- Aur-general - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-general] Removal request
by Max Roder 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

Hi, I think airoscript-svn [1] can safely be removed, as the svn repository is empty and [2] provides the current version. Thanks, Max [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28156 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33596

2 1

[aur-general] marge request
by A Rojas 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

Please merge zanshin-kde ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50984 ) into zanshin-todo ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52024 ) which is the upstream name.

2 1

[aur-general] JBoss packages
by Cédric Girard 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

There is 5 different packages on AUR: jboss-web [1] : version 2.1.9 jboss [2] : version 5.1.0 jboss4 [3] : version 4.2.3 jboss6 [4] : version 6.0.0 jboss7 [5] : version 7.0.1 While I may understand the need for older versions in some case (is there?), the naming scheme make little sense to me. Why jboss [2] is not the latest version (ie 7) ? jboss-web [1] does not seems right either. What do you think ? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51353 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45146 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5293 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39213 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51257 -- Cédric Girard

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Requests
by gadget3000 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

pylast(https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21758) has been replaced by python-pylast (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45128) and python2-pylast (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45119) facebook-google-sync (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34330) is a dead project that no longer functions due to facebook updates. It's a sh & curl script that could potentially be rewritten. The script is included in the src archive. Gadget3000

2 1

[aur-general] Request for fusing
by Jesse Jaara 30 Aug '11

30 Aug '11

Package [1]udev-android-rules should be jammed into package [2]android-udev. android-udevis currently more up to date, and has better name that goes together with the other android packages. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44220 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51476

1 0

Re: [aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released
by gadget3000 30 Aug '11

30 Aug '11

john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) was created to either update [community] or include a patch which is now included in [community] anyway. It's just been orphaned. Gadget3000 On 29 August 2011 20:46, gadget3000 <gadget3000(a)msn.com> wrote: > *Packages created to update others:* > haskell-xmpp-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32418) was > created to update haskell-xmpp ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30218) more quickly. The > maintainer is happy for it to be deleted, as stated in the comments. > hdate-applet-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42660) was > created to update hdate-applet ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4353) more quickly (I presume). > It currently has no votes or maintainer. > hspell-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44608) presumably > had similar intentions for hspell [extra]. It currently has no votes or > maintainer. > pyblosxom-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35982) presumably > had similar intentions for pyblosxom ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) and is maintained by > an inactive maintainer so it has old dependencies that haven't worked since > at least Oct 2010. > stardict-ncce-ce-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40850) I > think was created to fix the source links of stardict-ncce-ce ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19437) after the project was > removed from sourceforge. It currently has no maintainer or votes and > stardict-ncce-ce is also orphaned. > stardict-ncce-ec-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40851) did > the same thing for stardict-ncce-ec ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19438) It also is orphaned and > has no votes and stardict-ncce-ec is also orphaned. > > *Packages created for other reasons:* > idjc-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35076) is poorly > named and should be called idjc-git > lazarus-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26708) is poorly > named and should be called lazarus-svn, which already exists ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18729) but is orphaned. > reciteword-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41925) was > created to fix the PKGBUILD of pyblosxom ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17253) which is currently > orphaned. > spideroak-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47096) is > poorly named and should be called spideroak-beta. It is actively maintained. > xf86-video-intel-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22968) > is poorly named and should probably be called xf86-video-intel-alpha. I'm > not sure what is the norm around alpha packages so please let me know what > happens with this one. > yaffs2utils-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46674) is > poorly named and should be called yaffs2utils-snapshot but it's maintained > by someone with an @archlinux email address so I think I'm mistaken on this > one. Let me know what you think. > > *Awaiting maintainer responses:* > ipset-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49724) > john-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38152) > josm-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13569) > metslib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43739) > > > And that's the current, whole list processed! > > Gadget3000 > > > On 29 August 2011 14:20, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de>wrote: > >> Am 29.08.2011 13:13, schrieb gadget3000: >> >> *Packages created to update others:* >>> dar-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51785<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51785>) >>> wanted to >>> update dar [community] more quickly. It has been abandonded and only has >>> 1 >>> vote. >>> deja-dup-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=35144<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35144>) >>> has similar >>> intentions for deja-dup (https://aur.archlinux.org/** >>> packages.php?ID=28835 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28835>). >>> I >>> have just flagged deja-dup as out of date. >>> evilvte-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51769<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51769>) >>> had similar >>> intentions for evilvte (https://aur.archlinux.org/** >>> packages.php?ID=16727 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727>) >>> and >>> has since been abandoned. It has no votes. >>> extcalc-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=36578<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36578>) >>> has similar >>> intentions for extcalc (https://aur.archlinux.org/** >>> packages.php?ID=22084 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22084> >>> ), >>> which was a year out of date at the time of extcalc-new's creation. >>> flashrom-svn-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=45519<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45519>) >>> had >>> similar intentions for flashrom-svn ( >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=23390<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23390>). >>> It has since been >>> abandoned and may have even been deleted before. >>> fmit-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=51160<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51160>) >>> had similar >>> intentions but the maintainer want's it deleted. >>> gabedit-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=47301<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47301>) >>> had similar >>> intentions for gabedit (https://aur.archlinux.org/** >>> packages.php?ID=34230 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34230>) >>> but >>> is now itself out of date. It has no votes. >>> gtkglarea-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=31353<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31353>) >>> had >>> similar intentions for gtkglarea ( >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=901<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=901>). >>> It has since been abandoned. >>> >>> >> Most were deleted. Some were not yet, because I wrote a comment and want >> to give a chance to read them to the the maintainer. >> >> Thank you for your efforts. >> >> >> >> >

1 0

[aur-general] Removal requests: AUFS packages cleanup
by Calimero 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

Hello, As of the release of AUFS3, these packages need to be removed (they are orphaned, or mine): aufs2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49766 aufs2-all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38249 aufs2-ck https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37345 aufs2-util https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49767 aufs2-util-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26252 kernel26-aufs_friendly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49927 The new packages are: aufs3, aufs3-util, linux-aufs_friendly. Thanks.

2 1

Re: [aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released
by gadget3000 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

qtiplot-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47810) simply intends to update versions numbers quicker than the repository. I'm not sure what the rules are surrounding this situation. uqm-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51672) has similar intentions. libmowgli-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47375) does the same thing and is currently orphaned. libdrm-newest https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22973 does the same thing and is actively maintained. libksba-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50960) did the same thing but "Libksba 1.2 is now in [Extra]. This package is no longer required." and has subsequently been orphaned. tremulous-updated (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21426) does/did the same thing (the tremelous project hasn't been updated since 2009). libdvdnav-new (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17355) does/did the same thing (the project hasn't been updated since 2008). telepathy-glib-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50140) also does this. It is currently orphaned. The submitter says in the comments: "This package will be needed until telepathy-glib on extra is updated to 0.15.1." lyx-newest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48936) looks like it does the same thing but has changed a few couple flags in the process. I'll edit the original duplicates list once these packages have been processed by a TU. On 28 August 2011 23:07, gadget3000 <gadget3000(a)msn.com> wrote: > parcellite-latest (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31471) has > been replaced by parcellite-svn ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19919) > > Gadget3000 > > > > On 24 August 2011 18:09, Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de>wrote: > >> Am 24.08.2011 06:06, schrieb Gour-Gadadhara Dasa: >> >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:47:00 +0200 >>> Stefan Husmann<stefan-husmann(a)t-**online.de <stefan-husmann(a)t-online.de> >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> customizepkg-new is a fork of customizepkg, not a devel version. >>>> >>> >>> Does any other AUR helper (besides yaourt) work with customizepkg(-new)? >>> >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Gour >>> >>> >> autoaur does so. >> >> >

2 4

[aur-general] Removal request
by Max Roder 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] provides the same and is up-to-date. Thanks, Max [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32300 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16233 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5b4IcACgkQ3izE/HNrNdo/RACggTbIyWIyVXi9QDakOdenGLlo 2gUAmgNlSjCMVnGT4vVRJLhhxqQQmmvM =RVxs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] request to disown pyython26
by Rémy Oudompheng 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

Hello, I notice python26 has remained unattended for a year or so and despite comments from angry users and me sending an email to the maintainer last week no change has been done. Can a TU disown it? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41809 Thank you. Rémy.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Requests
by gadget3000 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

acnchess-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32470) Project now uses git. An acnchess-git package does not yet exist but acnchess-svn only has 2 votes anyway and acnchess does exist. vulturesclaw (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14157) and vultureseye (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=520) have both been replaced by vulture-nethack (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48815) due to project name changes (Source: http://www.darkarts.co.za/vulture/about )

5 10

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven seven 29 Aug '11

29 Aug '11

Please delete kdeaccessibility4-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10678. Reason: moved to git. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] aurdupes 0.6 released
by Lukas Fleischer 28 Aug '11

28 Aug '11

4 4

[aur-general] [deletion request] pwdhash
by Sebastian Wiesner 28 Aug '11

28 Aug '11

Hi, please delete pwdhash [1]. The project is dead and doesn't even exist anymore. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39502 Thanks

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Python packaging newbie
by Fabien Devaux 28 Aug '11

28 Aug '11

> > > 3) Why most packages I've seen are splitting build() and package() > > operations ? (build for .py? building & package for install part) > > Use build() for the part where you compile stuff and make files ready > for installation within $srcdir. Use package() for the part where you > copy stuff into $pkgdir. I remember there being issues about support > of split packages and packages without a build() function, and I guess > split packages are still not supported. The wiki page mentioned > suggest that packages with only a package() function are perfectly > fine, currently. But IMO this isn't worth bumping pkgrel of my own > python related packages in this case. AFAIK package() and check() are > additions to the historically only build() function, to allow faster > and more fine-grained repackaging through makepkg. Devs do not force > use of package() for the $pkgdir stuff mentioned, so maybe I'll keep > mine in the old layout, as long as these work as fine as they > currently do. > Ok, That was what I read and understood as well. The Wiki page with the python package template may be updated to suit the convention, don't you think ? > > 4) What is the recommended way to remove files from package ? (files that > > may be required at "setup.py build" step) > <snip> > > Just don't copy them into $pkgdir, or can rm them in your package() > function from $pkgdir. > Thanks !! fab.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven seven 27 Aug '11

27 Aug '11

Please delete kdesdk4-svn, kdeutils4-svn, sni-qt and qt-systemtrayicon https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10696 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10697 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50846 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50847 Thanks.

