- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge perl6-junction into perl-perl6-junction
by Konrad Borowski 04 Feb '13

04 Feb '13

perl-perl6-junction is correct name. It isn't Perl 6 module called Junction (not that Perl 6 has such module, considering it's builtin language feature), but Perl 5 module called Perl6::Junction.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Feb '13

03 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * boinc-7.0.47-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.47-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] merge freecol-svn into freecol-git
by Lone_Wolf 02 Feb '13

02 Feb '13

Hi, Freecol project has switched from svn to git. please merge [1] into [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freecol-git/ Lone_Wolf

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal Request] - xbmc-beta
by member graysky 02 Feb '13

02 Feb '13

I am the creator and maintainer of xbmc-beta. Plz remove it since v12.0 is in [community] and since there are no more betas.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Feb '13

02 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 2 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (2 total) == * boinc-7.0.47-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.47-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 9 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Remove libsc?
by Karol Blazewicz 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

The project's name is libbsc and not libsc, libsc PKGBUILD hasn't been updated in a while, while libbsc PKGBUILD provides the latest version. Both were submitted by the same person and judging from the submission time I think libsc was just a typo. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libbsc/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsc/

2 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * boinc-7.0.47-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.47-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 2. fyan - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] TU application
by Alexandre Filgueira 31 Jan '13

31 Jan '13

Hi everybody, This whole thing of becoming a TU began after talking by email with Allan about one article of his where he talked about one project of mine. He put me in contact with Evangelos Foutras to be my sponsor, and here I am trying to become a TU. My name is Alexandre Filgueira. I'm a galician guy (Spain), 22 to 23 years old and computer lover. I'm a sysadmin and teacher. I like bash, python and vala, but I have knowledge in some other languages. I also like web programming. I'm a tv-show/cinema addict and music lover, from classic to blues, jazz, rock, punk... I installed Arch the first time in 2008, at 18 years old. I was with Ubuntu since 2006 and I always wanted to have more control over some things, so I began trying distros... (Fedora, Gentoo, Debian...). When I saw what Arch was about, my head thought... oh yeah baby! ...and when I had my first Arch Linux system installed... I simply felt in love. My first forum post is dated 2009.02.18 asking about help with the grub when I deleted my ubuntu partition to have just Arch on my system. I'm better now xD I just have 2 packages in AUR simply because everything I wanted was in the official repos or already in AUR [1]. After all these years using Arch Linux, I thought that I wasn't helping the community as I could. I have a couple of forum posts, most of them asking. I did years ago a script to automatically install and configure a gnome system (gnome 2 in that time)[2]. My last contribution to the Arch Linux world is Cinnarch, being a bridge to show how good is our base system, showing them across a beautiful window, keeping the real rolling release soul intact. Thanks to my work on Cinnarch, I could find a bug in libalpm and I tried to fix it, with the help of David Reisner, the patch has already been merged.[3] My plan is to bring cinnamon to Arch Linux, a classic desktop built with modern technologies. I think is a good one to have in our official repos. I don't own the cinnamon package in AUR, when I began with Cinnarch, that package already existed. But I fixed some of the problems with that package, like the switch to systemd (I was awake until 3am fixing that thing in Cinnarch and then I reported the fix to the Arch Linux community), or the screensaver fix when gnome 3.6 came. And I think that's all. Thanks for considering me to become a TU. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=faidoc&SeB=m [2]http://archive.org/details/Videotutorial [3]https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2013-January/016283.ht…

18 31

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Jan '13

31 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * boinc-7.0.47-1 (i686) * boinc-7.0.47-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * boinc-7.0.47-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.47-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 2 signoffs 2. fyan - 1 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [REQUEST] Remove ffmpegsource-ffmpeg-svn and ffmpegsource-libav-svn
by SpinFlo 31 Jan '13

31 Jan '13

please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffmpegsource-ffmpeg-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffmpegsource-libav-svn/ the build is correct, but don't work greetings

2 1