- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Mar '16

25 Mar '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 36 packages missing signoffs * 8 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * clonezilla-3.20.21-1 (any) * drbl-2.19.11-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (36 total) == * clonezilla-3.20.21-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * drbl-2.19.11-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * firefox-theme-adwaita-45.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (8 total) == * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686), since 2016-03-11 * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686), since 2016-03-11 * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11 * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686), since 2016-03-11 * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11 * performous-1.1-2 (i686), since 2016-03-11 * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11 * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64), since 2016-03-11 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Info : Chromium and {aur4,luna}.archlinux.org
by SET 24 Mar '16

24 Mar '16

Hello, Chromium Version 49.0.2623.87 (64-bit) gives a ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID when accessing aur4.archlinux.org, it expects the url to be seemingly luna.archlinux.org. No way to workaround it. I doubt AUR webmasters would change the SSL certificate to please Chromium devs. I just wish to give the information and read any relevant comments. Cheers.

4 5

[aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout
by Dustin Falgout 24 Mar '16

24 Mar '16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Everyone, My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to join the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User. About Me: I'm 29 years old. I live on the Gulf Coast (USA). I work for a leading WordPress Theme Company where I do a little bit of everything: from sales, to development, to quality assurance, to tech support (you name it...). My first experience with linux was with Ubuntu in 2003. It wasn't until around 2008 that I began using linux exclusively on my desktops. Wanting more control than comes easily with Ubuntu, I first turned to openSUSE and was content for a while. In early 2013, I performed my first Arch linux installation and have been using it ever since. - From the start I loved almost everything about Arch. The one thing I didn't love was the attitudes towards new users that was so common in the forum. I certainly understand all sides of what is a complex issue and I'm not trying to open that can of worms here. I'm only mentioning it because when I first became an Arch user I found the overall tone of the forum to be extremely off-putting, so much so that I can pinpoint it as the sole reason I shied away from trying to become an active contributor back then. Also, it will help everyone to know where my head was at when I tell you the rest of my story. I stumbled upon Antergos in May 2013 and I immediately knew that I had found my home. The project's goals and the views of its developers aligned perfectly with my own. For me, Antergos was (and still is) the perfect solution as it has allowed me to contribute (albeit indirectly) to the advancement of what I truly believe to be the best linux distribution available. I know that's a rather broad statement, but I'm trying to keep this short and to the point. If anyone would like me to elaborate on something more specifically, I'd be happy to do so. I currently maintain six or seven PKGBUILDS in the AUR, of which three are notable: pycharm-eap[1], lightdm-webkit2-greeter[2], and lightdm-webkit-theme-antergos[3]. I've indirectly contributed to other packages in the AUR through comments by offering advice to users, notifying maintainers of new releases as well as any problems with PKGBUILDS (always including a proposed solution), and directing bug reports away from AUR comments and to their proper channel. I always take the time to properly request deletion of PKGBUILDS that shouldnt be in the AUR (for whatever reason) whenever I come across one. I've also reported (and still do report) bugs on http://bugs.archlinux.org when it was/is appropriate. On one or two occasions I've gone as far as reaching out directly to maintainers of official packages to provide them with important information. Its's also worth mentioning that I currently maintain many packages[4] for Antergos and I'm open to moving any (that are appropriate) to community. So you might be wondering: "Why become a TU now?". Well, the reason is pretty simple. I was asked to consider applying by Alex Filgueira, the TU who currently maintains the Cinnamon packages and a person with whom I've had the pleasure of collaborating with on Antergos for the past three years. Sadly, his schedule has become far too busy to continue to maintain the Cinnamon packages. Another TU, György Balló, has been picking up the slack for the past few months but, having more than a few packages of his own to maintain, he told Alex that it would be nice to have some help with Cinnamon. Considering that Cinnamon is my own personal desktop of choice, Alex thought I would want to consider joining forces with György to maintain Cinnamon. Obviously, Alex was correct and so here we are. That's my story :) I know that every minute of your free time is priceless, so thank you all in advance for taking the time review and consider my application. I look forward to (hopefully) "making things official" between myself and Arch Linux. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm-eap/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightdm-webkit2-greeter/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightdm-webkit-theme-antergos/ [4] http://build.antergos.com/browse/main Best Regards, Dustin Falgout Web Developer E-mail: dustin(a)falgout.us Google/Skype: dustinfalgout Freenode IRC: #antergos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJW02A1AAoJEK6lKb8SKQLlb6EH/2bE+uzlWsuU3kIouB8sEGwr qzGmBT3JntkZsOrsy1fYl7kNz2GAlc2/+8MCJ9LUinkv46Egiw93lW8C58G8eudQ LOJ1GTz7hh5suO+xOagXdmTJwJMK04VPtHksTeNg3mVONmJPNxSlDdRk77sTHZMd 95aAnvnPBkk1U6Zn4hr6pPUG6HvPGmMseDdmBLr62Fh5CgupsEli4Q2vmgTlZwr6 CoJo9LEaS20djXihDgXYY/6TDEeKeyzj7I9M33IP6eppoACEzsueXxInD5aBPyvD HgcqvC7UNnpha8k2LBbL5xyTOUiDyhwwpf8umLHWPLCA6OmK9se3aYiY2FaUd8A= =8/xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

