- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Oct '13

05 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 58 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (58 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Review request of PKGBUILD: thinlinc-server
by Adrian Bacircea 04 Oct '13

04 Oct '13

Hello all, I'm following the example of a fellow PKGBUILD writer and I'm asking you to review (and test) my creation. AUR Package Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/thinlinc-server/ "ThinLinc Linux Remote Desktop Server is a product which enables applications and/or desktops to be deployed, managed, supported and executed from a central server. Users connect remotely using the ThinLinc client, and have their desktops and applications published as if they were being run locally." My request is both for the review of the PKGBUILD and testing the package because I only use it for the most basic of the functions and it works. Thank you, Adrian

3 3

[aur-general] Multiple removal requests
by Iru Cai 04 Oct '13

04 Oct '13

wxflashget[1] and bin32-lha[2] are orphaned and no longer available. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wxflashget/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bin32-lha/

3 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Oct '13

04 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 58 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (58 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. djgera - 2 signoffs 2. bisson - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Dropping GNOME Flashback session
by Balló György 04 Oct '13

04 Oct '13

Hi all, I'll drop the following packages from the [community] repository as soon as GNOME 3.10 moved into the stable repositories: - gnome-applets - gnome-flashback-session - gnome-panel - gnome-settings-daemon-compat - sensors-applet The reason is the GNOME Flashback developers don't plan to keep the compatibility with latest GNOME releases, and I'm not able to make it compatible alone. If someone interested in fixing the problem, then check this thread on GNOME Flashback mailing list, where I described the actual issues: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-flashback-list/2013-September/msg0004… -- György Balló Trusted User

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Question about linux-bfs
by sir_lucjan＠bridgelinux.pl 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

On 09/13/2013 09:57 Bartlomiej Piotrowski wrote: On 09/12/2013 06:56 PM, Sir Lucjan wrote: > > I would like to adpot three packages: > > - linux-bfs > - nvidia-bfs > - virtualbox-modules-bfs > > could someone mark the packages as orphaned? > > > Have you tried to contact with the maintainer first? > > -- > Bart?omiej Piotrowski > http://bpiotrowski.pl/ I emailed JokerBoy but have not received a reply. sir_lucjan

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request: ruby-json_pure
by Hyacinthe Cartiaux 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

Hi, I've mailed the maintainer of ruby-json_pure[1] 2 weeks ago but i've received no answer, and the package is outdated for several months... Could you please orphan this package ? Thank you, Regards, [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-json_pure/ -- Hyacinthe

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request: libfixbuf-netsa
by Dwight Beaver 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

Hi all- I emailed the maintainer of libfixbuf-netsa, but got a bounce back. The package is outdated and has been flagged since 2013-04-13. Could you please orphan this package so I can update it? Thank you! https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libfixbuf-netsa/ -- Dwight Stephen Beaver Jr dsbeav(a)gmail.com

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 20 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 58 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-15 (i686) * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-12 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-15 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-15 (x86_64) * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-12 (x86_64) * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-15 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (58 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gedit-plugins-3.10.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-45 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-36 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-15 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 10 signoffs 2. bisson - 8 signoffs 3. pierre - 4 signoffs 4. tpowa - 4 signoffs 5. djgera - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Review request of PKGBUILD: einspline
by wolfgang_mader＠brain-frog.de 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

Dear list, I read that if one feels the need to get comments of a PKGBUILD, this is the place to ask. This is my first PKGBUILD. Source code to be package ===================== homepage: http://einspline.sourceforge.net/ >From the homepage ---------------------------- einspline is a C library for the creation and evaluation of interpolating cubic basis splines (B-splines) in 1, 2, and 3 dimensions. Output of namcap ============== namcap PKGBUILD: clean If einspline package is not installed: namcap einspline-0.9.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz einspline W: Referenced library 'libeinspline.so.0' is an uninstalled dependency If einspline packages is installed: namcap einspline-0.9.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz: clean ldd is fine on all libeinspline* Stuff to do ======== I am not sure if fftw is a build-only or a runtime dependency. I will figure that out. Is there anything in the PKGBUILD which is wrong? Can I upload thes PKGBUILD to the AUR? Thank you for your comments. Best, Wolfgang

3 3

[aur-general] Removal Request: gogglesmm-hg
by Sander Jansen 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

Please remove gogglesmm-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gogglesmm-hg/) It has been replaced by gogglesmm-git. Thanks, Sander

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: lsiutil
by Justin Dray 03 Oct '13

03 Oct '13

I've tried emailing the current maintainer of lsiutil as it is out-of-date and have not had any response. I'd like to update it/maintain it. Regards, Justin Dray E: justin(a)dray.be M: 0433348284

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Oct '13

02 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 1 new package in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 39 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (1 total) == * shadowsocks-1.3.3-3 (any) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (38 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (1 total) == * shadowsocks-1.3.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. djgera - 3 signoffs 3. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 4. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: ispmanager-pro
by Jakub Klinkovský 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

Please remove ispmanager-pro - upstream url unavailable. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispmanager-pro/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Oct '13

01 Oct '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 32 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 38 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (32 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (38 total) == * almanah-0.10.1-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * almanah-0.10.1-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cclive-0.9.2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-control-center-1.8.2-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-screensaver-1.8.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * emerillon-0.1.90-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * glabels-3.0.1-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-panel-3.8.0-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-phone-manager-0.69-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-6 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnome-settings-daemon-compat-3.6.4-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gnunet-gtk-0.9.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mpv-0.1.7-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * muffin-1.8.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nemo-1.8.5-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * quvi-0.9.3.1-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. pierre - 5 signoffs 2. dan - 2 signoffs 3. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] For alucryd, please check before remove package.
by MayKiller 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily is different with numix-utouch-icon-theme-bzr. here is PKGBUILD of numix-utouch-icon-theme-daily. please install these package and check it different or not.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 4 signoffs 2. djgera - 3 signoffs 3. thomas - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Package Removal Request - stellarforces
by Mike Lenzen 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

*Package Name*: stellarforces *URL:* https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stellarforces/ *Reason for Deletion:* The PC version of the game has been made obsolete by the developers. The game can now only be played using their servers and an android device. *Supporting Details:* Message indicating that the PC version is obsolete on source repo: http://stellarforces.googlecode.com/ Project website - no link to download PC client anymore http://www.stellarforces.com/ Mike Lenzen

2 1

[aur-general] delete gtk-numix-theme-dayily please
by MayKiller 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

package name : gtk-numix-theme-dayily package url : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-numix-theme-dayily/ reason: Wrong package name, careless to write more 'y'., Please delete it, I resubmit it after deleted.

2 1

[aur-general] Merging request
by Muflone 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

Please delete the snake_ [1] package with 0 votes uploaded today. It's the same software provided by the snake_pygame [2] package. It the meanwhile take a look at the snake_pygame PKGBUILD, really utterly broken. I hope to avoid to see stuff like that again. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/snake_/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/snake_pygame/ Muflone

4 6

[aur-general] Remove xvba-video-open
by lukpod 30 Sep '13

30 Sep '13

Remove xvba-video-open[1]. It has been superseded by libva-xvba-driver[2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xvba-video-open [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libva-xvba-driver

2 1

[aur-general] Removal requests: dkms-rt8192cu
by N30N 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Hi, This package has become dated and I would like it be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rt8192cu/ Thanks and best regards, N30N.

3 2

[aur-general] [Orphan Request]: zsh-syntax-highlighting-git
by Sam Stuewe 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Hey everyone, I send this maintainer an email about a week ago asking for them to orphan or update [1] as it is woefully out-of-date by packaging standards (it would not even build for me without some serious modifications). I know the standard practice is to wait two weeks, but on looking closer at the maintainer's history [2], they have not voted since the middle of 2012, and their last package update was made earlier in 2012 than their last vote. It would appear that the account is largely no longer active. If the TUs would like me to wait the rest of the standard two-week period before orphaning the package, that is fine, but I figured it might be worth while making y'all aware of the essentially inactive account. All the best, -Sam --- 1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zsh-syntax-highlighting-git 2 https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mjheagle8

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: vlc-vlsub
by Krzysztof AS 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Hi there, vlc-vlsub - already included as a part of vlc package by vlc devs (sorry) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vlc-vlsub/ Have a nice day.

2 1

[aur-general] Which developer should be considered as TU?
by Balló György 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Hi, The Trusted Users list is a bit different between Archweb and AUR. It looks like it's unclear which developer is a TU also. This means that we don't know how many active TUs are there, therefore can't ensure that the quorum meets on each votes. There are four categories: 1. The following developers are listed on Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1], and their account type is 'Trusted User' in AUR: - Bartłomiej Piotrowski (Barthalion) - Evangelos Foutras (foutrelis) - Laurent Carlier (lordheavy) - Sven-Hendrik Haase (svenstaro) - Thomas Dziedzic (td123) 2. The following developers are listed on Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1], but their account type is 'Developer' in AUR: - Dave Reisner (falconindy) - Florian Pritz (Bluewind) - Jan Steffens (heftig) - Ray Rashif (schivmeister) 3. The following developers are not listed on Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1], but their account type is 'Trusted User' in AUR: - Ángel Velásquez (angvp) - Gerardo Pozzi (djgera) 4. The following developer is not listed on Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1], and his account type is 'Developer' in AUR, but still takes part in votes: - Ronald van Haren (pressh) According to Trusted User Bylaws, TUs (and only TUs) must take part in votes. Therefore there should be a clear implementation like this: - Developers who want to take part in votes should set their account type to 'Trusted User' (or to a new 'Developer+Trusted User' type) in AUR, and they should be added to the Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1]. - Developers who don't want to take part in votes should set their account type to 'Developer' in AUR, and they should be removed from the Arch Linux Trusted Users page[1]. - Users with 'Developers' account type in AUR should not be allowed to vote. What is your opinion? [1] https://www.archlinux.org/trustedusers/ -- György Balló (City-busz) Trusted User

3 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 6 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == All packages in [community-testing] for more than 14 days (6 total) == * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686), since 2013-09-14 * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64), since 2013-09-14 == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request
by lukpod 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Remove smokinguns-custom_mappack1[1]. The source of this package is not available anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smokinguns-custom_mappack1

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: pycharm
by Jonas Heinrich 29 Sep '13

29 Sep '13

Hey, please delete pycharm [1] since it's superseded by the packages pycharm-community and pycharm-professional. Regards, onny [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pycharm/

2 1

[aur-general] Special Removal of an Inactive TU: Daenyth
by Balló György 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

