- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Re: Bugtracker Migration to GitLab [to arch-general]
by David C. Rankin 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

On 11/9/23 17:08, Levente Polyak wrote: > ## Scope > > Our primary goal is to migrate bugs.archlinux.org to GitLab, focusing on > packaging bugs and our internal projects. In this email, we'll outline the > workflow for packaging bugs and seek your assistance in testing the migration > and the bug bot in the [test migration > group](https://gitlab.archlinux.org/groups/flyspray-migration/packaging/pac…. > > Please pay attention to the relevant paragraphs and everyone is strongly > encouraged to conduct testing as outlined in the testing section. One issue I've had with gitlab is even though it has correct user name and password, it will not login and I've had to use Github credentials to login to the arch gitlab system. (which I do not like) This is after going through successfully adding new SSH key to my account, successfully changing the password for my account, e.g. <quote - updated 9/17/23> Hello, David C. Rankin! The password for your GitLab account on https://gitlab.archlinux.org has successfully been changed. </quote> But it does not work. Every time login fails at: https://accounts.archlinux.org/realms/archlinux/login-actions/authenticate Neither the username 'drankinatty' or the e-mail works. So as Bugtracker is migrated, there may need to be a fix or two for the gitlab logins to work. I still can't login. -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

3 3

btrfs advice needed
by Jude DaShiell 12 Nov '23

12 Nov '23

I've got a corrupted btrfs partition. Does the archlinux install disk have btrfsck on it? If yes, I'll probably need to run btrfs --repair /dev/sda2 on the system. If repair goes badly, I'll have to reinstall the system. I would like to know how to prevent btrfs corruption in the first place. -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.

4 6

Re: Anticipation - Any idea when linux 6.6 will emerge from core-testing? (fwd)
by Erich Eckner 08 Nov '23

08 Nov '23

Hi David, not answering your question, but: What speaks against testing with the linux package in core-testing? IIRC, the linux package was one of the packages, that could be up- and down-graded quite independently of all the other packages. regards, Erich On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, David C. Rankin wrote: > Devs, > > I've kept an eye on linux-6.6 that hit the core-testing repo on 10/31, but > has not yet hit core. Any estimate when that may happen. The only reason for > the anxiety is the untested patch for the AUR nvidia-390xx driver and I'd > like to have a better idea of when I may need to set triage-time aside for > the update. > > Anybody's crystal-ball working a bit more clearly than mine? > > -- > David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E. >

2 1

Anticipation - Any idea when linux 6.6 will emerge from core-testing?
by David C. Rankin 08 Nov '23

08 Nov '23

Devs, I've kept an eye on linux-6.6 that hit the core-testing repo on 10/31, but has not yet hit core. Any estimate when that may happen. The only reason for the anxiety is the untested patch for the AUR nvidia-390xx driver and I'd like to have a better idea of when I may need to set triage-time aside for the update. Anybody's crystal-ball working a bit more clearly than mine? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

1 0

Netbeans Package update to version 19 (PKGBUILD)
by mattyr＠mailbox.org 04 Nov '23

04 Nov '23

Hi all, I've made some updates to the Netbeans package and would like to open a merge request in order to bring it up to version 19. My fork is here:https://gitlab.archlinux.org/matty_r/netbeans - main branch. I've attempted to contact some of the package owners but haven't heard anything. Any assistance would be appreciated. Regards, Matty_r

1 0

accessibility install fail
by Jude DaShiell 04 Nov '23

04 Nov '23

You boot up and hit downarrow then enter when the hdmi card gets selected for video and no hdmi video is available so no sound. does a quick way to disable hdmi on the system exist that can be used ahead of an actual install? -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.

