- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Jan '15

28 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 11 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. eworm - 2 signoffs 4. dan - 2 signoffs 5. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Jan '15

27 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Please enable zh_TW locale on AUR
by 黃柏諺 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

As title says,please enable AUR's zh_TW locale,it should be 100% on Transifex now. :D

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Jan '15

25 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. fyan - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] AUR UTF-8 support?
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 25 Jan '15

25 Jan '15

Hi, I posted a message ending with the character "😄" on the AUR today, but that character got stripped. Does AUR not have UTF-8 support? Have I bumped into a new issue? Thanks, -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?

5 5

[aur-general] Cleaning [extra]
by Andrea Scarpino 24 Jan '15

24 Jan '15

Hi all, the following packages can be moved from [extra] to [community] because are orphan and not needed by any other package in [extra]. Neither as {make,opts,}deps. Also, the packages that are not needed by anyone could be directly moved to AUR if no DEV/TU is interested. Please take a look in the case you forgot to adopt some package. If there are no objections, I will move the packages between Saturday and Sunday. * archlinux-themes-kdm * archlinux-wallpaper * aspell-hu * bin86 * capseo (needed by none) * cd-discid * cinepaint * docker-tray (needed by none) * ethstatus (needed by none) * fbset * flickrnet * ftjam * gcdmaster (needed by none) * hitori * hunspell-hu * hyphen-hu * i8kutils (needed by none) * id3v2 * imlib * libnl1 * libotr3 (needed by none) * libunique3 * liquidwar (needed by none) * luajson (needed by none) * mhash * mod_perl * mythes-hu * mythes-nl * netkit-bsd-finger (needed by none) * ppl * python2-pysqlite * python2-speechd (needed by none) * racket (needed by none) * tsocks (needed by none) * tuxpuck (needed by none) * v86d (needed by none) Cheers -- Andrea Arch Linux Developer

1 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Jan '15

24 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 9 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (9 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * freeradius-3.0.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Can't update my own PKGBUILD, where to find errors?
by Sven Fischer 23 Jan '15

23 Jan '15

> Message-ID: <20150123115017.14690.22831(a)typhoon.lan> > > On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 at 12:34:40, LoneVVolf wrote: > > On 23-01-15 00:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > Let me elaborate just a bit: There currently isn't a bcusdk package > > > base in the AUR, so a new package base is created upon package > > > submission. That new package base contains a package eibd which is > > > already part of the package base eibd, though. Since a package base > > > cannot contain a package that is already provided by another one, you > > > receive that strange error message. Hope that clarifies it a bit. > > > Regards, Lukas > > > > The situation is weirder then that, check the PKGBUILD for the current > > version : > > > > > > pkgbase=('bcusdk') > > pkgname=('eibd') > > pkgver=0.0.5 > > pkgrel=4 > > > > > > Maybe the problems are caused by uploading a faulty .AURINFO or .SRCINFO > > file in the past. > > No, the package was last updated on 2014-03-04 20:25 which was before > the AUR supported split packages. During the migration, we automatically > assigned the package base eibd. > > > Sven, if you do want pkgbase bcusdk and pkgname eidb, > > i suggest you upload a dummy bcusdk pacakge, then request eidb to be > > merged into bcusdk. > > ... where "dummy bcusdk pacakge" means: Use the package base bcusdk > without any additional packages. > > > Once the merge has completed, you can then upload the correct package. Okay, thanks for the info, will do that. In fact, the PKGBUILD I attached was not the most recent one (with the correct version numbers). Anyway, a more delightful error message like "Package eibd already exists in pkgbase eibd, cannot overwrite with base bcusdk" would have made more sense to me... Regards, Sven -- Sven Fischer -- Platzer Höhenweg 34, 51429 Bergisch Gladbach, Germany Tel: +49-(0)2204-480985, Fax: +49-(0)2204-9670019 sven(a)leiderfischer.de

1 0