2013/8/28 Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de>: > ----- Forwarded message from Daenyth <daenyth+arch(a)gmail.com> ----- > > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:59:55 -0400 > From: Daenyth <daenyth+arch(a)gmail.com> > To: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> > Subject: Re: TU Votes -- Reminder! > > Hi Lukas, > > I think I must have missed doing this earlier, but unfortunately I find that I > have to resign my position as a TU. It's been a lot of fun and I've really > enjoyed working alongside so many great people and learning through it, but I > have a lot of new things going on in my life these days that doesn't leave me > time for the responsibility. > > Could you please forward this email to the AUR list as well? I unsubscribed > some time ago. > > Warm regards, > -Gavin > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> > wrote: > > I am sending this mail to all TUs who skipped three (or more) votes (in > succession). Guys, I really appreciate all your work but please remember > that all TUs *must* take part in votes. If there are too many TUs > neglecting votes, we fail to reach quorums and TU power stagnates. Also > keep in mind that skipping too many votes automatically triggers a > special TU removal... > > Thank you for your cooperation. > > Cheers, > Lukas > > > > ----- End forwarded message ----- According to the Trusted User Bylaws, I think we should vote about the removal of an inactive TU, Gavin Bisesi (Daenyth). So I'm starting the discussion period of 3 days. 1. His last activity on the [community] repo: 2012-05-17 2. His last package update in AUR: 2013-04-24 3. His last message to aur-general mailing list: 2012-06-24 Gavin, thank you for your work on making Arch Linux better. I hope that once we'll see you again! -- György Balló (City-busz) Trusted User

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 28 Sep '13

28 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 2. foutrelis - 2 signoffs 3. andyrtr - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Sep '13

27 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 3 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 30 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (3 total) == * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (28 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * openshot-1.4.3-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.5-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 5 signoffs 2. eric - 4 signoffs 3. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 4. pierre - 3 signoffs 5. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 29 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (27 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. dreisner - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete requests
by Doug Newgard 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

terminology-guake-git pulls from a branch of terminology that hasn't been updated since Oct of last year, when terminology was in it's infancy. I can't get a response from the author, either. This package has just become useless cruft, so I'm requesting it be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/terminology-guake-git/ Long dead upstream and hasn't built for years: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ei8k-module-svn/ Dead upstream and no development since the last release, making it a duplicate of the release package already in the AUR. Nothing worth merging, so just needs deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb-git/ Enlightenment used to have a DM called Entrance. It's long gone, but there was another one written named Elsa. After the original Entrance died, Elsa was renamed to Entrance. The entrance-themes package is for the old, non-existant Entrance, so it needs to be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/entrance-themes/ A lot of work was done on ffmpeg-compat in [community] a while ago, so now acestream can use that. The acestream-ffmpeg package is no longer needed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acestream-ffmpeg/ Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: python-xlrd3
by Aaron DeVore 26 Sep '13

26 Sep '13

xlrd3 was a third party effort to port xlrd to Python 3. The fork was never complete, xlrd now has full Python 3 support, and the package is orphaned. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-xlrd3/ -Aaron DeVore

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 23 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 33 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (23 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (31 total) == * freevo-1.9.0-12 (any) 0/2 signoffs * gourmet-0.16.1-1 (any) 0/2 signoffs * impressive-0.10.3-7 (any) 0/2 signoffs * mcomix-1.00-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * oblogout-0.2-15 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ocrfeeder-0.7.11-4 (any) 0/2 signoffs * puddletag-1.0.2rc1-2 (any) 0/2 signoffs * pysolfc-2.0-5 (any) 0/2 signoffs * python2-rst2pdf-0.93-6 (any) 0/2 signoffs * screenlets-pack-basic-0.1.6-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * ubuntu-sso-client-4.2.0-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * calibre-1.4-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinnamon-1.8.8-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gwibber-3.6.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * sk1-0.9.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * uniconvertor-1.1.5-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pillow-2.1.0-5 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request : catalyst-131-dkms
by yadieet still alive 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Hi, Please remove : - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/catalyst-131-dkms/ Actually this package is 'catalyst 13.1 non-legacy for linux kernel >= 3.10 (support xorg-server 1.13)'. But for some reason, I've changed this package and I decided to cancel this package. So, this package is useless. Thanks, -- Yadieet SA.

2 1

[aur-general] Forgot Username
by nudelmobby 25 Sep '13

25 Sep '13

Dear aur-general, the password reset site tells me to write here in case I forgot my email, well for me it's the other way around. I know my email (this one) and can happily change my password (which I naturally forgot as well, silly me), however no username is sent alongside the password link. Can you help me on this matter? Thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] btrfs-progs packages
by WorMzy Tykashi 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

Hi, I've submitted two new btrfs packages to the AUR: btrfs-progs-unstable-integration [0] and btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git [1], and I'd like opinions on the state of things: a) should btrfs-progs-git [2] should be merged with btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git, given that the latter is more true to it's name as a -git package, and the former is more of a lagging stable version of the "non-git" integration branch or b) should the non-git, btrfs-progs-unstable-integration package be dropped in favour of the more stable btrfs-progs-git package or c) should all three packages remain or d) should the unstables be merged into one PKGBUILD with the option to let the user choose between "stable" and "next" by setting a variable in it? or e) something else? Personally, I'm happy maintaining all three packages, but I'm aware that I have just tripled the number of btrfs-progs packages in the AUR, which may cause some confusion with some users, and may be considered littering the AUR. Some further information which may be useful: btrfs-progs-git = stable, but stale (no commits since July 5th) btrfs-progs-unstable-integration = unstable, but known to build, snapshot of the integration-next (git) branch btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git = most unstable, actively committed to, may not always build Thanks. [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-unstable-integration/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/btrfs-progs-git/

2 6

[aur-general] Remove/merge request: glamor-git -> glamor-egl-git
by Nowaker 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

glamor-git [1] has been marked out of date since 2012-10-29, and did not provide=('glamor-egl'). glamor-egl-git [2] does. Besides, I made it almost a 1:1 copy of glamor-git from [extra]. Please remove glamor-git in favor of glamor-egl-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glamor-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glamor-egl-git/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] gkrellweather orphan
by Jonathan Kotta 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

I'd like to take over the gkrellweather package. The maintainer is unresponsive and the PKGBUILD needs updating. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gkrellweather/ -- Thanks, Jonathan Kotta Hofstadter's Law: It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law.

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request: xf86-video-intel-plymouth
by Ivan Shapovalov 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

Hi, Please, remove xf86-video-intel-plymouth[1] package for its patches are now unneeded for Plymouth to work (checked with gen4 and gen7) and obsolete (the DDX's code has changed too much). [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-plymouth/ Thanks, -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /

2 1

[aur-general] Únete a mi red en LinkedIn
by Igor Cardoso a través de LinkedIn 24 Sep '13

24 Sep '13

LinkedIn ------------ Igor Cardoso ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. Aceptar invitación de Igor Cardoso http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlyd77oi-4b/7RQslQ8A75pgsbqd60wsrtZ775qszD… Ver el perfil de Igor Cardoso http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlyd77oi-4b/rso/64757176/U6rg/name/2282957… ------------------------------------------ Estás recibiendo invitaciones por correo electrónico. Este mensaje de correo electrónico estaba dirigido a Jorge Barroso Barea. Averigua la razón por la que incluimos esto: http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlyd77oi-4b/plh/http%3A%2F%2Fhelp%2Elinked… (c) 2012, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, EE.UU.

1 0

[aur-general] Please remove package
by Rob Til Freedmen 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn-opt/ It is a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tint2-svn/ without votes.

2 1

[aur-general] Announcement: coreutils-static, a statically compiled coreutils
by Nowaker 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

Hi, Today I released coreutils-static, a coreutils variant that is statically compiled. The aim of this package is to provide crucial Linux binaries that will be helpful during a disaster. Binaries are compiled with --prefix=/rescue, similar to FreeBSD. My plan is to include util-linux, grep, bash and zsh as well. (Static pacman is already in AUR) -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 3 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs 3. dan - 1 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] CSDP and Mosek in AUR :-)
by Ido Rosen 23 Sep '13

23 Sep '13

Hi, I just submitted two packages to AUR, these are my first packages so comments are welcome: coinor-csdp mosek (Note that mosek's "source" is dependent on the target architecture, so it only shows the 32 bit one on the AUR package website.) * CSDP is a C library for Semidefinite Programming, an optimization technique used in machine learning and other areas. It's released under the Common Public License 1.0. * Mosek is a linear, quadratic, conic, and mixed integer programming solver. (Mosek is commercial, but you can get trial or academic licenses for free to use it.) Both packages install their matlab toolboxes into /usr/share/doc/${pkgname}/matlab, for Matlab/Octave users. Both AUR uploads grab the sources from the upstream vendor. I'm maintaining these packages on GitHub, so if you want any changes made to them please submit a pull request or an issue on the GitHub repository located at: https://github.com/ido/packages-archlinux I'd love to see coinor-csdp reach the AUR community repository, since it's CPL licensed and a useful tool, but it's pretty niche software so I'm not holding my breath. :-) Cheers, Ido PS: I am unsubscribing from aur-general now so please CC my email address on replies meant for me.

2 1

[aur-general] Package deletion request
by Haffmans, Wouter 22 Sep '13

22 Sep '13

Hello, The package doxgen-git[1] was uploaded with a typo in the package name (I've replaced it with doxygen-git[2] - the "y" was missing). Please remove the doxgen-git variant. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxgen-git [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: qemu-kvm-opensuse
by Jakub Klinkovský 22 Sep '13

22 Sep '13

KVM was merged into upstream QEMU, so qemu-kvm-opensuse is useless (though it is patched): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qemu-kvm-opensuse/

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Sep '13

22 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] fontforge-git disown
by Arthur Țițeică 22 Sep '13

22 Sep '13

Please disown fontforge-git as it no longer builds and the maintainer didn't respond to comments in a long time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontforge-git/ Thanks. -- Arthur Țițeică

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: oss-hg
by Nowaker 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

Hi, I'd like oss-hg package removed from AUR. OSS does not use Mercurial for development now, so the name is out of date. Besides, the package didn't contain systemd units. Today I uploaded oss-git which is almost a 1:1 copy of oss from [community]. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

2 1

[aur-general] Merge mmat-git into minecraft-map-auto-trim-git
by Buce 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

Please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mmat-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft-map-auto-trim-git/ as I believe the latter more accurately reflects the upstream project's name. TYIA, -Buce

2 1

[aur-general] RFC: freecad-git
by Xyne 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

Hi, Would anyone care to comment on this PKGBUILD? AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fr/freecad-git/PKGBUILD Pastebin copy: http://pastebin.com/q3ARNgJ6 Is this an acceptable clever workaround or an abomination that should be purged with fire? Regards, Xyne p.s. OR statements and other boolean operatores really would be nice sometimes

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 21 Sep '13

21 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 10 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (10 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1522.102-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gtest-1.7.0-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tpowa - 3 signoffs 2. tomegun - 1 signoffs 3. djgera - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 20 Sep '13

20 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside
by Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

In recent shenanigans[0], python-pyside became a split package, building Python 3 and 2 versions simultaneously. python2-pyside still exists in the AUR. Please merge python2-pyside[1] into python-pyside[2]. [0]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-September/025115.h… [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyside/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyside/ -- Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <http://kwpolska.tk> PGP: 5EAAEA16 stop html mail | always bottom-post | only UTF-8 makes sense

8 16

[aur-general] pandoc moved back to the AUR for the time being
by Daniel Micay 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

I've moved pandoc back to the AUR because the latest version picked up too many new dependencies. It was convenient to have it in [community], but it's much saner to maintain these with the automation used by the arch-haskell project. I only use it for Rust's documentation generator, and don't want to be frequently rebuilding 30+ libraries for a language I don't use. Our packaging standards don't make much sense for Haskell because there are little gains from dynamic linking. There's not nearly enough sharing of code for it to come close to being efficient, and no stable ABI either.

