.x so, we'll keep a new kdebindings-python2 package in our repo. We already rebuilt our packages, please maintainers update your packages on AUR. >From now on, /usr/bin/pykdeuic4 will refer to the python3 version. /usr/bin/python2-pykdeuic4 will refer to the python2 version. Also, all examples and sip files, for the Python2 version, are stored respectively in /usr/share/apps/pykde4/python2-examples and /usr/share/sip/python2-PyKDE4 Thanks. -- Andrea

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. dan - 6 signoffs 3. ibiru - 3 signoffs 4. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 5. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Simon Perry 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

Hi, Please remove perl-javascript as it no longer builds with xulrunner 11.0, and a fix from upstream is very unlikely. Also, I've recently discovered that the same functionality is provided by perl-javascript-spidermonkey which builds / works fine. Cheers. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45852 -- Simon Perry (aka Pezz)

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion / Merge Request: {firefox, thunderbird}-firetray-svn
by Alexandre Ferrando 16 Mar '12

16 Mar '12

I've been maintaining for a few months the svn version of a thunderbird and firefox extension which are now broken and will not be fixed. Could the packages be deleted and their votes merged with their new git versions that do work? firefox-firetray: svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55256 git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57655 thunderbird-firetray svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45910 git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57653 Thank you in advance

2 1

[aur-general] astrolog package errors
by Jude DaShiell 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

The source file astrolog.dat is not one to delete from the build of the astrolog package. At a minimum it ought to go into /usr/share/astrolog since it is a configuration file the installed astrolog package will use if it finds it in the right place. The default for astrolog is to look for astrolog.dat in the astrolog directory right under the user's home directory. By default the ephemeris files also go into that astrolog directory as well. I think I can write myself an astrolog setup script which would do these things after a successful installation. The ephemeris files are in ephemall.zip and by default astrolog will use them if they're found. It's possible to edit astrolog.h and change some or all of these defaults but untouched that's where things go. For myself, I'd store charts in /home/jude/astrolog/charts so that requires at least one edit before building when I build it on slackware. The ultimate value of astrolog.dat is that it provides a user with a correct starting template to use for configuration. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Jude <jdashiel-at-shellworld-dot-net> <http://www.shellworld.net/~jdashiel/nj.html>

2 1

Re: [aur-general] AUR Email
by hector acosta 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

> are you sure you want to remove your account connected to this emailaddress Probably, can you first tell me the account? --Héctor Acosta

2 1

[aur-general] AUR email
by hector acosta 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

I want to change the email for the account hacosta to this one, but I can't do it because it's already assigned to another account (it was probably me). Can I get this changed? --Héctor Acosta

2 1

[aur-general] Merge/delete request: renpy & renpy64 -> renpy-bin
by alexander.r＠gmx.com 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Please merge votes and comments of renpy & renpy64 packages (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23983 and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36311) into renpy-bin (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57622) and delete renpy64 so I can create source-based renpy package from scratch. -- My AUR packages - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=AlexanderR

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] kernel26-grsecurity
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi, I think that kernel26-grsecurity [1] should be deleted because a) It's outdated. b) Unmaintained. c) There is new grsecurity kernel - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56674 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26652 Regards, kfgz

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal/merge request
by Christos Nouskas 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Package kernel26-pf [0] was obsoleted by linux-pf [1] but kept in the AUR because compressed hibernation failed with the latter. The issue is now resolved, so please merge comments/votes of kernel26-pf into linux-pf and remove kernel26-pf (I maintain both of them). Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40191 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50956

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * python-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) * python-docutils-0.8.1-1 (any) * python2-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (5 total) == * python-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * directfb-1.5.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * qingy-1.0.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-docutils-0.8.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-sphinx-1.1.2-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 5 signoffs 2. eric - 5 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs 4. pierre - 1 signoffs 5. bluewind - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] TU Application - György Balló - results
by Alexander Rødseth 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi everyone, The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm pleased to welcome him as a new TU. The results are: yes: 18 no: 1 abstain: 3 total: 22 (quorum has been met) Instructions for new TUs are available at our wiki and I'll also provide him with additional info (including our secret code to the suitcase with the red button). -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

7 6

[aur-general] Deletion request: uim-svn
by noonov 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

Hi, I've disowned uim-svn[1], as the project switched svn to git. Please delete it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14858 Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] New Package: ttytter beta
by Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. 15 Mar '12

15 Mar '12

The most awesome cli twitter client now has a public beta[1] and being a big fan of it, I thought that it would be a good idea to have a package for it. It actually doesn't conflict at all with the original package so I didn't fill that. The AUR package url is here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57612 As always, any feedback (specially regarding the way I decided the "pkgver" variable) would be appreciated :) [1] http://www.floodgap.com/software/ttytter/beta/ Warm regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://www.glatelier.org/ <http://www.mozillachile.org/> http://about.me/pablox/ <http://friendfeed.com/pablox/> http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request crossover-pro, crossover-games, crossover-standard
by Roland 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

The packages crossover-pro, crossover-games and crossover-standard are replaced by the new crossover package. Please delete them: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16777 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14187 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22027

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request
by Jonathan Arnold 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Could you merge python-sleekxmpp into my new, more correctly named, package python-sleekxmpp-git ? python-sleekxmpp : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34449 python-sleekxmpp-git : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57589 Thanks to mtorromeo for the input and sorry for th delay. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

3 2

[aur-general] Dropping package ownership
by Jakub Viták 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi. I have dropped ownership of several packages. Could you please remove following from AUR: system/depository devel/gof-git modules/ipwireless_cs lib/libaio-oracle devel/pluf-aa-git And please, adopt rest if possible: lib/authpgsql network/check_multi devel/ditz-commander network/indefero-git network/gozerbot network/nagiosql network/nconf multimedia/nokinux x11/obpager devel/simpletest devel/pluf-git devel/indefero-git Thank you in advance. Regards, Jakub V.

