- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Strange behavior : yaourt fail but makepkg success
by Félix Piédallu 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi there ! The flite package has a strange behavior : Installing it with Yaourt fails : $ yaourt -S flite ar: ../../..//tmp/yaourt-tmp-felix/aur-flite/lib/libflite.shared.a: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type ../../config/common_make_rules:116 : la recette pour la cible « /tmp/yaourt-tmp-felix/aur-flite/obj/src/audio/.build_so » a échouée But makepkg succeeds to build the package : $ rm -rf lib/ obj/ pkg/ src/ flite-2.0.0-release.tar.bz2 $ makepkg ==> Création finie : flite 2.0.0-2 (mer. août 5 22:52:30 CEST 2015) What could be happening with Yaourt ? NB : I am not the flite maintainer, though I would like it to work out of the box ;) - -- Félix Piédallu Président du Club Robotronik Phelma 06 51 41 32 48 Manjaro Linux. Feel the freedom. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVwn4VAAoJEMJ1NtNxTzOf8xEQAKlmFDLymYq2p43fVS9wNHHP rgdCcbiJvalQWnJ1UsIzjpxKWtld8AMYzSaOg5iVeplVogwFrwOyvfhMSXjIFJVW +M3VwSR6tUPd5DkQ2IsRbqsiI7h2ul9HebRux4nziUbVf2WWZ+BgKV1ZhiXWUKm0 sZV+OzNtplNx585ma7j0SZ+aKr38kMDS6OZLcD1hI2P8SLmN1KYe+d0wq+WtCN6p ajSo7Si9Z/6x0TWQdpS9V3p1y23VatL1+yn9q4LcrLFRgNmo2KK2uOQhOHTQJyKv KKbPukym5Iqeo8wcXYrJfp3qivinGLs3PCsDeYjZ8BXah5aQptbO4XVAuYCi/HbG y/OTMjxtDDdbMqtE51zaugIyXUuLlKWeWxGtpuzdkEAwz5cD2uBPVkbh5on0s/om 0MQ0pYlrmm/rZgUlSC4CMhB0WSUiQH41zh3zCaBGHTmi8/+7KlNTIxbxHOOO+VZn fYL1xVhZr0/2NGcJ7akh3Uh+Z80V0Mcs0O8xNKeGSUMGFfDX4aRXnE5wZShqM/MY M6NjeZEHlSwBa4BXloSubHBn12vjcT94vASzJavaLQWJyn5v4TOgMyUzKBQmO2Vf fSQNxZWwvW40KxwtQG0rrKly+L+AUjKPKJbUx/mYYBWFT5iG5BTBAIdVgK18awam 3co4vDailDYMHhdIp+9F =1bwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 4

[aur-general] package removal request
by luke bonham 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Hello, I erroneously created the following package: https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/lain could someone please delete it? Thanks.

2 2

[aur-general] Disowning packages
by Armin K. 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

Hi, Anyone interested in some (all) of my packages? I don't have the time to maintain them anymore. broadcom-wl mesa-git lib32-mesa-git llvm-svn lib32-llvm-svn libclc-svn libgxim imsettings im-chooser https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=Krejzi

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Aug '15

05 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-flickrapi-2.1.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-networkx-1.10-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anthraxx - 4 signoffs 2. djgera - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] systemd real-time priorities
by Leonidas Spyropoulos 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

Hi, In old systemd (not sure which version) there used to be a way to describe a realtime priority with cgroups. Mpd.service has these values in it's service definition file [1]. From a brief research I've done this functionality removed and there's no alternative. Anyone knows if there are plans to implement this back to systemd? Other distros face similar issues [2]. [1]: journal systemd[1]: [/usr/lib/systemd/system/mpd.service:17] Unknown lvalue 'ControlGroup' in section 'Service' systemd[1]: [/usr/lib/systemd/system/mpd.service:20] Unknown lvalue 'ControlGroupAttribute' in section 'Service' [2]: http://bugs.musicpd.org/view.php?id=4262

