- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Deletion for enigmail?
by David Manouchehri 24 Nov '13

24 Nov '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Not completely sure about this one, but think we should delete enigmail? It's out of date and the plugin can be downloaded straight through Thunderbird's add-on manager. - -- David Manouchehri -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJSkN9uAAoJENwn+5t0BF4/7F4P/3y8uE523M+UDgiKQnk5aG/H 6xjVaHnTb46XLX5FwFdI2pv7SruWTQkzP1QnsLmhh1loopi6LOL81pkhuMsgYDPg lO4mMVaYMXh38TqYArzf7LEEA1EXy+f6bEXgdKS+n04ztjua0fQ+tIWcdakf8jc8 4sslWhTF12DbIWdGUzU7BEVzTBmeTNNZNvlbiViGW4fWjDzaZFO6PKijXeErAS1o 8DzRyoUrXXop0tq/k8wr8tXQEGfXWMNlmInYhFKjcII43bwgoUUx6dNUnGsS8VvI oDUpGNcLK23rj/jrZlERawiocJyJc53Lc1GUMYVAlMQpcL+1G1+abkauInI92nVg FbkgVwpERxkVM1ID/I4dHJglcwZhTxJKFukAJPqOIeZZQ7g0WooN8pEO3u7t+EQ6 5BSXFkeNHOgk49dB8WlqdlJjwmQzGX/ql7wzdOLF1KELuvPX2Cy23U0HBJJqz18h 8CWSARJ0wmTUQGodKFa7TF1975hu1xGs8V8T6Zmvywas0tIzBKYNAANovUk64eti TYW4fL2EO4bzCehd4eYi+ceJEf2QO9oesWgPefg/xZj4vVuAksgMDhxeMKl0nBBe pRc/03/DyYNLMkvBRrH5xuI/qqGJRdrREOaotiTpuWxU9R6my1UF9Z6oCeSULwiv HUvkknIzdkqTkUcwxCsO =9WBW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by Lara Maia 23 Nov '13

23 Nov '13

Lara Maia <lara at craft.net.br> пишет: >Please, merge redshift-bzr[1] into redshift-git[2]. Developer currently >moving development to Github <https://github.com/jonls/redshift>. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redshift-bzr/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redshift-git/ > >thanks Merged, tnx. - -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sirencelly yours, E.Alekseev. ------------------------------------------------------------- redshift-minimal-bzr[1] and redshift-minimal-git[2] need be merged too. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redshift-minimal-bzr/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redshift-minimal-git/ -- *~ Lara ~*

2 1

[aur-general] Long check() function in AUR packages
by Anatol Pomozov 23 Nov '13

23 Nov '13

Hi, I am a big proponent of using automation testing. Tests saved me many times at my $dayjob projects. That is why I strongly believe that every arch package should have check() function - it is better find a problem at build time, rather than get a crash while running the application. But some projects have quite large test suites. v8,rethinkdb,tup-git are examples - their tests take 10 minutes or even more. Some AUR users complain that it is too long. Even worse - there can be flaky tests that work fine for me but fail for some users. What is the best practices in this situation? I see a few possible answers: 1) Tell users relax and enjoy running tests. Tests are for their own good. 2) Tell users to disable (!check) option in /etc/makepkg.conf 3) Maybe AUR install scripts (like yaourt) should not run tests at installation time? Or at least make it configurable? What do you think is the best option?

3 2

[aur-general] staticlibs in PKGBUILD?
by oliver 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Hello, some people mourned on AUR that a package that I maintain (adopted from other peoples) does not use "staticlibs" option. before they mentioned it I didn't knew about it. Is this a new PKGBUILD-option, or did I just have not seen it before? What does this option do? I found the description for the option, it says: staticlibs - Leave static library (.a) files in packages Will static libs be only part of the package, if this option is set? So, without it, only shared libs will be put into the install package and static libs will be leftout? Can somebody please explain me this option? Ciao, Oliver

2 2

[aur-general] Merge request: non-suite-git -> non-daw-git
by Lieven Moors 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Hi, I would like ask for a merge of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/non-suite-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/non-daw-git/ Both were providing the same package. I emailed the author of non-suite-git, and he agreed to merge both packages into non-daw-git. Thanks, lieven

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request: libassuan1
by Tom 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Nowadays libassuan1 isn't required by any current package and at least I don't expect it to be so in the future. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * r8168-lts-8.036.00-7 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-19 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.2-3 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.036.00-7 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-19 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.2-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * r8168-lts-8.036.00-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-19 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-19 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.3.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 5 signoffs 2. bisson - 4 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: bison27
by Rob McCathie 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

> > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:17:37 -0800 > From: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov(a)gmail.com> > To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" > <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] Delete request: bison27 > Message-ID: > <CAOMFOmXx=yDffcmEPfkdCMbDs8vCFcaRJZg3WyOnchrm=+ > mzTQ(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Hi > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Rob McCathie <korrode(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have re-uploaded bison27 to AUR and disowned the package. > > > > Sorry, if i'd known it had been used anywhere other than wine-stable > > obviously i'd have just disowned it and left it. > > > > Sadly when another packages references your package as a makedepends (not > > depends) is doesn't show up in that "Require by" section. > > Arch website tracks build time dependencies between packages. Check > for example 'bison' package > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/bison/ > > AUR website should do the same. Could you please file a bug against AUR > project? > Seems such a bug report already exists. I added my vote. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12998 Regards, Rob McCathie (korrode)

1 0

[aur-general] vim-python2
by Alberto Corona 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

I've flagged the package and emailed the maintainer but I haven't gotten a response. I have the updated package ready https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-python2/

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: fzf
by foalsrock 21 Nov '13

21 Nov '13

Hi, I've submitted the fzf[1] package some time ago with a few oversights. I've now re-submitted it as fzf-git[2]. Given that there are no votes or comments there's no reason for a merge so I'd like fzf to be deleted. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fzf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fzf-git/ Thanks!

2 1