3 2

[aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder - results
by Stéphane Gaudreault 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi TUs, The voting period for Ike Devolder has ended. Please welcome Ike as a TU :) The results are: Yes : 18 No : 1 Abstain : 2 Total : 21 (Quorum has been met) Ike, please follow these steps [1]. Cheers, Stéphane [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/New_Trusted_User_Checklist#TODO_list_f…

13 13

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. tomegun - 5 signoffs 3. stephane - 4 signoffs 4. ibiru - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion requests
by Xavier D. 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Ola, Could you delete the following packages as they are all redundant, outdated (and IMHO there is no reason to call them *-8layertech) * appkonference-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29082 * asterisk-core-sounds-en-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28471 * asterisk-extra-sounds-en-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28472 * asterisk16-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26282 * asterisk16-addons-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26305 * asterisk16-g72x-codecs-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26307 * dahdi-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26254 * dahdi-atcom-ax1600p-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28628 * dahdi-tools-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26255 * iaxmodem-8layertech: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26754 Could you also delete: * asterisk-sounds (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10224) as it's now possible to install them from the asterisk package (1.8 & 10), it exists a package for 1.6 so it's not a problem * libresample-asterisk (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27165) as it's outdated and redundant with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22727 Thanks in advance

3 2

[aur-general] Delete grub-ext
by Keshav P R 14 Mar '12

14 Mar '12

Hi, grub-ext[1] was uploaded by "elamskoy" as a temp workaround for some issue(s) in grub-gfx[2] package, but that person has since taken over grub-gfx and orphaned grub-ext. Please delete grub-ext. Regards. Keshav [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53974 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416

2 1

[aur-general] Package removal request: python2-decorator
by Maxime Gauduin 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Could you please delete python2-decorator from AUR. I uploaded a PKGBUILD while trying to fix firewalld and didn't check the official repo before. Turns out it was already in there. BTW, there's also a python3-decorator in AUR, which would be a duplicate of python-decorator in the official repo. Thx in advance, I'm really sorry for the trouble. -- Alucryd

2 2

[aur-general] merge request synaptics-xrandr
by Kaspar Bumke 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Could we merge the package (synaptics-xrandr) I am currently mainting: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24727 into (xf86-input-synaptics-xrandr): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34369 I think the second name is more appropriate as it is closer to the unpatched package in extra and would be happy for mine to be merged into that. Regards, Kaspar

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Fwd: willing to adopt avr-* packages in community
by Jakob Gruber 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

On 03/12/2012 09:20 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kaspar Bumke <kaspar.bumke(a)gmail.com> > ... > Could you forward to arch-dev-public at your discretion please? [community] matters are usually discussed on aur-general. > I saw that that the avr-gcc and avr-binutils packages are currently > orphans in community. Additionally, avr-gcc is flagged out of date. I > work with AVRs on Arch Linux and would be willing to take over > maintaining these packages. I've adopted avr-gcc and avr-binutils. If you become a TU, I'd be happy to transfer them to your maintainership. The same goes for Jelle of course, if he is interested in them. Jakob

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by YUP 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

Hi, Please delete my package usbip-svn. There is no sense to maintain this package since usbip drivers are already in kernel. >From README: The drivers were already in the kernel tree since version 2.6.28. The userspace tools have been moved on 20110520." Thanks. Yarema (Knedlyk)

2 1

[aur-general] Could you adopt qemu-git on AUR
by Daniel Lin 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

*Hi, Peter,* * * *https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30298 * *I found the maintainer is no longer update. * *Maybe its time to ask AUR maintainer to disown the package to you.*

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Mar '12

13 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 9 signoffs 2. allan - 6 signoffs 3. bisson - 3 signoffs 4. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Moving libmatio from community to AUR
by Laurent Carlier 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

This package is orphaned, unsigned, doesn't build anymore, and is not a dependency from a community package. So i want to move it to AUR https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/libmatio/

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Please remove instant-fenics package
by Evangelos Foutras 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

On 12/03/12 14:23, Myles English wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:44:07 +0300, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 24 April 2011 23:53, myles <mylesenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> I have been maintaining 'instant-fenics' but now that 'instant' has been >>> orphaned and I have adopted it and updated it, 'instant-fenics' is no longer >>> required: please could someone remove it? >> >> Removed, thanks. > > Evangelos, > > Sorry, I resurrected it again by mistake, please could you deleted it > again? > > Thanks, > > Myles Zombie package has been put down, thanks!

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Mar '12

12 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request: archcfg
by goran vucelic 11 Mar '12

11 Mar '12

Request to delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57414 Reason: Wrong name.

2 1

[aur-general] delete pkg
by Daniel Wallace 11 Mar '12

11 Mar '12

can someone please delete this https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57498 I uploaded it with out changing the package name first, Thank you

3 2

[aur-general] [merge?] List of vcs-duplicates
by Anton Larionov 11 Mar '12

11 Mar '12

All packages that match "${NAME}-{bzr,cvs,darcs,git,hg,svn}" with similar $NAME. http://p.blicky.net/avj2n Warning: I haven't tested any of these packages personally. -- Regards, Anton Larionov

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Mar '12

11 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * cdemu-daemon-1.5.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by trya 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

libxft-lcd[1] and lib32-libxft-lcd[2] are useless now, since upstream integrated the subpixel filter for LCD displays. Please can you delete them? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37044 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22091

2 1

[aur-general] Remove requests
by Schala Zeal 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Well, unfortunately this time one simple typo I overlooked caused a new package to be generated in the AUR. Please remove it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57479 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPWyvGAAoJEIf0CO8u1kdBmiEIAIr3vWKSqOXCpNsVu54znEWl KYSpQU74RFRam1Lp9Ho+Z1S0HsUvp0MZFlGUEP+3h0zivPs0CsgoCyPYvTK9JeMs iZ37rKPkwBaEgs0ds6HJqf3cOPRHKWlDOZuEZ3aObF5WJdpLgv5Kmb6ZmXHQonmv ghhxzpoSYqRjM/sE8SS172gmW9mL6okZqSNa1PZkhEuxlknzgDqtOkamG4cxe9/+ 72F443LXIYK4bx+RVeLpQrsXXN6nuSGd5Wp38u4XFxbvNp8IeIVtlgZin96qiwDP 97yvvMTNIp4pcoqRYmvFpgwgoZ7Xj7kIFQQH0gZJ9Ywrvvnbna8ELeU3lphlqTE= =CSo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 5

[aur-general] php-gtk out of date
by Jonathan Arnold 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

The php-gtk package is out of date and has an invalid optdepend in gtksourceview. It was flagged in Aug of 2011 but still hasn't been updated: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20658 Not sure what the next step is. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: biew in AUR is duplicated with beye in community.
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

[biew]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11625

2 1

[aur-general] merge freedroidrpg-svn into freedroidrpg-git
by Matthias Krüger 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hi, can someone please merge the votes and comments of freedroidrpg-svn into freedroidrpg-git (freedroidrpg-svn won't be needed any more, can get removed after merge)? freedroidrpg-svn: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30257 freedroidrpg-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57483 Regards and thanks, Matthias

2 1

[aur-general] AUR VCS and alias cleanups
by Lukas Fleischer 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hi, everyone! I thought of doing another VCS/alias package cleanup... Given that there's a pretty huge amount of packages, we should probably look for a better way to coordinate this: $ aurdupes -V | wc -l 260 $ aurdupes -A | wc -l 96 Maybe we could create another "AUR cleanup" wiki page? I noticed there's a "AUR Cleanup Day/2012" page already but this is kinda different. The main idea is: 1. Create two sections "VCS dupes" and "Alias packages". 2. Add the outputs of `aurdupes -V` and `aurdupes -A`. 3. Double-check dupes and mark them as "remove"/"false "positive". 4. TUs delete packages marked as "remove" and remove them from the list. Steps 2 to 4 can be repeated as often as needs be. Maybe we could even add packages marked as "false positive" to a whitelist, so that aurdupes won't list these anymore (I can implement this feature in aurdupes). Any thoughts? Any other suggestions? Cheers, Lukas