4 5

[aur-general] Deletion request: rt61-cvs-daily
by Aljosha Papsch 27 Aug '11

27 Aug '11

Please delete rt61-cvs-daily[0]. The driver is in the kernel with git access[1]. [0]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16086 [1]git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ivd/rt2x00.git/

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by notizblock 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Hi TUs, i believe, that the muttator package[1] is no longer needed as muttator is now installable via thunderbird's addon manager. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31304 -- bbs: nblock aur: notizblock

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: volumeicon-hotkeys
by Shacristo 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Please remove volumeicon-hotkeys http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48878 Hotkey support has been added upstream and is available in volumeicon http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35793

2 1

[aur-general] qsanguosha-git is outdated
by Yangtse Su 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

hi all, qsanguosha-git is outdated,I email the maintainer, but there is no response from the maintainer, And I want to maintain it myself. here is the new PKGBUILD. http://code.google.com/p/linux-android-files/downloads/detail?name=qsanguos…

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove 100% duplicate
by Jesse Jaara 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

So someone uploaded a copy of my PKGBUILD for [1]libpng12 with the only changes being a name change (to get it into AUR) and marked himself as maintainer and made me a contributor. Then he tells people to try his 100% copy PKGBUILD on the comments O_o. Please kill [2]libpng12-working [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33795 [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51855

5 4

[aur-general] Adoption request for google-musicmanager
by Matej Ľach 26 Aug '11

26 Aug '11

Hallo everyone, I would like to request adoption of Google Music beta Desktop Manager [google-musicmanager] PKGBUILD[1]. it doesn't seem to be updated anymore by its creator. I will be doing my best to keep the package up-to-date if I will be allowed to adopt this package. Thank you, Matej Lach, [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50891

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Requests
by gadget3000 25 Aug '11

25 Aug '11

netmaze (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1842) - Very old (1996) unfinished multiplayer game. 2 votes, no maintainer, PKGBUILD not updated since 2005. fxsudoku (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=Merge/4053<https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4053>) - Dead project, dead source link. Mirrors exist but it only has 2 votes, no maintainer and the PKGBUILD hasn't been updated since 2006. Lastly, what is the 'policy' around old games and putting a link to the actual game data? Some people would class it as abandonware but if it is still sold then surely it isn't abandonware and is just piracy. For example hmm2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33015) doom2 ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33036) and dune2 ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33037) all have a source link to the rar-ed game data at oldgames.ru.

1 0

[aur-general] skype Segment fault and lib32-gconf
by rafael ff1 24 Aug '11

24 Aug '11

Hi all, I'm running into segment fault when starting skype (from [multilib]). After some tests, I notice that when i uninstall lib32-gconf, it seems to solve the problem. Can someone reproduce the error for me? Basically 1- Have installed skype and lib32-gconf 2- Run skype (error expected) 3- Uninstall lib32-gconf 4- Run skype (success expected) Thanks -- Rafael

1 0

Re: [aur-general] Python packaging newbie
by Fabien Devaux 23 Aug '11

23 Aug '11

Heh, sorry for that, after my answer that is quite hilarious... Sorry for that.

1 0

[aur-general] Fwd: aur-general Digest, Vol 82, Issue 24
by Fabien Devaux 23 Aug '11

23 Aug '11

If that is all your questions then this is the wrong place to ask. In fact, it would then be wrong to even ask. It is only correct to read: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Python_Package_Guidelines Don't worry, I'm not _that_ newbie, I was just talking about arch, not IT... Thanks for pointing that document btw, it's (badly) covering one of the questions I had. 1) Why is this "template" not used by most packages I've seen ? 2) What is the main difference between build() & the optional package() function ? (appart the error handling) 3) Why most packages I've seen are splitting build() and package() operations ? (build for .py? building & package for install part) 4) What is the recommended way to remove files from package ? (files that may be required at "setup.py build" step) Thanks for your kind support...

3 2

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by Thomas Weißschuh 23 Aug '11

23 Aug '11

The package evilvte[1] has been out of date for a month and even the maintainer announced in the comments that he doesn't want to maintain it anymore. Trying to mail him failed at his nonexisting mail address. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16727 Regards

2 1

[aur-general] Orphaning out-of-date packages
by Lukas Fleischer 23 Aug '11

23 Aug '11

Andrea suggested this about two months ago [1] - it's time to take the gloves off. I just created a list of packages that have been flagged out-of-date for almost 6 months now and still have a maintainer [2]. If you maintain any of these packages, feel free to update it. I will re-generate that list and mass orphan affected packages in a week's time. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-June/014792.html [2] http://sprunge.us/SNGT

7 7

[aur-general] Python packaging newbie
by Fabien Devaux 23 Aug '11

23 Aug '11

Hi! I'm new to arch & his packaging techniques and I have some questions on how things should be for python2/3 and build() vs package() things as well... Is this the good place to ask ? Thanks, Fabien Devaux.

4 3

[aur-general] gwibber duplicates
by Balló György 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

Hi, please delete the following duplicates of gwibber and gwibber-dev: gwibber-dev-updated - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47745 gwibber-light - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47233 gwibber-new - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48086 gwibber3 - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49306 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Merge of virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin
by Seblu 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

Hello, Can you merge virtualbox_bin into virtualbox-bin ? The reason are those requested by josephgbr in https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9753 <quote> The reason I'm asking this is that every time I update my packages with "yaourt -Syua", the package "virtualbox-ext-oracle" is listed first than this package ('-' come first than '_') and I always have to reinstall again after virtualbox_bin in order to work. Thanks in advance. </quote> Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

3 5

[aur-general] Disown request
by rafael ff1 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

The packages lib32-libsexy [1] and lib32-libsexymm [2] have PKGBUILD set to build from binary and install libs in the invalid directory '/opt/lib32/usr/lib'. I asked the maintainer to fix it more than 2 weeks ago and got no reply. When I sent an email to the address informed in AUR (tried also ".org", got "no such user"), but it doesn't exist, as you can see below. Please disown this package, so I can fix them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37549 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37550 Thanks in advance ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon(a)googlemail.com> Date: 2011/8/22 Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: rafael.f.f1(a)gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: allspark(a)cyb0rg.0rg Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found ----- Original message ----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.121.4 with SMTP id t4mr1531525anc.60.1313985759195; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.1.15 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 01:02:39 -0300 Message-ID: < CALLTvweyDyG8DgNHuPq4RxK2GZdrLL2m1O7HSNo_1OeuvkRvnQ(a)mail.gmail.com> Subject: AUR packages fix From: rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1(a)gmail.com> To: allspark(a)cyb0rg.0rg Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d6446ab46704ab102615 Hi there, The packages you are maintaining, lib32-libsexy and lib32-libsexymm, are not built from source and are storing libs in wrong folder (should be /usr/lib32). Can you please fix or disown them? See example of PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.com/pymfAsT2 and http://pastebin.com/3ka6Ex7E Thanks in advance, josepgbr

2 2

[aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice
by Oon-Ee Ng 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice [2]. Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and comments/votes merged with linux-rt-ice [4]. The slight problem with that is that nvidia proprietary driver users will not be able to use linux-rt-ice, since the latest editions of the -rt patchset export several symbols as GPL which disallow compilation of the nvidia driver. Re-exporting (or modifying the nvidia license) with a patch is simple but not permitted under the terms of the GPL (as I understand it). In any case, this will not be resolved by the passage of time, so users will just have to use nouveau or patch themselves. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15224 [2] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51077 [3] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31893 [4] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51166

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request (libreoffice-extension-gdocs)
by Balló György 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

Hi, Please delete libreoffice-extension-gdocs package ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45372) from AUR, because it was added to [extra] as name libreoffice-extension-google-docs. Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Jamie Nguyen 22 Aug '11

22 Aug '11

Please can the following packages by removed from the AUR (all of which are now orphans and all of which were previously my own): kernel26-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44131 ==> replaced by linux-ccs nvidia-lts-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47235 ==> kernel26-lts-ccs no longer exists in AUR nvidia-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44132 ==> not maintained since April nvidia-ck-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48070 ==> kernel26-ck-ccs no longer exists in AUR Kind regards, Jamie

2 1

[aur-general] OK! changing a PKG's name and retaining votes/comments
by member graysky 21 Aug '11

21 Aug '11

I started a thread with same subject less the "OK! " back in May and am glad to see people saw some value in it to the point of modifying the AUR! Since the next version of the linux kernel is now released and likely soon to enter [testing] under a new name, I need to use this new feature to change the name of "kernel26-ck" in the AUR to "whatever-tpowa-uses-ck" -- at the risk of exposing my naiveté on the subject, I'll ask: 1) What is the SOP for people to request a namechange? 2) What is critically important to include the PKGBUILD? My best-guess answers: 1) Upload the new PKGNAME as a new package and email a TU with the old/new name or post to this mailing list. 2) Include a replaces statement in the PKGBUILD. E.g. replaces=('old_PKG_name'). Thanks for the thoughts!

10 15

[aur-general] Remove taskwarrior
by Chris van Dijk 21 Aug '11

21 Aug '11

Please remove taskwarrior [1], it is a duplicate of the community package task [2]. The submitter has disowned it and requested removal in the comments (about 6 weeks ago). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50536 [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/task/

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by KESHAV P.R. 20 Aug '11

20 Aug '11

Hi, Please delete efilinux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51119 . It has been replaced by efilinux-x86_64-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51688 . Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

4 3

[aur-general] Removal Requests
by Luca Bennati 20 Aug '11

20 Aug '11

kradio4-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23872 upstream switched to git kradioripper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19984 upstream renamed to kstreamripper (already in AUR, maintained by me) kradioripper-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20433 same

2 1

[aur-general] AUR upgraded to 1.9.0
by Lukas Fleischer 20 Aug '11

20 Aug '11

I just upgraded the official Arch Linux AUR setup to 1.9.0. For a short list of changes, read [1]. All AUR helper developers are encouraged to check for the latest RPC interface changes and the new package locations (we use segmented upload directories now). We also recommend to use the "URLPath" field from the RPC response instead of hardcoding the path to the PKGBUILD and tarball. For now, there's a rewrite rule to avoid unnecessary breakage of AUR helpers and legacy links. Please report any issues on the AUR bug tracker [2]. [1] http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2011-August/001842.html [2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=2