3 3

[aur-general] Remove dkms-intel-rst
by Philipp Wolfer 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

Please remove dkms-intel-rst. This package has become obsolete with the release of Linux Kernel 3.11 in the main repositories. Thanks, Philipp

2 2

[aur-general] Multi-merge request: acx{100, 111}-firmware -> acx-firmware
by Normal Ra 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acx100-firmware/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acx111-firmware/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acx-firmware/ Firmware files for acx-mac80211 driver are quite a difficult bunch; some versions work with cards, some don't, some versions specify USB-only firmware files. I think it's best not to saturate AUR with lots of stand-alone firmware PKGBUILDs. Cheers!

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: lpty -> lua-lpty
by Jerome Leclanche 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lpty/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-lpty/ PKGBUILD for the former is completely broken and doesn't build. Reuploaded with a fixed name and pkgbuild. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. tomegun - 9 signoffs 2. dan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] systemd 207 and btrfs
by Jameson 19 Sep '13

19 Sep '13

I upgraded to systemd 207 today, and upon reboot received several messages that say, "failed to open /dev/btrfs-control skipping device registration: No such file or directory." The btrfs problem faq suggests that running "mknod /dev/btrfs-control c 10 234" should fix me up. However, when I run this it says that it already exists. The only significant changes that I made were to upgrade systemd, and add the systemd hook to mkinicpio.conf. I tried booting from external media, and removing the systemd hook, but after re-running mkinitcpio I still get the same result. Does anyone have any suggestions for getting past this? I will happily provide more information if you can tell me what would be helpful. Thanks, =-Jameson

2 1

[aur-general] uppity replaces curlpaste in [community]
by Jonathan Steel 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

Hi, curlpaste [1] has been replaced [2] by uppity [3]. The usage is very much the same. I propose moving uppity-git to [community] as uppity, and removing curlpaste (not uploading it to the AUR). Am I right in thinking that uppity "replaces", but does not "conflict" with curlpaste as there are no file conflicts? I believe I need three other TUs to agree that uppity can go into [community] as it only has two votes. If this does not happen in the next two weeks, I will continue to remove curlpaste from [community], but leave uppity-git in the AUR. Thanks, [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/curlpaste/ [2] https://github.com/Kiwi/curlpaste/tree/master "Please use Uppity from this point on, it is far better than curlpaste ever was." [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/uppity-git/ -- Jonathan Steel

3 5

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 14 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (i686) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (i686) * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (14 total) == * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-lts-8.036.00-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-lts-0.41-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-lts-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 2. eric - 3 signoffs 3. tpowa - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: chunky
by Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen 18 Sep '13

18 Sep '13

'Lo list, I sent a mail to Luminary, the maintainer of the package "chunky" in the AUR, on September 4th, and I have not heard back from him. Please disown the package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chunky/ -- Cheers, Frederik "Freso" S. Olesen <http://freso.dk/>

2 1

[aur-general] bash script lint
by Jonathan Arnold 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Just a FYI - this site: http://www.shellcheck.net/ runs a checker on bash scripts. It actually works pretty well on PKGBUILD scripts, although it does warn about unused variables. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

1 0

[aur-general] PKGBUILD Help
by Storm Dragon 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Hi, I thought I had this stuff all figured out lol. This one is proving me wrong. It's failing to build, saying it can't find the file/directory, but it's clearly there. Can someone please let me know what I've done wrong? Thanks Storm -- Registered Linux user number 508465: https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.us/ Get paid to read email: http://is.gd/feRiB "Listen up to ancient tales of monsters, zombies, ghosts 'bout creatures rising from the graves to haunt the living world" The Other - Beware of Ghouls

6 6

[aur-general] LTS kernel moved to 3.10.x - module rebuilds
by Andreas Radke 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

I've updated LTS kernel to 3.10.x branch into testing repo. Please rebuild all community modules. I'll do the module rebuilds for extra repo packages. -Andy

7 8

[aur-general] Multiple merge request
by Lara Maia 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

I decided to maintain and update Guacamole. The new packages are already in aur: guacamole-client [1] guacamole-server [2] The old packages have different nomenclatures that are no longer used, and need to be merged. guacd [3] and all libguac* [4] needs to be merged with guacamole-server [2] guacamole [5] needs to be merged with guacamole-client [1] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/guacamole-client/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/guacamole-server/ [ 3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/guacd/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=libguac [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/guacamole Thanks. -- *~ Lara ~*

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: zabbix-agent-1.8.3
by Jonas Heinrich 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Hi, please remove this package since it has been unmaintained for several years and not needed anymore: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zabbix-agent-1.8.3/ Regards, Jonas

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: debhelper
by Charles Pigott 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Hi, can you please disown the maintainer of debhelper ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/debhelper/) ? It hasn'tbeen updated in more than a year (http://joeyh.name/code/debhelper/) and doesn't build Thanks (Hope I'm using mailing lists correctly!)

3 5

[aur-general] Disown request: cflow
by Jason St. John 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

I emailed the maintainer of cflow[1] asking him to update the package for the several listed problems with it (see comments), but his email address does not work. I got an automated response saying that the user is unknown. Please disown this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cflow/ Thanks, Jason

2 1

[aur-general] Is it OK to package oneliners?
by Karol Blazewicz 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Are we OK with packages like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/last-git/ ? Unless I'm missing something it's just https://raw.github.com/vanceza/last/master/last BTW, I don't understand what does it do & /usr/bin/last-line doesn't seem to work. $ echo 1 2 3 1 2 3 $ history 2 | head -n1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f"4-" 1 2 3 $ cat foo cat: foo: Is a directory $ history 2 | head -n1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f"4-" foo

6 10

[aur-general] removal of hid-holtek-mouse
by Fool Echo 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

Hi, Since this module is part of the kernel 3.11, the hid-holtek-mouse package is now senseless. Please delete it. Thanks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hid-holtek-mouse/ Yannick

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 17 Sep '13

17 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 8 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (8 total) == * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. heftig - 6 signoffs 2. pierre - 4 signoffs 3. tpowa - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request : teamdrive
by Matthieu Froment 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

Hello all, Can you please disown the actual maintainer of the package : teamdrive https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teamdrive/ I marked it as out-of-date the 19th of june, with a short message at the attention of the maintainer : No answer ! Actually, 6 months without an update. I wrote this mail, without any answer. > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:45:13 +0200 > From: thieume2(a)hotmail.com > To: ch.assfalg(a)gmx.de > Subject: [Archlinux AUR] Teamdrive > > Hello, > > I've seen that you are actually the maintainer of the teamdrive package > on AUR. You may don't have time to take care of this package (and some > release have been missed). I can propose you to take the maintenance of > the pkgbuild to my hand. > Possible to transfer the maintenance ? > Thanks for your answer, > > Regards, > Matthieu. I've got a pkgbuild ready to be uploaded. Thanks in advance, Regards, Matthieu.

2 2

[aur-general] Disown Request: qtiplot-opj
by v1c70r 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

Please disown qtiplot-opj: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtiplot-opj/ Not updated in more than a year despite the package doesn't build anymore. The current maintainer doesn't reply to comments or emails. Victor

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 14 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (14 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-14 (i686) * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-11 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-44 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-35 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-14 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-3 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-14 (x86_64) * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-11 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-44 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-35 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-14 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-44 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-35 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-14 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * cinelerra-cv-1:2.2-18 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-44 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-35 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-14 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 10 signoffs 2. allan - 2 signoffs

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside
by danielwallace 16 Sep '13

16 Sep '13

Replaces should never be in aur packages. It is only used by Pacman when searching the repository. There is nothing that searches replaces in the aur. Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <hugo(a)osvaldobarrera.com.ar> Date: 09/15/2013 6:16 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Subject: Re: [aur-general] Merge request: python2-pyside -> python-pyside On 2013-09-13 09:57, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 09/07/2013 10:24 AM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick wrote: > > In recent shenanigans[0], python-pyside became a split package, > > building Python 3 and 2 versions simultaneously. python2-pyside still > > exists in the AUR. Please merge python2-pyside[1] into > > python-pyside[2]. > > > > [0]: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-September/025115.h… > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyside/ > > [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyside/ > > > > Done, thank you. > > -- > Bartłomiej Piotrowski > http://bpiotrowski.pl/ > As maintainer of python2-pyside shouldn't I have gotten a notification about this? At least an automated one from the AUR? Also, since the PKGBUILD states "replaces=(python2-pyside...", shouldn't searching the AUR for python2-pyside yield python-pyside as one of the results? Finally, why does this merge make sense? It merges two *different* libraries into one; I maintained python2-pyside, but have no interest in installing the python3 version, so why is the original package deleted? -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad?

2 1

[aur-general] merge request: vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-git into vapoursynth-plugin-ffms2
by SpinFlo 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

Hi (again) please merge (again xd) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffms2-git/ for better name convention (upstream) greetings

2 1

[aur-general] merge request: vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-svn into vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-git
by SpinFlo 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

hi please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-svn/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffmpegsource-git/ upstream code move to github greetings

2 1

[aur-general] Únete a mi red en LinkedIn
by Hector Martinez-Seara a través de LinkedIn 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

LinkedIn ------------ Hector Martinez-Seara ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn. Aceptar invitación de Hector Martinez-Seara http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlm1jgod-45/7RQslQ8A75pgsbqd60wsrtZ775qszD… Ver el perfil de Hector Martinez-Seara http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlm1jgod-45/rso/287791434/La0a/name/228295… ------------------------------------------ Estás recibiendo invitaciones por correo electrónico. Este mensaje de correo electrónico estaba dirigido a Jorge Barroso Barea. Averigua la razón por la que incluimos esto: http://www.linkedin.com/e/sx2w4t-hlm1jgod-45/plh/http%3A%2F%2Fhelp%2Elinked… (c) 2012, LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, EE.UU.