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 2 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. allan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Schala Zeal 10 Mar '12

10 Mar '12

Hi, I unfortunately had some criticism from a former package maintainer about the naming of my Lazarus packages that I would have to agree with. If it's not too much trouble I'd like to merge the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57393 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57460 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57383 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57461 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57384 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57462 Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Merge requests
by Schala Zeal 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

Due to a road block in my maintenance of the Free Pascal cross compiler packages, I've had to resort to splitting each package in two. Everything has been resolved now and I'd like to request merging the following packages. I do apologise for my frequent requests lately, but now that I have this under control, I hope to leave you guys alone for a while after this Please merge the following, as these packages no longer should indicate providing a compiler, but rather a runtime now: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57339 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57378 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57341 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57379 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57310 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57380 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57311 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57382 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57335 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57383 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57313 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57384 Again, I apologise for the frequent removal requests.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs 2. dreisner - 1 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 1.9.1
by Lukas Fleischer 09 Mar '12

09 Mar '12

The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 1.9.1. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2012-March/001966.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0

[aur-general] Package merging
by Jagmjp Janpgm 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55087 into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57365 as 0ad stable is in [community] now. Thanks.

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Mar '12

08 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 4 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-02-23 * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-02-23 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 6 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package renamig request
by Jagmjp Janpgm 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

Could you rename https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55087 to 0ad-svn-bin since the stable version is in [community] now, and there is no need for stable version in AUR?

2 1

[aur-general] TU Application - Balló György - voting period
by Alexander Rødseth 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

Dear TUs, The discussion period for Balló György is over and the voting period starts now. -- Best regards, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

2 2

[aur-general] community/python-markdown and community/python2-markdown
by Simon Legner 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

Hi, why do we have python-markdown 2.1.1-2 as well as python2-markdown 2.1.1-2 in community? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=markdown http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python-markdown/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-markdown/ Cheers Simon PS: Please CC responses.

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: x86_64-darwin-binutils
by Schala Zeal 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

Unfortunately I found out after submission that a vital component (the assembler) isn't cross-compilable. Additionally the real binutils, odcctools, seems out of date wherever it's available. I've therefore decided to request this be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57342

2 1

[aur-general] lib32-openssl
by Taylor Lookabaugh 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

May [1] package be deleted and merge the votes and comments over to [2]? The reason is that [2] compiles straight from the source. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37007 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40573 Thanks, Taylor Lookabaugh

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request: lazarus-crossw32
by Schala Zeal 07 Mar '12

07 Mar '12

I would like to request removal of the following package, as I haveadopted and since renamed it to lazarus-cross-i386-win32 to follow the convention of my other FPC package names https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51275

2 1

[aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder - voting period
by Stéphane Gaudreault 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

Dear TUs, Judgement period has come for Ike Devolder. Please vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=54 As discussed previously, I will not participate in the vote. Cheers Stéphane

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: fpc-crossw32 (uploading under new name)
by Schala Zeal 06 Mar '12

06 Mar '12

I'd like to request the following package be removed. I'm reuploading it under a new name because I'm going to be submitting a few other cross compiler packages and would like to have a naming convention amongst the packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25123

2 1

[aur-general] TU Application - Ike Devolder
by Ike Devolder 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Hi, Currently I'm using Archlinux as my primary operating system for over 6 years and for several years I'm maintaining a small number of packages in AUR[1]. I also keep a repository with arch packages for everyone to use[2] and view the pkgbuilds on github[3]. Originally the repository got created so i could easily install some non-{core,extra,community}-packages on my different computers. Some personal stuff: born 1982, webdeveloper (php, with some jquery tricks), mad about all sorts of metal music, and loving to watch movies and sitcoms. I live in Belgium so I should speak at least Dutch, French and German but i speak and write Dutch, English, bad French, very bad German. I would like to become a TU for several reasons: - bring in some packages from AUR to community - apper (kde packagekit frontend, the gnome/gtk ones are already in) - lcdproc (drive your lcd displays) - closure-{compiler,linter} (googles javascript toys) - vim-qt (or provide a patch for addition to the extra package) as reference, some packages i was maintaining in AUR were already picked up - clementine (picked up by Stéphane Gaudreault) - par2cmdline (picked up by Sébastien Luttringer) - pick up some orphans from community - v8 (this is the only one from the list i'm currently using) - usualy i'm reading most of the issues reported so i could help sorting the "tickets" and assign them to their respective owners Last but not least, my sponsor is Stéphane Gaudreault. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&L=2&K=BlackIkeEagle [2] http://repo.herecura.be [3] https://github.com/BlackIkeEagle/herecura -- Ike

14 38

[aur-general] [merge] gpick-svn
by Anton Larionov 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Please, merge gpick-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24856) into gpick-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54174) -- Regards, Anton Larionov

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 60 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (60 total) == * blender-3:2.62-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.8-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.20.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-0.8-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.4.25-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * smc-1.9-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.86.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.141-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-3:2.62-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.20.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-0.8-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.4.25-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * smc-1.9-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.86.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.141-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 7 signoffs 2. dreisner - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests: mingw32-openssl-devel and mingw32-libtiff-devel
by Schala Zeal 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

I would like to request mingw32-libtiff-devel and mingw32-openssl-devel be removed. Development versions of libtiff and openssl aren't in demand at all for production environments and as such, I would rather focus maintaining stable releases. Thank you.

2 2

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages
by Lukáš Jirkovský 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

> * If a TU wants to maintain an orphan that is currently in [extra], > please let us know. I can maintain following packages in [community] if no-one else takes them, but I would prefer if some of the devs was interested in them so they can stay in [extra]. I think these packages deserve place in [extra], as they are reasonably wide-spread. * laptop-mode-tools * krusader * enblend-enfuse * hugin * gimp-refocus BTW: I see autopano-sift-c is orphaned too. I can assure you it is mostly forgotten, because it has been replaced by a better and patent free control points detector which is bundled with hugin. I vote for dropping it to AUR. Lukas

2 2

[aur-general] delete/merge squeezeboxserver
by Daniel Wallace 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31569 this package is horribly written and it has actually been succeeded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53691 <-- this Thanks

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-dev-public] Cleaning up orphaned packages
by Alexander Rødseth 05 Mar '12

