- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. anatolik - 2 signoffs 2. bpiotrowski - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Resignation from Trusted User position
by Thomas Dziedzic 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hey yall, I would like to send in my resignation as Archlinux Trusted User. I haven't been active as a TU for a while so I think it's time to throw in the towel. I am still going to stay as a archlinux developer, actively maintaining the ghc/cabal-install/haskell rebuilds. Thanks for the great times :) - Thomas Dziedzic (aka td123)

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Jan '15

12 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] KDE Frameworks 5 packages naming
by Evgeniy Alekseev 12 Jan '15

12 Jan '15

Hi, Is there a recommended way to naming KF5 additional components (like applets or themes) in AUR? We have a paper [1] which describes compnent naming for KDE4, but haven't one for KF5. For example atm we have applet "plasma-nm" [2] so should applet be named as "plasma-appletname"? I suppose they should be named as "kf5plasma-applet- appletname" on the analogy of KDE4 components. 1. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/KDE_package_guidelines 2. https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=plasma-nm -- Sincerely yours, Evgeniy Alekseev e-mail: darkarcanis(a)mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arcanis(a)jabber.ru

3 2

[aur-general] lib32-bluez & lib32-bluez4
by Que Quotion 11 Jan '15

11 Jan '15

I've submitted a new lib32-bluez package (bluez5 stack) to the AUR. bluez5 is a non-trival upgrade, so in case anyone depends on it, I resubmitted the original as lib32-bluez4.

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Jan '15

11 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Jan '15

10 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 19 packages missing signoffs * 3 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (i686) * bbswitch-0.8-22 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (i686) * vhba-module-20140928-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (i686) * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (x86_64) * bbswitch-0.8-22 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20140928-2 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-22 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-16 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-59 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (3 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 10 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 7 signoffs 3. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Compiz package naming
by Rob McCathie 09 Jan '15

09 Jan '15

Hello AUR general & Compiz package maintainers. There was some discussion about Compiz packages a little while ago, i don't think that much came of it. I'd like to re-open the discussion. My opinions/suggestions: Calling the 0.8 series "compiz" and the 0.9 series "compiz-devel" is no longer correct, it hasn't been for quite some time. All information on this page: http://www.compiz.org/ is completely wrong and out of date, like 5 years out of date, and should not be used as a reference for anything. Tracking of the state of Compiz should be done from here: https://launchpad.net/compiz Development of the 0.8 series is as close to being dead as it could be. Unless you count 2 tiny commits 5 months ago, nothing has been done in 16 months, and even that 16 month old commit was a minor change just to get it working with KDE 4.10, with the commit prior to that being an additional 5 months back. http://cgit.compiz.org/compiz/core/log/?h=compiz-0.8 My suggestion is pretty simple, "compiz" becomes the 0.9 series, the 0.8 series becomes "compiz-legacy". Any 0.9 series packages that have "core" in their name should have it removed, since the concept of Compiz being split up has been dropped since the 0.9 series. The 0.9 series doesn't have a "core" component, it's just "compiz". Some examples: martadinata666's "compiz-core" package would become "compiz-legacy-core" dev_rs0's "compiz-core-devel" package would become simply "compiz" Chazza's "compiz-core-bzr" package would become "compiz-bzr" flexiondotorg's "compiz-core-mate" package would become "compiz-legacy-core-mate" My "compiz-gtk-standalone" package would become "compiz-legacy-gtk-standalone" All the "compiz-fusion-plugins-*" packages would become "compiz-legacy-fusion-plugins-*" ...and so on. What are everyone's thoughts? -- Regards, Rob McCathie

9 22

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Jan '15

09 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-21 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * bbswitch-0.8-21 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * bbswitch-0.8-21 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * vhba-module-20140928-1 (i686), since 2014-12-21 * vhba-module-20140928-1 (x86_64), since 2014-12-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. arodseth - 2 signoffs 2. eric - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Jan '15

08 Jan '15

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 21 packages missing signoffs * 15 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * eric-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * eric-i18n-6.0.0-1 (any) 1/2 signoffs * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any) 0/2 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-21 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-h5py-2.4.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.8-21 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-h5py-2.4.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20140928-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * qscintilla-qt5-2.8.4-2 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (15 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-14 (any), since 2014-08-27 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1_r1-15 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * acpi_call-1.1.0-17 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * tp_smapi-0.41-58 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * virtualbox-modules-4.3.20-4 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * bbswitch-0.8-21 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (i686), since 2014-12-17 * bbswitch-0.8-21 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * r8168-8.039.00-6 (x86_64), since 2014-12-17 * vhba-module-20140928-1 (i686), since 2014-12-21 * vhba-module-20140928-1 (x86_64), since 2014-12-21 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 4 signoffs

1 0