- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] merge request: libsnl
by Maurizio D'Addona 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the PKGBUILD libsnl [0]. I have updated it according to the VCS PKGBUILD guidelines and submitted the new package libsnl-svn [1]. Please, can a TU merge [0] into [1] ? [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsnl/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libsnl-svn/

2 1

[aur-general] Delete sixpair-bluez
by Justin Dray 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

Can we please get sixpair-bluez removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sixpair-bluez/ It has been out of date for many years and there is already a sixpair package that is updated. Regards, Justin Dray E: justin(a)dray.be M: 0433348284

2 1

[aur-general] Merge bugseverywhere into bugseverywhere-git
by Alfredo Palhares 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

Hello fellow archinians. Please merge bugseverywhere[0] into bugseverywhere-git[1] the "stable" version of be is totally out of date, git is the only option. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bugseverywhere/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bugseverywhere-git/ -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

2 1

[aur-general] museek packages cleanup.
by Karol Woźniak 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

Hi all, it's cleaning time! As museek+ sources were recently moved from svn to git, I thought it would be good time to have a look at our packages for them. Therefore, please merge museekd-svn [1] and museeq-svn [2] into museekd-git [3] and museeq-git [4], respectively. Please also merge museekbindings-svn [5] into [3], as they're provided by that package (as long as the user has python2 installed). Next, please remove museek-plus [6], which is very old and not working for a long time. And last, we have to get rid of museekplus-svn [7]. I am not sure how, because it is substituted partially by [3] and partially by [4]. Feel free to distribute the points however you find most suitable or even just remove the package :). [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museekd-svn/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museeq-svn/ [3]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museekd-git/ [4]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museeq-git/ [5]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museekbindings-svn/ [6]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museek-plus/ [7]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/museekplus-svn/ -- Best regards, Karol Woźniak aka Kenji Takahashi @ kenji.sx "Don't shoot the messenger."

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (i686) * homebank-4.5.4-2 (i686) * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (i686) * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (i686) * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (x86_64) * homebank-4.5.4-2 (x86_64) * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (x86_64) * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 5 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: bittorrent-sync into btsync
by Emil Lundberg 26 Oct '13

26 Oct '13

Package bittorrent-sync[1] has been replaced by btsync[2] and btsync-autoconfig. Please merge [1] into [2] and remove [1]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bittorrent-sync [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btsync /Emil Lundberg, aka Lorde

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: graphviz-hg
by 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

The source URL in the package [graphviz-hg][1] is dead, and graphviz is now using Git as VCS, a new package is created at [graphviz-git][2]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphviz-hg/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/graphviz-git/

2 1

[aur-general] Removal/Renaming Request
by Ronnie Andrew 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

I'm the new maintainer of the package: wxpython https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython-2.4.9.1/ This package should be renamed from "wxpython-2.4.9.1" to "wxpython-updates" since its the development version of wxpython and submitting a new package for each version would not be ideal. Also, i mistakenly submitted a new package trying to update wxpython to a new version which should be deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxpython2.9.5.0/ Best Regards, Ronnie Andrew

5 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Oct '13

25 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libtaginfo-0.1.6-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 4 signoffs

1 0