- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] nextcloud-client: suggestion of moving to [community]
by Damian Nowak 21 Sep '18

21 Sep '18

Hello! Back in 2014, I sent the same request for owncloud-client. This time, I'd like to suggest nextcloud-client [1] as a potential candidate for [community]. It has 240 votes, nextcloud (the webapp) is already in [community], while owncloud (webapp) was moved to AUR a long time ago. Please note Nextcloud client is fully compatible with Owncloud server, and vice versa. I still use Owncloud server from AUR on my server, while using Nextcloud client across all my devices (Arch Linux, OSX and Android). Thank you for you consideration. CC Antonio, a TU maintainer of owncloud-client [2] [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nextcloud-client/ [2]: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/owncloud-client/ -Nowaker

2 1

[aur-general] Spam account: vedant
by Florian Bruhin 17 Sep '18

17 Sep '18

Yet another spambot: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vedant/comments Florian -- https://www.qutebrowser.org | me(a)the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/

1 0

[aur-general] Notification upon requests
by Einhard Leichtfuß 13 Sep '18

13 Sep '18

Hi, I just noticed due to a comment on the package's web page that a package I co-maintain [0] was requested to be deleted (due to being taken into [community]). I'd have expected to get an e-mail when such a request is made, however I did not receive any such e-mail. I have also enabled notifications for that package, if that matters. So is this expected behaviour? Maybe, because I am only a co-maintainer? Einhard [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thunderbird-enigmail/

2 1

[aur-general] IJulia and Julia library/module packages
by Jonathon Fernyhough 02 Sep '18

02 Sep '18

Hello everyone. Julia [1], a scientific/numerical computing-focussed programming language, recently went 1.0. It primarily focuses on user-local module installation (into $HOME/.julia), similar to conda, rustup, zef, etc. This is obviously fine for individuals but not great for deployment on a larger scale. Currently, no distributions that I'm aware of (i.e. Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, Arch) package modules for system-wide installation. I spent a few hours this afternoon putting together a package chain for IJulia [2] (which adds a Julia back-end/kernel to Jupyter). As there's no precedent or approach (I'm aware of) for system-wide Julia module installation I'm looking for some testing and feedback to ensure this approach will operate in an equivalent way to the standard Pkg.add("IJulia"). From the limited testing I've done IJulia _appears_ to work OK but I've not tried anything particularly fancy. I'm also interested in any general PKGBUILD feedback, including any depends which should be makedepends or checkdepends. If you find an easy way to tell what should be what then I'm all ears! Of particular note is the very hacky way of creating files which would otherwise be generated by Pkg.build()... there _must_ be a cleaner way of doing that. Best, Jonathon [1] https://julialang.org/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/julia-ijulia

3 4

[aur-general] TU Application - Chih-Hsuan Yen
by Chih-Hsuan Yen 30 Aug '18

30 Aug '18

Hi all, My name is Chih-Hsuan Yen. I'm also known as yan12125. I am applying to be a Trusted User with Felix Yan's sponsorship. I'm currently a PhD student in Taiwan. My Linux journey started when I met Ubuntu in 2011. Soon after that, I jumped to Arch Linux in 2012 for its simplicity. During my spare time, I'm active in open source stuffs. You may find some interesting bits on my GitHub [1] and GitLab [2] accounts. Most of my Arch contributions can be found on AUR [3]. Besides that, I'm also an Arch Linux tester and a member of Arch Linux China community, keeping some binary packages in the unofficial repo [archlinuxcn] up-to-date [4]. If I'm accepted as a TU, I'd like to improve the ecosystem for Arch users speaking Chinese. Specifically, I'll keep an eye on Chinese IME (Input Method Engine) and font packages, including but not limited to the following ones: - libchewing - the core library for a Chinese input method "Chewing" - scim-chewing - the SCIM adaptor for the chewing input method - ttf-arphic-ukai - a popular font in Taiwan - ttf-arphic-uming - another popular font in Taiwan Both libchewing and scim-chewing are in [extra] now. As they have no other reverse dependencies in [extra], I assume it's possible to move them to [community] for further maintenance. Also, as a Python developer, I'm interesting in making Python packages in Arch Linux even better. I'd like to bring the following packages to [community]: - buildbot - the main program of a continuous integration framework [5] - buildbot-worker - running commands dispatched by the master - python-buildbot-{www,console-view,grid-view,waterfall-view,wsgi-dashboards,badges} - buildbot plugins - python-buildbot-pkg - an auxiliary package for building buildbot plugins from sources. I'll create a stable version from my buildbot-pkg-git package. - python-{aws-xray-sdk,jsondiff,klein,moto,nose-random,pathlib2,pyjade,setuptools-trial,txrequests} - direct or indirect runtime/build-time/check-time dependencies for buildbot-related packages I'd like to improve dependency handling for Python packages in Namcap as well. Furthermore, I'm interested in move some other useful packages to [community]. Here are some packages coming out of my head: - pcmanx-gtk2 - A popular BBS/Telnet client in Taiwan (29 votes on AUR) - qps - the GUI process monitor recommended by LXQt (2% on pkgstats) - cmst - a Qt frontend for connman recommended by LXQt (49 votes on AUR) I'd like to stop here. Thanks for reading such a long mail. I'm passionately looking forward an oppurtunity to extend my Arch contributions to a new scope! Regards, Chih-Hsuan Yen [1] https://github.com/yan12125 [2] https://gitlab.com/yan12125 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?O=0&SeB=M&K=yan12125&SB=p&SO=d&PP=50&do… [4] https://github.com/archlinuxcn/repo/blob/80adbb5dbee28591f95babf4aed91b0791… [5] https://buildbot.net/