1 0

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Jaara 20 Aug '11

20 Aug '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could you please delete my package [1]powder-toy-beta as the beta releases are extremely rare. And I'm planning on uploading a -git version, that would basically be the same. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49645 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQGcBAEBAgAGBQJOT5I6AAoJEEZYEccqviVaQWgMAJYSoY6bKduYMC2Icg4pp972 Qe0QFbfRr/KbQXXCBKY9QiHSG42T/iUjYBJNIsGFTSzToTwNJBifeSrnSzHQzvHI PXPSwJU0XDU5OIQPOh/P1REFZ9QD1hGmy1zfvILdrHML6q8nXX0xsJfWFrrk/eQw 5ADt7yxNncdtCxNA3yaA1APyRMSEfiuomVsxxxuaYNJT+60KZw4nFELRMjeCIkJa dkn94vsygZOGIK0Ymx1Qy2wfly7XCiKCZ0KCLPaXiUzm64NP+6LvXaDMfV1cCQ+K Jp1X/ggilEU+IF72zpuPgE8JfJ/Vz3BZyAPh33oVrQpsFv91vPUSGJVXeTKLfsWD 7q2M6eSMcEWFY6BhAPqOm2f/qlD8rRpVOidaKASNaTSZeZlPZl+6p0BWcO/MEfC+ TA1EW6zr92LcypXseXiVEL0KcaA+LyJTl92QjjjVzB2rZpLUaLck1kanAO/vthEJ ZKa/mngDQDzw0ev9ZMtl8XXHlhE7SvzQppzBbubcIQ== =z4B2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] panda3d-samples OUTDATED
by Abhijeet Rastogi 18 Aug '11

18 Aug '11

Hi, The following package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20726 is not being updated since long, I can maintain the package so please disown the package. I am submitting first time to the AUR mailing list, so please guide what is the proper way to proceed. -- Regards, Abhijeet Rastogi (shadyabhi) http://www.google.com/profiles/abhijeet.1989

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 17 Aug '11

17 Aug '11

mpd-pulse (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18722) is deprecated as mpd in [extra] has pulseaudio support built in. I checked this myself by following the instructions here: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/PulseAudio#Setting_up_MPD and 'pulse' was indeed outputted when running 'mpd --version'.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete clementine-svn
by Axilleas P 17 Aug '11

17 Aug '11

The developers moved to git [1] so clementine-svn [2] can be deleted. Its maintainer already uploaded clementine-git [3]. Thanks :) [1] http://groups.google.com/group/clementine-player/browse_thread/thread/c7f97… [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34981 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50840 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request southerncross-git and mcabber duplicates
by nem 17 Aug '11

17 Aug '11

good day. two weeks ago southerncross github was deleted due halt of development (see reference in [1]). it was orphaned upon and since then nobody came up with a mirror (even though removal was announced 6 weeks ago). so i guess 'southerncross-git' [2] is redundant for now and can be removed. [1] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=956445#p956445 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48743 also there are some duplicates of 'mcabber-hg' (which is the source-version of mcabber in [community]) which can be deleted: 'mcabber-devel' [3] is orphaned and flagged out of date for 6 months. 'mcabber-crew-hg' [4] is simply a duplicate. 'mcabber-lm-hg' [5] is outdated (sources are 404). i contacted the maintainer (see mail below) and he agreed for removal of both of his packages, too ([4] and [5]). [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26896 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31147 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26570 regards, nem > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:28:28 +0400 Николай Степаненко > <nixtrian(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. Keep mcabber-hg. This is a development version (builds from > mercurial as seen from package name). *-crew and *-lm can be deleted. > > 2011/8/16, nem <nem(a)ikitten.co.uk>: > > > > hej! > > > > i saw that three of your packages in the AUR are basically the same > > of which one is already outdated, too. > > > > mcabber-lm-hg [1] is outdated (404). > > mcabber-crew-hg [2] and mcabber-hg [3] are basically the same > > (different repo). > > i find all PKGBUILDS redundant because mcabber is in [community] > > and up to date. is there any reason to keep them in AUR? > > > > regards, > > nem > > > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26570 > > [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31147 > > [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26873 > > >

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644) It exists as freedoko (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15705>) and I can't find a reason for a 32-bit only version. No votes, no maintainer and out of date.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete Request
by speps 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

Hi, plowshare recently switched from svn to git plowshare-svn [1] can be deleted, since plowshare-git [2] replaces it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31779 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51591 Thanks - speps -

2 4

[aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux
by Nicky726 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32045 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51470 Thanx, Nicky

2 1

[aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug
by Kevin Vesga 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809

5 6

[aur-general] Mass orphan all ghost1227 packages
by Jelle van der Waa 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

Hi, I noticed ghost still has a lot of packages in AUR, so i talked to him on irc and he said we can orphan all his packages. Can anyone mass orphan his packages for me? thanks, -- Jelle van der Waa

6 6

[aur-general] Please remove atolm
by Kevin Vesga 16 Aug '11

16 Aug '11

The maintainer of atolm[1] made a new package gnome-theme-atolm[2]. He/she has disowned atolm and it should be removed. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44903 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46345

2 1

[aur-general] Flash 10.1 and kernel26 packages
by Det 15 Aug '11

15 Aug '11

Hi all you electronic mail readers, There was some talk some time ago I think concerning the removal of the Flash10.1 packages. I thought I'd bring it back up. Here are the links: flashplugin-10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47029 lib32-flashplugin10.1: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49982 Then another thing is those kernel26- packages (all 59 of 'em). Is there some deadline until all the ones that hasn't been updated or converted into linux- alternatives should be removed?: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=kernel26&SeB=n&PP=100 Thanks, byyye Det End of electronic guru mail.

2 2

[aur-general] Dare I say it: AUR Cleanup Day
by gadget3000 15 Aug '11

15 Aug '11

Hi aur-general, With bug squashing day just around the corner and the recent mass orphaning of a lot of out of date packages, it seems like as good a time as any to start the discussion of the possibility of an AUR Cleanup Day 2011. It was around September last year I believe? Thoughts? Regards, Gadget3000

2 1

[aur-general] Dropping PCManFM
by Ángel Velásquez 15 Aug '11

15 Aug '11

Hi, This release of PcmanFM is hard to built (at least on Arch and other distros) .. libfm refuses to build, and pcmanfm cannot build without libfm >= 0.1.16 .. Since LXDE upstream have been doing slow releases (and full of bugs and patches) I am not so sure if we should drop many of LXDE components to AUR, maintaining buggy software is a hell, patching it a lot, and reporting bugs to their upstream isn't nice, and it becomes worst when upstream seems to be dead. If anyone (TU or Dev) would like to maintain pcmanfm or the rest of the components of LXDE, please adopt it go ahead and let me know, but in the contrary case, I think PcmanFM and buggy LXDE software should go to AUR Regards -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com

4 3

[aur-general] [away] 10-14 August
by Ronald van Haren 15 Aug '11

15 Aug '11

Hi all, I'll be in Sweden for a short family visit between tonight and Sunday evening. I don't bring my laptop so I won't be able to do any packaging stuff. Grub is moved to [core], meaning that there are no critical bugs in my packages left that can't wait until I return. Cheers, Ronald

1 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

theforgottenserver-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21881) The svn repository is no longer available to the public (Source: http://otland.net/f55/moved-private-subversion-11833/) There used to be a public repository at "http://svn.otland.net/public/forgottenserver" but that no longer exists (Since February 2009 by looks of the forum post edit). 2 votes and no maintainer.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

tux-ragnarok-full (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34062) - Dead multiplayer project. Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. 3 votes and hasn't been updated since Feb 2010. No maintainer.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request: musca-fixed
by nem 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

good day. please remove musca-fixed [1], which i added when musca [2] still was in [community]. i merged my bugpatches into the musca PKGBUILD making musca-fixed redundant. sorry for the hazzle. regards, nem [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51443 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51494

2 1

[aur-general] Please delete
by Jesse Jaara 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

otf-triod-postnaja[1] replaced with ttf version. plase make it go pufff [2]ttf-gillius replaced with otf-gillius-collection [3]ttf-liberastica, renamed to ttf-liberastika [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40293 [2]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34289 [3]http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23345 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

2 1

[aur-general] orphan request
by Auguste Pop 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

hi, fuego (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24761) is greatly outdated. the current version is 1.1 while our aur version is 0.4. i have contacted the maintainer a week ago, and got no response at all. i am willing to take it over and update it. please orphan it. best regards,

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 14 Aug '11

14 Aug '11

glest-tileset-autumn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21791) is included in megaglest which is in [community] (Source: http://www.titusgames.de/news.html#tilesets)

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Requests
by gadget3000 13 Aug '11

13 Aug '11

falldown (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11856) is a dead project and has a dead source link. I can't find a mirror. poker3d (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9894) is a dead multiplayer only project. Dead source link, I found a mirror here ( http://download.gna.org/underware/poker3d/gnulinux/fedora/fc6/src/redhat/SO…) but it's for a lower version. nero (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6413) is a dead project and has a dead source link. I can't find a mirror. pokenet-client-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42470) looks like a dead project (http://www.ohloh.net/p/pokenetonline) Homepage gives a 403 as does svnroot. No maintainer and no votes. Not updated since October.

2 1

[aur-general] Some Removal Requests
by gadget3000 13 Aug '11

13 Aug '11

taglib-wma (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2419) - Dead project (URL is now http://umeshshankar.com/taglib-wma/) Does not build with latest dependencies. alacarte-xfce-devel (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44362) - Dead project. Does not build with latest dependencies. tuxchan (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29399) - Dead project. Dead download link and I can't find a mirror, therefore does not build. netswitch (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4197) - Dead project. Depends on a dead package. Possibly now replaced by archassistant ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Netcfg#ArchAssistant_.28GUI.29) snowballz (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7926) - Dead project that no longer works due a using a deprecated module from python-rabbyt. kimboot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10295) - Dead project. Doesn't run with any version of python that I've tried. User unikim also noted on the AUR Cleanup Day wiki page ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Cleanup_Day) that kdeicons-reflections-kde4 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50564) is a duplicate of kdeicons-reflektions-kde4 ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50566)

2 2

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 13 Aug '11

13 Aug '11

tecnoballz-snapshot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4377) has been replaced by tecnoballz (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45077)

2 1

[aur-general] Private mailing list for TUs?
by Florian Pritz 13 Aug '11

13 Aug '11

Hi, I think it would be nice if we had a closed mailing list for TUs only (and maybe devs if they want to) so we can move more important stuff from IRC to mail because not everyone uses IRC or is online all the time. Keep in mind that it will likely be low traffic. Any hard feelings on that? -- Florian Pritz

12 14

[aur-general] Removal request
by A Rojas 12 Aug '11

12 Aug '11

please remove nepomukcontroller http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45131 as it is included in KDE 4.7

2 1

[aur-general] kernel26 removal requests
by Cedric Staniewski 12 Aug '11

12 Aug '11

Hi TUs, Please have a look at the following packages: kernel26-drm-next - seems to be obsolete and unmaintained https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30068 kernel26-eee901 - obsolete? wasn't updated for more than two years https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22904 kernel26-git - replaced by linux-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25304 kernel26-intelfix - not required anymore according to author's comment https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44045 kernel26-kamal - replaced by linux-kamal https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47458 kernel26-kamal-git - might be outdated; at least, it is not recommended by the maintainer and was not renamed to linux-kamal-git (same maintainer as for kernel26-kamal) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47386 kernel26-lqx - superseded by linux-lqx https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39882 kernel26-mike - obsolete? wasn't updated for nearly two years https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29693 kernel26-web100 - obsolete? wasn't updated for nearly two years https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23792 kernel26-zen - according to the comments, replaced by zen-kernel https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30330 kernel26-zen-next - obsolete? wasn't updated for 1,5 years https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31380 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 12 Aug '11

12 Aug '11

Please remove kernel26-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49563) because linux-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51456) replaces it.