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 6 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (6 total) == * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * gdal-1.10.0-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * python-pytables-3.0.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vtk-5.10.1-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] linux-next naming convention
by Dennis Borisevich 15 Sep '13

15 Sep '13

Hello, I have just become the maintainer of my first package in AUR,'linux-next'. It's name lacks -git prefix, though it is using git to fetch source code. I figure out that I have these courses of action: 1)Ask for the deletion of 'linux-next' package in favor of 'linux-next-git'; 2)Create a separate package 'linux-next-git' which uses git by fetching sources like described in Wiki page "VCS PKGBUILD Guidelines", but keep 'linux-next' and use prepare() mechanism, which will utilize 'git clone --depth=1' (less to download, useful for one-time building); 3) Don't create any new packages and just update 'linux-next' PKGBUILD like in 1). Thanks, denspirit.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Source packages in the AUR
by Mort 14 Sep '13

14 Sep '13

This package is useful when one wants to write C/C++ extensions to gawk. There's a bunch of header files available only in the source (while there is one gawkapi.h in the official gawk package, it is not sufficient for developers who want to build their own extensions). http://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/html_node/Internal-File-Ops.html It works exactly the same way as linux-headers and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-source/ (Correct me if I'm wrong). They exist mainly not for general users, but for developers who want to build their own modules from scratch. Even though it is relatively unpopular to build extensions in gawk, you can't assume the source package is "useless" in any case. Just let you know what this is intended for. On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle(a)vdwaa.nl> wrote: > On 09/13/13 at 01:11pm, Eric Bélanger wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Alexander Rødseth <rodseth(a)gmail.com > >wrote: > > > > > We have no policies against useless packages. I have faith that the > > > AUR web system + devs/TUs will be able to keep AUR useful, also in the > > > future, despite of this, though. :) > > > > > > - Alexander / xyproto > > > > > > > That is incorrect. There are policies: > > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_User_Guidelines#Submitting_packages > > > > - Make sure the package is useful. Will anyone else want to use this > > package? Is it extremely specialized? If more than a few people would > find > > this package useful, it is appropriate for submission. > > > > - The AUR and official repositories are intended for packages which > install > > generally software and software-related content, including one or more of > > the following: executable(s); config file(s); online or offline > > documentation for specific software or the Arch Linux distribution as a > > whole; media intended to be used directly by software. > > Since these source packages aren't of any use, I'm removing it and CC'ing > the AUR submitter. > > -- > Jelle van der Waa > -- Best Regards, Mort Yao

3 2

[aur-general] Source packages in the AUR
by Karol Blazewicz 14 Sep '13

14 Sep '13

Is it OK to upload PKGBUILDs like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ga/gawk-source/PKGBUILD ?

6 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 14 Sep '13

14 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bisson - 10 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disowning pkgs -- looking for adopters
by Rafael Ferreira 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

Hi all I'm currently out of time and therefore I'm not able to take care properly of my packages. So, I'm looking for someone to adopt them. Basically, you will find below a lot of lib32 packages (just a few of them are out-of-date), some teeworlds-related, the svn package of PCSX2 and some other packages. See if you want something below and let me know, and you give it to you. Otherwise, I'll make a mass disown. (p.s.: add a name below to 'https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/' to access it) PACKAGES: agar aggregate attesoro ballz carnagecontest cegui-0.7 counter-strike-2d d-feet-git f-spot-git gbrainy-git gcompris-git glew1.7 gngeo gnome-shell-extension-lockkeys-git gparted-git gtksourceview3-pkgbuild gtranslator-git java-jai-imageio keepassx-pt-br lib-compat lib32-allegro lib32-allegro4 lib32-atkmm lib32-bluez lib32-cloog lib32-cmt lib32-colord lib32-cracklib lib32-db lib32-dbus-glib lib32-device-mapper lib32-devil lib32-directfb lib32-enca lib32-faac lib32-faad2 lib32-fftw lib32-fribidi lib32-fuse lib32-gconf lib32-gcr lib32-gd lib32-gdbm lib32-glew1.7 lib32-glib-networking lib32-gmp4 lib32-gnome-keyring lib32-gnome-vfs lib32-gstreamer0.10-bad lib32-gtk-engines lib32-gtk3 lib32-gtkglext lib32-gvfs lib32-hal lib32-ilmbase lib32-isl lib32-jasper lib32-ladspa lib32-lame lib32-libaio lib32-libarchive lib32-libass lib32-libatasmart lib32-libbluray lib32-libbonobo lib32-libbonoboui lib32-libbsd lib32-libcap-ng lib32-libcdaudio lib32-libcdio-paranoia lib32-libdc1394 lib32-libdca lib32-libdvdcss lib32-libdvdnav lib32-libdvdread lib32-libevent lib32-libexif lib32-libftdi lib32-libgdiplus lib32-libgnome lib32-libgnome-keyring lib32-libgnomecanvas lib32-libgnomeui lib32-libgphoto2 lib32-libgssglue lib32-libgtop lib32-libgusb lib32-libidl2 lib32-libieee1284 lib32-libimobiledevice lib32-libjpeg6 lib32-libjpeg6-turbo lib32-libjpeg7 lib32-liblrdf lib32-libmicrohttpd lib32-libmms lib32-libmodplug lib32-libmp4v2 lib32-libmpcdec lib32-libnl lib32-libnotify lib32-libofa lib32-libplist lib32-libpng14 lib32-libproxy lib32-libraw1394 lib32-libsecret lib32-libsexy lib32-libsexymm lib32-libsoup lib32-libtiff3 lib32-libtirpc lib32-libunique3 lib32-libusb-compat lib32-libvdpau lib32-libwbclient lib32-libxaw lib32-libxkbcommon lib32-lzo2 lib32-musicbrainz lib32-neon lib32-nvidia-cg-toolkit lib32-ois lib32-openexr lib32-opus lib32-orbit2 lib32-pam lib32-pangox-compat lib32-physfs lib32-popt lib32-portaudio-svn lib32-ppl lib32-raptor lib32-rtmpdump lib32-sane lib32-schroedinger lib32-sdl_net lib32-slang lib32-smbclient lib32-spandsp lib32-sysfsutils lib32-udisks2 lib32-usbmuxd lib32-wayland lib32-zziplib libjpeg7 libtiff3 lilyterm-git local-repo-git meld-git nautilus-dropbox networkmanager-openconnect-git output-screenlet pcsx2-svn pcsx2ce pdfgrep portaudio-svn pyg3t pyg3t-bzr screenlets-bzr screenlets-pack-full-bzr smc-git speex-git sudokuki teeworlds-gamerclient teeworlds-git teeworlds-monster teeworlds-sushitee teeworlds-zcatch teeworlds-zchaos teighafileconverter teighaviewer vanessa-logger vcf2csv wippien wyslij-po xgngeo

7 7

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: ffgtk, libcapi20, libcapi20-fb
by Bjoern Franke 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

Hi, please delete ffgtk[1], libcapi20[2] and licapi-fb[3] Upstream is dead, ffgtk is superseeded by roger router[4] regards bjo [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffgtk/ [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcapi20/ [3]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcapi20-fb/ [4]http://de.tabos.org/news -- xmpp bjo(a)schafweide.org bjo.nord-west.org | nord-west.org | freifunk-ol.de

2 1

[aur-general] Question about linux-bfs
by Sir Lucjan 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

I would like to adpot three packages: - linux-bfs - nvidia-bfs - virtualbox-modules-bfs could someone mark the packages as orphaned? -- sir_lucjan -- Sir Lucjan <sir_lucjan(a)bridgelinux.pl>

2 1

[aur-general] disown request: urw
by lisu 13 Sep '13

13 Sep '13

Please disown urw: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/urw/ Not updated in 6 months. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. Michal

3 4

[aur-general] Orphan request: reciteword-books and reciteword-dicts
by hbdee.arch 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Hello, The reciteword-{books,dicts} packages are unmaintained and broken. They build but don't package any files and haven't been updated since 2010. I posted a comment to both packages with a link to working PKGBUILDS, but there's been no reply from the maintainer, who appears to no longer be active. Could someone please orphan these for me: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reciteword-books/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/reciteword-dicts/ Thank you, hbdee

3 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] How to deal with tarballs from GitHub
by Phillip Smith 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Hi all, When the source tarball is from a GitHub repository, part of the commit SHA1 forms the first level of the extracted directory tree. This leads to a non-deterministic tree in $srcdir At the moment I deal with this by using noextract() and manually extracting the tarball within build() using --strip-components=1 which you can see in [1]. (Arguably it should perhaps happen in prepare() but that's a separate discussion). Does anyone have any better ways to deal with these tarballs? Cheers, ~p [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ss/sshfp/PKGBUILD

2 1

[aur-general] One last removal request
by John D Jones III 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-match-smart/ Has been deleted upstream, the lookalike Smart::Match does not seem to offer the same interface that this one did.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by John D Jones III 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-www-pusher/ Upstream has been deleted and there isn't any alternative providing the same package.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge Request
by John D Jones III 12 Sep '13

12 Sep '13

Please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-catalyst-component-accept_context/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-catalyst-component-accept-context/ The latter's Module name is the correct CPAN spelling schema and updated.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: acxi
by member graysky 11 Sep '13

11 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/acxi/ Package is not maintained and other more powerful alternatives exist. See comments therein. Note I am not subscribed so plz cc me if you need me to read it :p

2 1

[aur-general] teamspeak3 package
by Jerome Leclanche 11 Sep '13

11 Sep '13

Wheres the teamspeak3 package gone? If it was deleted, why? J. Leclanche

3 2

[aur-general] Delete request mingw-w64-libnfc mingw-w64-libusb-win32
by xantares 09 11 Sep '13

11 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libusb-win32/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libnfc/ I thought it was possible and started the work, but no success unless libnfc switches to libusb 1.0 x.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 11 Sep '13

11 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. bpiotrowski - 3 signoffs 2. dan - 2 signoffs 3. tpowa - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Taking over package centerim5-git
by Joss Wright 10 Sep '13

10 Sep '13

Hello, (I've subscribed straight after reading the FAQ, so apologies for my unfamiliarity with the community.) I've been using the centerim5-git package for a while now. ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/centerim5-git/ ). Every time the package updates (for example, every time I run `yaourt --sucre`), I get asked to authorize the ssh key for centerim's git server. This causes the update procedure to wait for that authorisation, which is annoying if you run a full upgrade overnight. I finally got fed up and delved into the PKGBUILD. It seems the main problem was not splitting off the package() function. I've now made it work, as a reasonably standard git-based PKGBUILD based on the hundreds of other ones out there. I commented on the package itself a few days ago, and emailed the package maintainer. The FAQ says to wait a couple of weeks, but it seems unlikely he'll turn up as the email address is bouncing. (Which means I assume he's not getting notifications of comments either.) I'd be willing to take over maintaining this package if and when it's decided that it has been abandoned. (And, to be honest, for a relatively obscure package with 9 votes I doubt if anyone finds it critical.) Joss -- Joss Wright | @JossWright http://www.pseudonymity.net

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 10 Sep '13

10 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Unmerge mpv-build-git
by SpinFlo 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hi. Please unmerge mpv-build-git. This package use diferent repository . Mpv-git use "mpv" repository, my pakage use "mpv-build" repository See mpv-player in github Https://github.com/mpv-player

6 12

[aur-general] Merge request: mpv-player-git -> mpv-git
by Jerome Leclanche 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/ They build the same project, except the former does it an insane way. J. Leclanche

6 11

[aur-general] Problem with checksum verification of coreutils-8.21
by Adrien RAFFIN 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hi everyone, I'm currently updating my package ('advcp') and when i use 'makepkg -g' the list of checksums is the following: md5sums=('065ba41828644eca5dd8163446de5d64' 'SKIP' '5154b45b0e7230e17da802a3db0fd5d5') How can i get rid of 'SKIP' value and make the original package verified ? Thank you in advance

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 12 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: qscite
by Evgeniy Alekseev 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

Hi May you disown package 'qscite'? Current maintainer wasn't update package since March 2011 and doesn't reply to comments. So, it depends on Qt but isn't on Qt4, as needed. And it is necessary a small patch to compile the application correctly. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. Link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qscite/ -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarcanis(a)mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arcanis(a)jabber.ru

