- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

[arch-general] I am looking for the squid package maintainer.
by Eliezer Croitoru 23 Jul '15

23 Jul '15

Hey, I am looking for the squid package maintainer. I have been using the last built of squid 3.5.6 and it is missing rock cache_dir. It is considered to be stable enough for public use and testing. The addition of rock cache_dir doesn't affect any current installations or configuration. How can I get a hold of the package maintainer? Eliezer

2 1

[arch-general] [Q] Package all sources in openjdk8-src as Fedora does
by Konstantin Gribov 23 Jul '15

23 Jul '15

As I saw in fedora openjdk rpm, they bundle non-public java sources (like packages in sun, jdk etc). It's quite useful for debugging when low-level jdk parts involved, so I propose this patch (based on java8-openjdk 8.u51-1). File all-sources.patch contains patch for ${srcdir}/jdk-${_repo_ver}/make/CreateJars.gmk to include all sources instead of whitelisted ones. PKGBUILD.patch adds all-sources.patch to sources, its checksum and apply it in prepare phase. -- Best regards, Konstantin Gribov

2 3

[arch-general] A small and special Arch Linux distro
by feel.squally 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Hi folks, Few months ago I started an Arch Linux related open source project and, now that is in a stable version and it has got an interesting popularity, I wanted to announce it in the Arch Linux community. The project website is: http://fsquillace.github.io/junest-site/index.html The github page is: https://github.com/fsquillace/junest The JuNest project consists on a tiny distro Arch Linux based that can run upon any already existing GNU/Linux distros as a sandbox. In the sandbox you can install packages and run programs without any root access. There are more functionalities that are documented in the website such as possibilities to run the image on different architectures and so on. The intent of JuNest is, of course, not to substitute Arch Linux but to have an Arch Linux environment everywhere is needed. Any feedback and contribution are really welcome :) Thank you, Filippo

1 0

[arch-general] journald configuration
by kqt4at5v＠gmail.com 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

This is my first system that uses systemd-journald for logging Rsyslog and syslog-ng have facility and priority to control what gets logged and how verbose How is this done with journald Richard

3 3

[arch-general] sudo 1.8.14.p2-1 breaks gksudo
by Ralf Mardorf 22 Jul '15

22 Jul '15

Hi, after upgrading sudo today, gksudo stopped working. Downgrading sudo fixed the issue. [rocketmouse@archlinux tmp]$ grep sudo /var/log/pacman.log | grep 2015-07-21 [2015-07-21 15:30] [ALPM] upgraded sudo (1.8.14.p1-1 -> 1.8.14.p2-1) [2015-07-21 18:24] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -U sudo-1.8.11.p2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz' [2015-07-21 18:24] [ALPM] warning: /etc/sudoers installed as /etc/sudoers.pacnew [2015-07-21 18:24] [ALPM] downgraded sudo (1.8.14.p2-1 -> 1.8.11.p2-1) [2015-07-21 18:58] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -S sudo' [2015-07-21 18:58] [ALPM] warning: /etc/sudoers installed as /etc/sudoers.pacnew [2015-07-21 18:58] [ALPM] upgraded sudo (1.8.11.p2-1 -> 1.8.14.p2-1) [2015-07-21 18:59] [PACMAN] Running 'pacman -U sudo-1.8.11.p2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz' [2015-07-21 18:59] [ALPM] warning: /etc/sudoers installed as /etc/sudoers.pacnew [2015-07-21 18:59] [ALPM] downgraded sudo (1.8.14.p2-1 -> 1.8.11.p2-1) I need to extract the package of version 1.8.14.p1-1 from a backup, I downgraded to 1.8.11.p2-1, because this was the version provided by the downgrade command, however there wasn't an issue when 1.8.14.p1-1 was installed. Any ideas, before I file a bug report? Regards, Ralf

3 7

[arch-general] Arch Linux trademark and docker images
by Christoph Seitz 21 Jul '15

21 Jul '15

Hi there, I just stumbled on the following [1] blog post, which says that shipping ubuntu docker images with modifications (e.g. web app, etc.) might be a violation of trademarks. I was wondering wether this also applies to arch linux, since the trademark policy [2] is derived from ubuntu somehow. Especially if you use aur packages inside the container, the trademark policy insists on a trademark license. I found some packages [3] that include aur packages. The FSF started a dialog with Canonical in order to allow such customization based on ubuntu. [4] Am I right with my assumption, that docker images with aur packages need a trademark license? Would it be a possibility to change the policy in oder to allow such works as docker images with aur packages? Regards, Christoph --- [1] http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/36312.html [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:TrademarkPolicy [3] https://registry.hub.docker.com/search?q=arch&searchfield= [4] https://www.fsf.org/news/canonical-updated-licensing-terms

