- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] disown request
by xantares 09 04 Nov '13

04 Nov '13

Hello, These packages really need a fix regarding pacman changes and the last update dates back from july, and the maintainer still doesn't reply to our mails and patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-readline/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-termcap/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libffi/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-openssl/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libxml2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libiconv/ xan.

4 5

[aur-general] Merge request: projectm-jack
by Allen Li 04 Nov '13

04 Nov '13

It is possible to merge projectm-jack in the AUR with the one in community? I am the maintainer for the package in the AUR, and there's no need for it anymore since it is in community. Allen

4 5

[aur-general] (no subject)
by Lester B 04 Nov '13

04 Nov '13

Please delete [1], [2] and [3] because they are subset of [4]. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ozone-theme [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ozone2 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ozone3 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lubuntu-artwork

2 1

[aur-general] libhugetlbfs: transfer of ownership
by Anatol Pomozov 04 Nov '13

04 Nov '13

Hi I would like get ownership of libhugetlbfs AUR package. The owner email does not exist, and the package is out-of-date. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libhugetlbfs/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 9:30 PM Subject: libhugetlbfs: transfer of ownership To: uergen.bre(a)gmail.com Hi, I see that you are the maintainer of this package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libhugetlbfs/ I would like to get the ownership and keep improving/fix and update it.

2 1

[aur-general] Backslash to split lines in `depends` array
by Fabien Dubosson 03 Nov '13

03 Nov '13

Hi, I was trying to update my AUR packages with `aura` [1] † and get the following error: aura >>= Determining dependencies... aura >>= Dependency checking failed for these reasons: The dependency `\` could not be found. You may need to search for a package to satisfy it. This is due to the following lines in `octave-hg` [2] PKGBUILD: depends=('fftw>=3.2.2' 'curl' 'fltk' 'hdf5' 'glpk' 'arpack' 'gl2ps' \ 'qrupdate' 'qscintilla' 'qhull' 'graphicsmagick' 'java-environment') The problem doesn't seem to appear with `yaourt` [3] . So before filling a bug request to `aura`, I wanted to be sure that it is allowed/common to use `\` to split lines in the `depends` array? If it is not the case, I will post a comment on the `octave-hg` AUR page to ask to remove the backslash. † Also tested with `aura-git`, the problem still exists. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aura/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octave-hg/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt/ Best regards, Fabien

6 6

[aur-general] Delete requests: libfm-qt / libfm-qt-git
by Jerome Leclanche 03 Nov '13

03 Nov '13

For the time being, the library is not available standalone and is shipped as part of pcmanfm-qt. I'll reupload it once it's been split off. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfm-qt/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfm-qt-git/ J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Nov '13

03 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.12.1599.102-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.12.1599.102-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Request Remove: lua52-socket
by SpinFlo 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

Hi please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua52-socket/ this package is include in [community] greetings

2 1

[aur-general] PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git
by Bruno Jimenez 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

Hi, I have been interested lately in alt-currency and I wanted to try zetacoin, but I couldn't find a package in the repos or the AUR. So, using terracoin-qt's PKGBUILD (which is outdated, by the way) I have created the PKGBUILD for zetacoin-qt-git. As it is the first PKGBUILD I make, I wanted to make sure that it is well written. Thanks in Advance! Bruno P.S: Maybe tomorrow, I'll make also the zetacoin-daemon-git PKGBUILD in case you want to advice me on something

3 9

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Nov '13

02 Nov '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.12.1599.102-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.12.1599.102-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0