2 1

[aur-general] [kernel26-ck] is depreciated; remove request
by member graysky 11 Aug '11

11 Aug '11

Package is depreciated now that linux-ck is up. Please remove it from the AUR.

2 1

[aur-general] Some more removal requests
by gadget3000 11 Aug '11

11 Aug '11

sliky (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2620) - Dead project as of 2009 (http://sourceforge.net/projects/silky/) Only 6 votes, abandonded PKGBUILD which hasn't been updated since 2005 gmudix (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2546) - Dead project (Project page no longer exists) and is quite old now as mudix is now at v4.3 while gmudix is stuck at v1. Abandonded PKGBUILD, 1 vote and hasn't been updated since 2005. emerald-secondlife-bin-alpha (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37112) - Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. New project page is http://code.google.com/p/emeraldviewer/ It says alpha builds are on the downloads page but no alpha packages exist. emerald-secondlife-bin ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35694) exists as an alternative package.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request
by Bogdan Ionuț 11 Aug '11

11 Aug '11

kernel26-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36384 ) has been replaced by linux-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50934 ) thanks in advance.

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: kio_clipboard
by Jekyll Wu 11 Aug '11

11 Aug '11

kio_clipboard[1] is for KDE-3.5.x and is unmaintained for a long time in both AUR and upstream[2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7337 [2] http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=48046

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by gadget3000 10 Aug '11

10 Aug '11

splashy (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10211) has been replaced by splashy-full. Subsequently it has no maintainer and hasn't been updated since August 09.

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Requests
by Luca Bennati 10 Aug '11

10 Aug '11

amarok-ase-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47018 : branch merged in master anjal-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30220 : inexistent git repo babl-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41440 : dead upstream link, superseded by babl-git blender-apricot https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17202 : changed name to yofrankie

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Luca Bennati 10 Aug '11

10 Aug '11

warzone-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8384 since upstream doesn't use SVN anymore

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request for kernel26-fbcondecor
by Heiko Baums 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hi TUs, you can remove my package kernel26-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15603) from AUR. I have renamed it to linux-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50924) and upgraded it to 3.0.1. Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] Request for deletion of nvidia-fbcondecor3 package
by Wu Ying Ren 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Hi! I'm wuyingren, current maintainer of nvidia-fbcondecor aur package. Today, I uploaded a package named nvidia-fbcondecor3 because I thought cyberpatrol was going to maintain two packages for kernel-fbcondecor (one for 2.6 and another for 3.0 kernel branches). cyberpatrol told me that he is not going to maintain kernel26-fbcondecor package anymore, so nvidia-fbcondecor3 is a duplicated package. I will upgrade the original nvidia-fbcondecor as suggested by him on the package comments so nvidia-fbcondecor3 should be removed. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51335 -- Wu Ying Ren 死 - "El alma que hablar puede con los ojos también puede besar con la mirada." - Gustavo Adolfo Bécquer

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: python-middlestorm-hg
by Aaron DeVore 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

python-middlestorm-hg's author has replaced it with python2-middlestorm-hg. After a brief email exchange, he said that he wanted it deleted. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36570

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: neo4j-apoc (obsolete)
by Devin J. Pohly 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Apologies if this ends up duplicated - previous attempts are still "awaiting moderator approval." :) I am the maintainer for AUR package neo4j-apoc. I replaced it with neo4j when the apoc designation was dropped. Please remove the neo4j-apoc package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41813 New package neo4j is at http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48435. Thanks! *dp

2 1

[aur-general] [Del Req] dkms-rtl8192se
by Jason Melton 08 Aug '11

08 Aug '11

Request deletion of my dkms-rtl8192se package[1]. Kernel 3.0 comes with these drivers now, obsoleting this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47330

4 3

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by gadget3000 07 Aug '11

07 Aug '11

Hi everyone, I'm new here but I've been using Arch for about 1.5 years now. lib32-libv4l (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20859) is in the AUR but it's now provided by multilib/lib32-v4l-utils. The previous owner left a notice in the comments and orphaned the package. Regards, Gadget3000

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by 俞颐超 07 Aug '11

07 Aug '11

I think emacs-xcscope[1] need to be deleted. it depends on cscope but is actually included in cscope. THX [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28058

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 07 Aug '11

07 Aug '11

Hello, please delete a package atomzombiesmasher-hib http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51295 because a package is double atomzombiesmasher http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45944 .

2 1

[aur-general] Request for removal
by Jesse Jaara 07 Aug '11

07 Aug '11

otf-symbola [1] can and should be deleted as the symbola font is now distributed in ttf form ^^ [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44076 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

2 1

[aur-general] Frescobaldi CleanUp
by Bernardo Barros 06 Aug '11

06 Aug '11

* same as 'frescobaldi' : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36986 * old versions (discontinued and replaced by frescobaldi) of frescobaldi (old/different naming but very same project): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21738 AND https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19259

2 4

[aur-general] kvm package
by Seblu 05 Aug '11

05 Aug '11

Hi TUs, I would add a package named kvm for the next native kvm tools (http://lwn.net/Articles/447556/) Package is ready, but i'm unable to push it to AUR: kvm is on the package blacklist, please check if it's available in the official repos. Can you unblacklist it ? Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

2 2

[aur-general] libreoffice-extension-languagetool deletion request
by Cédric Girard 05 Aug '11

05 Aug '11

Please delete libreoffice-extension-languagetool [1] as it is a duplicate of languagetool [2] with an incorrect naming. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51209 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15183 Regards, -- Cédric Girard

2 2

[aur-general] removal of soya
by Martti Kühne 05 Aug '11

05 Aug '11

please remove package soya [1], I moved it to the correctly named python-soya [2] mar77i [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10102 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43850

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by widomaker2k7＠gmail.com 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

Hello, Delete please obkey-dev https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31888 (devel) obkey-dev is remplace by obkey. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51236 (stable) Thanks you.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan perl-email-sender-transport-smtp-tls
by minimalist 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

Please orphan perl-email-sender-transport-smtp-tls. The current maintainer is not replying to email and the package is very outdated. minimalist

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by rafael ff1 04 Aug '11

04 Aug '11

lib32-gmp-dev [1] is outdated for a thousand years and the maintainer seems to have forgotten this poor. Also, this resource is already provided by another package (lib32-gmp4). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28554 Please delete lib32-gmp-dev. Thanks, -- Rafael

4 3

[aur-general] Orphan request
by minimalist 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Please orphan perl-email-sender. It hasn't been updated and the maintainer does not respond to email. Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] python-jinja deletion request
by Axilleas P 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Please turn into ashes python-jinja2[1] as it is already maintained in community[2] 1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41497 2 http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python2-jinja/ -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

3 2

[aur-general] about hal removing
by Sergej Pupykin 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Hi, it looks synce-odccm and thoggen hardly depend on hal. I suggest move it to community instead of removing.

3 2

[aur-general] Orphan request: cmakeed
by Sven Schneider 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Hi, the package "cmakeed" [1] has been flaged out of date for several months now. Two weeks ago I contacted the current maintainer but I have not received a reply. Could someone please orphan the package so I can adopt it? Thanks in advance, Sven Schneider [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20168

2 1

[aur-general] Please remove rigsofrods and renoise
by merp boop 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

They have been replaced by rigsofrods-svn and renoise-demo. Thanks!

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request and removal request
by Austin Beatty 02 Aug '11

02 Aug '11

Please orphan z26 [1] since it has not been updated since 2009, and has been flagged out of date since March, I will gladly adopt this. Please remove bin32-z26 [2] since we have multilib, and I will update z26 to support x86_64. Also, the source download is broken. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22796 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31119

2 1

[aur-general] Removal Request
by Luca Bennati 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

kde4-kstyle-nitrogen (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30462) Dead upstream

3 3

[aur-general] Please remove hybird-git
by 俞颐超 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

I made a typo when writing the PKGBUILD. The new pkg is hybrid-im-git Thanks. Yichao Yu

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by speps 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Hi, a2jmidid is outdated since a long time. Actual maintainer, jiyunatori, seems to be unreachable. His mail address < tori(a)0xc29.net > seems to be invalid. Thanks - speps -

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: hledger
by Magnus Therning 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

Would someone please delete hledger[1]. It has been replaced by haskell-hledger. /M [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20762 -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay

2 2

[aur-general] Please delete kernel26-source
by Emmanuel Gras 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

Please delete kernel26-source (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17189) I uploaded its successor, linux-source (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51149) Thanks. Emmanuel

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: usb-modeswitch usb-modeswitch-data
by karnath 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

Hello. Both packages [1] and [2] are flagged as out of date for a long time and are responsible for same software as community/usb_modeswitch is. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39377 [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39376 -- Jabber: karnath(a)kergma.net

2 1

[aur-general] delete kernel26-besrv
by Ike Devolder 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

i uploaded linux-besrv which is the successor of kernel26-besrv http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44337 thx

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: hscolour
by Magnus Therning 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

Would someone please delete hscolour[1]. It has been replaced by haskell-hscolour. /M [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17463 -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: cpphs
by Magnus Therning 31 Jul '11

31 Jul '11

Would someone please delete cpphs[1]. It has been replaced by haskell-cpphs. /M [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17504 -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: magnus(a)therning.org jabber: magnus(a)therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. -- Alan Kay

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Moritz Rudert 30 Jul '11

30 Jul '11

Requesting deletion of my two packages: kernel26-usermode (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26012) kernel26-vanilla (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24450) I uploaded two new packages with the new naming scheme. Greetings helios

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Alessio Sergi 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

