- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Aug '15

19 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 7 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages
by Autumn-wind＠web.de 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

Someone went along and uploaded every package from the aur-mirror as a separate Repo on Github. https://github.com/aur-archive Not sure if this is helping, or working as a Archive. As there are also repos of packages that got migrated to AUR4 and could, in my opionen, be left aside. With regards Lex

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Aug '15

18 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * salt-2015.5.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] AUR repos and git subtrees
by Eli Schwartz 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

I have just attempted to update fanficfare{,-git} and I cannot push the changes because they are a non-fast-forward. I cannot be 100% sure because I don't have local clones, I have been splitting off subtrees as needed (see my setup at https://github.com/eli-schwartz/pkgbuilds) but this is supposed to be 100% guaranteed to create the same sha1 hash. However, it appears that the AUR repos are now out of sync. Same content and everything. Am I supposed to believe that those packages -- and a bunch more (but not all...) of mine -- had their repos randomly and sneakily rewritten??? Or that git subtrees are simply unreliable??? Neither seems very likely. This was working perfectly at least until July 20 (the last time I updated anything). -- Eli Schwartz

3 5

[aur-general] AUR activity log?
by Mark Laws 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Hi, In light of the mass deletion of many orphaned as well as not-really-orphaned packages, it would be nice if there were a way to get a log of AUR activity so that users other than just a package's maintainers can see that a package disappeared at some given point. It was also mentioned that deleted packages aren't really deleted, merely hidden--in that case, why not allow users to view these packages if some flag is set in the API request? This way, users can pick up maintenance of a once-extant package without having to recreate it from scratch. Thanks, Mark Laws -- |v\ /\ |\ |< |_ /\ \^| //

7 17

[aur-general] aurweb 4.0.0 released
by Lukas Fleischer 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

Hello, We are pleased to announce that aurweb 4.0.0 has been released. The official aurweb setup [1] has already been updated. The most exciting change in this release is that Git repositories are now used for AUR packages. This new feature comes along with some other nice additions, such as an SSH interface for registered AUR users. For a comprehensive list of changes, please consult the Git log [2]. As usual, bugs should be reported to the aurweb bug tracker [3]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/aurweb.git/log/?id=v4.0.0 [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

17 21

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-mustache-1.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ruby-rack-1.6.4-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sagemath-6.8-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Getting a 403 when trying to push changes to my packages
by Storm Dragon 16 Aug '15

16 Aug '15

Howdy, I made a small update to one of my packages. When I tried to push the changes it gave the following: fatal: unable to access 'https://aur.archlinux.org/fortune-mod-confucius.git/': The requested URL returned error: 403 Thanks for any help :) Storm -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193 Free and open source social networking, get your account TODAY! http://2mb.social/main/register My Blackberry is Broken: http://is.gd/my_blackberry_is_broken "And for every crossing where two roads diverged. I fell one false decision. But still you find me on this earth." Van Canto - I Stand Alone

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Aug '15

16 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-2 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] mksrcinfo bug: PKGBUILD stdout appears in mksrcinfo
by Ido Rosen 15 Aug '15

15 Aug '15

mksrcinfo will include anything the PKGBUILD writes to stdout in the body of the PKGBUILD (i.e. not in any prepare/build/package/etc. functions when being sourced, for example: pkgname=example pkgver=1 echo "Hello world." prepare() {} build() {} package() {} ... which will generate an .SRCINFO file with "Hello world." as the first line. This .SRCINFO file is then not parseable by AUR4 when trying to push it to the package's git repository, which will end up with an error that looks like this: $ git push -u origin master:master Counting objects: 4, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (4/4), done. Writing objects: 100% (4/4), 4.38 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Total 4 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File "/srv/http/vhosts/ aur.archlinux.org/public/git-interface/aurinfo.py", line 127, in ParseAurinfoFromIterable remote: key, value = map(str.strip, line.split('=', 1)) remote: ValueError: need more than 1 value to unpack remote: remote: During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred: remote: remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File "hooks/update", line 239, in <module> remote: srcinfo = aurinfo.ParseAurinfoFromIterable(srcinfo_raw, ecatcher) remote: File "/srv/http/vhosts/ aur.archlinux.org/public/git-interface/aurinfo.py", line 130, in ParseAurinfoFromIterable remote: current_package['pkgname'])) remote: TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To ^aur:/matlab.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to '^aur:/matlab.git' The fix should prevent the PKGBUILD's stdout output from appearing in the .SRCINFO that mksrcinfo generates.

3 2