- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Disown request: man-pages-pl
by Michał Górny 27 Jan '13

27 Jan '13

Please disown man-pages-pl package [1]. I flagged it as out-of-date on 2012-11-18, then on 2012-12-10 I emailed current maintainer but got no answer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/man-pages-pl/ Thanks, MG

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jan '13

27 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.45-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.45-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 14 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
by Tai-Lin Chu 27 Jan '13

27 Jan '13

LinkedIn ------------ Discussion, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Tai-Lin Tai-Lin Chu Software Developer at KokoChe San Francisco Bay Area Confirm that you know Tai-Lin Chu: https://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hcd4dqij-72/isd/10698992438/uS5Frp7z/?hs=… -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hcd4dqij-72/7RQslQ8A75pgsbqd60wsrtZ775qszD… (c) 2012 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.

2 1

[aur-general] Request for merge: python-mongokit -> python2-mongokit
by Aaron DeVore 27 Jan '13

27 Jan '13

I renamed python-mongokit to python2-mongokit. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-mongokit/

2 1

[aur-general] Please orphan st
by Kevin Vesga 27 Jan '13

27 Jan '13

The package st [1] has been marked out-of-date for almost two months and the maintainer has not responded to the email I sent on Jan. 10. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/st/

2 1

[aur-general] NVIDIA drivers
by Maxime Gauduin 26 Jan '13

26 Jan '13

Hi all, As you may know, the NVIDIA drivers are split across a multitude of packages. While it is of no consequence when using the ones in the repo, it becomes a bit more of a problem when building packages from the AUR. I for example have to install nvidia-utils-beta, lib32-nvidia-utils-beta, nvidia-source-beta and nvidia-hook (mkinitcpio hook using dkms) to get all the required files. That means downloading the x86_64 blob 2 times and the i686 one 1 time (I'm using a dkms version to not download them one more time for each of my kernels). Moreover, all those packages have hard dependencies on version numbers, making AUR helpers quite helpless when there is an update (sure you could download all tarballs and have a centralized sources folder, build all packages, and then installing all at the same time, but keeping up to date would become very time consuming). I heard a nvidia-total-beta package was uploaded not long ago but swiftly deleted by gtmanfred who thought it was not needed. I don't mean to criticize, but I do think it would be of use to quite a lot of people. I'm using the catalyst-total on my laptop and I love it, having all in one place is good for the bandwidth and every update is just a breeze. Therefore I have made two new PKGBUILDs, nvidia-total [1] and nvidia-total-beta [2] which group the packages mentioned above for the regular and beta drivers, and are the NVIDIA counterparts to the catalyst-total package. I'm asking the TUs to reconsider their usefulness before I upload the to the AUR, only to see them deleted. Thx in advance for your answers. Regards, [1] http://pastebin.com/sKa4pDfp [2] http://pastebin.com/V5FSLmUi -- Alucryd "In the name of God, impure souls of the living dead shall be banished into eternal damnation. Amen."

6 20

[aur-general] Inactivity
by Lukas Jirkovsky 26 Jan '13

26 Jan '13

Hello fellow TUs, Maybe some of you noticed that I was not very active last days, and I'm afraid that I will be inactive a few more days. I thought I will be able to do the boost rebuild at least, but because the new devtools dropped support for the initstrips I was not able to build it and I didn't have enough time to solve it. I'd have written earlier, but last few days were really hectic because of the traveling and school. Lukas

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Jan '13

26 Jan '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.45-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * boinc-7.0.45-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * openshadinglanguage-1.2.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * openimageio-1.1.2-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * blender-6:2.65a-3 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * blender-6:2.65a-3 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 * fcron-3.1.1-1 (i686), since 2013-01-03 * fcron-3.1.1-1 (x86_64), since 2013-01-03 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 12 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by Axilleas Pi 26 Jan '13

26 Jan '13

python2-six is in [community], I guess it's not needed anymore ;) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-six https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-six/

2 1

[aur-general] [Removal request] Tcl86, Tk86
by Erdei János 25 Jan '13

25 Jan '13

You can remove the following packages from AUR, they became unnecessary as the official repository is now having them. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tcl86/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tk86/ Thank you very much for all your work!

2 1