Hi TUs, please delete the following packages: ccsm++ [1] replaced by ccsm-git [2]; compiz-core++ [3] replaced by compiz-core-git [4]; compiz-plugins-extra++ [5] replaced by compiz-plugins-extra-git [6]; compiz-plugins-main++ [7] replaced by compiz-plugins-main-git [8]; compizconfig-python++ [9] replaced by compizconfig-python-git [10]; libcompizconfig++ [11] replaced by libcompizconfig-git [12]; emerald++ [13] 'cause the right package is emerald-git [14]. Also, please delete: compiz-git [15] and compiz-kde-git [16], both obsolete and superseded by compiz-core-git [4]; compiz-bcop-git [17], obsolete; it doesn't exist anymore in new compiz 0.9.x [18]; compiz-fusion-plugins-extra-git [19] and compiz-fusion-plugins-main-git [20], both obsolete and anyway superseded by compiz-plugins-{extra,main}-git [6][8]. About the other compiz-fusion-plugin{s}-* packages [21-27], they should all be deleted 'cause they're out-of-date, broken (sources moved to [28]) and the right pkgname schema should be compiz-plugin-*. Thanks in advance. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35685 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11536 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35680 [4] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26334 [5] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35911 [6] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50552 [7] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35910 [8] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50551 [9] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35684 [10] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11730 [11] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35683 [12] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11734 [13] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35959 [14] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11539 [15] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5904 [16] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12558 [17] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11731 [18] http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.9.0/ [19] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11733 [20] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11732 [21] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24037 [22] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24027 [23] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18512 [24] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18394 [25] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38216 [26] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29209 [27] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=14255 [28] http://git.compiz.org/ -- Alessio Sergi

3 6

[aur-general] delete grub-gfx
by KESHAV P.R. 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

Hi, Please delete grub-gfx https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2416 . Although it has more votes, I modified the PKGBUILD a bit and replaced the package with grub-legacy-gfx https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50986 which builds fine in x86_64 system with gcc-multilib. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

4 7

[aur-general] SuperCollider CleanUp 2
by Bernardo Barros 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

Hi We have now a separated packages for SuperCollider Plugins sc3-plugins-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51106 So those packages should be removed, since they are equivalent to supercollider-git + sc3-plugins-git (And they are duplicate BTW) supercollider-with-extras-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48934 supercollider-git-with-plugins-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44413

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Kwpolska 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

Hi, package faenza-cupertino-icons[1] is out-of-date since 2/21/11 and faenza-cupertino-icon-theme is an updated version. Please remove it. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40394 "faenza-cupertino-icons" -- Kwpolska Sent from my phone.

3 4

[aur-general] request - aur deletion
by Jozef Riha 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

hello, please remove ayim (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39485) from aur - there is another PKGBUILD that replaces it: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40543 cheers, jose

2 1

Re: [aur-general] Delete an AUR package for me please
by Dave Reisner 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 12:44:42PM +0200, Åke Svensson wrote: > Hi! > > Since there is scarce room on the AUR server could you please delete > my package: > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51083 > > I've made a new version with a patch, and from source. > > Or point me in the direction of doing it myself. I'm just learning > AUR, and PKGBUILD. > > Best Regards, > swanson, sweden In the future, please send mail to aur-general(a)archlinux.org for package deletion requests, and make sure to include the name of the package, not just the link. I've deleted 'mousepad-standalone'. dave

1 0

[aur-general] python-djapian
by Alper Kanat 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

Hey There, I just adopted this package and found out that it's in fact an SVN package. So can you please rename it to python-djapian or I can upload a new one with that name so you can delete this package? --- Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion Request: old SuperCollider packages
by Bernardo Barros 29 Jul '11

29 Jul '11

old packages (sc uses git now): ----------------------------------- + sc3-plugins-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36602 + sced-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29285 + scvim-svn http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35130 merged with sc3-plugins: --------------------------- + supercollider-dfm http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45931

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by fastfret79＠archlinux.org.uk 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

Hi, Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 11:29:05 +0100 Please orphan zathura-git [1]. I posted a change (git package using replaces=) and emailed the maintainer, but no reply in two weeks. Similar to my last orphan request, the current maintainer seems active as they have updated other packages [2] recently, but seems unresponsive to comments and emails. What's the official view with this type of situation? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30285 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50770 -- Mark

2 1

[aur-general] Delete Request
by speps 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

Hi, please delete all useless audacious2* packages, they're all orphaned: [1] audacious2-alpha 2.5-2 [2] audacious2-beta 2.5-2 [3] audacious2-plugins-alpha 2.5-2 [4] audacious2-plugins-beta 2.5-3 [5] audacious2-plugins-rc 2.4-3 [6] audacious2-rc 2.4-3 Please do not touch audacious2{,-plugins} since they provide a gtk2 version of the audacious{,-plugins} in extra, that does not conflict with the gtk3 one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27367 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31928 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27368 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31929 [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39581 [6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39580 Tnx - speps -

3 4

[aur-general] Disown request
by rafael ff1 27 Jul '11

27 Jul '11

nautilus-dropbox was flagged out-of-date a few times (some one "un-did" and did it again today) and its PKGBUILD is set with wrong md5sum. As you can see below, I asked a few days ago and got no reply, as absent as in the package's comments. Please disown nautilus-dropbox [1], so I can fix the PKGBUILD with Unknown47's suggestion. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19615 Thanks, -- Rafael ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: rafael ff1 <rafael.f.f1(a)gmail.com> Date: 2011/7/22 Subject: AUR package update: nautilus-dropbox To: archlinux.org(a)christianmorlok.de Hi there, The package "nautilus-dropbox" is flagged out-of-date and currently it has wrong md5sum, which cause problems to install it. Can you please fix the PKGBUILD or disown the package? Thanks, -- Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by fastfret79＠archlinux.org.uk 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Hi, Please orphan notmuch-git [1] as I posted an updated PKGUILD and emailed maintainer, but not had any response in two weeks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32399 Thanks in advance, --- Mark

2 2

[aur-general] deletion request: qwt6
by Michael Schubert 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

Dear TUs, Please delete qwt6 [1] as qwt with the current version 6 is already in extra [2]. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50231 [2] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=qwt&maintainer=&last_update=&fla…

2 1

[aur-general] Renaming a package
by merp boop 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Hey guys, I decided to rename the package renoise to renoise-demo. "renoise" already has a few votes. Can one of you kind fellows transfer the votes to renoise-demo and remove renoise? Also, is there a way I can make the people with renoise installed upgrade to renoise-demo? Thanks! -Max

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request
by karnath 25 Jul '11

25 Jul '11

Please, delete [girara-git][1] since it become obsolete and had been divided to girara-gtk2-git and girara-gtk3-git. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42618 -- Jabber: karnath(a)kergma.net

2 2

[aur-general] nssbackup 0.2-2
by Simon Bonner 24 Jul '11

24 Jul '11

Hi, I'm a user of nssbackup and noticed today that the package has been out-of-date for a while. A comment was posted to the maintainer on Feb 7 and the package was flagged out of date on Feb 21, but it seems that no action has been taken since. I'd be happy to maintain it if someone can offer a little help with building the new version. I've tried building both the most recent 0.2 release and the new 0.3.1 release, and neither currently work. Both give the same error message: Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 3, in <module> from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools I've seen that several packages have had similar errors fixed by installing the python2-distribute package, but I have this installed already. Thanks for your help, Simon

3 3

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by roland karim 24 Jul '11

24 Jul '11

Requesting deletion of my package console-setup: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50887 It is not compatible with Arch, because Debian systems have a global keyboard config.

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by member graysky 24 Jul '11

24 Jul '11

virtualbox-guest-modules-ck http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288

5 6

[aur-general] Request for PKGBUILD check: tomboy-export-to-latex
by Marat Mukhametshin 24 Jul '11

24 Jul '11

3 2

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seven seven 24 Jul '11

24 Jul '11

Please delete libkmap-git, replaced by libkgeomap-git http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46206 Thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] Remove request mate-icon-theme-symbolic
by Perberos 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

Hello, I wanted to remove mate-icon-theme-symbolic. It's not any longer on the project. Package to delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49878 Announcement: http://matsusoft.com.ar/redmine/news/11 Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: c2lib, cdoc, makeplus
by Anton Leontiev 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

Hi, Please delete packages 'c2lib' [1], 'cdoc' [2] and 'makeplus' [3]. I am their maintainer and they are not accessible since 28/06/2011. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38998 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38997 [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38995 Thanks, -- Anton Leontiev <bunder(a)t-25.ru>

2 1

[aur-general] Request Removal
by Seblu 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

Hello, can you remove the following 2 packages : linux-tools http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50920 kernel26-tools http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46188 i remplaced it by perf (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50926) Regards, -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

2 1

[aur-general] Realtime kernel package name for 3.0
by Ray Rashif 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

On 23 July 2011 09:49, Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> > Date: 2011/7/22 > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt1 > To: LKML <linux-kernel(a)vger.kernel.org> > Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users(a)vger.kernel.org> > > > Dear RT Folks, > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt1 release. > > Changes versus 3.0-rc7-rt0: > > * Update to Linus final 3.0 release > > * RTC bugfixes (scheduled for mainline/stable) > > * Long standing (rt only) timer_list bug (see > timers-avoid-the-base-null-otptimization-on-rt.patch in the split > out quilt queue) > > * Minor non exciting fixes all over the place > > Known issues: > > * Some weird "console=..." commandline + config dependent > interactions which have been not yet investigated down to their > root cause. Result in a boot hang. YMMV > > Patch against 3.0 can be found here: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patch-3.0-rt1.patch.bz2 > > The split quilt queue is available at: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/patches-3.0-rt1.tar.bz2 This calls for a new package name. The standard kernel will be named "linux", so the obvious options are "linux-rt" and "linux-realtime". Tell us which you would prefer or suggest a different suffix. -- GPG/PGP ID: D90FA77D

3 2

[aur-general] Request Deletion
by roland karim 23 Jul '11

23 Jul '11

Requesting deletion of Aur package console-setup: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50887, because of incompatibility with Arch.

2 1

[aur-general] delete mingw32-ssh2-static
by Joao Cordeiro 22 Jul '11

22 Jul '11

mingw32-libssh2-static [1] and mingw32-ssh2-static [2] are the same. I think [2] should be deleted. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28886 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28851

2 1

[aur-general] remove kernel26-bede
by Ike Devolder 22 Jul '11

22 Jul '11

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44336 why ? updated to linux-bede 3.0.0, see: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50914 thx

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by H.Gökhan Sarı 22 Jul '11

22 Jul '11

Hello, aldabra package is not maintained anymore because it is replaced by gtk-theme-aldabra due to naming issues. Can you please delete old aldabra package? Thanks, aldabra: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49459 gtk-theme-aldabra: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49511 -- H.Gökhan Sarı th0th(a)returnfalse.net

7 8

[aur-general] Is the AUR down?
by Thomas S Hatch 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Or am I just crazy?