2 1

[aur-general] Removal of OSS
by keenerd 09 Sep '13

09 Sep '13

tldr; Will move OSSv4 to the AUR in one week if no one can fix it or wants to maintain it. I had started maintaining OSS because I had one computer that absolutely required it. That computer has since completely broken. Also since then, our OSS package started to bit-rot around the 3.10 kernel release. The 3.10 patches floating around don't seem to help. The pre-compiled oss-nonfree package in the AUR does work. I'm guessing there is some compile flag that I am missing. It seems odd that a generic binary works for us when the package produced by our toolchain does not. I am at a loss as to how to make OSS work. I'd like to see it stay in the repositories because options and choices are good. But only if they actually function. -Kyle http://kmkeen.com

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 08 Sep '13

08 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * archlinux-lxdm-theme-1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Multiple Deletions Request
by David Spicer 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request for Facter
by Greg Sutcliffe 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Hi, Please delete my package 'facter' [1] - it has been superceded by @joschi's ruby-facter package[2] Thanks Gwmngilfen [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/facter [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-facter

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Nuno Araujo 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Hello Could you please merge the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome15-gnome-shell/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome15-plugin-impulse15/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome15-plugins/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pylibg19/ into: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome15/ Gnome15 source code has been through a major reorganization and now integrates the packages to merge. Thanks -- Nuno Araujo <nuno.araujo(a)russo79.com>

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request gibo and gibo-git
by Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

I would like to ask if someone can delete these two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gibo/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gibo-git/ Both are duplicated from gitignore-boilerplates{,-git}. Regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://glatelier.org/ http://about.me/pablox/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/

2 1

[aur-general] qtquickcontrols-git
by Pier Luigi 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Just received a notice from AUR that Barthalion delete qtquickcontrols-git. The package is needed by the hawaii packages and it was meant to complete the qt from git packages series maintained by Andrea Scarpino. The real problem here is that we have two sets of packages for Qt 5 from git (qt5-*-git and qt*-git), I'd keep the qt*-git made by Andrea Scarpino and the few packages (such as qtquickcontrols-git) I made myself. I'm now subscribed to the list so I'll be able to quickly respond to issues like this. -- Out of the box experience http://www.maui-project.org/

3 4

[aur-general] UnMerge request mpv-player-git vs. mpv-git
by Rob Til Freedmen 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Merging those packages doesn't make sense at all! https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-git/ This package uses dynamically linked system libs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-player-git/ This package uses statically linked libs from git It has also lots of comments to guide users in building & experimenting. If you're really want to take choice from users, this would be a better package for merging with mpv-player-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-build-git/

4 3

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 15 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (15 total) == * archlinux-lxdm-theme-1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.18-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 4 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge python-lineprofiler to python2-lineprofiler
by Lester B 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Please python-lineprofiler[1] to python2-lineprofiler[2]. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-lineprofiler/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-lineprofiler/

2 1

[aur-general] merge qtquickcontrols
by Philip A Reimer 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could someone do something about these qtquickcontrols packages https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/qt5-quickcontrols/ qt5 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtdesktopcomponents-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt5-quickcontrols-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtquickcontrols-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtquickstyles-git/ qt4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtdesktopcomponents-qt4-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qt-components-desktop-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtquickcontrols-qt4-git/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSKPTdAAoJEBXbY7Xe8exMm2kH/3bG8SBTc4iv5+taIaO8R4N1 p8PyEx16HGxPhY7RImjPpD8HbK05E3ucOz7RdZUlzntnInZgqr706f+zKqYszuXu JpCKvUotV3cIhpLr+or+JKMQJFAe7wGsnEdsJXGSQ78cpui1QkN211K7+EdcHmJH T3IktY167RyXMd4pbZan9+Y0mlPShdCL+xgGQpnAI1ygWFGM15Y0ct/1fWimeOO6 KGyEI9lvHvMSV2CSdu+RHAecLcyfS4hQ0sejvrSIcxofUxWWl8mOtRd7gT7ubEEL AngIHnh9CSOBHa+scVoTXgMWkNSrb3ba7Tirr7zqSrSi38Z+vfO/hCzEnOqI0Rw= =QgVK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Jerome Leclanche 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sonata-fork-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sonata-git/ They build the same package. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: zapps
by Jerome Leclanche 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zapps/ Dead fork of a project. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Delete g2-fpic
by Albert Graef 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Please delete AUR package g2-fpic. The functionality was incorporated into package g2 and I've updated dependent packages accordingly. Thanks, Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: aggraef(a)gmail.com WWW: https://plus.google.com/111193356966611167754

2 2

[aur-general] Disown request: moc-svn
by Øyvind Heggstad 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Email to current maintainer bounces, and no response to comment for 4 weeks.

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: moka blue icons
by Diego Principe 07 Sep '13

07 Sep '13

Hi TUs! please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-icon-theme-blue-git/ in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/moka-blue-icon-theme-git/ Diego

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 06 Sep '13

06 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 7 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 17 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (7 total) == * archlinux-lxdm-theme-1-3 (any) * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (i686) * virtualbox-4.2.16-3 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-11 (i686) * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (x86_64) * virtualbox-4.2.16-3 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-11 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (17 total) == * archlinux-lxdm-theme-1-3 (any) 0/2 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.16-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * lxdm-0.4.1-24 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-4.2.16-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Doom3 BFG packages
by Jonathan Arnold 05 Sep '13

05 Sep '13

There are 2 Doom3 BFG packages, based on the same github: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbdoom3-bfg-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rbdoom3bfg-git/ As far as I can tell, they build the same thing. The second one should probably be deleted, as the first one has been around since January and the second one only since August. -- Jonathan Arnold Webstream: http://hieronymus.soup.io Talent wins games, but team work and intelligence wins championships. Michael Jordan

2 1

[aur-general] Disown Request
by Lara Maia 05 Sep '13

05 Sep '13

P lease, disown qtwitgui-svn [1] The current maintainer not reply emails The package is not updated since 2011. [ 1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtwitgui-svn/ -- ~ *Lara* ~

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 05 Sep '13

05 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request: launch
by Brian F. G. Bidulock 05 Sep '13

05 Sep '13

Please disown launch: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/launch/ Not updated in seven years. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. --brian

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: wmix
by Brian F. G. Bidulock 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Please disown wmix: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmix/ Not updated in three years. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. --brian

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: merge toxic with toxic-git
by Florian Hahn 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Hello, I've created the toxic package [1] about 2 weeks ago, which installs toxic from git. I forgot about using the -git suffix and I've created a new toxic-git [2] package to make clear it uses git. Is it possible to merge both packages as toxic-git? Cheers, Florian [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toxic/unflag/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/toxic-git/

2 3

[aur-general] Remove perl-perl-ldap
by Daniel Albers 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Please remove perl-perl-ldap¹, uploaded by myself. Didn't pay attention when fiddling around with cpan2aur. Thanks, Daniel ¹ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-perl-ldap/

2 1

[aur-general] vim-youcompleteme-git does not build when android-studio is installed
by Alexandre Ferrando 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

First of all, excuse me if this is not the appropriate place for this issue, didn't know where it could fit better. Now, the issue. As said in the title, vim-youcompleteme-git [ 0 ] does not build when android-studio [ 1 ] is installed throwing this error: Linking CXX shared library /dev/shm/vim-youcompleteme-git/src/YouCompleteMe/python/ycm_core.so /opt/android-sdk/build-tools/18.0.1/libclang.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [/dev/shm/vim-youcompleteme-git/src/YouCompleteMe/python/ycm_core.so] Error 1 make[2]: *** [ycm/CMakeFiles/ycm_core.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** [ycm/CMakeFiles/ycm_core.dir/rule] Error 2 make: *** [ycm_core] Error 2 ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... This happens because android-studio adds /opt/android-sdk to the PATH. Building in a clean chroot or without /opt/android-sdk added to the PATH or android-studio uninstalled is ok. This, however, does not seem the ideal situation. I don't know if other packages are affected by this as well because I can't think of another package that links against libclang.so at the moment, but, in this case, what could be done to solve it rather than using workarounds as mentioned? Thank you in advance [ 0 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-youcompleteme-git/ [ 1 ] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-studio/

3 6

[aur-general] Renaming Request For aws-cli
by Alper Kanat 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Hey There, Could you please rename my package aws-cli to aws-cli-git ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aws-cli/ Thanks! --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 12 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 18 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (12 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (18 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-43 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-34 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-13 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-10 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. foutrelis - 5 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete Request: audiothumbs-patched
by Ben R 04 Sep '13

04 Sep '13

Hello, The package audiothumbs-patched [1] appears to be a duplicate of audiothumbs [2]. Thanks, Ben. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audiothumbs-patched/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/audiothumbs/

1 0

[aur-general] Removal request python3-cherrpy
by Dobrosław Kijowski 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-cherrypy/ It's already in community (package called python-cherrypy).

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: django-rosetta-svn
by Jerome Leclanche 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-rosetta-svn/ Upstream has moved to git J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request: kde-solid-for-hawaii-git
by Jerome Leclanche 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Missing dependency & maintainer personally told me the package was no longer of any use. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-solid-for-hawaii-git/ J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request: wmpiki-v24 into wmpiki
by Brian F. G. Bidulock 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Please merge wmpiki-v24 to wmpiki: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmpiki-v24/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmpiki/ No updates to wmpiki since first upload 4 years ago. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. wmpiki-v24 is the up to date version of the package that I adopted. --brian

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request: wmtime
by Brian F. G. Bidulock 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Please disown wmauda: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wmtime/ Not updates since first upload 4 years ago. No response of maintainer to comments in the mean time. I have an updated PKGBUILD ready to go. --brian

2 1

[aur-general] package deletion
by Lorenzo Porta 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

Can you please shred https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/suse_studio_imagewriter ? It's mine but now I've adopted the original one (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imagewriter) so it bacame useless

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 03 Sep '13

03 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * prelink-20130503-1 (i686) * prelink-20130503-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (6 total) == * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx- (i686) 0/1 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx- (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * prelink-20130503-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request: {,dkms}-ax88179
by Zack Buhman 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

{,dkms}-ax88179[1][2] are superfluous, being provided by core/linux since 3.9; they should be deleted. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ax88179/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-ax88179/

4 4

[aur-general] delete eclipse-php
by Ike Devolder 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-php/ if no-one is interested i will delete this package. Zend is going nowhere with it -- Ike

2 2

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws] [PATCH 0/2] TU bylaws amendment
by Lukas Fleischer 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

Ok, sending this before the voting period for Xyne's proposal is over since it is already clear that it will be accepted. More than 65% of all TUs voted "yes" and there are zero "no" votes so far :) The first patch is a follow-up to Xyne's proposal and is something he simply forgot when writing the patch. The second patch adds some information on how to submit patches for TU bylaws amendments. It answers following questions and solves following issues: * Where is the official bylaws Git repository? * Proposals with bad formatting that are hard to comment on. * How to submit formatting changes and actual changes at once without creating messy patches. Let the discussion period begin. Lukas Fleischer (2): Add note on when the number of TUs is recorded Add details on patch submissions tu-bylaws.txt | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4.rc3.500.gc3113b0