1 0

Re: (No Subject)
by Aaron Liu 31 Oct '23

31 Oct '23

No, I'm just on the mailing list. On 2023/10/31 13:01, Novak Simic wrote: > Are you administrator? > > > Sent from Proton Mail mobile > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > On 29. окт 2023. 16:47, Aaron Liu < aaronliu0130(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > If you wish to unsubscribe, go to > https://lists.archlinux.org/mailman3/lists/arch-general.lists.archlinux.org/ > On 2023/10/29 6:29, Novak Simic wrote: > Uscribe > > > Sent from > Proton Mail mobile > > >

1 0

(No Subject)
by Novak Simic 29 Oct '23

29 Oct '23

Uscribe Sent from Proton Mail mobile

2 1

How to handle .htaccess Invalid Hash on each Nextcloud Upgrade?
by David C. Rankin 27 Oct '23

27 Oct '23

Devs, David, All, I've now gone though 3 Nextcloud updates since a fresh install 27.0.2* and having resolved all config notices/warnings in the "Administrator settings" "Overview" check. Every update there are a few changes to the /etc/webapps/nextcloud/.htaccess file that are provided in the .htaccess.pacnew file. Each time to remain current you incorporate anything new in the .htaccess.pacnew file with the config changes necessary for the Arch install detailed in the wiki. Additional changes are needed if you server your nextcloud install from a /nextcloud subdirectory. The problem is each time you modify /etc/webapps/nextcloud/.htaccess, nextcloud will flag the file with an Invalid Hash due to the changes. There is no simple occ command to tell nextcloud "Yes, I changed the .htaccess file it's fine". Instead, you have to go through an elaborate process to have nextcloud update the stored hash with: 1. upgrade as normal with pacman, 2. check and update /etc/webapps/nexcloud/.htaccess with additions in .htaccess.pacnew 3. occ upgrade 4. login and go to "Administrator settings". The "Overview" check will fail complaining about an Invalid Hash for the .htaccess file. 5. Edit /etc/webapps/nexcloud/config/config.php and add "'integrity.check.disabled' => true,", invoke the "Overview" check again, let it fail, choose the "Rescan" link. That will rescan the files updating the integrity hash for the .htaccess. 6. Log out/in and remove the "'integrity.check.disabled' => true," additiong to config.php (I haven't confirmed whether log in/out before removing the "'integrity.check.disabled' => true," is necessary. Rescan with the line set and then removing should be sufficient) Where should this config issue be handled, or is this just the routine you have to go through each there is a nextcloud update? It's not a nextcloud issue, the additions to the .htaccess that prevent using the .htaccess supplied are Arch specific. It's not a one-size-fits-all Arch issue either because the server can either be installed in the document root (as your only served app) or served out of the /nextcloud subdirectory existing alongside your other web offerings. But, the changes to .htaccess and the resulting [Invalid Hash] issue on upgrade are specifically Arch unique. Is this something that Arch could patch the "occ upgrade" script to handle? Or is this a "just the way it is" issue? Other than this one little nit, the nextcloud server upgrades are flawless. Thoughts? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

2 2

USBasp programmer not listed in /dev
by Sadeep Madurange 27 Oct '23

27 Oct '23

Greetings all, I am trying to connect an AVR programmer to Arch machine. I can't see it appearing under /dev. I found the vendor and product ids using lsusb. I think the device is 16c0:05dc: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 058f:9540 Alcor Micro Corp. AU9540 Smartcard Reader Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c52f Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver Bus 001 Device 004: ID 13d3:56bc IMC Networks [unknown] Bus 001 Device 005: ID 06cb:00bd Synaptics, Inc. Prometheus MIS Touch Fingerprint Reader Bus 001 Device 006: ID 8087:0026 Intel Corp. AX201 Bluetooth Bus 001 Device 009: ID 16c0:05dc Van Ooijen Technische Informatica shared ID for use with libusb Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub I added the following to /etc/udev/rules.d/99-avrprogrammer.rules and restarted the machine: SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTRS{idVendor}=="16c0", ATTRS{idProduct}=="05dc", GROUP="uucp", MODE=="0666" I see the following in my dmesg when I insert the programmer: [ 1526.700607] usb 1-4: new low-speed USB device number 9 using xhci_hcd [ 1526.849141] usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=16c0, idProduct=05dc, bcdDevice= 1.04 [ 1526.849152] usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0 [ 1526.849156] usb 1-4: Product: USBasp [ 1526.849159] usb 1-4: Manufacturer: www.fischl.de I'm checking the device by doing something like ls /dev > before_plugging_in_programmer ls /dev > after_plugging_in_programmer vimdiff before_plugging_in_programmer after_plugging_in_programmer -- Regards, Sadeep PGP: 103BF9E3E750BF7E

3 3