12 25

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Mar '16

24 Mar '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * firefox-theme-adwaita-45.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Mar '16

23 Mar '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (i686) * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * firefox-theme-adwaita-45.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxqt-config-0.10.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Help needed to update Arch_User_Repository Wiki - Was: Invisible packages? Can't find in aurweb but avaliable on git
by Ralf Mardorf 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:20:54 -0400, Eli Schwartz wrote: >The git repos of deleted AUR packages are not purged and this is wanted, to get back old PKGBUILDs, but it also comes with pitfalls: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Talk:Arch_User_Repository#How_do_I_fin… Perhaps somebody is able to provide a faster solution, than the "curl" approach, without building on AUR helpers. Yesterday when somebody posted https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2016-March/032167.html I noticed that the Wiki still mentioned "File Request", even while we had a long thread about misunderstanding "File Request" and it was changed to "Submit Request". On the Arch general mailing list somebody else opened this tread: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2016-March/040986.html We perhaps should at least maintain/update Wikis about fundamental Arch Linux topics. 2 Cents, Ralf

1 0

[aur-general] Invisible packages? Can't find in aurweb but avaliable on git
by Tyler 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hi All, I recently noticed an update for the jbidwatcher package. I could not find the package using the aur web interface, so I proceeded to get the package off of an AUR 3 backup (in addition to there being a new version the license had also changed), and then updated the PKGBUILD. When I went to push to git, though, remote rejected my push. I then git cloned the package and found that the AUR3 package was hidden from the AUR web interface, but available on git. Is this normal? Should I harass the original maintainer of the AUR 3 package, or can someone unlock the package on the aur so I can push to it? Thanks, Tyler -- PGP key, Signal, & OTR encryption avaliable upon request. Learn to use PGP email encryption: https://ssd.eff.org/en/module/how-use-pgp-windows https://ssd.eff.org/en/module/how-use-pgp-mac-os-x https://ssd.eff.org/en/module/how-use-pgp-linux Signal: https://whispersystems.org/ Off-the-record: https://otr.cypherpunks.ca/

4 4

[aur-general] python2-virtualfish can be removed
by Ricardo Band 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Ahoi, I made 2 packages for virtualfish. One with python2 and one with python3. I will disown the python2 one because it makes no sense for me to have basically the same package twice. Can someone remove the python2 version? Thx! -- gru:cce o7 . o . . . o o o o X e N

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 34 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * partclone-0.2.87-2 (i686) * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (i686) * partclone-0.2.87-2 (x86_64) * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * firefox-theme-adwaita-45.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * partclone-0.2.87-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * partclone-0.2.87-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uboot-tools-2016.03-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Mar '16

21 Mar '16

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 36 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) * connman-1.31-5 (i686) * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * firefox-theme-adwaita-45.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * hiera-3.1.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puppet-4.4.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * sweethome3d-5.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * facter-3.1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-2.53.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * connman-1.31-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * facter-3.1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * frei0r-plugins-1.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gmic-1.6.9-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-3.0.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * performous-1.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.041.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r3-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-2.3.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-82 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-26 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * leatherman-0.4.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * leatherman-0.4.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 1 signoffs 2. djgera - 1 signoffs 3. seblu - 1 signoffs

1 0