3 7

[aur-general] Deletion request
by dmbuce＠gmail.com 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

Hi, Could you remove clicraft-devel-git [1] from the AUR? I've stopped development on the devel branch of clicraft, so it's no longer needed. I'll continue to maintain the clicraft-git and clicraft AUR packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/clicraft-devel-git/ Thanks, -Buce

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request python-pyside into pyside
by lilydjwg 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

Hi, Would you please merge python-pyside into pyside, which will build a pyside-python3 package replacing python-pyside? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pyside/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pyside/ -- Best regards, lilydjwg

5 11

[aur-general] Delete request
by Karol Blazewicz 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

mpv is in the official repos now https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=mpv , please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv/

2 2

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 2.3.0
by Lukas Fleischer 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

The official Arch Linux AUR setup has been upgraded to 2.3.0. For a short list of changes, read [1]. Please report any issues to the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2013-September/002558.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request
by Julien Nicoulaud 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

Hi, Please delete freerdp-awakecoding-git - upstream fork has been merged into freerdp. Regards, Julien

2 1

[aur-general] Delete requests
by Jerome Leclanche 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-requests-0.9.3/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-requests-0.10.0/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-requests-0.14/ All very old versions of community/python2-requests J. Leclanche

4 6

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 02 Sep '13

02 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (i686) * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx- (i686) 0/1 signoffs * kimtoy-1.9.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx- (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mpv-0.1.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 01 Sep '13

01 Sep '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 6 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * cgminer-3.4.1-1 (i686) * cgminer-3.4.1-1 (x86_64) * mpv-0.1.4-3 (i686) * mpv-0.1.4-3 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * cgminer-3.4.1-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx- (i686) 0/1 signoffs * cgminer-3.4.1-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx- (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Incomplete signoffs for [unknown] (2 total) == * mpv-0.1.4-3 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mpv-0.1.4-3 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request: ogg2mp3
by Jerome Leclanche 01 Sep '13

01 Sep '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ogg2mp3/ Source domain is parked, no git repo available. Only ogg2mp3 that shows up on google is a different project. J. Leclanche

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 31 Aug '13

31 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 16 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 16 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (16 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-12 (i686) * nginx- (i686) * r8168-8.036.00-9 (i686) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-42 (i686) * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20130406-2 (i686) * tp_smapi-0.41-33 (i686) * vhba-module-20130607-12 (i686) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-9 (i686) * bbswitch-0.7-12 (x86_64) * nginx- (x86_64) * r8168-8.036.00-9 (x86_64) * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-42 (x86_64) * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20130406-2 (x86_64) * tp_smapi-0.41-33 (x86_64) * vhba-module-20130607-12 (x86_64) * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-9 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (16 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx- (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-42 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20130406-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-33 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-12 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-9 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx- (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-42 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tomoyo-tools-2.5.0.20130406-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-33 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-12 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-9 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

[aur-general] How would I implement this?
by Aaron France 31 Aug '13

31 Aug '13

Hi, I've wrote a couple of basic PKGBUILD files which simply pull from github and compile but this time I need something a bit more. Basically I need to pull in some dependencies from other repositories (easy) and then invoke a command via one of the Common Lisp implementations which may be available on the system. I'm not sure how to set up the dependencies for that. Any ideas? Aaron

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion and merge requests (long list)
by Lex Black 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

Huge list incoming :) Following packages are out of date and orphaned and couldn't be revived, as their source is dead, or better PKGBuilds are available. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xspice/ Should be merged with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-qxl Both are the same ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/synce-gnomevfs superceeded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/synce-gvfs ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wbar-patched/ patches gone ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-login-manager-git/ Merged with something else https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sddm-devel/g3kGNWI0A3A ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/meliae-dust/ Downloadlink is dead ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nimbus/ Better named and maintained package is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gtk-engine-nimbus/ ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ob-pippe-menu/ Seems to be gone ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen-bin-fix/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen/ Changes from the first went into the latter ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen-bin/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/obmenugen/ Developer suggested the use of the latter. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pymouse/ & is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pyuserinput-git/ pymouse got merged into pyuserinput. And versioned pymouse was deprecated in favor for the git version. But the git version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pymouse-git has a maintainer! Although last update was 2011-11-04 ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dpkg-ubuntu/ Source link not available. Long time ood ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntfs-3g-fuse-internal/ should propably merged into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ntfs-3g-fuse I go along with the commenter that the packages are similar (internal flag) and the latter is better maintained ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-grin/ should be merged into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-grin/ Grin seems to support only python2 (Segfaults with python3) On a sidenote. There is also another package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grin/ ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/programmer-dvorak-console-map/ should be merged into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/programmers-dvorak It's more up to date and maintained ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qemu-diskp/ Source and page dead. No alternative found ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/englab-cimg/ Superceeded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libenglab-cimg ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/englab-plot/ Superceeded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libenglab-plot ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/englab-matrix/ Replaced and not used ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/englab-special_functions/ Not used ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/khanacademy/ Deprecated and replaced by youtube-viewer ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/needles-git/ Repo gone and I couldn't find a fork. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/octave-suitesparse/ Octave from [extra] uses suitesparse ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/omnetpp4/ should be merged into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/omnetpp/ It's more maintained and up-to-date ____________ And here some packages where I'm not sure if they can be removed or not: ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-ati-6.14.2/ Orphaned and ood ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pacman.manfr/ Orphaned and ood ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ Dunno about that. -git is more active and due to missing tags/releases this cannot be updated. IIRC the download section on github was deprecated in that case ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quick-boot/ Upstream is gone, so is the wiki. Package may work, but without a docu it seems to be risky. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aeskulap/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aeskulap-dcmtkcompat/ The aeskulap package seems to conflict dcmtk and dreieck made a new package to avoid this. As this package is more maintained than the other, they should propably be merged. But the name from the first would be better. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grass-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grass7-svn The first has the better name, but the latter is maintained and up to date ____________ Packages that should be merged/removed, but not possible: ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coin-utils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coin-or-utils/ Both packages are the same. Though the later was more up-to-date in the past. I suppose the first wasn't updated and someone uploaded the second. In case of naming, there should only exist one of those and more packages are uploaded as coin-*. I wrote a comment and suggested a change. ------ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coin-clp/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/coin-or-clp/ Same story like the above Best regards Lex

3 3

[aur-general] Merge request
by Hugo Osvaldo Barrera 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

Please merge python-shiboken into shiboken. The shiboken package is older and shiboken is an application, not a library, so it as the proper naming scheme. Both packages provide the same software, and there are no particular differences in build flags. -- Hugo Osvaldo Barrera

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request for [mingw-w64-qt5]
by Филип Брчић 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

2 1

[aur-general] Merge request
by Linos 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

Hi, could someone please merge mingw32-qt with mingw32-qt4? i maintain both packages, i renamed the original package to follow naming conventions after Qt 5 release, after the rename i am only updating the new one. Thanks! Regards, Miguel Angel.

2 2

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 30 Aug '13

30 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. lcarlier - 3 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete Request: tunet mytunet qtunet corsair
by GSC 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mytunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tunet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/corsair/ These are some obsolete authentication packages for university internal network authentication, are no longer usable.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request "python2-storm-git"
by Samed Beyribey 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

Hi, Could someone delete python2-storm-git package, please? It's causing confusion with "python2-storm" Here's the link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-storm-git/ I've uploaded a new package named "python2-stormssh-git" -- Samed Beyribey ---------------------------------------- Özgür Yazılım A.Ş. ~ $ http://www.ozguryazilim.com.tr

2 1

[aur-general] [delete] xz-alpha
by member graysky 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xz-alpha/ Xz-alpha v5.1.2 was tagged by upstream >13 mo ago. There is a more up-to-date xz-git package. Plz delete this one.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 4 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 4 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (4 total) == * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (i686) * nginx-1.4.2-2 (i686) * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (x86_64) * nginx-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (4 total) == * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-2 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * iftop-1.0pre2-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * nginx-1.4.2-2 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dreisner - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request awesome-tyranical-git into awesome-tyrannical-git
by Alfredo Palhares 29 Aug '13

29 Aug '13

Hello Can you please merge awesome-tyranical-git into the newest awesome-tyrannical-git[2], I made a typo. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/awesome-tyranical-git/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/awesome-tyrannical-git/ -- Regards, Alfredo Palhares

2 1

[aur-general] request merge vapoursynth-git into vapoursynth
by SpinFlo 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

hi please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-git<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/> into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/ vapursynth package use SVN (tag branch), this method not longer available. i change to GIT because this project don't use "zip" sources greetings

2 2

[aur-general] Delete Request: python-printdesign and python-uniconvertor
by Moritz Lipp 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

Hello, I would like to ask to delete * python-uniconvertor * python-printdesign since I've replaced them with * python2-uniconvertor * python2-printdesign Thank you and best regards, Moritz

2 1

[aur-general] Fwd: Re: TU Votes -- Reminder!
by Lukas Fleischer 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

----- Forwarded message from Daenyth <daenyth+arch(a)gmail.com> ----- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:59:55 -0400 From: Daenyth <daenyth+arch(a)gmail.com> To: Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> Subject: Re: TU Votes -- Reminder! Hi Lukas, I think I must have missed doing this earlier, but unfortunately I find that I have to resign my position as a TU. It's been a lot of fun and I've really enjoyed working alongside so many great people and learning through it, but I have a lot of new things going on in my life these days that doesn't leave me time for the responsibility. Could you please forward this email to the AUR list as well? I unsubscribed some time ago. Warm regards, -Gavin On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Lukas Fleischer <archlinux(a)cryptocrack.de> wrote: I am sending this mail to all TUs who skipped three (or more) votes (in succession). Guys, I really appreciate all your work but please remember that all TUs *must* take part in votes. If there are too many TUs neglecting votes, we fail to reach quorums and TU power stagnates. Also keep in mind that skipping too many votes automatically triggers a special TU removal... Thank you for your cooperation. Cheers, Lukas ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

[aur-general] Proofreading request
by Clément Junca 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

Hello, Could someone have a look at the attached package, please ? It's my first AUR package written from scratch. I've packaged the script Feather written in Python2 by Dan Rue to handle backups with tarsnap (https://github.com/danrue/feather) It contains some difficulties for a beginner: sources from github, a patch to correct Python executable name and a custom licence. I would be glad to have a seasoned packager looking at it. Running namcap gives two warnings: feather-git W: Dependency included and not needed ('tarsnap') feather-git W: Dependency included and not needed ('python2-yaml') since namcap probably can't notice their usage as a system call and as a Python library. Best regards, -- Clément

8 14

[aur-general] Removal request htmldoc-patched
by Mariusz Libera 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

Hi, please remove htmldoc-patched, it's now the same as htmldoc. Also consider deleting htmldoc-svn as it's currently broken and seems to be unmaintained for a long time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/htmldoc-patched/

2 1

[aur-general] Remove package 'python2-gmusicapi-git'
by Kristóf Jakab 28 Aug '13

28 Aug '13

Hi! I've just submitted the package python2-gmusicapi-git, but was told that the name is misleading (it is an unstable, development branch), so I'm asking you to remove it from the AUR. Thanks in advance!

