June 2009 - Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] rsync for AUR
by Abhishek Dasgupta 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Is it feasible to setup an rsync for AUR packages? Would it increase load on the server a lot? Installing packages from AUR would become simpler, as tools can work on the local cache instead. It'll be also easier to keep backups. -- Abhishek

2 1

[aur-general] (no subject)
by nathan owe. 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Is anyone having a problem with yaourt? mine isnt finding packages in aur that i know exists

6 10

[aur-general] ftp://archlinux.org/community/ still does not get updates
by Sergej Pupykin 01 Jul '09

01 Jul '09

Hi, aur.archlinux.org/srv/ftp/community/os/i686 differs from ftp.archlinux.org/community/os/i686 ~100Mb in ~20 files differs. Rsync seems still broken...

4 5

[aur-general] The [community-testing] repository
by Thomas Bächler 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

I think this has been requested and discussed a few times and I talked to several people about it, so I want to outline my ideas here: When moving the community db scripts to the new svn-based scripts, a community-testing repository should be created. With the new scripts, handling this is incredibly easy. And here is why: Rebuild sprees. We have the problem now with readline: libreadline.so.6 is in testing and community packages are built against .so.5. [testing] users cannot use everything from [community] and once we move everything to core and extra, it takes too much time for [community] to catch up. The [community-testing] repository will solve that: While the dev team does rebuilds in [testing], the TUs do the same in [community-testing]. When everything is done, a developer can move the core/extra and community packages simultaneously. This is not only useful for SONAME bumps, but also for kernel updates (there's a few kernel modules in [community]). I suggest this should be set up as soon as [community] is moved to SVN-based scripts, as the upcoming libjpeg rebuilds will break too many packages and we need to rebuild not only the [extra] but also the [community] packages in time. That's how I see it, opinions?

1 0

Re: [aur-general] new version for package holdingnuts
by Aaron Griffin 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Dominik Geyer<dominik.geyer(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Aaron, > > the old maintainer of the holdingnuts package seems to be inactive now > (had contact with him via mail). At the package's page it says > there's no maintainer. Is there a chance finding a new maintainer for it? > > There's a new version of this package (0.0.5) and I would like to see > it updated in Arch, too. The package structure hasn't changed, so it > might be a pure version bump. Hi Dominik, As this is an AUR package, I am forwarding this message on to the aur-general mailing list to see if one of the TUs or another member of the community would be interested in maintaining it. Cheers, Aaron

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: ruby-sup
by Andrei Thorp 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

Hello there. While playing around with aurbuild today, I found that there is a package in AUR called ruby-sup. This is an outdated duplicate of my package "sup". It was also orphaned, so I adopted it. I guess my package, "sup" is probably the correct name, so could you please delete ruby-sup. Thanks! -- Andrei Thorp, Developer: Xandros Corp. (http://www.xandros.com)

2 4

[aur-general] mulk pkgbuild
by nathan owe. 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

the pkgbuild i am working on is mulk. it has a optdepends of libmetalink but to make it optional i have to do ./configure --disable-metalink do i do it like that or should i just put libmetalink as a regular depends?

2 1

[aur-general] AUR Moving
by Loui Chang 30 Jun '09

30 Jun '09

Hey users and trusted users. The AUR will be moving to a new server tomorrow June 27, 2009 around 12:00:00 -0500. Expect some downtime. Cheers!

15 34

[aur-general] deletion of netbeans-prerelease
by Alper KANAT 29 Jun '09

29 Jun '09

Hey There, Could someone please delete the package http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25239 ? The final release is out now; so there's no need to maintain this package any more..? Alper KANAT <alperkanat(a)raptiye.org>

2 1

[aur-general] Can not upload moinmoin package
by Sergej Pupykin 29 Jun '09

29 Jun '09

Hi, after aur moving, I can't upload package, bigger than 100-200Kb. connection hangs after this size uploaded. I sniff conversation with wireshark and found 'TCP Acked lost segment' packet near the end. May be uploading is in progress, but very very slow. Please advise, how can I test it to find where is the problem? (ssh, cvs works quite slowly, but don't hangs)

2 2