- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Start sequences of daemons in background
by Florian Pritz 23 May '09

23 May '09

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Rayner wrote: > This patch allows you to background a whole sequence of daemons, > rather than an individual daemon. As a result, you can get a very fast > parallel boot. I suppose this could be considered an 'arch like' > parallel boot setup. This isn't my idea, I'm sure someone has made a > patch like this before however I couldnt find it and it never got > merged. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12476 (last comment has a good patch) Greetings Florian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKGBIlAAoJEG0WVcFM4cE+OJgP/RMehbQ9dO/E5bQ22IRGoZ6L feSfcF8S3+xLUcZ06A5IrMrSIMlLltVA7yMiS1OGtg+H9+sRmPg3xZndCVWGV5Bz AcKXHO8OYxy/EzErF447f+wGZtnIV9mz6QDvov6TUFrYwj5IdzBSPvbiO6WV/uUv WyMmDuKbvN8jFEZhVjfWNbhfEtDc8pgWUF/RPMIRbqZeii8ZzweD/pBCFsM1Tx1n 50MhF8i0dF8kDRqrNuyAJeN5D++YoZq8CtsXASx+vj2+k+qr3YnqybOu69Dx+RHA axmUDX0D5COyCz0q/XHSRdupr7IjMgNbMwWGy9EaTbbWC5kcgA40PBUkBcZold7d jW52X4q6FVcaU4rkdi3Jx0YUvT5XRRTqM1k6GpUR9fhKOFwK0aVcOuGSLevZ1Ibc qamjCiohqXGx0Xa5YvHre2bB+AKloSj7OshQRi4HjAm7sUebPdvIDG2MWbi0lS5Z 55F8l6vLa1iMFmvlVKlFTEcb5HjnIhVqT+khWBfWjJdOoJMoYDDA7qBl2wLi3eTr J2ytpe4LVfQJhPpWfeVZVpzcW14wVFv2MDuH1UGMKliO0hGbXKl2PhX3fdqXqXYP p7o+A08hWvMQGnktJpr3b6Xe+vvxq2cfBhjrokPMZ9YcdcHpxV+cacGZYX3jyjtQ FaZT0Y1hPtsFUVVrdtVs =6WZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [PATCH] Start sequences of daemons in background
by Damjan Georgievski 23 May '09

23 May '09

> This patch allows you to background a whole sequence of daemons, > rather than an individual daemon. As a result, you can get a very fast > parallel boot. I suppose this could be considered an 'arch like' > parallel boot setup. This isn't my idea, I'm sure someone has made a > patch like this before however I couldnt find it and it never got > merged. > > The major benefit is that boot doesnt get held up by slow starting > dependencies, like hal and network. I can't background network because > I have other services that depend on it such as nfs, ssh, iptables, > ntpdate and cups. Similarly, I cant background hal, as gdm depends on > it. ssh, iptables and cups can be started before your network is up... even more, iptables SHOULD be started before network is up, since it needs to protect you from the first moment > For example... > DAEMONS=(@net-auto,ntpdate,cups @acpi,hal,gdm syslog-ng cpufreq bluetooth crond) > Comma delimited groups are started in background and run in sequence. > > Bootchart testing > I saw a consistent improvement of at least 5s, from 31s to 26s. One > boot somehow acheived 23s, and that was with full auto wireless > enabled. I used a fixed modules list to avoid any inconsistency in > udev time, so udev was always 1.9-2.1 seconds. I also used a wired > connection for network as wireless connection time varied too much. > There is a more noticable improvement with wireless, as it takes > longer and can be backgrounded with the patch. > -- damjan

1 0

Re: [arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 11:56 +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > Baho Utot wrote: > > I am missing something here ? > > > > > > sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u > > building union chroot > > ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! > > > > > > I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs > > > > You need to patch makechrootpkg with this: > http://code.phraktured.net/cgit.cgi/devtools/commit/?id=2269e5c9 > > Allan > > > $ sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/scrat/Build/root -- -u building union chroot ERROR: No aufs available. Abandon ship! $ cat /proc/filesystems nodev sysfs nodev rootfs nodev bdev nodev proc nodev binfmt_misc nodev debugfs nodev securityfs nodev sockfs nodev pipefs nodev anon_inodefs nodev tmpfs nodev inotifyfs nodev devpts nodev ramfs nodev mqueue jfs nodev fuse fuseblk nodev fusectl nodev usbfs ext2 The modprobe -q aufs did not happen, lsmod did not show it. modprobe aufs and retrying still fails with no aufs --> ERROR: No aufs available. Abandon ship! Using the latest kernel 2.6.29-4

2 2

[arch-general] calender pgm
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

I am looking for a calander program like the one in evolution but is a standalone or web based Any Suggestions?

6 14

[arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 23 May '09

23 May '09

I am missing something here ? sudo makechrootpkg -r /home/Build/root -- -u building union chroot ERROR: No unionfs available. Abandon ship! I have aufs2-utils installed and I did a modprobe fuse and modprobe aufs

2 1

[arch-general] DeveloperWiki:Building in a Clean Chroot
by Baho Utot 22 May '09

22 May '09

Which unionfs should I use? unionfs-utils or aufs2-util They are both marked as ophans

1 0

[arch-general] Subversion server - authentication problem
by Paulo Santos 22 May '09

22 May '09

Greetings everyone, I've been trying to create a Subversion repository without success. I end up always with the same error: 403 Forbidden. I've followed the wiki [1] doing exactly the same as described there (except the path and username) and I don't understand. I set the permissions, checked the ssl paths over and over again, the same with .svn-policy-file and nothing... Trying the link in the browser, accept the certificate and pass the basic authentication and there it is, the 403 page. I don't get prompted again for authentication so it's the right one. Using svn -co, the same thing: svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to OPTIONS request for 'https://localhost/svn/repo' Does anyone have any idea what can be wrong? Maybe some common mistake or something... Thanks in advance, Paulo Santos [1] http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Subversion_Setup

2 1

[arch-general] dictionary for evolution
by Baho Utot 22 May '09

22 May '09

What dictionary does evolution use for spell checking? It tells me I have only the Turkish available, but since I don't know Turkish I need to change this to something I know about. Thanks

2 2

[arch-general] libdrm stuck at 2.4.9
by Damjan Georgievski 22 May '09

22 May '09

Does anyone know why the i686 version of libdrm is stuck at version 2.4.9 (the x86_64 is up-to-date at 2.4.11)? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?q=libdrm I don't mind it much, since I've compiled my own package, but each time I try to -Syu pacman wants to downgrade to 2.4.9 and it's a bit annoying :) -- damjan

4 3

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] glibc-2.10 toolchain
by Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi 22 May '09

22 May '09

Allan McRae wrote: > Hi, > > Now that gmp is fixed... it is about time to signoff for these packages. > > binutils 2.19.1-3 > gcc 4.4.0-2 > gcc-libs 4.4.0-2 > glibc 2.10.1-1 > gmp 4.3.1-2 > kernel-headers 2.6.29.3-1 Currently running on it (both 32 and 64) since these pkg are on my mirror ;) > > I will draft an announcement about the kernel minimum requirement > change from 2.6.16 -> .18. > Maybe a good idea is to add these two links to note: about porting to GCC 4.4.0 [#1] and glibc-2.10 changes [#2] especially for the part of "C++ compliance". [#1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/porting_to.html [#2] http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20948.html Good Luck! -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D

1 0