- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] python2-pwntools AUR package deletion
by Borja 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

Hi guys, I've renamed the package python2-pwntools to python2-pwntools-git in order to fit the best practices, thereby I would like to request the deletion of the python2-pwntools package. Cheers, Borja. -- ================================================================================ GPG 0x8C00BA074CA6E08B -- https://www.libcrack.so/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 13 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (13 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.20-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 3 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 3 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] [arch-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)
by Jan Alexander Steffens 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)rocketmail.com> wrote: > Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that > packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower "pkgrel="-value. > IMO that is very annoying and doesn't make sense. I don't want to > reinstall software that does work and I dislike to get tons of warnings. > Why is this the common approach? Resetting the pkgrel is indeed wrong. pkgrel should be bumped when moving to [community], and that has been my habit when moving packages from the AUR.

4 4

[aur-general] AUR 4.0 and existing git repositories
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

Hi, I've been reading about the upcoming AUR 4.0 with git repositories for each package (which is very much welcome for a variety of reasons!). I'm curious how existing packages will be handled. I already keep git repos for my packages, so it would be nice to be able to import those directly for two reasons: * To share the existing history with everyone else. * If packages are imported as-are into new repositories, then I can't push the existing repos. I'll need to create clone the AUR-generated ones, and work on those, loosing all my history. Has this sort of scenario been given any thought? Cheers and thanks for the hard work! -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right. Q: Why should I start my reply below the quoted text?

2 2

[aur-general] warning: foobar: local (1.0.0-2) is newer than community (1.0.0-1)
by Ralf Mardorf 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

Regarding to my AUR cache [1], it seems to be common practise, that packages that moved from AUR to community get a lower "pkgrel="-value. IMO that is very annoying and doesn't make sense. I don't want to reinstall software that does work and I dislike to get tons of warnings. Why is this the common approach? Regards, Ralf PS: I'll send it to Arch and AUR general. [1] $ ls /var/cache/aur/foobar*

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 11 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * subsurface-4.3-2 (i686) * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (i686) * subsurface-4.3-2 (x86_64) * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (11 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * subsurface-4.3-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * yakuake-2.9.9-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 7 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (i686) * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (i686) * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-qt5-1.0.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mongodb-2.6.7-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Orphan request (python2-flask-restful - qtadb)
by maxk69＠free.fr 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Hi, I'm requesting orphaning of some AUR packages. python2-flask-restful https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-flask-restful/ Last Updated: 2014-01-25 23:23 Flagged out-of-date (2014-12-23) No answers to my comment since three weeks. qtadb https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtadb/ Last Updated: 2013-08-13 16:43 Flagged out-of-date (2014-07-21) No answers to comments since last update. Thanks a lot.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 3 packages missing signoffs * 1 package older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * exim-4.85-1 (i686) * exim-4.85-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * exim-4.85-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (1 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Trusted User application
by Jerome Leclanche 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

[reposted to the correct list, oops] Hi list My name is Jerome Leclanche and this is my application for becoming an Arch Linux TU. Both Balló György and Sven-Hendrik Haase have encouraged me to apply, and Sven-Hendrik has agreed to sponsor me for the occasion. I am a French Python developer living in Stockholm. I work on FOSS both for my full-time job and in my free time, with my focus being on the LXQt project of which I am one of the lead developers (http://lxqt.org/) All my contributions are available on Github: https://github.com/jleclanche My main goal is of course to bring LXQt to [community]. I emailed Antonio Rojas about that a while back as he was also interested in this. I'm on my third year with Arch Linux and absolutely love the distro; been hanging around IRC and the community as jleclanche. This is my package list: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?SeB=m&K=jleclanche I have started the release process to get LXQt 0.9 out some time in January. I would really like to see it become available on Arch Linux at the same time =) Other than LXQt, I also maintain ruby-sass and its dependencies, which I would also like to move to [community] - although it is something I'd like to bring up with Anatol Pomozov first as he maintains a large array of Ruby packages himself already. I also saw that libfm and libfm-extra are currently orphaned there and since they are LXDE projects, I will happily pick them up. If any of you are going to FOSDEM, I will also be able to meet you there - I'd love to get to know the Arch community in person as well. Thanks for the great distribution and happy 2015 to everyone. I've kept this as terse as possible but I'll be happy to answer any questions. J. Leclanche

11 16