- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] WARNING boost 1.43 enter testing
by Ionuț Bîru 20 Jun '10

20 Jun '10

On 06/18/2010 04:06 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > Hi DEVs/TUs, > > this new version has been split into boost-libs and boost. Now boost is > a makedepends and boost-libs a depends. > > If you rebuild a package that is not yours, please check to see if a new > upstream version is available, mostly to be compatible with boost >1.41. > encfs and schroot is two that comes in my head right now. > > Others, please test it and let me know via bugtracker if we have any > problems with the new boost. > > i know there was a problem with gcc 4.5 but every patch that i found, is > already applied in this version. > the rebuilding is over and i would prefer to let them in testing couples of days more. I would appreciate some feedback especially from encfs users -- Ionuț

1 0

[aur-general] Voting period: Thomas Dziedzic(td123)
by Ionuț Bîru 19 Jun '10

19 Jun '10

Hi TUs, It's voting time for Thomas Dziedzic's TU application. See discussion period here: http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2010-June/009198.html -- Ionuț

14 21

[aur-general] Please delete packages
by xandry 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

flashplugin-dev (#1), flashplugin-prerelease-debug (#2) supersedes this. flashplugin-universal (#3), flashplugin9 (#5) is out of date and it is substituted flashplugin-native64 (#4) + flashplugin from extra. Such package cannot be because of that any more that versions different for architectures. lib32-flashplugin (#6) substituted flashplugin from extra. lib32-flashplugin-prerelease (#7) it is substituted flashplugin-prerelease (#8) 1. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32391 2. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34871 3. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25402 4. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38184 5. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21045 6. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15406 7. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37888 8. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32072 -- I apologise for my English. Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/

1 0

[aur-general] delete xar and rename xar-archive to xar
by solsTiCe d'Hiver 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

as xar package is unmaintained since 2007 it could be deleted and xar-archive renamed to xar. Of course you better notify the owners of these packages first ;-) xar seems not to see any developped recently but may be a 1.5.3 release will come soon.

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete package
by xandry 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

Hello. Please delete nxserver-3.4 (#1). He is orphan and nxserver (#2) include in extra repository. 1. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32431 2. http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/nxserver/ ____ Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/

2 1

[aur-general] kdeplasma-addons-applets-daisy: unmaintained duplicate, can probably go.
by Peter Lewis 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

Hi, kdeplasma-addons-applets-daisy http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31392 is unmaintained and duplicates plasma-daisy-plasmoid http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25203 so can probably be safely deleted. Incidentally, is there any naming convention for KDE plasmoid packages? A quick search reveals a whole range of approaches: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=plasm&do_Search=Go Appending -plasmoid seems the most popular, but having kdeplasma-addons or something simliar at the start of the package name also seems sensible. Thanks, Pete.

3 8

[aur-general] Please delete a package.
by xandry 18 Jun '10

18 Jun '10

Hello people. Please delete swiftweasel3-athlon-xp [#1] and swiftweasel-athlon-xp [#2] that is replaced now by swiftweasel-amd-pgo, and becouse they out of date. [#1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12263 [#2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15940 [#3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23842 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] mpfr-3.0.0 rebuild
by Allan McRae 17 Jun '10

17 Jun '10

Hi, I will be uploading mpfr-3.0.0 soon. This requires a small amount of rebuilds (see below - I have not made a todo list). I will handle all of [core] and [extra]. I will also be pulling a new gcc-4.5 snapshot as the bug we patch out has be properly fixed upstream along with a couple of other useful fixes. [core] gcc/gcc-ada/gcc-fortran/gcc-objc libmpc [extra] genius rasqal seed [community] cross-arm-elf-gcc-base gcc-avr mingw32-gcc mingw32-gcc-base BTW, we really need to standarise cross-compiler naming... Allan

2 2

[aur-general] Out-of-date packages in [extra]/[community]
by Andrea Scarpino 16 Jun '10

16 Jun '10

Hi DEVs/TUs, these packages are out-of-date from time and needed by none. Can I move them on AUR? I will wait 2 days because I do not know many of them, maybe someone is useful. Please TUs, let me know if you want to maintain any of these packages in [community]. [extra] - biopython - gcin - glabels - linux_logo - nss_ldap - pam_ldap - prelink - pylint - python-cheetah - python-formencode - python-sqlobject (needed by pacbuild, but does pacbuild still work?!) - python-gdata (needed by pytube in [community]) - python-vpython [community] - live-f1 - sauerbraten -- Andrea Scarpino - andreascarpino.it KDE Maintainer in Arch Linux

4 3

[aur-general] Delete libvpx package
by julroy67 15 Jun '10

15 Jun '10

As libvpx is now in extra, you can delete my libvpx package from AUR, thanks :)

2 1