- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Packages deletion request
by KESHAV P.R. 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

The following packages have to be removed from AUR nspluginwrapper-flash - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6232 nspluginwrapper-ubuntu - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14707 wine-stable - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35486 nspluginwrapper and wine are present in the multilib repo. I think nspluginwrapper-flash-prerelease http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32081can be left alone since it provides prerelease versions, not stable releases. Regards. Keshav

4 4

Re: [aur-general] Flashplugin packages removal
by KESHAV P.R. 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

>> flashplugin-native64 - >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 > The old stable 64bit release, will be removed when we have it back in > the repo. There has never been any stable release of x86_64 flashplugin, the old plugin (with the security problems) was part of Adobe Labs and not a stable release. The source link in the flashplugin-native64 package does not work now and flashplugin-prereleas epackage works perfectly. >> flashplugin-dev - >> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32391 > Done, uploaded, never touched again. This package is not yet removed. It is too old and has not been updated for a long time. Regards. Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request (bin32-skype)
by Lukas Fleischer 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

I guess this [1] can be removed as well as skype has been in [multilib] for a while now... [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7914

3 2

[aur-general] please disown this packages
by Gonzalo Seguel 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

hi please disown the next packages of the user onestep_ua, this user is innactive gnome-packagekit http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16372 gnome-packagekit-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16508 kpackagekit http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20413 libpackagekit-qt http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20412 packagekit http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16370 packagekit-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16507 packagekit now support pacman backend, but this pkgbuilds are not updated and not add the properly patch and dependencies to works with pacman some users was created forks of the packages mentionen with the proper patch, i think that theese packages should be deleted when the "normal" packages be updated, with all the patch applied and wotks fine, but not now, to give a time to the users to change to the not forked packages and please delete this package gnome-packagekit-pacman http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40607 this is the same thing that gnome-packagekit (and it's my pkgbuild) thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: nspluginwrapper-debian
by Thomas Jost 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi, Please remove the nspluginwrapper-debian package from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34111 It's useless since now we have nspluginwrapper in [multilib]. Thanks! -- Thomas/Schnouki

2 1

[aur-general] Flashplugin packages removal
by KESHAV P.R. 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

I think the following packages have to be removed from AUR :- flashplugin-universal - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25402 lib32-flashplugin-prerelease - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37888 lib32-flashplugin - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15406 flashplugin-native64 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 flashplugin-dev - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32391 The lib32 plugins are present in multilib repo (using nspluginwrapper). A new native x86_64 flashplugin preview has been released in Adobe labs and available through flashplugin-prerelease http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32072 which replaces flashplugin-native64. ALl these packages have many votes though. Regards. Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] packages deletion request
by Xavier D. 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

4 5

[aur-general] Disown request
by Andrea Fagiani 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Please disown the pylotro [1] package, I've contacted the maintainer but he hasn't answered in about two weeks. The package is also flagged as out-of-date. Thanks [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33222

2 1

[aur-general] Delete Request
by Nathan O 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Can somebody delete pidgin-toolbar: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38546 I am currently working on it, and in my opinion, the package should be named pidgin-toobars since that is what the author of the plugin calls it. My package will be called pidgin-toobars Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Spux-svn should be removed
by Final Crisis 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

The Spux (ventrilo client) project is dead and another project, Mangler (also on aur already), has taken its place. The pkgbuild for spux-svn naturally has been long since dead, and should be removed.

2 1