05 Mar '12

Hi, >From [extra], I'm interested in adopting: acpi allegro eclipse-cdt fltk-docs midori orage pwgen tightvnc Also, I think that all Haskell-related packages that are orphans or flagged should be downgraded to [community]. I just checked, and only Vesa Kaihlavirta and Thomas Dziedzic maintain Haskell-related packages in [core] and [extra]. 70.6% of all Haskell-related packages are currently flagged as out of date. [1] Provided this isn't done intentionally, I think it would be good to make use of the available maintainer-power in [community] and unsupported. In general, I'm all for moving packages that are orphans, few or no packages depend on or just isn't that relevant anymore. Like "boo". -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth Arch Linux Trusted User (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

3 4

[aur-general] Remove request
by Piotr Rogoża 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hello Please remove my package prename: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54715 There is community/perl-rename doing the and even better. Thanks in advance. -- Best regards Piotr Rogoża

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: vim-c
by Piotr Rogoża 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hello Please disown vim-c. The package is out of date and email of author is broken: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.1.1 <captainhaggy at mail.i2p>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table (in reply to RCPT TO command) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27780 -- Best regards Piotr Rogoża

2 1

[aur-general] TU inactivity
by Chris Brannon 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hello, I'm going away for a job interview. I'll be gone from now until March 8. -- Chris

1 0

[aur-general] package deletion request
by scj＠archlinux.us 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

I would like to request the removal of the package retro-fossil [1], as the project has switched DVCS and is superceded by retro-bzr [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45134 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57263

2 1

[aur-general] Inactive for a bit.
by Peter Lewis 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hi all, I'm going to be inactive for a bit, I'm afraid. I'm travelling for work this week, and then moving house. Not sure how quickly I'll get Internet set up at the new place. If anyone could update choqok, then that would be great - it should be a straightforward version bump. I'm not aware of anything else impending that needs doing. Cheers, Pete.

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 27 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 60 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (27 total) == * blender-3:2.62-2 (x86_64) * cclive-0.7.8-3 (x86_64) * encfs-1.7.4-7 (x86_64) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (x86_64) * frogatto-1.2-3 (x86_64) * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (x86_64) * glom-1.20.4-1 (x86_64) * gnash-0.8.10-2 (x86_64) * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (x86_64) * luxrender-0.8-13 (x86_64) * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (x86_64) * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (x86_64) * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (x86_64) * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (x86_64) * performous-0.6.1-13 (x86_64) * pingus-0.7.6-3 (x86_64) * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (x86_64) * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (x86_64) * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (x86_64) * schroot-1.4.25-1 (x86_64) * smc-1.9-15 (x86_64) * spring-0.86.0-2 (x86_64) * springlobby-0.141-2 (x86_64) * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (x86_64) * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (x86_64) * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (x86_64) * wt-3.2.0-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (60 total) == * blender-3:2.62-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.8-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.20.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-0.8-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.4.25-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * smc-1.9-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.86.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.141-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-3:2.62-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.20.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-0.8-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.4.25-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * smc-1.9-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.86.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.141-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.2.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. stephane - 4 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. allan - 1 signoffs 5. td123 - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request
by rafael ff1 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

lib32-libnl [1] is out-of-date for some time now and fails to build. Sent email to the maintainer, but he didn't replay. By the way, all his packages are out-of-date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36007 Please disown lib32-libnl. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] TU Application - György Balló
by Balló György 04 Mar '12

04 Mar '12

Hello everybody, I'm applying to be a Trusted User. I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my main system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for one year. In my free time I like surfing on the net, contributing to OpenStreetMap, bicycling, hiking, take photos about trams, and of course, packaging. I really like Arch Linux's transparency, the pacman and the build system, the website and the great wiki. I'm maintaining packages[1] a long time ago, and I already contributed to wiki by creating a page about libcanberra[2], and updated, extended some other articles. I reported many issues[3] with GNOME packages (including upstream and packaging bugs) to make Arch Linux better. I usually try to find the solution and send patch to upstream if needed before open bug reports. I helped to Ioni e.g. on updating some C# packages, and I also cooperated with AndyRTR on splitting out extensions from libreoffice package. I currently have 150 packages in AUR with a total of 5775 votes. I already maintain more than 200 packages as source packages on github[4] and as built i686 packages in my [ayatana] repo[5]. I don't want to move all of these packages to [community], only the popular ones. I always try to make the best packages and I hate poorly written PKGBUILDs. Some packages that I would like to add to [community]: - deja-dup (115 votes) - gwibber (299 votes) - pinta (186 votes) Some orphan packages in [community] that I could adopt: - agave - buoh My goal with becoming a TU is to provide more popular GTK+ applications in [community] and keep GNOME stable and consistent by fixing packages on large updates if needed. I hope that I could support Arch Linux as a TU in the next months and years. Alexander Rødseth is my sponsor. Best regards, György Balló My PGP key: https://raw.github.com/City-busz/Arch-Linux-Repository/master/ballogyor@gma… [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?SeB=m&K=City-busz [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Libcanberra [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=1&status[]=&opened=City-busz&d… [4] https://github.com/City-busz/Arch-Linux-Repository [5] http://ayatana.info/

20 52

[aur-general] Obsolete grub2-gfxmenu packages
by Final Crisis 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

The following aur packages I made some time ago have been obsolete and the source files non-existent for a very long time and should be removed: grub2-theme-aftermathblue, grub2-theme-archsphere, grub2-theme-distroballs, grub2-theme-elegantarch, grub2-theme-planeplant, grub2-theme-simplyblack, grub2-theme-ubuntuglow, grub2-gfxmenu-overlay, grub2-icons-circlestarts Thanks.

3 2

[aur-general] request for deletion
by Daniel Wallace 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

this package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55495 and this one https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20371 as they are both python2 and exist here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52696 and here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=57243 Thank you, Daniel

1 0

[aur-general] ghc 7.4.1 moved to extra
by Thomas Dziedzic 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

I have finally moved the new ghc to arch repos. With this cleanup comes a bit of change. The decision has been made that ghc will be updated to the latest stable version and haskell-platform will be moved to the aur. This means you should remove the haskell-platform related packages before updating. I will also keep only essential packages and their dependencies related to haskell in [extra]. For now this means cabal-install and ghc + their depends. I have closed the following bugs with this release: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23247 - [ghc 7.0.2] ghci -package ghc causes panic https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27132 - [ghc] re-enable the strip makepkg option https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18917 - [ghc] ghc.install :: test if directory exists https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/28758 - [haskell-text] uninstallable due to removal of haskell-deepseq https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25991 - haskell-glut: undefined references to pretty much all glut functions https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25072 - [alex][happy][cabal-install] missing makedepnds The following bugs are still open which I will fix as soon as cabal-install and darcs are buildable: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27249 - [cabal-install] Add bash completion support https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/26955 - [darcs] missing makedependence haskell-hashed-storage<0.6 There are still some issues left with the current situation of haskell on arch, but these will take time and communication with upstream. *I need to figure out what to do about haddock since ghc only packages the binary and thus provides only half the package with ghc. This is the reason why we packaged haskell-haddock even though the ghc package already provides the haddock binary. *The post-install messages related to haskell packages can get pretty long. There is a proposed solution with a patch, but I need to figure out if there is any way we can work it out with upstream first. *There is no cabal-install or darcs version that is marked as stable and currently builds with ghc 7.4.1 These packages are statically linked so it shouldn't matter for now. I will be keeping an eye on these packages and waiting for upstream to provide new stable versions that builds against the latest ghc. Cheers!