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Proofreading request
by Evan Teitelman 27 Aug '13

27 Aug '13

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17:16PM +0200, Cl?ment Junca wrote: > Could someone have a look at the attached package, please ? It's my first > AUR package written from scratch. I made some changes to your PKGBUILD file. Here they are: # Maintainer: Clément Junca <cju.arch(a)gmail.com> # Remove unused variables. pkgname=feather-git _gitname=feather pkgver=19.3a91bc7 pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="A tarsnap script that performs and maintains a set of backups as defined by a yaml configuration file" arch=('any') url="https://github.com/danrue/feather" license=('custom:beerware') depends=('tarsnap' 'python2-yaml') # Note: The quotation marks are not necessary here but they are an impromptu # standard---probably for reasons of consistency. makedepends=('git') source=('git://github.com/danrue/feather.git' 'feather.patch') md5sums=('SKIP' '61ca0090775f0f7910dd525a19ac5540') pkgver() { cd $_gitname echo $(git rev-list --count HEAD).$(git rev-parse --short HEAD) # No need to reset the current working directory. } # Patch in the `prepare` function. prepare() { # Use the full path. cd "$srcdir/$_gitname" # The `|| exit 1` part is not necessary. `makepkg` traps errors. # You make come across `|| return 1` on the AUR though. It used to be necessary. patch -p1 -i ../feather.patch } # Note: Only the `package` function is mandatory. package() { # Note: Use double quotation marks around `$pkgdir` and `$srcdir`. # These variables store absolute paths. Some people have spaces or special # characters in their build paths. cd "$srcdir/$_gitname" # Using `install` to create directories is common. I believe `makepkg` sets # `umask` appropriately though so `makedir` should work. install -dm755 "$pkgdir/etc" install -dm755 "$pkgdir/usr/bin" install -dm755 "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname" # Whitespace is nice. # The `-D` switch is not necessary here. install -m755 feather "$pkgdir/usr/bin/feather" install -m644 feather.yaml.dist "$pkgdir/etc/feather.yaml" # You should put LICENSE in the `source` array. install -m644 ../../LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE" } # Modelines are an eyesore. # I have this in my Vim configuration: # autocmd BufRead,BufNewFile, PKGBUILD setlocal tabstop=2 shiftwidth=2 expandtab # vim:set ts=2 sw=2 et:

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Proofreading request
by Evan Teitelman 27 Aug '13

27 Aug '13

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:17:16PM +0200, Cl?ment Junca wrote: > Could someone have a look at the attached package, please ? It's my first > AUR package written from scratch. A few additional notes: - Your patch is small. You can use `sed` instead. sed -i 's|env python|env python2|' feather sed -i 's|binpath: /usr/local/bin/|binpath: /usr/bin/|' feather.yaml.dist - Here is a fixed and cleaned version of your `config.install` file: # You should probably run this on install, not on upgrade. # If you want to run this on both install and upgrade, you can do this: # post_install() { # post_upgrade # } post_install() { # Install file output should be dense. echo 'Feather is designed to be run from cron like this:' # The quotation marks are necessary here. Without them, the shell will expand the asterisks. echo ' */5 * * * * /usr/bin/feather /etc/feather.yaml' # 'shall' gives the impression that the file will be updated automatically. echo 'Configuration file /etc/feather.yaml must be updated before running.' } - It is common to name install files after the packages they belong to. You should consider naming your install file `feather.install` or `feather-git.install`.

1 0

[aur-general] Inactive until 18. September
by Thorsten Töpper 27 Aug '13

27 Aug '13

Hello, I will be inactive until the 18th September 2013. I voted in any of the currently open votes, so count me into the quorum. The reason for my inactivity is, that I need to focus on my thesis until I hand it in. I won't be completely gone, I just won't invest much time into reading and writing mails or spent much time online at all. Please take care of my packages and be aware that john is based on the community enhanced version and not the official free version that lacks lots of features. (1.7.9 with jumbo patches is ahead of a plain 1.8.0 but includes its features.) Cheers, Thorsten

1 0

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 27 Aug '13

27 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours ==

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Request name change/orphaing of drawterm
by Marshall Conover 26 Aug '13

26 Aug '13

Hello aur-general, I messaged the list about two weeks about the drawterm[1] package, saying that I had flagged the package out of date, uploaded a working package build to the page as a comment, and attempted to contact the owner of the package two weeks prior; I then asked that the package be orphaned/updated with my working package build. I was asked by speps to send an email to the package maintainer at his gmail address, as the domain for his other email address seems out of sorts; that address was actually the one I had originally sent it to, but I figured I"d give it more time and check IRC and speps suggested. I have still been unable to contact the prior maintainer. I have uploaded a new package, drawterm-hg[2], which (as far as I can tell) meets the criteria for a package on the AUR, and fixes the issues with the old drawterm package (which also used mercurial, but didn't have it in the name). As the new package seems to hit all the points needed, I believe the old drawterm should be deleted. Let me know if anything else is required! Thanks, Marshall Conover [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm-hg/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/>-- Have a good day, Marshall Conover

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 26 Aug '13

26 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. allan - 4 signoffs 2. andyrtr - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Merge request: beclock into bekwinfx-git
by David Strobach 26 Aug '13

26 Aug '13

Please merge beclock[1] int bekwinfx-git[2]. The BeClock effect has been incorporated in and superseded by the BE::KWinFX effect suite. It is no longer maintained and is incompatible with KDE >= 4.10. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/beclock [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bekwinfx-git

2 1

[aur-general] Unused account on BBS and AUR web interface
by William Gathoye 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi guys, I would like to contribute to the AUR, but it appears the account 'wget' has already been registrered, but no one seems to currently use it. It looks like someone has asked for a password reset but hasn't clicked on the confirmation link from the email yet. Would it be possible for you to unlock this account and release this username for me? I'm experiencing the same issue with the BBS forum. I got 'Invalid username' as a response from the registration form. It would be nice if I could keep the same e-dentity for the ArchLinux community, as I'm using the same nickname for the communities where I'm getting involved in. Regards, - -- William Gathoye <william(a)gathoye.be> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRhSpxAAoJEA595SwE1xaDaEYQAMaVsrNPep/Gm/UXSkCr0dlm 84upblK10lQcjiq3BeUU4sSrPFWq1ewVR6tr2w86VuzPG2Pa8jpwbJ53ZomsiCP4 2MFn6OqQ9aDWb2ghSEyTmY/588Y64PXMV4H7bAtTE6JXPDh3S0ekLF47cWY23bxe LvRDCvgxwPGERSHEW1YD2bOUoODiB8THYBQdZWZZsy6ule5/UAKsu0G4y5gvBlqT Hfk/pzdS5BnNRx11mUVceqZkRy5pgfjNHjGa2ZvRHlycPnEnwM7fMXraDAJ5OH7Q JW+cxMrQQgtd16iUt7V1n2e3f44lSytG8CP32n5ioXPAz0INz/FPbGl0NVeja+MP rcpgvYD9ql+685wrRcO+a5iyimjb6cBaxFGKCD2t/cJrQTL5B4dne8BakbMLChLa ajtpVLnCvFefV4FKkRKfxDTxENIhEW3HD9cuJrKIJM/ZNH4sYdfj5Uf+iAFI5Gmb 7Fr7iqiiA3KtMF/tQ+VxNXdTObVuTbeTAzZPzQOaYsL05Ii9lLg0tyuphDpM90aK OVDgfo618YAEvIe9WMKrWrSVkQ3FuD4yNOoWhDis0pF+fYi0S2vWo39NRtZhgaWr kWS0ydcYQXh6r9szsiOc2wfEWHWL9loAWQlcA0/nuupxypp35QH5BQG1LWWj70l1 dGchvAA74CJR4mGXuabx =jSyj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

5 8

Re: [aur-general] request merge vapoursynth-git into vapoursynth
by danielwallace 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

You could also keep both, and just specify the fragment in the one without -git in the name. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines#VCS_sources Gtmanfred

2 1

Re: [aur-general] request merge vapoursynth-git into vapoursynth
by danielwallace 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

So, since you are using the source straight from the git repository, we should be merging into the -git version? Also, there is no need to use echo in your pkgver, just run the command in the sub shell Gtmanfred -------- Original message -------- From: SpinFlo <sl1pkn07(a)gmail.com> Date: 08/25/2013 1:36 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> Subject: [aur-general] request merge vapoursynth-git into vapoursynth hi please merge https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-git<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/> into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth/ vapursynth package use SVN (tag branch), this method not longer available. i change to GIT because this project don't use "zip" sources greetings

1 0

[aur-general] Disown request
by Iván Pulido 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

Hello, I'd like to request to disown the package dislin in AUR https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dislin/ . The package has been flagged out of date for over three months now and I already sent a fix/update for the PKGBUILD (with the username "mefistofeles") and the developer has not done anything. I'd like to adopt the package if possible. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 7 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (7 total) == * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. dan - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Delete request [Aug 24]
by Limao Luo 25 Aug '13

25 Aug '13

Can a TU delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pylast/ ? python2-pylast is in [community], and python-pylast doesn't build a Python 3 version of the library. Thanks. - luolimao

4 3

[aur-general] Removal request: lmms-vst
by Martti Kühne 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

Hi list There's no point in having [0] around, since community/lmms passes -USE=vst to compilation... cheers! mar77i [0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lmms-vst

2 1

[aur-general] Merging request.
by Jagmjp Janpgm 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

Could elementary-icons-bzr be merged into elementary-icon-theme-bzr to be in sync with elementary-icon-theme from [community] ?

4 4

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 24 Aug '13

24 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 2 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 21 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (2 total) == * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (i686) * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (21 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * fcitx-mozc-1.11.1502.102-1 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. eric - 9 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] Removal of AUR packages brother-mfc260c-lpr and brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper
by Tobias Böhm 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

Hello, today I have installed drivers for the Brother MFC260C and found two packages which might be worth to be removed. The two packages are: brother-mfc260c-lpr https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc260c-lpr/ brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc260c-cupswrapper/ The reasons are that both of this packages are currently not working, as the source url is not working any more. Both packages are orphaned as well. Additionally there is a working package which provides both drivers, thus supersedes the two mentioned ones: brother-mfc-260c https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-mfc-260c/ Thank you for your efforts. Best Regards, Tobias

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request: kdeplasma-applets-qstardict
by A Rojas 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeplasma-applets-qstardict/ It is in [community] now

2 1

[aur-general] Disown request : python2-logbook
by Laël Guillemenot 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

Please disown python2-logbook https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-logbook/ The package is mark as out-of-date since 2012-11-17. No response of maintainer to mail I had send two weeks ago.

