- Arch-general - lists.archlinux.org

Haupauge TV card failed on kernel 6.5.2-arch1-1
by pete 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

Hi folks Just run my normal daily "pacman -Syu" update rebooted to see the below message flash past the tv card was perfect less than 3 minuets earlier i had been watching it . failing symbol_get of non-GPLONLY symbol cx22702_attach. [ 20.746259] DVB: Unable to find symbol cx22702_attach() [ 20.746300] cx88_dvb: frontend initialization failed [ 20.746333] cx88_dvb: dvb_register failed (err = -22) system is as follows Operating System: Arch Linux KDE Plasma Version: 5.27.7 KDE Frameworks Version: 5.109.0 Qt Version: 5.15.10 Kernel Version: 6.5.2-arch1-1 (64-bit) Graphics Platform: X11 Processors: 8 × AMD FX-8370E Eight-Core Processor Memory: 15.6 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: HAWAII Manufacturer: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. if you need more let me know i would like to get this TV card back i use it a lot it is my TV . Thanks Pete

4 7

archinstall log file
by Jude DaShiell 09 Sep '23

09 Sep '23

archinstall failed and when I ran archinstall I ran: archinstall 2>&1 | tee archinstall.log. Since the file is about 10,000 lines long I think what I ought to do is make another shorter file using grep containing only the bugs before posting that smaller file. I used the Installation_guide script after having made lynx screen reader accessible and got up to installing grub but couldn't figure out what to do after that to finish the system installation. The iso file verified with sq verify --signer-cert release-key.pgp --detached archlinux-2023-09.01-x86_64.iso.sig archlinux-2023.09.01-x86_64.iso As important, the installer came up talking. -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.

1 0

swaywm, closing and opening of laptop lid connects to wrong wifi station
by Morten Bo Johansen 08 Sep '23

08 Sep '23

Hi, I have a wifi router and an extender/repeater. I connect to the extender's station to get the best signal, but when I close the lid on my laptop and then open it again, wifi resumes with a connection to my router's station, thereby losing about 30% signal strength so I need to manually disconnect from it and connect to the extender. I can't figure out where this happens. It is not in my sway config file and it doesn't seem to be in /etc/logind.conf either. Does anybody know how to configure this properly? Thanks, Morten

4 5

Disregard - nextcloud - fresh install on php-legacy, wiki followed - "Log in to Nextcloud" fails?
by David C. Rankin 06 Sep '23

06 Sep '23

Uugh, Never fails, the default is 'admin' and the password is the admin password (duh) not the database password.. Works fine! -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

1 0

nextcloud - fresh install on php-legacy, wiki followed - "Log in to Nextcloud" fails?
by David C. Rankin 06 Sep '23

06 Sep '23

All, I have a new nextcloud installed, I followed https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nextcloud. Everything is configured per the wiki aside from cache. Nextcloud is accessed in its own directory /nextcloud. Pointing a browser to https://localhost/nextcloud bring up the nextcloud login just fine. However, I expected the set admin dialog like is shown in the nextcloud documentation under quickstart. The install is long and I may have missed something -- but when nextcloud is asking for the "Account name or email" and "Password" -- whose credentials is it wanting?? The only credentials provided so far are for MariaDB - which appears to be working fine. With the setup per the wiki, do I need to further configure something to be prompted with the first-login box to set an admin user and password, or is this something I should have read further about configuring users with occ? The log tells me: {"reqId":"<snipped>","level":2,"time":"2023-09-06T20:14:23+00:00","remoteAddr":"127.0.0.1","user":"--","app":"no app in context","method":"POST","url":"/nextcloud/login","message":"Login failed: admin (Remote IP: 127.0.0.1)","userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/102.0","version":"27.0.2.1","data":[]} Which just looks like nextcloud has no clue who 'admin' and trying my user name resulted in the same log message for me. What did I miss? -- David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.

1 0

got verified archlinux iso
by Jude DaShiell 02 Sep '23

02 Sep '23

The website may need a little correction: sq verify --signer-file probably should read: sq verify --signer-cert release-key.pgp --detached archlinux-2023.09.01-x86_64.iso.sig archlinux-2023.09.01-x86_64.iso I had to upgrade debian to bookworm for all of these sq commands to work. wkd isn't available in bullseye. -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940.

1 0

Waterfox G
by Aaron Liu 02 Sep '23

02 Sep '23

Currently, there are 2 packages for the latest Waterfox "current": waterfox-g-bin and waterfox-current-bin . My guess is as follows: This arose from Waterfox changing their versions from "current" to "G", short for "generation". hawkeye116477, the maintainer for the former package and former maintainer for the latter package, decided to create a new package, waterfox-g-bin, for later releases and keep waterfox-current-bin frozen at the last release with "current". However, MarsSeed orphaned waterfox-current-bin through [PRQ#42365] in June and Leo Izen claimed it and updated it to the latest Waterfox G. The current situation is that Waterfox refers to "Waterfox G" as simply "Waterfox" and both bin packages have the wrong name. What should be done? Also, is it necessary to have both gtk3 and gtk2 as dependencies? Looking at the PKGBUILDs the only difference between the packages is waterfox-g-bin disables automatic updates + update notifications and has the extra profile manager desktop action while waterfox-current-bin has none of these and has the extra dependency "nss" (is this necessary?) P.S.: I've Bcc'd everybody I've named in this email. I'm new to the AUR, so tell me if that's not the right thing to do.