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Aug '15

04 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 5 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 2 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (5 total) == * python-flickrapi-2.1.1-1 (any) * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (i686) * sakura-3.3.0-1 (i686) * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (x86_64) * sakura-3.3.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-flickrapi-2.1.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-networkx-1.10-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * roxterm-3.0.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sakura-3.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * cjdns-16.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cjdns-16.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (2 total) == * cjdns-16.1-2 (i686), since 2015-07-20 * cjdns-16.1-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-20 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 4 signoffs 2. fyan - 3 signoffs 3. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 36 packages missing signoffs * 26 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any) * python-networkx-1.10-1 (any) * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686) * opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686) * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64) * opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (34 total) == * fail2ban-0.9.3-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python-networkx-1.10-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * evtest-1.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evtest-1.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-3.0.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * opencc-1.0.3-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * cjdns-16.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cjdns-16.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (26 total) == * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * pinot-1.08-4 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 10 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Two licenses (GPL and custom) on a package - split up or not
by Sebastian Lau 03 Aug '15

03 Aug '15

Hi, After asking their maintainers in AUR3, I just adopted a few packages that I'll need in AUR4. Three of them were definitions for Brother printers I'm using. My question: Brother is using GPL2 for their cupswrapper part [0] and a custom license for their lpr part [1]. I also adopted the package for Brother's HL3040CN which original maintainer bundled both parts in one package [2]. Shall I split this package up into a GPL and a custom part like in [0] and [1]? Regards, Sebastian ----------- [0] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-ql700-cupswrapper/ [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-ql700-lpr/ [2] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Aug '15

02 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 37 packages missing signoffs * 26 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (35 total) == * glm-0.9.6.3-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * evtest-1.33-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gluon-0.71.0-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sfml-2.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wt-3.3.4-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * evtest-1.33-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gluon-0.71.0-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sfml-2.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wt-3.3.4-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * cjdns-16.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cjdns-16.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (26 total) == * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * rawstudio-2.0-14 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libextractor-1.0.1-7 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * darktable-1.6.7-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * libgexiv2-0.10.3-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * rawstudio-2.0-14 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * nomacs-2.4.4-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * pinot-1.08-4 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * darktable-1.6.7-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * krename-4.0.9-5 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * kphotoalbum-4.6.2-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * luminancehdr-2.4.0-4 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * viewnior-1.5-3 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * pinot-1.08-4 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * krename-4.0.9-5 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (i686), since 2015-07-14 * gimp-ufraw-0.22-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * viewnior-1.5-3 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * mate-color-manager-1.8.0-2 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 * python2-exiv2-0.3.2-7 (x86_64), since 2015-07-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR 4 Submission Problem
by Itay Grudev 01 Aug '15

01 Aug '15

Gentlemen, I am trying to commit a package through Git to your new system. The process is really straight-forward but I’ve stumbled upon an error, when pushing the repo, which I cannot resolve. remote: error: The following errors occurred when parsing .SRCINFO in commit remote: error: e129d11255f3c1b7e5ba3ab705e6547427c31528: remote: error: line 4: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 5: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 6: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 7: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 8: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 9: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 10: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 11: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 12: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 13: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: line 14: unexpected new section not starting with 'pkgname' found remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/master To ssh://aur@aur4.archlinux.org/imperial.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://aur@aur4.archlinux.org/imperial.git' The contents of the .SRCINFO are as follows: # Generated by makepkg 4.2.1 # Sat Aug 1 11:23:19 UTC 2015 pkgbase = imperial pkgdesc = Plays the Imperial March using the beep utility pkgver = 1.1 pkgrel = 1 url = https://github.com/itay-grudev/imperial arch = any license = mit depends = beep source = imperial-1.1.tar.gz::https://github.com/itay-grudev/imperial/archive/1.1.ta… source = https://raw.githubusercontent.com/itay-grudev/imperial/arch/imperial.service md5sums = a96a83feaa767b2784e5c2f4cfdafc8e md5sums = bcfe5ab48b096ad8fdbac87990ba02d8 pkgname = imperial Kind Regards, Itay Grudev @: itay(a)grudev.com

2 1