1 0

[aur-general] Duplication: gill-sans-font | ttf-gill-sans
by Simon Legner 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

Hi, the packages gill-sans-font and ttf-gill-sans provide the same font. It would make sense to delete one. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9843 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18570 Cheers Simon PS: Please CC responses.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Mar '12

03 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 28 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 75 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (28 total) == * blender-3:2.62-2 (i686) * cclive-0.7.8-3 (i686) * encfs-1.7.4-7 (i686) * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (i686) * frogatto-1.2-3 (i686) * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (i686) * glom-1.20.4-1 (i686) * gnash-0.8.10-2 (i686) * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (i686) * luxrender-0.8-13 (i686) * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (i686) * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (i686) * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (i686) * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (i686) * performous-0.6.1-13 (i686) * pingus-0.7.6-3 (i686) * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (i686) * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (i686) * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (i686) * schroot-1.4.25-1 (i686) * smc-1.9-15 (i686) * spring-0.86.0-2 (i686) * springlobby-0.141-2 (i686) * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (i686) * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (i686) * wt-3.2.0-3 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (75 total) == * blender-3:2.62-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.7.8-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * encfs-1.7.4-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fatrat-1.2.0_beta1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * frogatto-1.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glob2-0.9.4.4-11 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * glom-1.20.4-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gnash-0.8.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gpsdrive-2.11-12 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * luxrender-0.8-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mapnik-0.7.1-14 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.0.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ogre-1.8.0RC1-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-0.10.4-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * performous-0.6.1-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pingus-0.7.6-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pion-net-4.0.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pokerth-0.9.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * povray-3.7.0.RC4-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * schroot-1.4.25-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * smc-1.9-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * spring-0.86.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * springlobby-0.141-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tagpy-0.94.8-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * twinkle-1.4.2-15 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wesnoth-1.10.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.2.0-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmobar-0.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-0.10-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmobar-0.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-0.10-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 18 signoffs 2. dan - 8 signoffs 3. tomegun - 5 signoffs 4. seblu - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletion/Merge: batterymon
by Jarek Sedlacek 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

Package batterymon [1] is broken and will remain broken as long as arch kernels are built without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER. It can be replaced by batterymon-clone [2] which is a fork of the same project that gets battery information from /sys instead of /proc. Could batterymon be deleted and the votes merged? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24694 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52974 Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: batterymon-clone
by Jarek Sedlacek 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

Packagae batterymon-clone[1] is out of date and broken, and has been for a while. I tried to email the maintainer, monstermudder78, but the email he has listed ( casey(a)archlinux.us) doesn't exist. I see he doesn't maintain any other packages, so I'd assume he's inactive. Could this package be orphaned? I'd love to pick it up (and ideally have it replace the batterymon package, since the former is broken without a kernel built with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER, which the stock arch kernels aren't) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52974 Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] AUR helpers and AUR standards
by Oon-Ee Ng 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

Splitting off from the TU application thread that's becoming more of a discussion on the above:- My (user) perspective - when did being able/not to install packages from a helper (for example yaourt) become a benchmark for deciding how 'correct' a PKGBUILD is?

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 22 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 47 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (22 total) == * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (x86_64) * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (x86_64) * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (x86_64) * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (x86_64) * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (x86_64) * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (x86_64) * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (x86_64) * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (x86_64) * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (x86_64) * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (x86_64) * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (x86_64) * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (x86_64) * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (x86_64) * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) * xmobar-0.14-2 (x86_64) * xmonad-0.10-3 (x86_64) * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (47 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmobar-0.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-0.10-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.1.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmobar-0.14-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-0.10-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. ttopper - 9 signoffs 2. ronald - 5 signoffs 3. ibiru - 5 signoffs 4. stephane - 4 signoffs 5. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Abandonware: lgeneral-data
by Anton Bazhenov 02 Mar '12

02 Mar '12

Package 'lgeneral-data' [1] contains data files for the game LGeneral [2]. But these files are taken from the original game - Panzer General, the rights to which are now owned by Ubisoft. I could update the package and remove the link to the archive, but is it worth it? The user need to enter only one command to install data files (and I added an example to .install file in the package 'lgeneral'). So I think that 'lgeneral-data' can be deleted. [1] lgeneral-data - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44211 [2] lgeneral - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6112

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request: conky-google-calendar-bzr
by Ferdinando Romano 01 Mar '12

01 Mar '12

Request to delete conky-google-calendar-bzr [1]. Reason: Reason, it is out of date and orphaned and there is another, maintained version: conkygooglecalendar-bzr [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21973 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32212 -- Fred Romano

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Mar '12

01 Mar '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 21 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 25 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (21 total) == * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (i686) * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (i686) * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (i686) * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (i686) * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (i686) * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (i686) * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (i686) * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (i686) * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (i686) * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (i686) * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (i686) * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (i686) * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (i686) * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (i686) * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (i686) * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (i686) * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (i686) * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (i686) * xmobar-0.14-2 (i686) * xmonad-0.10-3 (i686) * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (25 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * gtk2hs-buildtools-0.12.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-binary-0.5.1.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-bytestring-show-0.3.5.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-cairo-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-dataenc-0.14.0.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-glib-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-gtk-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-haskeline-0.6.4.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-hslogger-1.1.5-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-pango-0.12.2-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-stm-2.2.0.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-syb-0.3.6-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-tar-0.4.0.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-terminfo-0.3.2.3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-utf8-string-0.3.7-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-1.5.0.1-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * haskell-x11-xft-0.3.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hedgewars-0.9.17-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmobar-0.14-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-0.10-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * xmonad-contrib-0.10-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletion: perltidy
by Jarek Sedlacek 01 Mar '12

01 Mar '12

Package perltidy in aur seems to be a duplicate of perl-tidy in community. It hasn't been updated since 2010, and in the comments on the AUR page the maintainer acknowledges it can go. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34248 Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request
by Uli Armbruster 29 Feb '12

29 Feb '12

Hi Just read the news, that the pirate bay won't provide torrent files anymore. So my package pbtorrent <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19014> won't work anymore. Please delete it! Merci beaucoup

2 1

[aur-general] please delete, thanks
by Daniel Wallace 29 Feb '12

29 Feb '12

Could someone please delete this for me? gomstream-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55293 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Feb '12

29 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 6 signoffs 2. bisson - 5 signoffs 3. dan - 4 signoffs 4. ibiru - 3 signoffs 5. stephane - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: 3to2-hg
by Jarek Sedlacek 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Can someone delete 3to2-hg? I maintain 3to2 as well as the latest version from mercurial, but since the project has stopped updating there is no point in maintaining the development version. Thanks, Jarek Sedlacek