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 23 Aug '13

23 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 0 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 1 fully signed off package * 19 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (19 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 1/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Completed signoffs (1 total) == * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. andyrtr - 6 signoffs 2. allan - 5 signoffs 3. lcarlier - 4 signoffs 4. jsteel - 2 signoffs 5. heftig - 2 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] [tu-bylaws][PATCH]
by Xyne 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Hi, Here's a patch for the TU-bylaws that resulted from discussion in the previous thread: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html I hope this is in the correct format. I haven't used git send-email because I still haven't configured it and didn't want to risk doing something stupid in a hurry. For those of you who prefer reading the resulting document, I have attached the source file and the generated HTML file. Please read through the previous thread for an explanation of the changes. Let the discussion period begin! From 8328526fc0fef469d9edb1abf0f0448c2f440e90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xyne <xyne(a)archlinux.ca> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 13:55:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Following discussion on aur-general (https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-August/024745.html) * remove distinction between "active" and "inactive" TUs * update all clauses affected by this change, most importantly the definition of quorum * update conditions for special removal of a TU * use abbreviations consistently through the document * add missing links to instances of "aur-general" * various changes to correct or improve English throughout the document --- tu-bylaws.txt | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) diff --git a/tu-bylaws.txt b/tu-bylaws.txt index 991d683..4c0699b 100644 --- a/tu-bylaws.txt +++ b/tu-bylaws.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Trusted User Bylaws =================== Trusted Users <aur-general(a)archlinux.org> -1.2, 18 January 2011 +1.3, 2013-08-07 Summary ------- @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ duties. Mission ------- -The Trusted Users serve the following purposes: +The Trusted Users (TUs) serve the following purposes: 1. Maintain +[community]+ as an intermediary between Archlinux's official repositories and the +unsupported+ package collection in the AUR. @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ repositories and the +unsupported+ package collection in the AUR. Bylaws ------ -The bylaws are written to be consistent with the mission of the Trusted Users, -and to ensure that Trusted Users continue to be *Trusted* in the future. They -are also written with the intent to keep the Trusted User organization a -thriving one, fulfilling their purpose. +The bylaws are written to be consistent with the mission of the TUs, +and to ensure that TUs continue to be *Trusted* in the future. They +are also written with the intent to keep the TU organization a +thriving one, fulfilling its purpose. Standard Voting Procedure ------------------------- @@ -35,31 +35,23 @@ accept or reject proposals regarding TU affairs. SVP begins with a proposal, for example the addition of a TU or an amendment to the bylaws. The proposal should be clear and concise and it must be posted on -the aur-general mailing list (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded +the https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general mailing list] (aur-general). The proposal must also be worded unambiguously, and such that a YES or NO answer may be given. -The discussion period begins when the proposal is posted on aur-general. The +The discussion period begins when the proposal is posted on https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. The duration of the discussion period shall be 5 full days UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. Official discussion -shall take place on aur-general. During the discussion period, votes shall not +shall take place on https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. During the discussion period, votes shall not be cast. The voting period begins when the discussion period ends. The duration of the voting period shall be 7 full days UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. During the voting period, TUs may vote YES, -NO or ABSTAIN. Votes shall be cast under the Trusted User section of the AUR -homepage. At the end of the voting period, all votes shall be tallied. - -In the context of SVP, TUs are considered active if they are marked as active -when the voting period ends. - -Quorum shall be 66% of all active TUs and participation shall be measured by -the sum of YES, NO and ABSTAIN votes, UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of -the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. +NO or ABSTAIN. Votes shall be cast under the Trusted User section of the https://aur.archlinux.org/[AUR website]. At the end of the voting period, all votes shall be tallied. The proposal is accepted if EITHER -1. the number of YES votes is greater than half the number of active TUs OR +1. the number of YES votes is greater than half the number of TUs OR 2. quorum has been established and the number of YES votes is greater than the number of NO votes @@ -68,8 +60,7 @@ UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. The proposal is rejected if EITHER -1. the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to half the number of active -TUs OR +1. the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to half the number of TUs OR 2. quorum was established and the number of NO votes is greater than or equal to the number of YES votes @@ -90,47 +81,20 @@ second SVP then it shall be rejected. Quorum ------ -This section deals with quorums, and the consequences for those that repeatedly -keep the group from meeting them. - -Quorums were established to make sure that all TUs are having a say in the -matters that they vote on, and to ensure that TUs remain active in the job that -they have taken on. All active TUs should be participating in discussions and -voting procedures in order to continue meeting the quorums. For this reason, -active TUs that keep quorum from being established on a voting procedure for -three consecutive voting procedures (they need not be on the same motion) are -automatically brought up for removal procedure, by reason of unwarranted -inactivity. - -Active vs. Inactive -------------------- - -A Trusted User will have an activity status at all times. Only two statuses -exist, +active+, and +inactive+. A TU should remain active whenever possible, -and avoid being inactive, especially without declaring it. - -An active TU participates in all TU tasks and activities normally. - -A TU may declare themselves inactive, for instance if they are going on -vacation, by sending a message to -https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. TUs -are expected to step down altogether if they plan on becoming inactive for a -period longer than 2 months. It is expected that while inactive, a TU is -unable to maintain packages and partake in normal TU activities. They are -exempt from quorums and in fact cannot vote. A TU becomes active again at the -stated date on their original inactivity declaration, or when they declare -themselves such. +Quorums were established to ensure that all matters decided by vote are +representative of the TU group. All TUs are expected to participate in all votes +and the preceding discussions whenever possible. -If a TU becomes inactive without declaring it, "disappears", someone must -motion for their removal for reason of unwarranted and undeclared inactivity, -and the normal procedure for the motion is followed. +Quorum shall be 66% of all TUs and participation shall be measured by +the sum of YES, NO and ABSTAIN votes, UNLESS otherwise stated in a section of +the bylaws pertaining to the proposal. Addition of a TU ---------------- -The addition of a Trusted User may occur at any time. +The addition of a TU may occur at any time. -In order to become a Trusted User, one must first find a sponsoring active TU, +In order to become a TU, one must first find a sponsoring TU, and arrange privately with them to announce their candidacy on the https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general] mailing list. Following the announcement, standard voting procedure commences with a @@ -146,32 +110,46 @@ User for a period of three months. Removal of a TU --------------- -The removal of a Trusted User may also occur at any time. +The removal of a TU may also occur at any time. -A motion must be made by at least two active Trusted Users for the removal of a -Trusted User. The motion must be sent to +A motion must be made by at least two TUs for the removal of a +TU. The motion must be sent to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general], and contain a detailed and valid reason that the TU in question should be removed. Following the motion, standard voting procedure commences with a discussion -period of 7 days, a quorum of 75%, and a voting period of 7 days. +period of 7 days, a quorum of 75% of all TUs except for the TU being considered +for removal, and a voting period of 7 days. + ---- SVP( general_removal_of_TU, 7, 0.75, 7); ---- -The Trusted User brought up for removal may defend themselves during the -discussion period, but may not vote during the voting period, nor may they vote -on any other matters while SVP for their removal is in progress. +The TU brought up for removal may defend themselves during the +discussion period, but may not vote on the proposal. + + +Special Removal of an Inactive TU +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +A TU who has not done ANY of the following for a period of at least 2 months: + +1. added, removed or updated a package in +[community]+ or the AUR + +2. performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR + +3. posted a message to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general] + +OR who has not voted in a consecutive series of voting periods, the starting dates +of which span 2 months or more, shall be brought up for special removal due to +inactivity. -There is one special case for removal, removal due to unwarranted and -undeclared inactivity, for which standard voting procedure deviates from the -above. This motion is also automatically triggered by repeated quorum offenses, -as described in the <<Q,Quorum>> subsection of this document. For this special -case, SVP is followed with a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, -and a voting period of 5 days. +In this special case, the motion may be made by one TU instead of two, and SVP +is followed by a discussion period of three days, a quorum of 66%, and a voting +period of 5 days. ---- -SVP( inactivity_removal_of_TU, 3, 0.66, 5 ); +SVP( removal_of_inactive_TU, 3, 0.66, 5 ); ---- Amendment of Bylaws @@ -179,7 +157,7 @@ Amendment of Bylaws These bylaws may be amended at any time. -An active Trusted User must motion for an amendment by sending an announcement +A TU must motion for an amendment by sending an announcement to https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general[aur-general]. The message must either contain, or have attached, a patch against this document which accomplishes the suggested change. SVP is commenced at the time @@ -190,5 +168,5 @@ voting period of 7 days. SVP( amend_bylaws, 5, 0.75, 7); ---- -If the amendment fails, the same amendment may not be motioned for for a period +If the amendment fails, the same amendment may not be motioned for a period of three weeks. -- 1.8.3.4

5 11

[aur-general] deletion request
by Alexej Magura 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Could yall please delete /nocp/, I'm the developer, and I thought that /nocp/was fully functional and ready to be packaged, but upon further testing today I realized that it's hardly functional at all, which is pretty dang disappointing. Anyway, here's a link to the AUR package page thingy. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nocp/ /**/ -- Alexej Magura Give a little more for a little less today. :)

2 1

[aur-general] Signoff report for [community-testing]
by Arch Website Notification 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

=== Signoff report for [community-testing] === https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/ There are currently: * 8 new packages in last 24 hours * 0 known bad packages * 0 packages not accepting signoffs * 0 fully signed off packages * 20 packages missing signoffs * 0 packages older than 14 days (Note: the word 'package' as used here refers to packages as grouped by pkgbase, architecture, and repository; e.g., one PKGBUILD produces one package per architecture, even if it is a split package.) == New packages in [community-testing] in last 24 hours (8 total) == * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) == Incomplete signoffs for [community] (20 total) == * bbswitch-0.7-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (i686) 0/1 signoffs * bbswitch-0.7-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * devil-1.7.8-17 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * mplayer-vaapi-36265-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * netsurf-3.0-4 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * r8168-8.036.00-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * rt3562sta-2.4.1.1-41 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * synfig-0.64.0-7 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * tp_smapi-0.41-32 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * vhba-module-20130607-11 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs * virtualbox-modules-4.2.16-8 (x86_64) 0/2 signoffs == Top five in signoffs in last 24 hours == 1. thomas - 1 signoffs

1 0

[aur-general] A simple introduction
by Tanner Danzey 22 Aug '13

22 Aug '13

Since I've never really learned mailing list etiquette, I'm not sure this is the right place. Nevertheless... My name is Tanner, currently residing in strange-weathered Fargo, ND. I work as a support technician / system engineer at a local managed service provider. We use Linux for anything that we aren't paid specifically to use Windows for. I have a breadth of skill in both general IT / system tasks as well as programming (C/C++, Ruby, Python, Web Design, PHP, Haskel). I have developed a deep fondness for the Arch community as a result of lurking over the last few months. I've taken it upon myself to maintain some niche orphaned packages on the AUR (bff, 3dpong, emu65el02) and I'd like to dedicate more time helping you guys out. I'm on IRC frequently as Arkaniad, usually lurking or having it running in the background during some various task. Long story short, I like you guys and I'm gonna stick around for a while. Hello :)

1 0

[aur-general] [Delete request] - miltilame
by member graysky 21 Aug '13

21 Aug '13

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/multilame/ This was a script I wrote a while ago but have abandoned upstream. Other packages do the same only with tagging. Please delete.

2 1