2 1

[arch-general] Tuxguitar: documentation and SWT/GTK
by Alan E. Davis 21 Jul '15

21 Jul '15

I have stumbled. Archlinux does almost everything to perfection, so I am concerned I may have erred in the installation of tuxguitar. I am uisng a 64 bit, a relatively mature installation with many packages installed, including many from AUR. Tux guitar works well, so far; however, when trying to access Documentation through "Help>Documentation" Tuxguitar hangs. I've spent some hours researching this problem, and have gotten nowhere. Every google search I make leads one to mention of SWT, and apparently the most up to date 4.2 version, and some issue regarding gtk. The following messages are received: (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type 'GtkWi dget' (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot add class private field to in valid type '<invalid>' (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot add private field to invalid (non-instantiatable) type '<invalid>' (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_add_interface_static: assert ion 'G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE (instance_type)' failed (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot register existing type 'GtkBu ildable' (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_interface_add_prerequisite: assertion 'G_TYPE_IS_INTERFACE (interface_type)' failed (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion 'result != 0' failed (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_add_interface_static: assert ion 'G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE (instance_type)' failed (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: assertion ' parent_type > 0' failed (TuxGuitar:10351): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot add private field to invalid (non-instantiatable) type '<invalid>' Also interesting, in the "About" screen, is the following information: This product include third party libraries: -> SWT (Standard Widget Toolkit): http://www.eclipse.org/swt/ -> iText (Free Java-PDF library): http://www.lowagie.com/iText/ The documentation is pretty good, in general, on the Archlinux Wiki. I could not find much useful information regarding this problem with Tuxguitar with respect to Archlinux, even there. Can someone shed some light, or, better still, suggest a way to solve this problem. I suppose I can try to get a PDF of the docs, and use that. Alan Davis -- “That is the way to learn the most, that when you are doing something with such enjoyment that you don’t notice that the time passes.” --- Albert Einstein

4 5

Re: [arch-general] vmnet fail to recompile when kernel upgrade
by mudongliang 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

I scan the webpage: Sources common-functions.sh vmci-10.0.4-3.14.patch vmci-10.0.6-3.19.patch vmci-10.0.6-4.0.patch vmmon-10.0.4-3.14.patch vmmon-10.0.5-3.14.patch vmnet-10.0.1-3.13.patch vmnet-10.0.4-3.14.patch vmnet-10.0.5-3.17.patch vmnet-11.1.0-3.19.patch vmware-patch.sh vmware-unpatch.sh vmware-usbarbitrator.service vmware-workstation.service vmware.service vsock-10.0.4-3.14.patch vsock-10.0.6-3.15.patch vsock-10.0.6-3.19.patch There is no corresponding patch for vmnet 4.0.0 Maybe I should use the higher version of VMware Workstation. I hear that someone has installed 11.2 without this issue in kernel 4.0.0. Thank you all the same. - mudongliang On 07/20/2015 02:55 PM, Chi Hsuan Yen wrote: > Dear mudongliang, > > The AUR package vmware-patch[1] may be helpful. > > Best Regards > > Yen Chi Hsuan > > [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/vmware-patch/ > > On 20 July 2015 at 10:38, mudongliang <mudongliangabcd(a)outlook.com> wrote: > >> Today I upgraded kernel to 4.0.0-2, but when I restart ,I found that >> vmnet module can't be recompiled >> I use vmware workstation of version : 10.0.3 >> I search and find that all the thing about kernel 3.19 in arch wiki. >> >> # curl http://pastie.org/pastes/9934018/download -o /tmp/vmnet-3.19.patch >> # cd /usr/lib/vmware/modules/source >> # tar -xf vmnet.tar >> # patch -p0 -i /tmp/vmnet-3.19.patch >> # tar -cf vmnet.tar vmnet-only >> # vmware-modconfig �Cconsole �Cinstall-all >> >> But this method is not right with kernel 4.0.0-2. vmnet module can't be >> compiled successfully. >> I need a patch for kernel 4.0.0-2 so that I can use vmware normally. >> Thanks in advance. >> - mudongliang >>

1 0

[arch-general] vmnet fail to recompile when kernel upgrade
by mudongliang 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

Today I upgraded kernel to 4.0.0-2, but when I restart ,I found that vmnet module can't be recompiled I use vmware workstation of version : 10.0.3 I search and find that all the thing about kernel 3.19 in arch wiki. # curl http://pastie.org/pastes/9934018/download -o /tmp/vmnet-3.19.patch # cd /usr/lib/vmware/modules/source # tar -xf vmnet.tar # patch -p0 -i /tmp/vmnet-3.19.patch # tar -cf vmnet.tar vmnet-only # vmware-modconfig �Cconsole �Cinstall-all But this method is not right with kernel 4.0.0-2. vmnet module can't be compiled successfully. I need a patch for kernel 4.0.0-2 so that I can use vmware normally. Thanks in advance. - mudongliang

2 1

[arch-general] current flash vulnerabilities - what to do?
by Francis Gerund 19 Jul '15

19 Jul '15

Hello! Run: - Arch linux 64-bit - 4.0.7-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 30 07:50:21 UTC 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux - Firefox 39.0-1 - flashplugin 11.2.202.481-1 (Install Date : Wed 08 Jul 2015) What is best practice about the current flash vulnerabilites? Just uninstall flashplugin? Can live without, but many websites still require it.

13 32