4 5

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Bartek Piotrowski 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Please orphan wmfs[1] and wmfs-git[2]. Wmfs is out-of-date since February. I sended message to maintainer 12.06, without reaction. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26923 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26924

2 1

[aur-general] {,ruby-}sinatra
by Simon Legner 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Hi, sinatra [1] seems to be replaced by ruby-sinatra [2]. Hence, delete [1]? Regards, Simon [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36046 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37698

2 1

[aur-general] package deletion request
by Auguste Pop 21 Jul '11

21 Jul '11

Hi, I am the current maintainer of osd-lyrics (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489) One of the upstream developer commented on the package and requested a rename to osdlyrics, and I have uploaded osdlyrics (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50877) accordingly to AUR. Although upstream page on googlecode is still osd-lyrics, their github name is osdlyrics. and I have found a git commit explicitly convert all osd-lyrics occurrences into osdlyrics. So, osdlyrics should be the upstream choice for the package's name. Sorry for all the mess this package has created. Best Regards,

2 1

[aur-general] The songbird mess
by Det 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

Hey, This one (I hope) even has the links correctly defined. songbird: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7286 * A binary package, wrong naming (there's songbird-bin in the AUR too) songbird-nightly-bin: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32932 * Maintained, but severly out-of-date * Wrong naming * Replaced by songbird-auto-nightly songbird-auto-nightly: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39911 * Wrong naming * The contents of this one should replace that of songbird-nightly - this should be removed afterwards songbird-nightly: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13193 * Actually has the correct naming * Out-of-date * The contents of songbird-auto-nightly should replace this package's So to some up what I think is best: Replace: * songbird-auto-nightly -> songbird-nightly Remove: * songbird * songbird-nightly-bin * songbird-auto-nightly Thanks for your time, Det

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion Request: dkms-virtualbox_bin
by Jason Melton 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

The "main" AUR package, virtualbox_bin just added dkms support, which renders my dkms-virtualbox_bin[1] package unnecessary. Please delete it! Peace, Jason [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47572

4 3

[aur-general] Delete and orphan request
by Anton Larionov 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

DELETE: narcissu-bin https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=5790 Duplicate "narcissu-en" + "onscripter-en" vimpression-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26811 webkitbrowser-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26756 Link is broken and AFAIK this project is currently abandonded (to vimprobable1/2) ORPHAN: doukutsu https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20672 Marked as out of date on Mar 28 (3 months ago) -- Regards, Anton Larionov

2 1

[aur-general] mcabber-module-*-git: Outdated VCS packages in the AUR
by Lukas Fleischer 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

---- $ aurdupes -V | grep -A2 ^mcabber-module mcabber-module-activity (VCS) * mcabber-module-activity-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31825 * mcabber-module-activity-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50202 mcabber-module-avatar (VCS) * mcabber-module-avatar-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31809 * mcabber-module-avatar-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50190 mcabber-module-cmd (VCS) * mcabber-module-cmd-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50191 * mcabber-module-cmd-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31867 mcabber-module-disco (VCS) * mcabber-module-disco-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31813 * mcabber-module-disco-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50192 mcabber-module-env (VCS) * mcabber-module-env-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31831 * mcabber-module-env-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50193 mcabber-module-eventcmd-ng (VCS) * mcabber-module-eventcmd-ng-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50194 * mcabber-module-eventcmd-ng-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31828 mcabber-module-geoloc (VCS) * mcabber-module-geoloc-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50195 * mcabber-module-geoloc-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31821 mcabber-module-lua (VCS) * mcabber-module-lua-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50196 * mcabber-module-lua-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31817 mcabber-module-marking (VCS) * mcabber-module-marking-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32378 * mcabber-module-marking-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50197 mcabber-module-mood (VCS) * mcabber-module-mood-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31818 * mcabber-module-mood-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50198 mcabber-module-mpd (VCS) * mcabber-module-mpd-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31816 * mcabber-module-mpd-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50199 mcabber-module-pep (VCS) * mcabber-module-pep-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50186 * mcabber-module-pep-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31808 mcabber-module-templatecmd (VCS) * mcabber-module-templatecmd-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50200 * mcabber-module-templatecmd-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32462 mcabber-module-tune (VCS) * mcabber-module-tune-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31815 * mcabber-module-tune-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50201 mcabber-module-urlopen (VCS) * mcabber-module-urlopen-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31494 * mcabber-module-urlopen-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50188 mcabber-module-yaubil (VCS) * mcabber-module-yaubil-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50185 * mcabber-module-yaubil-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32560 ---- Given that all of the "-git" packages are flagged out-of-date and clone URIs seem to be dead, I'd say we should remove them. Objections?

2 2

[aur-general] The osd-lyrics mess
by Det 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

Hey, There's currently 6 osd-lyrics packages in AUR, 4 of which are redundant. <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489> osd-lyrics: <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489>http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30489 * Should be left and updated since it has the correct naming osdlyrics: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29787 * The project's name is "osd-lyrics" - not "osdlyrics" * Maintained, but severly out-of-date osd-lyrics-stable: <http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50725>http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50725 * Wrong naming * Sadly, currently the only one up-to-date (decluding the -git package) osd-lyrics-stsable: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50724 * A typoed upload that the maintainer decided to leave in the AUR osd-lyrics-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30488 * Upstream moved to git ( http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29787) Thanks for your time, Det

2 1

[aur-general] Inactive July 19 - 27
by Jakob Gruber 19 Jul '11

19 Jul '11

I will be hiking in Iceland from today until July 27th, feel free to update my packages if needed. See you guys in a bit!

1 0

[aur-general] virtualbox additions package naming
by Ionut Biru 19 Jul '11

19 Jul '11

I've been criticized a lot because I choose poorly the name for guest additions. Right now the packages are like this: virtualbox-addtitions - contains the iso with guest additions for linux/windows/etc and is installed on host virtualbox-guest-additions - contains guest additions only for an arch linux system as guest. virtualbo-guest-modules - modules only for an arch linux system as guest. Now that virtualbox 4.1 is released I need help choosing this names. -- Ionuț

2 1

[aur-general] ArchHaskell Maintainer Change
by Peter Simons 19 Jul '11

19 Jul '11

Hi guys, I can no longer maintain the ArchHaskell project due to time constraints. Magnus Therning is going to take over that task from now on. Take care, Peter

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request for rasqal-latest
by Leif Warner 18 Jul '11

18 Jul '11

Hi, could you please delete my package rasqal-latest: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50322 It was a dependency for 4-store, which required the new API, but the version of rasqal in extra has been updated, so this package is redundant now. Thanks! -Leif

2 1

[aur-general] Delete request
by Marco Schulze 17 Jul '11

17 Jul '11

Please delete libdivsufsort [1]. This package was only used by zpaq [2], and is not needed anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50350 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29726 <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50350>

2 1

[aur-general] inactivity
by Lukáš Jirkovský 17 Jul '11

17 Jul '11

Hello, I'll be inactive starting from tomorrow (July 18) up to July 25. I'm going on a short vacation. I'm taking laptop with me, but it doesn't have Arch installed so no package updates from me for the next week. Lukas

2 1

[aur-general] Delete gtk-theme-equinox-radiance
by Joao Cordeiro 17 Jul '11

17 Jul '11

Maintainer created a new package for the same theme (see comments). Thank you. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35869

3 3

[aur-general] delete steadyflow-all-inclusive
by Joao Cordeiro 16 Jul '11

16 Jul '11

This package is obsolete and replaced by maintainer (see comments). Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49492

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan Request
by Mark Foxwell 16 Jul '11

16 Jul '11

Hi, Please can you orphan weechat-git [1]. I emailed the maintainer on 2nd July with a much more cleaner PKGBUILD but not had reply in two weeks. Thanks in advance, Mark

2 2

[aur-general] Delete request
by rafael ff1 16 Jul '11

16 Jul '11

caffeine-gnome3 [1] is based in a branch that was already merged [2] to trunk, which is provided by package caffeine [3]. Therefore, no need for this package package anymore. Please delete caffeine-gnome3. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49831 [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~caffeine-developers/caffeine/main/revision/377 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29762 Thanks, Rafael

2 1

[aur-general] PCSX2 Plugins folder - suggestion?
by rafael ff1 16 Jul '11

16 Jul '11

Hi all, I'm the maintainer of the package pcsx2-svn[1]. PCSX2 from now on will install files in a different folder than /opt/pcsx2 - I'm still going to adapt the PKGBUILD. Plugins, as I can see in Archlinux Packaging Standards [2], should go to /var/lib/pcsx2/PLUGINNAME.so... However, pcsx2 is a 32 bit package and only works in 64 bit because it uses lib32 packages. In my 64 bit system, I can see that the compilation of pcsx2 [gcc -m32, thanks to gcc-multilib] gives me ELF 32 bit plugins, which makes it a little bit weird to have it inside /var/lib/pcsx2 - which is a system's architecture folder. However, on 32 bit systems, there would be no problem putting plugins in /var/lib/pcsx2. Having that said, where should 32 and 64 bit compilations of PCSX2 put its plugins (talking about /varlib/pcsx2 and /var/lib32/pcsx2)? [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21899 [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards Thanks in advance, Rafael

3 5

[aur-general] Orphan request
by Marco Schulze 15 Jul '11

15 Jul '11

Please orphan zpaq [1]. I contacted tuxspirit by email and he agreed to transfer it to me, but he forgot to orphan the package and he doesn't seem to check his emails often (more than a week with no replies). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29726

2 1

[aur-general] large number of deprecated/duplicate flashplugin packages
by Anish Bhatt 14 Jul '11

14 Jul '11

All of these packages are either orphaned/out-of-date/duplicate or deprecated. Could someone delete these please ? http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47038 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47308 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49704 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50704 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44101 Also, adobe at one point had three seperate flash releases available, and had versioning/architecture issues that required three seperate AUR packages. Their last release consolidates all these releases, rendering two of these packages obsolete. Adobe also tends to use adjectives like prerelease/beta/preview randomly, causing further package naming issues. (eg, all -prerelease packages have now become -beta, when there used to be seperate -beta & -prerelease releases earlier). What's a good way to consolidate users of the three packages into the correct one ? -Anish -- As long as the music's loud enough, we won't hear the world falling apart.