2 1

[aur-general] disown pure 0.47
by Bjoern Lindig 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi everybody, at first I would like to say thank you. I'm with archlinux since quite some time now (I think it was 2009 when I moved over from debian), but I never had anything serious to ask on a list or the forum. Sometimes the guys from the IRC-Channels or the archaudios where helping out. All the rest I could solve on my own with the help of the docs and the archives in the forum. For me this shows how good arch works! Now, I would like to advertize archlinux in the pure community. For that I would like to update as many of the pure-packages as possible. Unfortunately the package of pure itself is unmaintained since quite a while. It is stuck with version 0.47 where the actual version of pure is 0.51. So it might be about half a year, that nobody took care of it: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22893 I wrote a mail to the maintainer 'sdiehl' yesterday and I asked him to disown the package so that I can update and maintain it. If this mail rests unanswered I'd ask somebody to disown it. With kind regards, Bjoern

3 4

[aur-general] Disown Request cellwriter
by Adonay Sanz Alsina 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

please disown the next package cellwriter https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12663 the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page, for at least a few weeks and, the package is outdated for a years. I can't send email, because isn't. It's flagged out-of-date cause not compile. I can mantain it. Thanks, Adonay

4 3

[aur-general] package deletion request: waf-svn
by François Boulogne 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi Could you delete python-waf-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48189 Reason, waf moved to git as announced in one comment. Thank you. Cheers, -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Disown Request Pidgin-Festival
by Adonay Sanz Alsina 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

please disown the next package Pidgin-Festival https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22970 the user dont respond any request, by message in aur page and email, for at least a few weeks and, the package is outdated for a weeks. I flagged out-of-date cause not compile. I can mantain it. Thanks, Adonay

4 3

[aur-general] Removal request - pygame2-py3
by Ольга 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Author of package pygame2-py3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39071) moved it to satisfy naming guidelines so it should be removed.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 3 signoffs 2. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR is doubling required by packages
by member graysky 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Browse to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50911 Here is what I show for required by package... why are some of these doubled? Required by broadcom-wl-ck broadcom-wl-ck lirc-ck lirc-ck nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-275xx-ck nvidia-beta-ck nvidia-ck nvidia-ck r8168-ck r8168-ck vhba-module-ck vhba-module-ck

3 2

[aur-general] Requesting removal: python-vatnumber
by Luis von Bernus 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Hi! python-vatnumber is Hopelessly outdated (0.5 while current is 1.0), orphaned and depends on python2, so I submitted it as python2-vatnumber for easier recognition Thanks! Luis

3 4

[aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]
by Thomas Dziedzic 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

I have released ruby 1.9.3_p125 into [extra]. This is a version bump (p0 -> p125) and all tests passed for me. Along with the update, I will be introducing the following new conventions as part of my ruby cleanup project. /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby is now the correct location where non-gem ruby libraries installed with pacman should go. If your package installs anything to /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby, you have to update to the new location. Site_ruby is only there for files installed specifically by the user without a package manager. A new file will be created at "/etc/gemrc" where I add --user-install as the default option for gem. This will install all gems by default to "$HOME/.gem/ruby". You will have to add the new bindir to your PATH if you decide to install gems that provide binaries. export PATH="$PATH:$(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem.user_dir')/bin" As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD. If you run sudo gem install foo, it will install to /root/.gem/ruby To install to the system-wide gems location (not recommended), you will have to either remove --user-install from /etc/gemrc or you will have to pass the --no-user-install flag when using gem as root. Cheers!

6 10

[aur-general] Delete request (viewnior-wp)
by nado＠troglodyte.be 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

Hi folks, Could you delete viewnior-wp (1), because wallpaper support is now enabled by default, thus, this package is outdated and is a clone of community/viewnior (2). 1 : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52709 2 : https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/viewnior/ -- Pazdera Corentin (Nado) Clé PGP/PGP key : http://troglodyte.be/pub/pubkey.pgp.asc

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 5 signoffs 2. ibiru - 5 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by rafael ff1 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

speex replaced SVN repo by GIT repo. Therefore, I uploaded speex-git to replace speex-svn. Please delete speex-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17012) Thanks, Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] Disownment request
by rafael ff1 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

portaudio-svn [1] has some issues with 'makedepends' and 'options'. I already requested the maintainer to fix the PKGBUILD, which was last updated back in May/2008. As can be seen below, I can't contact him because his email's domain doesn't exist. Please disown this package so I can adopt and fix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11397 Thanks, Rafael ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> Date: 2012/2/27 Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: rafael.f.f1(a)gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: rmbl(a)openspeak-project.org Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- <mail header snip> Hi there, You're the maintainer of portaudio-svn [1], right? I posted some comments in AUR interface, with suggestions for the PKGBUILD, but I'm not sure you received it. Can you please take a look? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11397 Thanks, Rafael

2 2

[aur-general] Removal request - garden-of-coloured-lights
by Ольга 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

Package garden-of-coloured-lights (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44913) should be removed as duplicate of garden (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22178) Last one is of the same version but have more dependencies, votes, more reliable name and more up-to-date link to website.

2 1

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: sqlplus11
by Jason St. John 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

sqlplus11[1] should be deleted because the submitter of the package basically admitted that sqlplus11 was a duplicate of instantclient-sqlplus[2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36198 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16724 Thanks! ______________________________________________ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lfleischer - 2 signoffs 2. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] ruby 1.9.3_p125-1 in [extra]
by eagletmt 26 Feb '12

26 Feb '12

> As a result of the above change, all ruby gem packages will have to > add a --no-user-install flag when running gem in the PKGBUILD. Most PKGBUILDs specify -i/--install-dir and -n/--bindir. So there is no need to add --no-user-install, isn't it?