3 9

[aur-general] Amd-ucode - manjaro tools
by fredbezies 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

Rajouter amd-ucode au fichier package-root pour la compilation des images ISO d'octobre 2018 -- Frederic Bezies fredbezies(a)gmail.com

3 2

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH] extend tu addition discussion period to 7 days
by Levente Polyak 29 Aug '18

29 Aug '18

Just adding this signed mail to authenticate i indeed proposed this change :) cheers, Levente

1 2

[aur-general] Blobs in package
by Tucker Boniface 26 Aug '18

26 Aug '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hey all, I am the maintainer of the acroread package on the aur. As you might know, if you use that program, it fails to run with newer versions of harfbuzz and glib. So, as suggested by users on the bbs, I have decided to bundle the needed libraries with acroread, but I have run into a problem. When I try to push my patch to the aur, I get "maxium blob size (250.00KiB) exceeded)." What would be the best way to bundle the libraries? It doesn't feel right for me to put them up on my server. TL;DR: What's the best way to bundle blobs with an aur package? Tucker Boniface -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEtBZqZi6L9mU3zSoTo3Ay1mUVXGEFAluC70oACgkQo3Ay1mUV XGHqQA/+PklUgm3b6sOcGv/JoYErReVyXQUcMU1iTAda9LbVsFqS9E6Ubxnmj73q fzmpC+Mobn/qzI0Vim1UOvKwqacImp0niz4jKolHFIyLvGd91kB3e8aey+INxn3z Gz7pRQiPKCVbJpKxQyy8hzenLpmh3rhAefF1kGKKoMzgIDaMDy9DKoMgKDZXFaVb iRClmzY+/OPngbd0ADB2A8EaDMudr8IuuJkIhzl4lksXMZXf66gjS8fGV8YPFrEq krx/OIKzxTJ5uT9G071PhoSZaAerKGZlWXZrVmik0Mp/kxJp878yrBZOTG1kwnmJ jWrTjKGsp6toDQlY/CMBToua+EXzCY5CAJ7GKZ3SH76mj5BmPvVCOre6T2rF+5ys SKE+a7jeJa78ZgiWkG7eMEzs5dk/spBa5TMrqL3d2lGgSjat9BsMG8yoqms6kqnt PY/0EOAaJcnYM5ClYtltfxdi38XUWo0eTRBhJse9+/e7OzhmoGZDNUulNEXAlZza SYLZh/7DdLZq8uphhhHNokcYMvGCp7hm1ebGPr6xiq74U+2LRPPnVgjhUFrZ6oRy 3jqh1dxUi5ldIJ54chZhaGjqbPMAvhBUKeGWTVxfQX/Js35Ufa+kyxX/Q6j5BcCF 3yOxwkxNd/gymQ/9L4CQgYQFsVM4KlAnfu/lAJQrrfkuqkMTEiM= =TXB9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Request to delete AUR package vim-tetris
by crt 24 Aug '18

24 Aug '18

The project has not had an upstream update in just about a decade. Instead of making this package an orphan I'd like to request to remove it from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-tetris/ Cheers

2 2

Re: [aur-general] intellij-idea-community-edition
by kunik08＠wp.pl 22 Aug '18

22 Aug '18

> On 8/10/18 8:20 AM, Simon Legner via aur-general wrote: > > Hi Arch! > > > > (I'm not sure whether I'm posting to the correct mailing list.) > > I'm a happy user of IntelliJ IDEA. Unfortunately, the community > > package intellij-idea-community-edition is out-of-date most of the > > time. As of writing, it has been updated at 2018-07-10 and flagged > > again on 2018-07-12. In the meanwhile, the versions 2018.1.6, 2018.2, > > 2018.2.1 have been released. > > Since I found updates to be smooth, updating the community package > > should be easy as well. Could any TU step in as (co)maintainer of this > > package to bring updates closer to the time? > > > > Thank you! > > Simon > > > > Hi, > > I've spoken to Lukas and am now co-maintaining the package. Together I > believe we will achieve faster update cycles. > > cheers, > Levente

1 0