3 4

Re: the archlinux torrent
by Ralf Mardorf 02 Sep '23

02 Sep '23

Hi, first off all, please reply to the mailing-list only, don't reply to me, too. I'm subscribed to the list and receiving two mails, one with mailing-list headers and another without the headers, is asking for trouble. FWIW I'm not an experienced sq user, I'm used to gpg. In the first place I seemingly replied to your request accidentally not to the list, since you usually sent to the list and to me and I probably clicked the email without the mailing list headers. On Sat, 2023-09-02 at 07:52 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: > On Sat, 2 Sep 2023, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -<file>.gpg >> >> Did you run >> >> sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -release-key.pgp >> >> instead of >> >> sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -o release-key.pgp >> >> ? > Yes and that's what got sq not liking wkd much was happening yesterday and > at the time I wrote that message I substituted a variable for the > release-key. Ok, you likely wanted to say "no", IOW you run sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -o $KEY since "yes" would mean you run sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -$KEY what happened when you run sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -o $KEY ? Did stdout or stderr return "error: sq doesn't like wkd" ? It does work on my machine • rocketmouse@archlinux /tmp $ KEY=release-key.pgp • rocketmouse@archlinux /tmp $ sq wkd get pierre(a)archlinux.org -o $KEY • rocketmouse@archlinux /tmp $ echo $? 0 • rocketmouse@archlinux /tmp $ /bin/ls -l $KEY -rw-r--r-- 1 rocketmouse rocketmouse 18971 Sep 2 14:03 release-key.pgp Without the error message we (or at least I) cannot help. Regards, Ralf

1 0

Re: Waterfox G
by Aaron Liu 01 Sep '23

01 Sep '23

-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Waterfox G Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:18:07 -0400 From: Aaron Liu <aaronliu0130(a)gmail.com> To: arch-general(a)lists.archlinux.org, aur-general(a)lists.archlinux.org Oops, I've sent this to the arch-general mailing list instead! I meant to send this to aur-general, sorry. I guess forwarding it should be fine. On 9/1/23 15:15, Aaron Liu wrote: > Currently, there are 2 packages for the latest Waterfox "current": > waterfox-g-bin and waterfox-current-bin . > > My guess is as follows: This arose from Waterfox changing their > versions from "current" to "G", short for "generation". hawkeye116477, > the maintainer for the former package and former maintainer for the > latter package, decided to create a new package, waterfox-g-bin, for > later releases and keep waterfox-current-bin frozen at the last > release with "current". However, MarsSeed orphaned > waterfox-current-bin through [PRQ#42365] in June and Leo Izen claimed > it and updated it to the latest Waterfox G. > > The current situation is that Waterfox refers to "Waterfox G" as > simply "Waterfox" and both bin packages have the wrong name. What > should be done? > > Also, is it necessary to have both gtk3 and gtk2 as > dependencies? Looking at the PKGBUILDs the only difference between the > packages is waterfox-g-bin disables automatic updates + update > notifications and has the extra profile manager desktop action while > waterfox-current-bin has none of these and has the extra dependency > "nss" (is this necessary?) > > P.S.: I've Bcc'd everybody I've named in this email. I'm new to the > AUR, so tell me if that's not the right thing to do. >

1 0

Re: the archlinux torrent
by Jude DaShiell 29 Aug '23

29 Aug '23

Thanks. I'll download that on another system and try doing this correctly next time. -- Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Thibault de Villèle wrote: > It seems to be sequoia-sq : > > $ sudo pacman --files --refresh # long version of 'pacman -Fy' > $ pacman --files --regex '.*bin/sq' # long version of 'pacman -Fx' > [...snip...] > /usr/bin/sq is owned by extra/sequoia-sq 0.31.0-1 > [...snip...] > > Le mar. 29 août 2023 à 10:00, Jude DaShiell <jdashiel(a)panix.com> a écrit : > > > What package has sq in it? > > > > -- > > Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com> > > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. > > Please use in that order." > > Ed Howdershelt 1940. > > > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2023, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the download page as well as the installation guide describe what to do. > > > I didn't copy the description, the details are provided by those links. > > > > > > "[...] With this key the signature can be verified like this: > > > > > > sq [...]" - https://archlinux.org/download/ > > > > > > > > > "1.2 Verify signature > > > [...] gpg" - > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Installation_guide#Verify_signature > > > > > > Regards, > > > Ralf > > > > > > > > >

1 0