3 3

[aur-general] The license of flashplugin(-prerelease) requires a download?
by Nimeton maili 14 Jul '11

14 Jul '11

There was some discussion in the flashplugin-prerelease's comment section[1] whether or not the PDF license of Flash Player (that is bigger than the tarball of the plugin itself) would be required to download along with the package. There was a suggestion to just use the post_install to link to the license (which the same guy said was redundant anyway because "We all know what we're installing, and how proprietary it is"). I could not care less for the license either but it's not that hard to just cut out the URL from the source=() section. So here we are. What do you guys think? Thanks for your time, Det [1] = http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32072

5 6

[aur-general] Request for PKGBUILD check: perl-pdl 2.4.9-1
by Anton Leontiev 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

Hi, all! Could you help me with PKGBUILD for Perl's PDL module? Currently I'm stuck with makedepends/optdepends. There is a number of dependencies which are optional, but to get PDL work with them as with optional packages in Arch, it should be compiled with them. So I added the in both makedepends and optdepends. Am I right? What are official recommendations for AUR packages in this case? Thank you in advance. -- Anton Leontiev <bunder(a)t-25.ru>

2 1

[aur-general] Ask for checking a PKGBUILD
by Marat Mukhametshin 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

3 2

[aur-general] Cleaning up wine packages
by Sven-Hendrik Haase 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

There are many wine packages in AUR and many of them are fairly old and/or obsolete, too. I'd like to clean that up. Here are the candidates: dwarffortress-wine (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36202) Reason: Old version, no maintainer, no need (dwarffortress is in community/multilib) kwine (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=6498) Reason: Extremely old (2007), obsolete, dead upstream wine-chs (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17914) Reason: Very old wine version, unmaintained wine-dib (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31499) Reason: Old wine version and apparently the maintainer is uninterested wine-starcraft (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41819) Reason: Very old wine, unnecessary patch and apparently the maintainer is uninterested wine-suse (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37839) Reason: Unmaintained, bin32-wine-suse exists and is maintained wine-doors-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11849) Reason: Unmaintained, dead upstream, dead source wine-doors (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11823) Reason: Very old, dead upstream, dead source wine-forgames (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45631) Reason: Old, doesn't explain its purpose, seems to be a clone of wine-lol (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39529) winetools (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8913) Reason: Very old, dead upstream, dead source, obsolete (now in winetricks and other helpers) wuninst-git (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18868) Reason: Very old, dead upstream, obsolete (now in wine) wisotool (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37824) Reason: Old, obsolete (now in winetricks) wisotool-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37825) Reason: Obsolete (now in winetricks) winegame-t (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37830) Reason: Unmaintained, old, dead upstream winefix (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=17459) Reason: Very old, unmaintained, apparently dead upstream Thoughts?

4 5

[aur-general] Deleteion request : qterm-unstable
by Jekyll Wu 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

qterm-unstable[1] is now actually the same as qterm[2]: same version and similar PKGBUILD. I have adopted qterm recently and please delete qterm-unstable which is also maintained by me now. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18234 [2] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=3317

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan goblin-camp
by Joao Cordeiro 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

Goblin-camp [1] was marked as out of date on Apr 26 (2.5 months ago). On June 28 (2 weeks ago) I sent the maintainer an email asking for him to update it and got no reply. I would like to adopt it, if possible. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47108

3 2

[aur-general] Request deletion of manjaro-x11
by roland karim 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

I am requesting the deletion of the manjaro-x11 package in Aur. It is my own package, which has been replaced by xoco. Link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45770 Ying

2 1

[aur-general] zynaddsubfx-lash removal
by Daniele Paolella 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

Please remove zynaddsubfx-lash <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34411>, the same compilation options are now included in zynaddsubfx <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43700>. Many thanks.

2 1

[aur-general] zynaddsubfx-lash removal
by Daniele Paolella 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

Please remove zynaddsubfx-lash <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34411>, the same compilation options are now included in zynaddsubfx <https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43700>. Many thanks.

1 0

[aur-general] Awesome+vicious-git
by Daniel Hilst Selli 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

Hi people I has installed awesome in my system, and works fine. But when I install vicious it just hangs with background and pointer. I also tryed, awesome-git, but got stuck on xcb-util>=0.3. 8 installation Any idea? Thanks!! -- "Do or do not... there is no try" Yoda Master

2 2

[aur-general] duplicated packages
by Miguel Aguilar Molina 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

Hello I accidentally duplicated a package in the repository: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50620 Might be removed from AUR? Thanks

2 1

[aur-general] grub-legacy-fedora-git package
by KESHAV P.R. 10 Jul '11

10 Jul '11

Hi all, I have created a PKGBUILD for Fedora's GRUB Legacy fork, grub-legacy-fedora-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47959 . It includes support for GPT boot (not tested) and supports ext4 /boot (tested using the UEFI package). It does not include any of the patches used in core/grub package. It compiles fine with the binutils in Arch repos (unlike the current core/grub and aur/grub-gfx packages). It also supports splashimage (gfx) option. Although I maintain that package, I do not use it. I use grub2-bios-bzr which I maintain). Important info :- 1. The menu config file is /boot/grub/grub.conf, not /boot/grub/menu.lst . 2. The syntax for splashimage is (for example) - splashimage (hd0,0)/boot/grub/image.xpm.gz 3. The package builds fine in x86_64 with gcc-multilib. I have not checked whether it compiles without gcc-multilib (grub2 1.99 compiles without multilib in x86_64). Would be helpful if someone confirms whether it compiles in x86_64 without multilib. I request current core/grub and aur/grub-gfx users to test this package and give your comments/suggestions. Regards. Keshav PS: The equivalent UEFI package is grub-legacy-efi-fedora https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47979 .

1 0

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Seblu 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

Package: ntpdate Reason: Already in ntp Link: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19145 -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

4 8

[aur-general] package for the gui of mkvmerge from mkvtoolnix (mmg)
by Uli Armbruster 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

Hi guys Since the PKGBUILD of mkvtoolnix now has the additional option --disable-gui, I want to create a package in the AUR which provides this gui, which is called mmg (MkvMergeGui). Right now I have it up here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49992 but I'm not sure about some things: - Is it good or bad to only provide mmg (and its manpage, desktop file and icons of course) in the package and add mkvtoolnix as a dependency, because mmg depends on mkvmerge (which is in mkvtoolnix)? You see in the comments, that others want me to make a package, which provides all the mkvtoolnix package contains PLUS mmg => they want a package which is exactly like that one which has been in the repos until recently. In my opinion it makes more sense to make this package depending on mkvtoolnix, for some reasons: - People don't have to compile everything, the build process is faster and packages depending on mkvtoolnix remain dependent on an official package, which is always recommended in my opinion. - It's possible to install the gui for mkvmerge AND / OR the gui for mkvinfo (which I want to upload to the AUR as well later today or tomorrow). If I provide everything in that package, that's not possible, except of course if I create 3 packages, one which includes the one gui, one which includes the other gui and one which includes both guis (the fourth possibility, no gui, is already in the repos). So the way I want to do it makes more sense, right? - I'm struggling with the naming of the package. Right now I called it mkvtoolnix-gtk, because for some reason I thought, that in mkvtoolnix's source there's one gtk gui for mkvmerge and a qt gui for mkvmerge. But that's wrong, there's the gtk gui for mkvmerge and a qt gui for mkvinfo. So right now I'd say, I name mkvmerge's gui mkvmerge-gui or mmg and mkvinfo's gui mkvinfo-gui or whatever the executable is called. I think that makes more sense. Do you agree? So what I'm asking is, what would you recommend? I'd like to make the package(s) as good as possible for all Arch users, not just for me. So if my approach makes no sense to you guys, I'll bow to the majority and change it (or let someone else take care of it ;D ) Cheers Army

5 7

[aur-general] [deletion request] streetview-explorer
by Uli Armbruster 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

And another one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49968 There's a package called streetview-explorer-svn which fits better, because this application is only provided as a svn version, so my package (which indicated to be a stable release according to the name, but there won't be a stable release ever according to the developer) isn't needed in the AUR. Regards Army

2 1

[aur-general] [removal request] luakit-noscript-git
by Uli Armbruster 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

Please remove my package luakit-noscript-git. It was merged into the develop branch which is used in the package luakit-git. I only created this package to make it easier for users to test this plugin. You can find it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50387

2 1

[aur-general] removal of python3-pyopengl
by Michael Schubert 09 Jul '11

09 Jul '11

Hi TUs, please remove python3-pyopengl [1]. It is out of date, orphaned, and I maintain the proper package python-pyopengl. Thanks. Michael [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45322

2 1

[aur-general] delete SFML 1.6 packages
by Joao Cordeiro 08 Jul '11

08 Jul '11

Hi, All the SFML 1.6 packages are broken and orphaned. The official package is the git version. I think they could all be delete. sfml1 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49606 lib32-sfml https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42518 mingw32-sfml https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38509 Cheers.

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request: eclipse-java
by Vitaliy Berdinskikh 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

Hi all! [eclipse-java][] was marked as out of date in February. Fgrano adopts it in April but doesn't update the package. Now we have new Eclipse - Indigo. I wrote to Fgrano on 30 June - no answer. [eclipse-java]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18064 -- Regards, Vitaliy Berdinskikh

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion Request
by Nathan Hulse 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

Hello there, I would like to request deletion of the compiz-*-09 packages on the AUR, as suggested by wonder. They are out-of-date and pretty much redundant as the compiz-*-++ packages fulfill the same purpose. http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38958 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38959 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38960 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38961 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38962 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38963 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38964 I have made an alternate set of packages available using a more generic -dev suffix. These install the current release from the development branch as a normal installation, rather than a test install, differentiating them from the "compiz++" packages. I've added installation routines here and there to smooth out some rough edges. Regards, Nathan

2 1

[aur-general] (no subject)
by karnath 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

I request of deletion of [libgirara-git][1] since it has incorrect lines in PKGBUILD and there is older packege for the same software (girara-git). [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48568 -- Jabber: karnath(a)kergma.net

2 1

[aur-general] pragha-svn
by Brett Kleinschmidt 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

The AUR package pragha-svn (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27537) is well out of date and has been neglected since 2009. Emailing its maintainer is futile (message bounces). I've been an Arch user for years and I've been a developer and user of Pragha for many months. I would be happy to adopt and maintain the package, if only someone would orphan it for me. Thanks, Brett

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request
by Estêvão 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Please delete google-appengine [1]. Now we should use google-appengine-python [2], because this package has the correct dependencies for Google App Engine SDK for Python, as python25, python25-ssl, etc, and it also has the _correct_ name: google-appengine-* python*. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20651 [2] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50483 Thanks. -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

Re: [aur-general] error building perl-package-stash-xs
by sacarde 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

> Try to > uninstall 'perl-scalar-list-utils' at all from you machine. Its > functionality is in Perl's core. And then try to rebuild > 'perl-package-stash-xs'. ok, I unistall: perl-moose-2.0007-1 perl-eval-closure-0.06-1 perl-scalar-list-utils-1.23-4 (for dependencies) now perl-package-stash-xs build OK thanks a lot sacarde(a)tiscali.it

4 3

[aur-general] Delete rtorrent-color?
by Axilleas P 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Is there any point in having both rtorrent-extended[1] and rtorrent-color[2]? rtorrent-extended includes patch for rtorrent-color and besides that the maintainer just disowned the package. So, I think it's safe to remove [2]. [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33756 [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31956 -- (\_ /) copy the bunny to your profile (0.o ) to help him achieve world domination. (> <) come join the dark side. /_|_\ (we have cookies.)

