- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Oct '13

30 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] please remove lib32-wineasio
by Joakim Hernberg 30 Oct '13

30 Oct '13

I created https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-wineasio/ by mistake. It's not needed so please remove it. Sorry for the noise! -- Joakim

2 1

[aur-general] projectm packages in AUR
by Allen Li 29 Oct '13

29 Oct '13

Hello, I am the maintainer for two projectm packages in the AUR, namely projectm-jack and projectm-libvisual-alsa. I think it would be best if these were also included in the split PKGBUILD for projectm related packages in the official repos. I see no reason to keep them separate in the AUR. P.S. I see that projectm-jack is now in the repos. Should I drop a message on the AUR mailing list to have that merged? P.P.S. I tried putting this in arch-dev-public, but it's not open for comment to the public it seems. I'm not entirely sure where to direct this, but since it is sort of related to the AUR, here seemed like a possibility. Allen

2 1

[aur-general] pkgbuild with after installation Customizations
by Storm Dragon 29 Oct '13

29 Oct '13

Hi, I have made a package for espeakup that pulls the git version and installs it. It has a systemd file so that espeakup can start with boot. After installation is complete though, the system file needs to be edited to set the voice the user wants to use, e.g. en-us, en-sc, etc. Can I just put a standard prompt in the pkgbuild? E.g. read -p "Enter the voice file you want to use, e.g. en-us: " voice Currently I just set it to en-us by default which means the person who uses it would have to edit the systemd file to change it. Thanks Storm -- -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ My last.fm profile: http://www.last.fm/user/stormdragon2976 "I am your soul insane" Slayer - Gemini

5 15

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Oct '13

29 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (i686) * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.94-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 16 signoffs 2. bisson - 13 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: eclipse-knime
by Fabien Dubosson 28 Oct '13

28 Oct '13

Hello, The package "eclipse-knime" is orphan, outdated from 5 months and its name is not explicit. The package "kime-sdk" replaces it from several months. Could you remove it for clarity? Best regards, Fabien Dubosson

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Oct '13

28 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * aqbanking-5.0.25-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * homebank-4.5.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kmymoney-4.6.4-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * libpinyin-0.9.93-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mailman-2.1.16-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * skrooge-1.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * wvstreams-4.6.1-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 15 signoffs 2. allan - 14 signoffs 3. pierre - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] disown request: fuse-zip
by xtricman 28 Oct '13

28 Oct '13

Hi, please disown fuse-zip: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fuse-zip/ The package has been flagged out-of-date on 2013-06-29 and has not been updated by the maintainer since 2011-01-16.But this software has been updated to 0.3.0 upstream: https://code.google.com/p/fuse-zip/ I send email to the maintainer's mailbox<ur6lad(a)archlinux.org.ua> and get no reply. Thanks, Xtricman

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion Request: lua51-socket-devel
by Dwayne Bent 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua51-socket-devel/ Hi, can this package be deleted? Its functionality is now in the official package in community. Thanks. -- Dwayne Bent

2 1

[aur-general] Merge compiz-core-dev into compiz-dev
by Johannes Löthberg 27 Oct '13

27 Oct '13

Hey, Upstream doesn't call it compiz-core anymore, the compiz-core-dev package hasn't been updated in over a year and is orphaned. compiz-dev on the other hand is named after the current upstream name and is up to date, could a TU merge compiz-core-dev[1] into compiz-dev[2]? [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core-dev/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-dev/ -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg

3 2