2 2

[aur-general] Package Deletion Request: perl-shared
by Jason St. John 25 Feb '12

25 Feb '12

perl-shared[1] should be deleted because it is *very* out of date, has 0 votes, has been orphaned, and the official 'perl' package provides the same functionality[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25536 [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=… Thanks! ______________________________________________ Jason St. John Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Feb '12

25 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: vte-svn
by Jekyll Wu 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The upstream has moved to git[1], so this package[2] should be removed now. [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20846 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPR+NQAAoJEOemZ9znWXlAsAAQAJg/xmOQ0Fy8mDp8B+4308V4 JxhxhijnnuLchPftUZI8CLTr7i1LHxKzxPA69eU5U+pezBIzcO65RTjeo1oeaQmA +XmPeGW2Q1/xtjhxc/bJVYlRDLdO9E1G6Egb4f/qh+rouc2JZcjZKrnUdbth0wv1 ur1FKDx45A3uGzdovLk5N/64SBN8ebzQ/RpLhx3NPw7yavPZbJbyp2bWNMcI+uhH dbdvNNJD8J8LCAWBXLMulFmAQzaDcyzCy6yBQbdRmfARmvOtvi5dGUM3IUBGRbG5 bcqPUiUNlXSIvIMth7jpywDTPpUeVpvYHJMUuFdjgRRm85cZKmeYn8FwpnH5ClPz JZHXE7NyS7NV0P0ggDlmdhRinidmc1QSadxiAB7jG24/Erk0aVs0rQtxvShlFHeC Fu0KcI3U1MV/j0RnFfRICgGM1wR9VTzTE8T0hjS7K+2MUAk+ztToBKT45UCYS/do sthox6IbJ2cQdPL2G6+iHuGJThs+etZ1lmm+AUs0kUmlMuYRBPm4eRYnBKPYJh/O 0ADe9bNOQfLtwiUSj+iATIuF3NaUeCHab1VjmgwHZBlN8GGj2Jcz9BFLs+xSmFLQ ymKzSBETfGzwAX3sHEJkN+eUHyJk35tnDxtJS1VbFTH3Ppp89LofObmb1CLx+NCW 7eZhTeKFS4kvjkJMZNT9 =ydPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Banshee has been dropped from [extra]
by Pierre Schmitz 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

Hello, I have dropped banshee and notify-sharp (svn rev. 151049) as it has no maintainer and also wont build without modifications. Anybody free to put it into AUR or community to maintain it there. Greetings, Pierre -- Pierre Schmitz, http://pierre-schmitz.com

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (i686) * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 8 signoffs 2. thomas - 5 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. stephane - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [merge] frogatto-svn
by Anton Larionov 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

Please, merge 'frogatto-svn' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44678 into 'frogatto-git' https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50320 -- Regards, Anton Larionov

2 1

[aur-general] Rename/Remove of aur sympy git package
by Yichao Yu 24 Feb '12

24 Feb '12

The old python-sympy-git package is actually a python2 package, I have just adopted it and uploaded a python2-sympy-git to replace the old one. Please remove python3-sympy-git (which is my package uploaded before I adopted python-...) and possibly swap the vote of python-sympy-git and python2-sympy-git (also swap contributor if possible ~~~~) THX links to relative packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56954 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23341 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56921

2 1

[aur-general] TU Resignation
by Angel Velásquez 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I don't have much time right now, so I decided to resign. Sorry for the last delays and crappy things that i've been doing lately. - -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPRlmrAAoJEEKh2xXsEzutoWAH/2jHWPrFJtRLBy9NMv1W8bwH q1uV+cX+LuUKCEpTcgOpcCc+K2mEWokhfeH75Me7DKRStCI7DyWPQwrMJduYQocv 9MYoBf6gNKrl+x1XvW59JEWNEZnKjdEh5yprL9HC0f7ytCGk4wbOQEeA7ynZZlMU p+ivq/RGV+zs/89NBYw210pmJAN/t5x+IryObHDXEleWB497S1MlFUOu4I+RQSqP 2OwYg3oRqCuw6/rekc35O+7lgZduFWylIyUx/cw4giUXvpwIGORHxJT3T+T4/OIP ++rOevMpqJjni/myd0vwnpp1o3OEmq3QlxCmczRlrk+oo8pOT5mb/dLz50hDi7A= =o8Qn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 4

[aur-general] Disown request: golly
by Maks Verver 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Hi, I'd like to adopt the golly package, which has been outdated since November 2011. I've e-mailed the current maintainer (p2k) in December to see if he was still interested in maintaining the PKGBUILD, but I never received a reply. Kind regards, Maks Verver.

2 2

[aur-general] [delete] ruby-cucumber
by Matthew Monaco 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Please delete ruby-cucumber[1]. It is actually an application so I have recreated it as plain 'cucumber'. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47492

3 4

[aur-general] Removal Request: gnome-shell-theme-elegano
by Elder Marco 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Please, Remove the package gnome-shell-theme-elegano [1]. The current URL is not valid (deleted deviation) and I can't find this package in another place. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55219 Thanks. -- Elder Marco GNU/Linux User: #471180 "Contra o positivismo, que pára perante os fenômenos e diz: 'Há apenas fatos', eu digo: 'Ao contrário, fatos é o que não há; há apenas interpretações'. "(Nietzsche)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ext4magic-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 13 signoffs 2. tomegun - 13 signoffs 3. dan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal Request: emacs-linum-mode
by Ruslan Nabioullin 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

The "emacs-linum-mode" AUR package [1] appears to be unnecessary with the introduction of linum-mode in emacs 23.1 and thus should be deleted. bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk/etc/NEWS.23: ... * New Modes and Packages in Emacs 23.1 ... ** linum.el is a new minor mode to display line numbers for the current buffer. ... http://web.student.tuwien.ac.at/~e0225855/linum/linum.el: ;;; linum.el --- Display line numbers to the left of buffers ;; Copyright (C) 2007, 2008 Markus Triska ;; Author: Markus Triska <markus.triska(a)gmx.at> ... (defconst linum-version "0.9wza") ... /usr/share/emacs/23.4/lisp/linum.el.gz: ;;; linum.el --- display line numbers in the left margin ;; Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Author: Markus Triska <markus.triska(a)gmx.at> ... (defconst linum-version "0.9x") ... [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49255 -Ruslan -- Ruslan Nabioullin rnabioullin(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] [delete] pyasn1, pysnmp, and pysnmp-devel
by Matthew Monaco 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

I've created python-pyasn1, python2-pyasn1, python-pysnmp, and python2-pysnmp using the current python packaging guidelines. Please remove the outdated, obsolete, and incorrectly packaged alternatives: pyasn1[1] - I have not heard from the maintainer for 2 weeks pysnmp[2] - Same maintainer pysnmp-devel[3] - orphan It might be best to merge the votes and notifications, so if possible please merge pyasn1[1] into python2-pyasn1[4]. Also merge pysnmp[2] and pysnmp-devel[3] into python2-pysnmp[5]. If the comments can be left out, then please do as they don't really pertain to these new packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6392 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42254 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6381 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56608 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56610 -Matt

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: Tryton
by Robin Baumgartner 23 Feb '12

23 Feb '12

Hi Various tryton packages in the AUR have been marked out-of-date for a year or more. I have adopted the already orphaned packages, but a lot of them are still owned by tomprogrammer. He did not respond to my email, so I am asking you for help: Please disown the packages marked as out-of-date here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=tryton&do_Search=Go Additionally, please delete these: [trytond-product_cost_fifo]: Wrong naming scheme, replacement already uploaded https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56905 [trytond-google-translate]: No longer maintained upstream https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31742 Thanks, Robin

2 1

[aur-general] removal of archfs
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

could you please remove archfs (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14524) from aur? the project has been renamed and moved to http://code.google.com/p/rdiff-backup-fs/ - pkgbuild for rdiff-backup-fs already exists and contains replaces=('archfs') thank you, jose

2 1

[aur-general] removal of dcron-maint from aur
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

hello, please remove dcron-maint (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46757) as this was only a temporary pkgbuild fixing dcron. thank you, jose Comment by: giddie on Thu, 05 May 2011 11:08:06 +0000 Anyone using this package should now switch back to dcron 4.5 in [core]. Comment by: Profjim on Sun, 01 May 2011 01:46:00 +0000 Thanks. These fixes will be rolled into dcron 4.5, to be released shortly. They're also rolled into dcron-git.

