- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Install fails on x86_64
by set 31 Jan '13

31 Jan '13

Hello, Fresh install fails on x86_64 with cracklib integrity verification failure and signer verification failure. Tried with 12.12 and 13.01 install images. Other signature failures occur with vim packages. pacman-key --populate and --update result in 'No need to update/refresh'. Can't report the relevant keys as I can't access the machine at any time. arch-chroot /mnt drops in an irresponsive shell. Even ls fails in this chroot. Used mirror.archlinux.ikoula.com . Any hints how to resolve this ? Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Jan '13

30 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * boinc-7.0.46-1 (i686) * partclone-0.2.48-5 (i686) * boinc-7.0.46-1 (x86_64) * partclone-0.2.48-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * boinc-7.0.46-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.46-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.48-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 4 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Request for comments: new tdom package - replace or additional git
by Uwe Koloska 30 Jan '13

30 Jan '13

Hello, since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR I would like to get some comments on my first package, derived from an existing one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/ Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possible to build the package. Their is no current tagged version so I have created a git-version of the PKGBUILD: https://gist.github.com/4614862 So besides any comment to make the PKGBUILD better, I have the following questions: What's best: make a new package tdom-git that uses the github master branch or just change the current package? Or make a "stable" package that uses the last tagged version and patch the support for tcl 8.6? (and maybe make a git package too) The current maintainer wants to hand over the package. What are the right steps for this? Best regards Uwe

3 9

[aur-general] PKGBUILD removal request
by Federico Cinelli 30 Jan '13

30 Jan '13

analog-vu-meter-plugin (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/analog-vu-meter-plugin/) replaced by audacious-vumeter (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audacious-vumeter/) -- Federico Cinelli <cinelli.federico(a)gmail.com> "Stay true."

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Xavier Corredor Llano 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

Hi please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-rangs/ because It was renamed to: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ncl-highres/ thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano

2 1

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] Winter Cleanup of [community]
by Andrea Scarpino 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

On Monday 28 January 2013 18:09:04 Chris Brannon wrote: > Well, it looks like espeakup got cleaned. Could someone please add it > back? It is pretty much necessary for blind users, of which there are a > few. > If it really needs a maintainer that badly, I'd consider reapplying for > my TU position. I moved it back. -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) == * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (i686) * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (i686) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (i686) * r8168-8.035.00-3 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (i686) * vhba-module-20120422-16 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (i686) * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (x86_64) * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (x86_64) * r8168-8.035.00-3 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20120422-16 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * boinc-7.0.45-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-3 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-16 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.45-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * cdfs-2.6.27-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * ndiswrapper-1.57-28 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-modules-1:9.2.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.035.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20120422-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.6-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 5 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. allan - 2 signoffs 4. pierre - 2 signoffs 5. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] FYI: PKGBUILDs in Ohloh
by Johannes Dewender 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

Hello, TLDNR: A collection of multiple PKGBUILD repositories (from multiple users!) is listed at this Ohloh project: https://www.ohloh.net/p/aur-pkgbuilds Feel free to add your own, but not aur-mirror.git (see below) long story: I like Ohloh for an overview of open source contributions and realized that I spend quite some time packaging. Actually more than working on (released) oss software. So I wanted to add my PKGBUILD repo to Ohloh. Adding every PKGBUILD repo as an extra project (like some already have) didn't seem fitting, since most of them are part of a general "project". So I created: https://www.ohloh.net/p/aur-pkgbuilds The purpose is to track overall activity in AUR PKGBUILDs in a way that preserves authorship. I certainly know of http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/ However, that didn't seem fitting since commits were automated (which is no "natural" repo anymore) and more important: commit authorship and "real" authorship is in no correlation. So please don't add aur-mirror.git or other automated repositories. "other automated" also means repositories that are "bumped" often in order to trigger some kind of vcs-package rebuild or similar. DO feel free to add your PKGBUILD repo, though. I already added a couple of "bigger" repos I knew of. "bigger" in that case is with lots of commits. Adding 600 repositories with 5 commits each doesn't help much (don't even know if there is a limit for "enlistements" on Ohloh) so please don't just add all 600 PKGBUILD repos on Github. Unless it is your own and you really are interested. -- JonnyJD

1 0

[aur-general] Status of openshadinglanguage
by Chirantan Ekbote 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

Hello, When I tried to upgrade blender today I got an unresolved dependency error for openshadinglanguage. After some searching I found it in [community-testing] [0]. It's been in there since 2013-01-03 and appears to be an orphaned package. While there is a git version in the AUR [1], I would prefer not to have a binary package depend on a source package. Is there some reason that openshadinglanguage is only in [community-testing] and not [community]? Thanks, Chirantan [0] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community-testing/x86_64/openshadinglang… [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openshadinglanguage-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Delete kupfer-add-git
by SanskritFritz 28 Jan '13

28 Jan '13

Please delete my package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kupfer-add-git/ as I have renamed it to kupfer-adds-git. No need to merge anything (no votes, no comments).

2 2