- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Aug '15

15 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * apitrace-7.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * open-vm-tools-6:9.10.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 21 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Listing of packages
by Taylor Lookabaugh 15 Aug '15

15 Aug '15

Is there a possibility of a Co-Maintainer option in the AUR search critertia to list packages like the 'Search by' Maintainer option? -- LookTJ Taylor Lookabaugn

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Aug '15

14 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) * jupyter-4.0.2-1 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * ipython-4.0.0-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * jupyter-4.0.2-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 7 signoffs 2. eworm - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Issues creating a AUR4 package called 'chunkfs'
by Lance G. 14 Aug '15

14 Aug '15

Hi, So I'm having issues creating a package called 'chunkfs' on the AUR. Someone on Freenode #Archlinux suggested maybe someone tagged the repo with 'ssh aur(a)aur.archlinux.org setup-repo chunkfs' but never actually uploaded anything. Can someone let me know if this is really the case? Or maybe it's a glitch of some sort? My AUR username is Raansu. Thank you in advance, Raansu

3 5

[aur-general] fbterm-git has an AUR git repo, but it isn't available in the web view?
by ShadowKyogre 14 Aug '15

14 Aug '15

fbterm-git has an AUR git repo, but it isn't available in the web view for some reason. A clone of the package git repo shows a PKGBUILD and an INSTALL file. But when I try to visit the corresponding overview page, it says that it's not found. Relevant URLs: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fbterm-git ssh://aur@aur.archlinux.org/fbterm-git.git - ShadowKyogre

3 2

[aur-general] Archive of AUR3 packages
by Chi Hsuan Yen 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

Dear Arch lovers, Recently lots of orphaned packages on AUR are deleted by Kyrias [1]. Are AUR3 PKGBUILD tarballs kept somewhere? I'd like to re-upload packages I'm using, but it takes too long time to write all PKGBUILDs from scratch. [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-August/031380.html

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.040.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r2-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-73 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-5.0.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 3 signoffs 2. anatolik - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] AUR Package deleted: pypy-setuptools
by Chi Hsuan Yen 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

On 8 August 2015 at 21:32, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > Kyrias deleted "pypy-setuptools". > > You will no longer receive notifications about this package. > Sorry why is this package deleted? I didn't find any deletion request on aur-requests <aur-requests(a)archlinux.org>. Best Regards, Yen Chi Hsuan

2 2

[aur-general] My Packages Disappeared
by Wayne Hartmann 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

All packages I was the maintainer of have all of a sudden disappeared. I do not remember all the packages I adopted, but this includes 'gnome-rdp' and 'bitdefender'. Not only do I maintain zero packages now, they are not even listed on the AUR now. Regards, Wayne Hartmann

6 9

[aur-general] Deletion of orphaned packages on AUR4
by Rob McCathie 13 Aug '15

13 Aug '15

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:30 AM, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > Kyrias deleted "compiz-gtk-standalone". > > You will no longer receive notifications about this package. On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:32 AM, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > Kyrias deleted "compiz-xfce". > > You will no longer receive notifications about this package. Just a query: Why were packages i added to AUR4, ensured were in good working order (and made an enhancement to one of the packages compared to the last release on AUR3), know are used by at least some users, and then orphaned so some other interested party can take over maintenance, were deleted from AUR4? compiz-gtk-standalone was actually the ONLY package on AUR4 that provided the Compiz 0.8 series core component. Since it's deletion there is now at least one package on AUR4 that has unresolvable dependencies. (eg. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ccsm/ ) Regards, Rob McCathie

15 29