- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Merge request rsibreak-svn ==> rsibreak-git
by Jekyll Wu 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

The upstream has switched to git. And the two packages are maintained by the same user. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rsibreak-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 8 signoffs 2. stephane - 2 signoffs 3. tomegun - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib
by Martin Schmölzer 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

Hi! I recently adopted and updated the following orphaned packages: - cross-arm-none-eabi-binutils - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc - cross-arm-none-eabi-gdb Two packages from the cross-arm-none-eabi-* series remain as orphans in the AUR: - cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base - cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib In the past, the cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package was used to bootstrap the GCC compiler for the ARM EABI target, which is no longer needed [1]. The cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib package was then built using the cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base package, which is no longer needed because my PKGBUILD does a combined source tree build, where the compilation of newlib is integrated with the GCC autotools build. Please remove the no longer needed cross-arm-none-eabi-gcc-base and cross-arm-none-eabi-newlib packages. Thanks! [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html - section "Building a cross compiler" Best regards, Martin Schmölzer

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: some vala packages
by Jekyll Wu 29 Nov '12

29 Nov '12

All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valaswig/ fail to buid https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/va/valaswig-hg/ fail to build (after suppressing the sed error) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valabind-hg/ dropped; fail to build by intention Regards Jekyll

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: some gedit packages
by Jekyll Wu 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

All packages below are orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-docwordscompletion/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-macro-plugin/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-multi-edit-svn/ svn repo gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gedit-markuplanguage-preview/ tarball gone, upstream seems gone too https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/valencia/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vtg/ fail to build https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vtg-devel/ fail to build Regards Jekyll

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Joeny Ang 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

Hello, vboxgtk-svn can now be removed. Reason: migrated to git. Thanks. Joeny (Biloky)

3 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686) 1/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-matplotlib-1.2.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-dkms-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (i686), since 2012-10-25 * catalyst-utils-12.11-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-25 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (i686), since 2012-10-28 * shapelib-1.3.0-1 (x86_64), since 2012-10-28 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 10 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 4 signoffs 3. dan - 2 signoffs 4. bisson - 1 signoffs 5. pierre - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge-Request: spatialite_gui to spatialite-gui
by piotr 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

Hi, could you please merge spatialite_gui [1] to spatialite-gui [2]? For some reason, I thought the underscore was a good idea at the time. Regards [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spatialite_gui/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spatialite-gui/

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: codeblocks-trunk ==> codeblocks-svn
by Jekyll Wu 28 Nov '12

28 Nov '12

They both build from svn trunk. Also, codeblocks-svn is actively maintained, while codeblocks-trunk is barely maintained. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/co/codeblocks-trunk/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/co/codeblocks-svn/

2 1

[aur-general] Systemd service files
by Limao Luo 27 Nov '12

27 Nov '12

In general, should .install files enable systemd service files on startup by default (even if some custom config may or may not be required)? Are there any other special considerations when deciding? [1] provided some info about systemd scripts, but I couldn't find anything as it relates to PKGBUILDs. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd

6 5