4 5

Re: [aur-general] replacing spidermonkey with js185
by Sergej Pupykin 04 Jul '11

04 Jul '11

On 02.07.2011 14:53, Ionut Biru wrote: > I want to ask the maintainers of couchdb, elinks, freewrl, gpac, > mediatomb, mongodb to look at their packages and see: did not spend much time, but couchdb and freewrl fails with: couchdb *** bin/sh ../../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -D_BSD_SOURCE -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -lcurl -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/local/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/opt/local/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/js -I/usr/include/mozjs -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/local/include -I/usr/local/include/js -I/opt/local/include/js -DXP_UNIX -lm -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -o couchjs couchjs-http.o couchjs-main.o couchjs-utf8.o -lcurl -lmozjs185 -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -lpthread -lcrypt libtool: link: gcc -D_BSD_SOURCE -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/local/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/opt/local/lib/erlang/usr/include -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/js -I/usr/include/mozjs -I/usr/local/include -I/opt/local/include -I/usr/local/include/js -I/opt/local/include/js -DXP_UNIX -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed -o couchjs couchjs-http.o couchjs-main.o couchjs-utf8.o -L/usr/local/lib -L/opt/local/lib -lm -lcurl -lmozjs185 -lpthread -lcrypt couchjs-main.o: In function `seal': main.c:(.text+0x74): undefined reference to `JS_SealObject' couchjs-main.o: In function `evalcx': main.c:(.text+0x159): undefined reference to `JS_GetStringChars' couchjs-main.o: In function `readline': main.c:(.text+0x2a7): undefined reference to `js_fgets' couchjs-main.o: In function `execute_script': main.c:(.text+0x4a4): undefined reference to `JS_DestroyScript' couchjs-http.o: In function `status': http.c:(.text+0xc8c): undefined reference to `INT_FITS_IN_JSVAL' couchjs-utf8.o: In function `enc_string': utf8.c:(.text+0x421): undefined reference to `JS_GetStringChars' *** freewrl: world_script/jsVRMLClasses.c:938:19: error: incompatible type for argument 1 of ‘DOUBLE_TO_JSVAL’

2 1

[aur-general] bluefish
by François Boulogne 03 Jul '11

03 Jul '11

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, bluefish-devel [1] is out of date and useless. I suggest to remove it. Arguments: * a svn package exists [2] * bluefish is in extra [3] [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10671 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21701 [3] http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/bluefish/ Regards, - -- François Boulogne. Membre de l'April - Promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre http://www.april.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOEHLGAAoJEKkn15fZnrRLSrwP/3XvHIeLYOsUFsS9DHFv53+C q7T0ZD5J94jTBpdWbRV+ThuWeztrXKJygag+C3e8h8oo9S6kgwrV5+wQKEknmjqF lJmqKcSKhq1yIoVoL4b/NFpmPtzP8U3yrzYerJ8XCfV/TD4R7Ccs0nyKk58Agjy9 7+azzl0FaFmeFfHXASY53sVnRU1txTTEyIawybidzJXAXEm0PCai1lR4d4K3lkzH f+UYJoel+iEfb90BosPgcZlPvBpW/w62xK/iQk9cKveS+kpD7b2ol3bwqki8BboV kCApzDjkFSlOY6zY1UzC4UGfv/jkfEIdOuDvUrS4mNLGIScOKIqoZDWcx5FcmgX5 VEzp8rq2B5XQMVcaHZqTljFz5g6Zxw5ru9eJSQaLHMNaKLUJ00nJmeVL/Klq2G9s hnr3RYXXdfUnd9c/OjbjYXKML8gzaOf1ir3z7eZSDLvszAQ6PoBbiwJxlIZmfdlD Nw9k2zh2O1ZCR11rT37hVhe2TanXqWr/9UHYkq7k7qiQatekjMBC9BGcummkoHtB Rr9qNNNJs0rKmTwnT6MuLquT0lGV1jak6pHC/1gcF/a+7lv7RMghOG+e9dA6zrSE QLUfS7xFTC/L+DGFzN6IlYYJZje81SKkAHeap4pcZxJquhStET3UrzBgaKnIFLY6 GBttv3xpU67ayp2hAvNB =3zkL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

[aur-general] error building perl-package-stash-xs
by sacarde 03 Jul '11

03 Jul '11

hi, on my arch-64 I try to upgrade: perl-package-stash-xs but I have error: ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... Package-Stash-XS-0.22.tar.gz ... Passed ==> Extracting Sources... -> Extracting Package-Stash-XS-0.22.tar.gz with bsdtar bsdtar: Failed to set default locale ==> Starting build()... ... Checking if your kit is complete... perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build perl-package-stash-xs. if I try to upgrade: perl-scalar-list-utils, I have same error: ... Checking if your kit is complete... perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Istack_sp_ptr ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... ... can you help me? thankyou

1 0

[aur-general] [RFC] Inclusion of CPANPLUS in community
by Florian Pritz 03 Jul '11

03 Jul '11

Hi, I'd like to move perl-cpanplus and perl-cpanplus-dist-arch to community so users can install software from cpan easily without bypassing pacman. I'm not sure whether this is a problem or not because cpanplus automates the installation of software from a possibly untrusted source. It uses the metadata from CPAN to generate a PKGBUILD and runs makepkg -i on that. More information about perl-cpanplus-dist-arch can be found here: https://github.com/juster/perl-cpanplus-dist-arch/blob/master/README -- Florian Pritz

3 4

[aur-general] geos rebuild
by Stéphane Gaudreault 02 Jul '11

02 Jul '11

Hi, geos-3.3.0 is in [community-staging] and the small todo list is on http://www.archlinux.org/todo/82/ Happy rebuilding ! Stéphane

1 0

[aur-general] VCS Packaging Guidelines
by Mark Foxwell 02 Jul '11

02 Jul '11

Hi, What is the _official_ opinion on when to bump pkgver on VCS packages? I maintain offlineimap-git [1] (and a few other VCS packages) in AUR and generally bump the pkgver on each commit and may add to the comments about major changes. Other maintainers seem to take the approach to not bump the pkgver unless any changes to the build process are needed. I think that any _official_ view (even if it's 'either way is fine') should be added to the VCS PKGBUILD Guidelines wiki page [2]. Many Thanks, Mark [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24202 [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_CVS_%26_SVN_PKGBUILD_guidelines

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request
by Francois Rigaut 02 Jul '11

02 Jul '11

Dear TU/AUR managers, Can you please delete the following packages: yorick yorick-imutil yorick-soy yorick-yutils yorick-spydr yorick-yao reason: they are superseeded by their -git versions. and yorick-all reason: I've never been able to make this metapackage work properly. Thanks in advance! Francois Rigaut

2 3

[aur-general] Deletion request
by KESHAV P.R. 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Please delete sip-communicator-nightly http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32221 . It has been replaced with jitsi http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48928 due to upstream name change. Also the download url for sip-communicator-nightly does not work anymore. Thanks in advance. Regards. Keshav

2 1

[aur-general] Orphan request for awib & ascii-invaders
by Baptiste 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Hello, I would like to adopt ascii-invaders [1] and awib [2]. I had proposed some changes to the PKGBUILD back in January, but the current maintainer of both packages (Phrodo_00 [3]) didn't show any sign of life since then. Changes include a python -> python2 patch and a new upstream release for awib [2]. Thanks, Baptiste PS: CC-ing this to Phrodo_00 [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7730 [3] http://aur.archlinux.org/account.php?Action=AccountInfo&ID=1707 -- "C'est mieux, mais il y a plus cher ailleurs" : ____ _ _ _ _ ___ _ / ___| \ | | | | | / / | (_)_ __ _ ___ __ | | _| \| | | | |/ /| | | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / | |_| | |\ | |_| / / | |___| | | | | |_| |> < \____|_| \_|\___/_/ |_____|_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ GNU/Linux fan && Archlinux user

2 2

[aur-general] Deletion request: btrfs-progs
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

This package [1] is now available in [core] as btrfs-progs-unstable. [1] - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15635 Thanks. -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Deletion request: mencoder
by Estêvão 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Please delete mencoder [1], now it's available in [extra]. [1] - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21282 -- Estêvão Valadão

2 1

[aur-general] Removal request for xfce-menu-edit
by Heiko Baums 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

xfce-menu-edit is obsolete. It doesn't compile anymore, doesn't work with Xfce 4.8 anyway and is orphaned. So I guess it should be removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39370 See also the last maintainer's comment in AUR. Heiko

2 1

[aur-general] deletion request: e17-full-svn
by Calimero 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hello, Could you remove e17-full-svn? It has become absolutely impossible to maintain. It needs to be linked to several libraries that are included in the package itself, so a hundred of silly hacks are necessary. I have lost an entire day on it to finally think that it wasn't worth so much effort (and maintainability would be horrible too). All the best

2 1

[aur-general] Delete: mod_bw and mod_macro
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Could someone please delete "mod_bw" and "mod_macro" as I have renamed them to have the "apache-" prefix. Thx, ~p

2 1

[aur-general] Package Guidelines: Naming of Apache mods
by Phillip Smith 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hi all, My Google-fu has turned up nothing on this this. Is there a preferred standard for naming packages of Apache mods? I see everything in [extra] is just "mod_name" but some AUR packages are "apache-mod_name" Personally I prefer the "apache-mod_name" form, but I take the format of [extra] to be the official word? It doesn't seem to have been discussed before (as best I can find in my searching) so thought I would raise it. I have packages in AUR using both formats and I want to bring them in line with "the right way", whichever that is ;) Cheers, ~p

5 4

[aur-general] Remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu
by Simon Legner 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Please consider to remove gnome-panel-no-limit-places-menu [1] as it is completely out-dated. Thanks! [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39415

1 0

[aur-general] pyopengl packages
by Michael Schubert 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Dear TUs, Currently, there are 3 pyopengl packages in community and AUR: [1] python-opengl (python2): http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/python-opengl/ [2] python-pyopengl (python3): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7798 [3] python3-pyopengl (python3): http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45322 I just adopted and updated python-pyopengl without realizing that there is a python3 version already in AUR. As the package itself is called "OpenGL", I think that the correct name in community would be python2-opengl and the one in AUR python-opengl (according to the naming standards). Either way, there are now 2 packages for python(3)-opengl in AUR, please delete whatever you think is the better choice. Thank you. Michael

2 1

[aur-general] Provide update in AUR to extra package as a dependency of my package?
by Leif Warner 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Hi, I'm the maintainer of the 4store package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33807 It's been blocked from being upgraded for a while now by a lack up upgrades to the rasqal package in extra. Would it be permissible to provided an updated rasqal version on AUR for people who want to run a recent version of 4store? Another of its dependencies, raptor, which is maintained in step with rasqal, was updated from raptor1 to raptor2 a while ago, and both are installed concurrently, but there's no similar update for rasqal. -Leif Warner

2 1