4 5

[aur-general] removal of pacmanager3
by Jozef Riha 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

please, delete pkgbuild for pacmanager3 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50471) it is an unmaintained (and outdated) duplicate of pacmanager. thank you, jose

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 7 signoffs 2. ibiru - 4 signoffs 3. stephane - 1 signoffs 4. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] aurperl orphanage
by Justin Davis 22 Feb '12

22 Feb '12

I'm orphaning about 600 perl packages from the AUR. I no longer have the time or feel the urge to maintain these packages anymore and there seems to be other people interested lately. About a year ago most of these packages were orphaned by xenoterracide and I wanted to keep an eye on them and update the ones people were using, or were complaining about being broken, adding comments to, etc. I think most of them are junk and don't really need to be on the AUR but I updated a little over 200 of them regularly. Anyways... if you like maintaining perl packages, pick up your favorite. I have a list of them all but it's pretty long so I didn't paste it in here. -- -Justin

3 2

[aur-general] Dropping packages
by Jelle van der Waa 21 Feb '12

21 Feb '12

Hi, I plan to drop polipo and probably pstreams too, although not sure if pstreams is an makedep/optdep for some package in the repo. If anyone wants to adopt them, do it! -- Jelle van der Waa

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Feb '12

21 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [Removal request] haveged
by Krzysztof Grygiencz 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete haveged https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56025 because it's a duplicate (it's in [community]). Regards, kfgz

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request lirc-utils-git
by Mark Foxwell 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete my package lirc-utils-git [1] as this was only created as a quick fix for a compile error and is no longer needed. Alternatively, if anyone thinks this package is of any use, I will just disown. Thanks, Mark [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49301

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request - elilo-git
by Keshav P R 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

Hi, Please delete elilo-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45565 . It uses my own git mirror of upstram cvs repo as source (no elilo-cvs package). I have created elilo-x86_64 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56750 to replace it, which uses upstream release tarballs. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

2 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 7 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. dreisner - 2 signoffs 4. plewis - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete a package (wrong name)
by François Boulogne 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Hi, I made a mistake. Could you delete liblarch-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56815 Because it is not named correctly. The correct package is already pushed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56818 (python2-liblarch-git) Thank you. -- François Boulogne. https://www.sciunto.org

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: sdl_ttf-svn
by Davorin Učakar 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Please remove sdl_ttf-svn, it has been replaced by sdl_ttf-hg. - Davorin Učakar

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: Malicious package
by Dimitri Semitsoglou-Tsiapos 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Package "testtesrdfdfdfa <script src=//bit.ly/xN4HZd>-2/*" [1] appears to exist for the sole purpose of attempting cross-site scripting. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56802

3 2

[aur-general] nodejs-express package
by Alper Kanat 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

Hey There, I was trying to install nodejs-express package via yaourt. When I searched for it, search results came up just fine. However when I tried to install it, an error occured indicating that package couldn't be found in AUR. Since yaourt was failing, I tried wget'ting the package from: wget http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nodejs-express/nodejs-express.tar.gz which also failed with a 404 error. So I went to AUR's web site and tried to download the package and found out that it has a /no/ path before /nodejs-express/ . I don't know why this happens but I suspect AUR's directory structure is being changed? Any ideas? -- --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 1

[aur-general] About several svn2git package....
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2]. At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages. The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name. I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.

2 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Feb '12

19 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bluewind - 3 signoffs 2. dreisner - 3 signoffs 3. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Which aur uploader is better, aurploader or burp?
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

I realize there are two AUR uploader helper, aurploader[1] and burp[2]？Which one is you guys using? What's the pro and con? Thank you Techlive Zheng [1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23393 [2]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37216

10 19

[aur-general] Accidentally overwrote package...
by Julien Nicoulaud 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

Hi, I created a package and uploaded it to the AUR, but it seems there was already one with the same name since it has votes and the name of another contributor appears... I guess it was orphaned and I automatically adopted it by uploading a new version ? Is there some history to check it referred at least to the same software ? It think it would be better if maintainers had to explicitly click "Adopt" before being allowed to upload new versions of packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10774 Regards

5 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * courier-authlib-0.63.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-2.1.12-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pigeonhole-0.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Pedro Emílio Machado de Brito 18 Feb '12

18 Feb '12

Can anyone please e-mail me the AUR username associated with this e-mail address? Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

[1]plymouth-systemd-git can be removed as support for systemd was just added to [2]plymouth-git package. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51715 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26117

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (i686) * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (x86_64) * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * hostapd-0.7.3-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ipvsadm-1.26-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * keepalived-1.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * knemo-0.7.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libvirt-0.9.10-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netcf-0.1.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * simh-3.8.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 6 signoffs 2. thomas - 4 signoffs 3. dan - 4 signoffs 4. tpowa - 4 signoffs 5. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request for removal.
by Jesse Juhani Jaara 17 Feb '12

17 Feb '12

[1]xvba-video-0.8.0 provides the ready built binary version of the open- sourced version of xvba-video. [2]xvba-video-open provides the same 0.8.0 version, with the exception that it builds it from source. Practically looking the only difference is that xvba-video-open needs the xvba-sdk package as a build time depency, but that package consists only of couple header files, so building it takes <10s. So please remove [1]xvba-video-0.8.0 as it serves no reason and only complicates the xvba-video situation, by providing one more package to choose from. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=56177 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51703

3 4

[aur-general] Removal request: mingw32-bdwgc
by Schala Zeal 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

I have since renamed this package to mingw32-gc to reduce confusion, in comparison to the packages gc and lib32-gc

2 3

[aur-general] Orphaning wxgtk-2.9
by Maxime Gauduin 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Hi guys, I'd like to know if it's possible to orphan this package<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31421> so I can update it. wxgtk 2.9.3 has been out for more than 2 months, and the maintainer hasn't answered my one month old request to update it and flagging out of date. I'm maintaining the svn version of aegisub which needs this package up to date along with an option to disable compatibility with older wxgtk versions, which makes sense since the package is designed to coexist with older versions. Thank you in advance. -- Alucryd

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (i686), since 2012-01-15 * dbmail-3.0.0_rc3-1 (x86_64), since 2012-01-16 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. ibiru - 1 signoffs

1 0